I find the only one actually counts to 50. Good evening. I'm Cindy Darling, Mayor of the
City of Walnut Creek, and welcome to the Tuesday, January 21st, 2025 regular meeting of the Walnut
Creek City Council and the Public Facilities Financing Authority. The City Council is conducting
this meeting from the City Council Chambers. The video meeting is being video streamed and can be
viewed live or later on the City's website. As some attendees, including all of our guests here,
maybe participating in their first city council meeting I wanted to welcome everybody and talk
briefly about the public comment process. For each agenda item there will be an opportunity
for the public to comment on the item so if you desire to speak to an item that is on the agenda
please hold your comments until the city council considers that item. Additionally we have a
section on the agenda titled public communications which is for public comments for items not on the
agenda. Any comments during public communication should not relate to an item that is actually on
the agenda this evening and consistent with section 9.5 of the City Council handbook, 30 minutes will
be initially allocated for public communications for items not on the agenda at the beginning of
the meeting. Additional time for public communications for items not on the agenda will be provided at
the end of the open session portion of the meeting if we need it. If you desire to provide a public
comment, please complete a yellow speaker identification card and line up behind
the lectern when we get there. Wait your turn and then when you approach the lectern,
state your name, city of residence for the record and you'll have two minutes to address the council.
And this is the important part. Please keep in mind that this is a city business meeting.
The City Council has adopted rules of decorum to ensure that meetings are conducted efficiently
and effectively and that all members of the public have a full fair and equal opportunity to be heard.
the City Council handbook outlines decorum expected in the council chambers and can
be found on our website. All remarks should be addressed to the City Council please do not use
threatening profane or abusive language which disrupts disturbs or other ways impedes the
orderly conduct of the City Council meeting. Again everybody's going to have their two
minutes to make your remarks and written comments have been that were submitted and received up to
two hours beforehand have been posted to our website and our part of the public record will
be included here but not being read separately into the record so that's the
technical part of things now if you would all join me in the Pledge of
Allegiance
Thank you. City Clerk Susie Martinez, please call the roll. Council Member
Davenny. Here. Council Member Francois. Here. Council Member Silva. Here. Mayor Pro Tem
Wilt. Here. Mayor Darling. Here. All right, next on the agenda is a proclamation
recognizing the month of January is Human Trafficking Prevention Month.
Katrina Natale, are you here? She is supposed to be accepting this but
Perhaps she's tied up in traffic
She at this time she's not here so I will just present the proclamation
Many of us assumed that human trafficking
Couldn't happen here and that if it did there was nothing we could do about it
But we are recognizing human trafficking
Prevention month today because neither of these assumptions is true
The city of Crip Walnut Creek urges all of our residents to take collective action to strengthen the community
by reducing the conditions that contribute to exploitation, building resilience and creating
environments where people are protected from human trafficking and other forms of violence.
During this month, we recognize the survivors of human trafficking and commit to building
a future in which no person is deprived of human dignity or denied their inherent human
rights of liberty, security, and access to justice.
We want to make it known that human trafficking
has no place in this city, this county,
this nation, or this world.
We do have a really nice proclamation,
and when I find Natalie, I will provide it to her,
and we're happy to proclaim this month.
Moving right along then, we get to the consent calendar,
and I will note that we have received an amendment
to agenda item 2F and a red-lined agenda item report,
and license agreement for the model,
railroad society has been presented.
So now we're at the point where,
do any of my fellow council members
wish to pull an agenda item?
Council Member Silber.
Thank you very much, Mayor.
I'd like to pull item H.
And item F.
Item F.
Okay.
And I'd like to comment on item E.
Okay, we'll pull E.
So that gets us to,
does any member of the public wish to comment
on an item on the consent calendar other than H, F and E.
Okay, seeing no speakers,
I'll ask the council if somebody would like to make a motion
for B, C, D and G.
Go ahead.
I'll make a motion to approve items A, B, C, D, G.
Was that right?
Yeah.
And I.
Second.
All right.
the roll Mayor Pro Tem Wolk? Aye. Councilmember Francois? Aye. Councilmember
Davenny? Aye. Councilmember Silva? Aye. Mayor Darling? Aye. All right, are you Natalie?
Oh, sorry we already read the part about the proclamation but come on up. We got going a little faster.
I'm Cindy Darling and it's a pleasure to talk about how important it was and now I'll let you say a couple of words.
Oh, okay, thank you so much. Thank you. Sorry I'm late. I was coming from another meeting just like this one.
I'm here on behalf of the Contra Costa Human Trafficking Task Force. We were here last year as well.
We are a partnership of agencies from law enforcement, government, civil society that
works at the county level and the local level on human trafficking.
And we're delighted that you did this proclamation.
As we said last year, and continue to remind folks, human trafficking is a countywide issue.
Happens everywhere and, you know, needs to be addressed everywhere.
I thought it might be helpful to present a couple examples of work that's been done by
the task force and its partners specific to Walnut Creek over the last year since we saw you last.
So one example that comes to mind is with respect to services to victims. So a victim
reported to the emergency room at John Muir in Walnut Creek with critical injuries inflicted
on her by her trafficker. Walnut Creek police was quick to come to the scene at the request of
hospital staff and called in Community Violence Solutions, which is a member of the task force,
the co-chair, and the 24-hour, 7-day-a-week, 365-days-a-year service provider.
They were able to connect that survivor with services, give her ongoing support,
and really help her start down the pathway of identifying herself as a victim or survivor
of human trafficking. Other efforts that we've undertaken this year, we've worked with Walnut
Creek Police Department to address massage establishments that are
suspected of engaging in human trafficking, human trafficking of their
staff of their masseuses. I believe in the last year we went to six different
establishments in the city with partners from state government, from the police
department, from city code enforcement to ensure that those businesses are
operating legitimately and that if there are survivors there that they're getting
access to services and an opportunity to report what's
happening if that's something that they want to do.
And then the last example I'd give
would be on the level of education and prevention.
So in the last year, we've been working with two
of your local churches to provide prevention programming
specifically targeted to parents about the online threat
of human trafficking, how to keep their kids safe.
It's an ever-evolving, constantly changing cat
mouse game as technology improves and artificial intelligence becomes more and more used and
intelligent. So those are a few of the initiatives that we've undertaken with partners in the city
of Walnut Creek. We look forward to continuing to expand our work with our partners here and
I brought with me and I'll maybe leave with the clerk a packet of information for each of you
that will address what the task force does and provide some useful information about human
trafficking and myths and facts. Thank you very much Katrina. I know it's something that
it's hard to imagine that it does happen here in Walnut Creek because we think of ourselves as
Mayberry RFD but yet the examples that you give are classic examples of how people in this day and
age can fall victim in ways that one would never expect.
Very, very true, and highly mobile.
So in the case that I gave of the individual that was a John Muir, she's a resident of
Walnut Creek.
Most of her trafficking, we believe, took place outside of the county, with the exception
of maybe a couple examples, and that's not uncommon.
There are survivors that are here living in the community.
There are also folks that come to this area and experience their trafficking here.
Walnut Creek, like a lot of our cities in Contra Costa County, are susceptible in part
because we sit right along major thoroughfares.
So the 680 is one of those.
So is Highway 4.
Yeah, it's easy to get in and out for a smash and grab or something much worse.
So thank you.
Thank you very much for the work that you guys do.
Thank you.
We appreciate it.
And we appreciate you coming and talking about this important topic.
Sure.
I'm gonna leave some materials for the public
if they're interested.
Thank you so much.
Okay, now I'm gonna regain my footing
and go back to the consent calendar.
The first item that was pulled is item E,
which is the authorization
to execute a five-year lease agreement with, or no.
Which one do I pull?
Well E.
E.
The Wine Harbor?
E, F, and H.
Why don't we start with F then?
Oh, okay.
I'm just thinking, cause you guys are all here for F,
so let's talk about F.
I was like, expecting that one to be E, and it wasn't,
it was authorization of the wine.
Well, I'm pulling F because we've got about 15 members
of the Walnut Creek Model train railroad side of here,
and I thought maybe one of them would like to come up
and speak and let the audience that's watching as well
know a little bit more about what's happening there,
and then I will be happy to make the motion.
so somebody raise their hand, there we go.
Thanks for that volunteer.
Hi, my name is Woody Hodge, and I am the Chairman
of the League Committee.
The club has been around since 1947.
It was originally in a shed over here
on Southern Pacific right away.
Mr. Hodge, excuse me, thank you for being here.
You just might want to move the mic up a little
so that we can pick you up on the TV.
Does that work?
Yeah.
There you go.
thank you. Uh, originally in the shed over on the southern Pacific right
away, which is no longer there. Uh, it was condemned by these south
Broadway expansion project in 1970, which left us homeless. Um, the city
offered us a piece of property in Lucky Park where we built the building at
our expense and uh, needed it back to the city. We continued to maintain that
building at no expense of the city. Uh, our primary function is a train club.
We are, it's a hobby. Um, and there are a number of members and it's all ages.
Our newest member is 18 and his sister is an associate member and so we are a nondiscriminatory.
All age groups, sexes, and we have some special needs people in our club as well and in addition
of being a hobby we provide an inexpensive family entertainment in through our shows.
The last Friday of every month, and weekend in the first, third, fifth, now seventh, ninth
and eleventh, in November we do a two weekend show.
And a family can go in for under 20 bucks.
Where can you do that?
by a bucket of popcorn for that. We also do other things. We have birthday parties. We
had a fourth grade class on a special visitation. We've had other classes and other birthday
parties and other things. We've had a car club come. Old time cars.
How can people find out more about you?
We do have a website, wcmrs.org and we have a Facebook page, WCMRS.
We do advertise through the city arts and rec department for our shows, they hang banners,
different locations in the city. Heather Farms facing Bancroft, right out here.
Civic facing Broadway, Tice Valley and Lucky Park. So there are ways and
actually the banners have been tremendous in terms of finding people
that, gee I didn't know they were there. And that's the most common comment we
get. We didn't know you were there. Yeah. But it is difficult. Well we're happy to
work in partnership with you and we're happy that we successfully got your
lease ready teed up to renew. Yes if you want to two minute. You mentioned the
last Friday of the month just for members of the public and hearing the
audience what is there a set schedule that the trains are available for public
viewing? Yes, there is. It is available on our website. Okay, we have business cards that I think were passed out. Okay. And the schedule is on the back.
It's every Friday, last Friday of the month, which has been on for a long time. Yeah, got it here. And on the back. Yep. Okay. So thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you.
sir, just your name and your town. My name is George George's. I'm from Antioch up north,
but I've been with the club since approximately 2010. And I'm a licensed electrician and
I work for City College of San Francisco as well as a theater technician. I do sound design for
them and I've done theater my whole life for 35 years and when I joined the
club I found that it was much like a basically a theater production because
you know we are our sets are the trains and our props are the actual trains that
we run around the the layout but more importantly the everything that in you
know it engages so many of the arts and so many of the talents of people you
You know, all the skills, all the stuff.
And also just in the end, the camaraderie and the group
orient and the sheer welcoming and openness of everyone there.
I mean, if there's somebody there,
and the public just comes and knocks,
usually they can come in for like a little free tour
and do that kind of thing.
And then reality is when we're members, we do the shows
and we do all of that, but also it's our club.
It's, it kind of belongs to each one of us.
You know, we take care of it in that way.
And we really, it really builds a community feeling
and it's a great place to really get,
and we welcome everybody, everybody.
Thank you so much.
You're welcome.
Any other discussion by the council?
Thank you all for coming
and thank you for maintaining it all
and you'll be getting another 10 year lease here.
And with that, I'll make the motion to approve item 2F
along with the changes and red lines
that have been that we have in front of us on the report.
Second.
Roll.
Mayor Pro Tem Wolk?
Aye.
Council Member Silva?
Aye.
Council Member Davini?
Aye.
Council Member Francois?
Aye.
Mayor Darling?
Aye.
Motion carries unanimously.
Congratulations, guys.
And now we'll go to item E.
Council Member Davini.
Do you have a question for staff on that one?
No, it was more of a comment.
When I was reading through the consent calendar,
I was excited to see this item here.
Michael Vecchia has the wine hardware store
that's being renewed for five years,
and this is a very cool store.
So I wanted to give them a shout out.
They customize wine racks, wine refrigerators,
and they have a lot of really neat items in there.
They've got a wooden barrel, like a wine barrel,
that opens up, and you can store things inside.
It doubles as a table.
So a lot of great items in there
and I was glad to see this lease renewed.
Yeah, they are a great partner.
With that, would you like to make the motion to approve?
Yeah, make the motion to approve item E,
extending for five years the lease for wine hardware.
Second.
Call the roll, please.
Councilmember Davini?
Aye.
Mayor Pro Tem Wilk?
Aye.
Councilmember Francois?
Aye.
Councilmember Silva?
Aye.
Mayor Darling?
Aye.
Motion carried.
I had a question on this one.
I did, thank you very much.
Item two H is the acceptance of our 2024
commission attendance reports
for the various advisory commissions that we appoint.
I wanna thank staff first of all for doing this each year
and collecting the information.
There was one of our advisory commissioners,
committee members at the county level
who has been unable to attend any meetings this last year.
And I think I would ask that we direct staff
to inquire as to the reason for this.
And with that caveat.
So I will make the motion to accept
the 2024 commission attendance reports
with the caveat and the direction to staff
to inquire and determine the reason
for the attendance problem of the one member.
And I will second that motion and just wanna,
and I know all my colleagues share that my view
on thanking all of our commissioners.
Most of the commissioners have not met a single meeting.
So I just want to appreciate and acknowledge
their volunteer service to the community
and in the arts, transportation, planning, design review,
and that we really couldn't do our job without them.
So I enthusiastically second your motion.
Call the roll please.
Aye.
Councilmember Campbell.
Aye.
Councilmember Davini.
Aye.
Mayor Pro Tem Will.
Aye.
And I want to note that the Planning Commission,
those folks make 14 meetings out of the year.
And that's a lot of work.
So I really appreciate everything that they do.
That brings us to the end of the consent calendar.
And now we are going on to,
I've lost my place in my handy spot for the communication.
Next on the agenda is public communications.
This is a portion of the meeting reserve
for comment on items not on the agenda.
Under the Brown Act, the city council cannot act
on the items raised during public communications
but may respond briefly to statements made
or questions posed.
We can request clarification or refer the item to staff.
Consistent with section 9.5 of the city council handbook,
30 minutes will be allocated at this time
for public communication for items not on the agenda.
Additional time for items not on the agenda
will be provided at the end of the medium if necessary.
So anybody that would like to address the council
as part of public communications,
please step forward to the podium,
complete a speaker card and let us know who you are
and your city of residence.
And consistent with policy of the city,
you'll each have two minutes.
Public comment.
Good evening.
I'm Kathy Hemingway,
Walnut Creek Downtown Association,
executive director and place of residence is Lafayette,
but I'm here most of the time.
So good evening, Mayor Darling and City Council members,
City staff, I'm here tonight to share just a few updates
from the Walnut Creek Downtown Association.
I wanted to share that we have finally launched
our vision plan.
So that was a program that was being funded
by the Measure O campaign and funding.
And so we were able to do a soft launch in December
with our facilitator, Kim Miller Hershaun.
We have conducted a SWOT analysis session with our staff and then with the executive
committee from our board of directors.
So next week we'll be holding a session with our board of directors.
And then we'll follow up with member and community outreach via focus groups and a survey.
So more to come on that as we collect data and be able to really hone in on some three
to five-year goals for the organization as well as the downtown.
And then at the end of this week, we'll be announcing our 2025 calendar of events.
So we'll be opening up the registration for booths and participation.
So that will be shared via a newsletter and online through social media and our website.
So stay tuned.
And then in regards to our events, as you may have seen, Walnut Creek on Ice was there
and gone and within 24 hours their staff started breaking
down the ice rink which closed yesterday and so we are excited
about the season that we were able to produce this year
including the slide so we'll be able to come back in March
to provide a full recap but as of right now
that season has ended so that concludes my report.
Thank you.
Anybody have questions for Kathy?
I'm just curious how the ice slide, was it fun?
it looked fun. I cannot afford to be out but I had many family members and
friends and some of my staff members went down so yeah it was a huge hit so
great thank you yeah thank you thank you any other public comment okay we'll go
ahead and close public comment and next on the agenda is council member and
staff announcements reports on activities or requests we'll start off
with closed session announcements. Thank you Madam Mayor there were no
reportable actions from closed session this evening. Okay City Manager reports.
Yeah good evening Dan Buckshi City Manager I do have two updates this
evening. The first I want to acknowledge the wildfires of Southern California
that started a few weeks ago first to offer condolences and support for
everybody there. Obviously an extremely difficult situation and just for the
Publix Benefit, there are a number of units
from Contra Costa Fire Department
that were sent there for mutual aid
as well as other fire departments,
not only from the Bay Area, but throughout the state
to help battle those fires.
Last I had seen, they're close to 90 and 70% containment
at this point, so hopefully they can get those
fully extinguished here soon enough.
And at the same time, I wanted to take a few moments
to share what we do here to try to prepare.
And I can't emphasize that word enough that preparation
and prevention is really the best means
for dealing with something along those lines
because that type of situation with wins that strong
is extremely difficult to react to.
So it's really about preparation on the front end.
Here in Walnut Creek,
similar to many other cities and jurisdictions,
we have an emergency management plan
that guides our operations.
We train on that regularly.
In fact, we have some training scheduled coincidentally tomorrow
and throughout the next couple of months
to train a lot of our new staff on our emergency management
plan.
Additionally, we work with our partners closely.
We do not have a Walnut Creek Fire Department,
nor do we have water districts.
And obviously, water has been a big focal point
as part of the LA Fire.
So we do work closely with the Contra Costa Fire Department,
with the two water purveyors, with Red Cross,
with county emergency services, numerous, numerous
other jurisdictions in the event of an actual emergency
in order to respond in a very coordinated fashion.
Additionally, again, on the prevention side,
we do a lot to maintain our open space, our roadways,
to have defensible space, to cut fire breaks
in the open space, try to ensure that their weeds
or any other growth-long roadways are as best maintained,
particularly in the dry seasons, obviously.
And a particular note, the fire department
has been working on for a while,
what's known as a shaded fuel break
along the southern Walnut Creek border near Rossmore,
as well as Lafayette and parts of Moraga
to put an extensive break,
because there is expansive open space adjacent
to developed areas to help provide that.
And that's always a challenge.
It's a tremendous amount of work to do that.
If anybody's seen that firsthand,
amount of debris and foliage and trees that have been removed in order to make that break.
And there's a trade-off as well as doing that, but it's obviously a safety first mindset.
In addition, just to really encourage folks to manage their own properties as best as possible
with defensible space, maintaining weeds and barriers as well as being mindful of trees and
foliage that may be overhanging properties. And for more information of
how to prepare and also to have emergency kits and to go bags to have
those always on hand in in case an emergency does arise. You can find
information on the city's website at walnut creek ca.gov. That's walnut creek
ca.gov. And more specifically for wildfire there's a website that's very
helpful ReadyForWildfire.org. Once again that's ReadyForWildfire.org and I
would encourage anyone and everyone to review that and be as prepared as
possible at home should something like this occur. So it was the first update, the
second update briefly wanted to mention that since our last meeting the governor
did introduce the state budget on January 10th as is customary. It's a 322
billion total budget about 230 billion general fund some interesting math
there's a 363 million dollar quote surplus which is about 1% give or take
but balancing that the way I say it that way is the governor's proposing to use
about seven billion dollars of reserves to help balance that amount this still
does leave I believe about 15 to 17 billion in reserves for future use so
So really the big takeaway not anticipating dramatic changes in the budget, as you may
know, two years ago there was a record surplus and last year there was nearly a record deficit
at this point in time.
Some wild swings in terms of revenues, which seem to have stabilized a bit for this year.
Of note of some of the programs we deal with, particularly on the housing and homeless front,
which have been front and center, there is continued support for those programs, but
it's still largely almost exclusively one-time in nature.
I know cities and the League of California Cities
in particular for a collective voice have been advocating
for ongoing funding for those programs
because it's hard to build ongoing supportive services
with only one-time funds,
but there is one-time funding for that.
And also of note, there is a proposed new department
of housing, new housing and homeless agency
that is proposed that consolidates a few other departments
as part of the budget.
So we'll see if that goes through it,
if that impacts how the state is managing homeless
and housing services going forward.
Then lastly, just building off of what I just mentioned,
the state budget does include significant resources
and focus on wildfire mitigation
along the prevention lines that I mentioned
in terms of dealing with controlled burns,
other types of debris removal
to try to mitigate wildfire risks.
And that is my update this evening, Mayor.
Thank you very much.
I know the wildfires were top of mind for everybody.
My cousin lost her house in Malibu and heartbreaking.
They didn't have time to get anything out.
Okay, now we'll move on to the City Council members,
maybe 1234, the last time I started this way.
So this time I'll start with Council Member Silva.
Thank you, Mayor.
And thank you everyone for being here with us tonight
and you're hanging in there with us.
So hopefully we're going to give you some reports
that are of interest to you all.
Thank you, city manager, for the report on the wildfires
and the state budget.
I will start with mention that as the liaison
from the council to Rossmore this year,
the community of Rossmore is very concerned about wildfire
and the risk and what they can do to prevent it.
And the community came together
and the emergency preparedness organization together
partnered with the city and the county fire agency
and others to present a two-hour town hall
on fire issues last week.
And it was very, very informative.
I would add to what you mentioned that that go bag,
I thought the most interesting thing was.
And that that go bag that you have ready to go,
you need a go bag for your pets as well.
And you might forget that.
And that one of the things you probably need to do
with your pets if you have them is to be prepared to go
and go quickly is to train them to get in the car
and get in that crate.
Because if you're fighting with a dog or a cat
who's reluctant to do that,
you could lose precious minutes.
So there's just a piece of, one piece of advice.
And I'd like to acknowledge Fran Gibson,
who is the chair of the EPO organization at Rossmore
for all of the work that she does
to make Rossmore prepared and thank Charles,
our assistant city manager for his presentation that day
participating in the event. Of note related to the Recycle Smart Council
Member Francois and I represent this city on the Recycle Smart Board and one
of the things we are doing is looking at a new franchise agreement and we had
included in the proposed contracts for the next 10 to 15 years that zero
emission vehicles would be included at the outset and last week the state in
recognizing what may be changing at the federal level. They didn't set aside but
they delayed the implementation of the zero emission vehicle requirements in
this state so that is changing what we're acquiring in our franchise
agreement. The Association of Bay Area Governments has had a meeting last week
their board and they are releasing priority conservation opportunity
areas for cities to apply for and I want to recognize city staff for getting us
off the wrong we were on the wrong list and we worked with a bag at the last
minute two weeks ago and got us back onto the right list so hopefully that
there's opportunities we will be pursuing those and also last week at our
meeting the board approved the draft plan Bay Area 2050 plus and send it into
environmental review process which will be about another year. Yes we plan every
four years for the next for 25 years out. The new employee event I want to
congratulate and welcome that all of the new employees there were a lot of them
at the event last Wednesday. And I sit on the Housing Committee for the League of
California Cities and we're going to be having some conversations on Thursday. I
know about what has happened with this governor's budget and the establishment
of the new department, just what we need is more bureaucracy.
Hopefully it will streamline things and not just make it harder
and harder to achieve our goals.
I'm also a member of the California Seismic Safety Commission
and we had our recent meeting two weeks ago.
We are part of CAL Officer of Emergency Services and so most
of the staff were actually in Southern California trying
to address the fires that they were tackling.
The interesting thing that the Seismic Safety Commission is very
concerned about is what is called fire-following earthquake.
Very often, fires erupt. If you can think even about the
1989 earthquake, Loma Prieta and San Francisco, fires erupt
when there is a lot of shaking and breaking of infrastructure,
particularly gas infrastructure or electrical lines. And the
availability of water and the ability to move water, if you
don't have power, is very, very hard. So we are looking a lot
at that issue from a policy level and I'm sure there's other things that other
council members can report on. Thank you very much councilmember Francois. Okay
thank you mayor. I'm looking at my list here for anything pertaining to model
railroads. I might find one toward the end but starting off as the council
liaison to Wanna Creek downtown I attended their monthly meeting Kathy
Hemingway the executive director gave a great report in terms of the ice rink
or we're getting a more detailed report in March it sounds like. She also we also
heard about the hospitality bar meeting which Walnut Creek downtown puts on on a
monthly basis with our police department and bar operators and owners so that
there's an open line of communication and hopefully everyone can identify
problems early on and address those so that the downtown remains thriving and
vibrant with not any issues for our public safety officers
to deal with.
There was an update in terms of Broadway Plaza.
A lot of changing, comings and goings
in terms of the comings.
It sounds like original Joe's will open sometime
in the spring at the restaurant that used to be known
as Stanford's near the new Lifetime Fitness.
We're excited about that.
Further on the horizon is RH, Restoration Hardware
has plans to come into the Neiman Marcus building
and actually they would demolish that building,
build a new building with one of their signature restaurants
and so excited to see that come to the downtown area.
The Broadway Plaza also acknowledged
some of the parking challenges that we all encountered.
Not just the normal challenges during the holiday season
with trying to find a parking space
but the parking garage on Main Street
was particularly challenging with lines backed up,
even with parking attendants.
So they're looking at plans to try to route people
to the other garages or around downtown
that don't result in us getting frustrated
and not finding a parking space
and going to Concord to shop or something like that.
Something crazy like that.
Painted pianos are returning on April 13th,
So it'll be fun to see that in live in the downtown area.
And then also, it used to be called first Wednesdays.
I think now it's called Walnut Creek Wednesdays.
And there will be four of them with the first one
starting on May 14.
So a lot of fun things happening in downtown this spring
and into the early summer.
Then on January 16, I filled the mayor's large shoes
because she was on vacation.
and so I attended the chamber board meeting on her behalf
and got a great update in terms of the chambers
heavily involved in updating their annual strategic plan
with focus on workforce development,
advocacy, economic development, and business development
and that's made up of three year, one year action items
and goals and priorities.
We'll all get a bigger briefing and update on that
at the state of the chamber, which will be on April 16,
from 745 to 9.
That, I believe, is open to the public
and will be at Boundary Oak Golf Course in the,
not on the golf course, but in the clubhouse.
Also kind of interesting event that's happening,
and I don't believe this one's opening to the public,
but it is a startup event for people in the technology
industry funders and founders
that will be a networking event
for people starting in that realm space
so they can network with one another
and more importantly with venture capitalists
who might fund their great ideas.
And that's taking place later this month in the Shadelands.
So exciting to see something like that happen
in Walnut Creek.
And then the future of Walnut Creek,
which I'll let the mayor report on that,
will be February 20th.
The 100th anniversary of the chamber will be in 2026.
So we had kind of an interesting conversation
about recognizing our history
and how they could promote that event
and celebrate that event in two years.
And along those lines,
there'll be a civic affairs meeting on March 11th,
which will involve two of our former mayors
will be present.
I believe it's Bill Armstrong and Merle Hall
We'll be leading a panel discussion with Matt Gushard.
I think he's still the board president.
So a lot going on at the chamber,
a lot going on at Walnut Creek downtown.
And then I do serve on the Recycle Smart Board
along with Council Member Silva.
There will be a repair cafe,
and this is where the model railroad could come in,
maybe not, I don't know.
A repair cafe this Saturday from 10 to one at Civic Park
in the assembly hall.
There will be 20 repair coaches available.
Small household appliances, jewelry, clothing,
bike repairs, nothing about model railroads,
but you might wanna take your chance.
It's exciting that to see that, you know,
we're trying to avoid discarding things,
reusing things, and oftentimes we don't have the skills,
I know I don't, to fix things around home.
There are gonna be 20 people volunteering their time
to fix your lamp or to fix a piece of jewelry.
this Saturday, and it's free.
And it's from 10 to one.
So please take advantage of that in Civic Park.
And then finally, I had the honor of attending,
and I'll let Council Member Wilk report on this,
the menorah lighting at Broadway Plaza
with Council Member Wilk and the mayor,
and it was a wonderful event,
and thank you for the invitation.
That's my report.
Thank you.
Council Member Dafini?
Yeah, yeah, I gotta keep my toes, yeah.
Well, we haven't had a chance to meet since the New Year,
so happy New Year to everyone.
I attended the initial scoping meeting
for the Mitchell Town Homes Development in December.
This is the beginning of the EIR under CEQA law.
This meeting was open to the public,
but it didn't have great attendance.
I imagine it wasn't on a lot of people's radar.
The Mitchell Town Homes Development
is a builder's remedy project,
which is proposing high-density residential housing
in the shade lens, which is currently zoned for commercial.
422 units are proposed.
So what is a builder's remedy project?
Well, we're currently in our sixth housing cycle,
it goes from 2023 to 2031.
And during our current cycle, the state housing
and community development department has mandated
approximately 6,000 new units to be built in Walnut Creek.
In order to comply with HCD mandate,
the first step is for the city to submit to the state
our housing element, which is basically the city plan
how we will allow these units to be built. If the city does not comply by
submitting the housing element on time and follow through allowing the units to
be built, it may be subjected to what's called builder's remedy. Invoking
builder's remedy allows builders to bypass city zoning and building
ordinances and build according to state laws which are much more lenient. For
example, if local building laws might only allow five to ten units on a
parcel, or not allow any units at all because it's owned commercial or
single-family, state law might allow 50 units on the same parcel. This past year,
Walnut Creek submitted its housing element on time in January, but the state
delayed and did not approve it until October. This delay made the city
vulnerable to a builder's remedy project, and just a few days before the housing
element was certified, the Mitchell Town Homes project was submitted. So if this
project is of interest, please reach out. The draft environmental, the draft EIR
will be available for public review in the next couple of months, so we'll be revisiting
that.
On the sustainable front, I had a very nice meeting with our sustainable manager, Candice
Mumbi and Charles, our assistant city manager, and we talked about how the Sustainable Action
Plan is being implemented, priorities, and how we can make sure that the public stays
involved and up to date with the process.
a very nice meeting also with our community development director, Erica Vandenbrandt.
We again discussed permit streamlining and ongoing efforts to make Wanna Creek as inviting
as possible for small businesses.
I'm excited about the direction that we are heading.
We are also working to improve the customer experience.
I think the message is we are grateful for the businesses that we have here and welcome
future business.
What can we do to help make your lives easier?
right child if you have suggestions or concerns on this topic. Outdoor dining. I continue
to meet with businesses and there's ongoing exploration at the city level of how to make
the program more affordable and appealing for businesses. I know this is a priority
for the residents of Walnut Creek and the city and the business owners. There are multiple
potential modifications being explored at this time. I attended the Walnut Creek sister
Sister Cities meeting this year, their first meeting of the year.
This program was set up by Dwight Eisenhower, just after World War II, 1956, and it was
to promote peace and person-to-person contact between countries around the world.
I recommend visiting the Sister Cities International website to see a 10-minute speech given by
Dwight Eisenhower, which launched this program.
It was very inspiring.
In the fall we'll be sending 20 lucky eighth graders
to Soifo, Hungary and Nocetto, Italy as youth ambassadors.
Thank you very much.
Now we'll turn to Mayor Pro Tem Wilk.
Thank you.
Well, considering it's been about a month
since our last meeting,
a lot of things have happened in the last month.
The first, and this may be of interest actually
to the railroad society.
I am liaison for the council to County Connection.
I'm the board chair this year there.
And I wanted to give an update on electric buses because I have heard from people here
about where are the electric buses that should be running here.
Well, as I've been explaining over the last few months, we had some issues when we had
one of our provider of the electric buses on the batteries.
There was change in ownership and chaos ensued.
Essentially, we have figured out the problems with the manufacturers.
There are four electric buses right now working on Route 4, that's the downtown area where
it goes between Barton and Broadway Plaza and around there.
The Route 5 bus charger needs a new charging board, and so we're still working to get the
new charging board at BART for that.
That's why those aren't electric buses currently.
The problems are with the manufacturers and obsolescence.
This had a lot of board discussion this last week.
The manufacturers have moved on to their next upgrades of battery packs and chargers and
don't make or service the original lines anymore.
Imagine if you bought a car and five years later GM isn't making the car anymore and
now you can't do any more manufacturing and services.
That's the problem that we're having with County Connection.
That's the problem that every transit company is having in the country right now.
It's a problem in the electric industry, and we're having meetings with federal and state
legislatures about this issue, which impacts our ability to plan for the future and moving
to zero-emission buses, bus fleets.
This is a problem that the entire transit industry is having right now, and a real problem
with what we need to do to move up to zero-emission buses.
So continued watch on this, just astounding to us that electric battery manufacturers
for buses can just stop making that line and not service them anymore.
That's what you get for being on the pilot program.
Mayor Pro Tem, those buses then are charged through a plate on the underneath of the bus.
They're not plugged in like a vehicle.
Correct, correct.
So to give a little bit of a longer explanation there, these can be charged, at least the
the Route 4 ones, can be charged at the bus yard.
That's not the problem right now.
But when they're mobile, like at BART,
because it takes 60% of the battery
just to go from the bus yard and conquered to BART,
because there's an uphill and that
requires a lot of battery juice.
So they need to charge at BART.
If we can't get the chargers to work at BART,
we can't get the buses to work.
So we've got some very pretty buses right now in the bus yard.
And if anybody in the train association
knows how to work on electric buses, let us know.
The other thing I wanted to bring up
that I think might be relevant for potentially our city,
as well as other cities, is we were
alerted that the Mount Diablo School District starts a week
earlier on August 6th this next school year.
For those of us that started school after Labor Day,
that is no longer the case.
It's now really a full month before then.
And County Connections is working
update our bus schedules with the district for that. There'll be more to
follow on that front, but it also led to a discussion about how council, city
councils in the area and boards are going to start going dark in July instead
of in August due to the change in school dates. The reason is because staff is
being impacted more and more now since many vacations are being taken in July
and not in August, so it's something that we as a council may want to discuss at
some point as well. I was asked to, as the as council member Francois mentioned, I
was asked to participate in several menorah sightings during Hanukkah. In
addition to Walnut Creek's, which we've done for many years here, I was also
asked to participate in Pleasant Hill and Clayton's, which incorporated their
first menorah lighting ceremonies as a city lighting ceremony for the first
time in their histories. So I was proud to attend those. Along with several of my
colleagues we attended the supervisor reorg with Candace Anderson who does
represent part of Walnut Creek in taking the board chair for the board of
supervisors and just as we have a new council member Craig Davini the
Contra Costa Board of Supervisors has a new board member Chanel Scales Preston
is now on board for her district. The mayor and I had our finance committee
meeting we'll be reviewing that shortly on the agenda item. I also attended the
Bedford Gallery new opening of stitched which is different mackerman stitching
projects it's really interesting especially with the the inner room area
was my favorite there I one of the things as we become get into the line of
the mayoral rotation here I was able to attend the Eagle Scout of Court of Honor
in Northgate last week where four of our boys graduated and got to become Eagle
Scouts, and that's always a great idea. It's such a festive program. I love that.
I do want to mention and finish my report that January 27th, next Monday, is
recognized as International Holocaust Remembrance Day. And in 2025, this day
holds even greater significance as we mark 80 years since the end of the
Second World War and Holocaust. Preserving this history not only honors
the dignity of those whom the Nazis and their collaborators sought to destroy,
but also serves as a powerful victory against hatred, Holocaust distortion, and
denial, and by remembering, we confront those who seek to perpetuate the legacy
of hatred into the 21st century. And unfortunately, as we know, some of that
hatred has descended upon us here in our very chambers during council meetings.
And that's why I wanted to ensure that Holocaust Remembrance Day was
acknowledged in our meeting today. And that ends my report. Thank you very much.
I enjoyed the menorah lighting and Kevin knows all the words
So I was really impressed with that because I know none of the words, but I got to light one of them that
You know one of the candles whatever those are a couple things going on
Cummings and goings in the city. I got to go to a hundredth birthday party Doris kawakami's father-in-law
Tom had his hundredth birthday this last Saturday and I got to go and
Present him a certificate and we're talking to all of his grandchildren in the room and he goes I made all this
Tom story is
amazing he was
Originally interred into the the camps and then drafted out of the camps during World War two. So it was a pretty amazing story
as
The mayor pro tem indicated there is a change on the supervisor level. So I went to federal Glover's retirement to celebrate
He was the first
African-american
Board a supervisor in Contra Costa County and it was a great celebration. The man has an amazing memory
Really
Did a great job and looking forward to working with Chanel in his place
other changes
Trinity Center Leslie Gleason has stepped down as the director by thank you guys you guys hung in there far longer than most people do
Leslie Gleason is stepping down at Trinity Center and they are in the process of finding a new
director there and we look forward to working with the interim director during the time being.
We also lost a longtime member of Walnut Creek, Pam Kessler, who was the queen of the Walnut
Creek Magazine. Her kids and mine grew up together so I knew her for every swim meet, every car show,
everything that went on and she cared about the city a lot and we're looking forward to planning a
appropriate memorial for all that she did.
She had her own way of doing things.
For any of you who did anything with Pam Custer,
she let you know when you were doing things her way,
but she really did a lot for this city
and we will all miss her.
Two things coming up on the 11th of February,
the city council will meet in a retreat
and update our priorities
as part of our two year budget cycle.
And that'll be an interesting exercise.
And then on the 20th, February 20th of next month,
or working with the chamber to have the state of the city
and Caitlin Sly, the chair of the board
for the chamber this year
and I will have a little conversation
about how Walnut Creek is going
and all the wonderful things happening here
and she won't ask me any hardball questions at all
is what I've been told.
And our police chief will also give a state of the city
on the crime aspect of Walnut Creek.
The last thing I wanted to talk about,
We heard a lot last year about the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board and nutrients
in San Francisco Bay.
They were coming up with a new set of requirements for nutrients that affects the waste dischargers
around the bay because all of that stuff comes from our poop and our pee, all the nitrogen
that's in the bay.
For many, many years, we assumed that the bay was relatively immune to nitrogen and
algal blooms because it was very turbid.
The bay has changed over time.
It is no longer as turbid as it used to be, and in 22 and 23, we saw massive algal blooms
and fish die-offs.
So the good news is when we were originally hearing about this, we were hearing numbers
like $18 billion worth of work and a 10-year timeframe.
The good news is, it sounds like in the presentation
this morning between the regional board
and the Bay Area Clean Water Agencies,
there's a recognition that solving this problem
is not a 10 year problem, it is a longer problem.
There was also recognition that it might actually
be $18 billion worth of work to get this done Bay Area-wide.
But there was a lot of discussion
about trading nutrient credits, working together
cooperatively to solve problems,
either through more recycled water
or nature-based solutions.
And so it was a much better story than we were hearing
when Central San came to us last year to talk about it.
And I think there are solutions out there.
I did talk to a couple of our water district brethren
about our interest in our sustainability action plan.
We have a requirement for recycled water in Walnut Creek,
which has been a difficult issue.
And this actually could be driving that
towards a slightly higher chance
of actually getting recycled water
because it could be a part of the solution
of putting the nitrogen into the bay
where it could grow algae
or we could put it on the golf course and grow grass.
Did you say turbid or?
Turbid.
Turbid, and what does turbid mean?
Sorry, I got one.
Turbid is turbidity in the water.
It's suspended sediment.
The San Francisco Bay has been going through decades
of change from the time of the hydraulic mining
And a lot of sediment got swept down into the delta
and the bay in the 1800s.
And it's gradually been clearing that out.
The water has gotten significantly clearer
in the last 20 years.
So it's a good news, bad news.
The good news is it doesn't look as bad.
The bad news is more light penetrates.
And if more light penetrates, that makes the plants grow.
You add the nitrogen, you add the plants,
add the sunlight and the algae grows and that's what causes. Briefly, can you summarize how do you
address the nitrogen in the wastewater? There's a couple different ways. There's additional
treatment they can do at the source, actually removing the nitrogen from the water that ends
that being roughly equivalent to going through reverse osmosis, desalination, basically.
And that is an expensive thing to do on wastewater.
You can also take it and land apply it as recycled water.
And you can also take it and apply it into a marsh environment and have the marsh plants
grow instead of the algae.
Basically you're trying to grow plants somewhere other than in the water.
So it's a complicated thing,
but I think there was a recognition
from the Regional Water Quality Control Board
that it is not a 10-minute solution.
So that was really good to hear.
And now, switching from those things
that I could go on forever and ever about,
we will get to our regular consideration items.
And the first one is consideration and acceptance
of the 10-year financial forecast
and a staff presentation.
Good evening, Mayor Darling and Mayor Pro Tem.
Welcome members of City Council,
Kirsten Lacast, Administrative Services Director.
Tonight, I'm going to be providing the update
on our 10-year financial forecast.
So the city, as you know, has a practice
of conducting multi-year forecasts,
and we typically bring them every two years.
And so the forecast tonight does include
updated financial data as well as updated assumptions.
And the last time we brought this to you
was in January of 2023.
So, just waiting for the presentation.
Okay, thank you.
And so what we're requesting from you this evening
is to accept the report.
So tonight I will be talking about our set of assumptions
that we've built into the forecast.
So we have some general assumptions,
which includes the recession assumptions,
revenue expenditure assumptions,
which include personnel costs
and operating and maintenance costs,
as well as presenting two scenarios to you this evening.
And I'm happy to pause throughout for questions
since we will be covering quite a bit of data this evening.
So what I would like to start with is on our financial forecast,
what it is and what it isn't.
And so what it is is a projection of trends based on a set of assumptions that flow
through the entire 10-year forecast.
It's dynamic and is updated based on changing conditions.
So we bring forward, as I mentioned, this forecast to you as things do update.
And then it's a guide for decision-making.
However, we have many tools that we use and so this is only one of them.
So what it is not, is it's not a budget, it's not a guarantee of future financial outcomes
and it's not an exact science.
So for our general assumptions, all the contributions to fund balance or use of fund balance that
you see in these scenarios are shown after fully funding reserves and assuming no budget
balancing actions were taken.
It's important to note that the city is legally required to have a balanced budget, so we'll
be bringing forward a proposed balance budget to you in the spring for fiscal years 26 and
27. This forecast also assumes no use of reserves or the pension trust. As you know, the pension
trust was established by this council back in 2018 with about $20 million investment.
The policy for the use of the trust indicated we would not be using it prior to fiscal year
So in order going forward to help us determine the best timing for the use of the trust based
on our future pension costs, we've engaged consultants to help us with that and to come
back here to Finance Committee in February and then to this council in March to talk
about those assumptions and to receive feedback.
And the balance of the pension trust as of September 30th was actually $28.7 million,
so we are doing well.
Lastly, measure O, the projections for measure O are not included in this forecast.
This is just the general fund.
However, we are assuming that the future cost of $3.8 million of the ongoing measure O cost
will return to the general fund when the measure expires in fiscal year 34.
So the forecast models two recession scenarios, both beginning in fiscal year 27.
This is consistent with previous forecasts where we have used a seven-year recession
cycle.
the last recession occurring in 2020 with the pandemic.
With regards to the recession timing, there are varying opinions about when the next recession
will begin, but the current information out there from the experts is that there's a relatively
low risk of a recession occurring in the immediate future.
So the timing is influenced by several factors, including job market trends, gross domestic
product, growth, and inflation.
Federal Reserve has been somewhat successful so far in achieving a soft landing by balancing
the reduction in rates without pushing the economy into a recession.
The last jobs report, which was in November of 2024, had a, it was still, unemployment
was at a historic low still at 4.2% even though it was slightly higher than fiscal year 23.
The timing of the recession is difficult to predict and generally is not called until
the recession is actually underway.
So today, again, we're presenting two scenarios.
The first is a mild recession, which assumes a downturn in revenue over 12 months and a
recovery over two years.
Comparatively, a moderate recession assumes a downturn in revenue over 18 months and a
recovery of three years.
With regards to the forecasted revenue loss in a mild recession, the percentage loss from
normal growth is what's reflected in this chart. So for property tax that would be 1%,
sales tax and TOT 5% and other revenues 4%. And I'll provide an example of what this means.
In a moderate recession the percentage loss from normal growth is 2% for property tax,
6.25% for sales tax and transient occupancy tax, and 5% for all other revenues. So the
way this is applied is if property tax for example if it normally grows at a
2% rate in a mild recession it will only grow at 1% so it's 1% off of the
normal growth rate and that's for the 12 months of the downturn. In a moderate
recession the property tax revenues would remain flat or grow at 0% during
that downturn. So we're modeling these different recession strengths just to
help demonstrate what the impacts of a recession could be on this on city
revenues. So next we want to just talk a little, oh sorry. Sure. I didn't think of
this question until you brought up the the slide so if you don't have the
answer that's fine but compared to 2020 where would that fit? Would that have
been a severe recession with a faster recovery? Actually our next slide talks
about the previous recession so thank you for that segue. So in we have two
recessions here previous we have the Great Recession the COVID-19 recession
so in the Great Recession in 2008 city revenues experience declines from normal
growth between 2008 and 2010 so it took about two to three years for revenues to
recover so you can see what the percentage loss over the normal growth
was back then so it was four percent for property tax sales percent was more
significant I'm sorry sales tax at 11% from normal growth and other revenues
experienced about a 3% annualized loss from normal growth. For 2020 the
recession from the COVID-19 pandemic had a very short downturn so that was less
than six months and then most revenue sources recovered within a year. So
property tax revenues were not affected by the pandemic where sales tax had an
annualized loss from normal growth of 11%. Other revenue streams it was more
severe, it was a decline of 19% from normal growth and those included arts
and rec based on the shuttered programs and events as well as our transient
occupancy tax, both which took longer than that year to recover. So each
recession that has occurred has looked different and so while we can't predict
them as I mentioned we can broadly model what might happen and while the
The assumptions about the timing for our moderate recession are similar to the timing of the
Great Recession.
The impact to the revenues that we're using in the forecast are actually less severe.
So we're conservative on our moderate recession assumptions.
So before I go into our revenue assumptions, any questions?
Sure.
Related questions.
What do you consider the years of, I remember the Great Recession years very well because
it lasted so long.
What do you consider the six month timeframe for the COVID-19 pandemic related recession?
The official recession was February through April of 2020.
So those were the official downturn, six months during COVID.
February through April of 2020.
Correct.
That's only two months.
Oh my goodness, you're right.
It could be, but you know, I don't think he even went into it.
I didn't talk differently that year.
Right.
Right.
It felt longer.
Yeah.
That's um so it's 2020-2021 somewhere in that crossing over the fiscal year to yes okay in that
range thank you apologize were there any other questions okay next I will talk about our revenue
assumptions so for property tax the assessed value will grow at two percent annually which is based
on the prop 13 inflator we're also incorporating information from our consultants projections
for the supplemental property taxes based on home sales in the area. So the assumed growth
in the model is averaged at 3.4%. Over the past few years we have received closer to 5%, but they
do anticipate that to decline some. For sales tax, our revenues have been updated based on projections
using actual data through June of 2024. The city sales tax consultant is projecting a softening
sales tax revenues in fiscal year 25 it began in fiscal year 24 and they
anticipate it will continue and this is due to rising inflation which is
impacting discretionary spending transient occupancy tax and arts and
revenues arts and recreation revenues were most impacted by the COVID-19
pandemic however they did fully recover by the end of fiscal year 24 other
department revenues and other revenue sources will grow on average 2.6% in our
forecast question yes so I was looking at the previous fiscal forecast from two
years ago and arts and recreation revenue assumptions were separated from
other revenue and now appears you're incorporating it with other revenues I
assume because the other the previous report separated it because of the
basically the catastrophic results correct to those revenues during the
COVID pandemic is that correct? Yes we had anticipated in our prior forecast
they wouldn't recover until fiscal year 25 but that was handled separately
because of the impact. And off the top of your head and I apologize for this
question is a surprise of our sales tax revenues what percentage roughly are
related to auto sales and service it used to be about a third and I don't
know if that's changing or our assumptions are still in that range. I
Actually don't have that information off the top of my head, but I can certainly provide that it's still about a third go to members
Yeah, okay, great. Thank you
More is the new hotel that's going in on Lawrence way included the assumptions of TOT are
the new hotels reflected in
our assumptions for TOT for
Actually, they are not it's only based on historic
It's based on what we've received the data and then-
You're not looking at the future and trying to game it.
Correct.
Okay, great.
Thank you.
Okay, for our expenditure assumptions, we'll start with personnel.
So increases have been built in per the adopted memorandums of understanding based beyond
the expiration date of those MOUs.
We've applied a 2.9% consumer price index.
And this is based on the 10-year average Bay Area CPI, which is consistent with what we
have used in the past. We're assuming a 6% growth on medical costs. Historically our
costs have averaged between five and a half and 6%, so we're consistent with that. We've
also assumed the addition of one FTE per year, and so while we may not add one FTE per year,
that would be determined during the budget process. We wanted to reflect the fact that
we would add FTE over time, so over that 10 year period, what would that look like if
if we were adding FTE.
The vacancy rate that's assumed throughout the forecast
is 5%, and that incorporates normal staff turnover rates.
So for our pension assumptions,
the discount rate from CalPERS is the assumed rate of return
for their investments.
So it impacts employer contribution rates,
PEPRA employee contribution rates,
and the unfunded accrued liability payments.
Due to the extraordinary investment returns
that we saw back in June of 2021,
which was 21.3%, they did an automatic reduction
to the discount rate from 7% to 6.8%,
and that change impacted the city
beginning in fiscal year 24.
In November of 2024, the CalPERS Board
decided to keep the discount rate at 6.8%,
even though they did see returns
in fiscal year 24 of 9.3%.
In the past, that would have automatically triggered
a reduction in the discount rate.
However, they since changed their policy.
They review it, and then they make that determination.
So they decided to keep that at 6.8%.
Now, every four years, CalPERS conducts their asset liability
management process, and so that is
done to align investment strategy with long-term pension
obligations.
So the ALM informs decisions on discount rate changes,
contribution policies, and asset allocation strategies.
The next ALM cycle is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 25,
likely completed by November of this year any changes to the discount rate
that come from that if any would impact the city in fiscal year 28 so due to the
timing of the ALM cycle and the CalPERS historic rate of return which is ranged
from 6.6 over the prior five years to 7.7 over 30 years our forecast assumes
6.8 percent through the entire forecast through fiscal year 24 sorry 34 so one
change from this year's forecast is that in the past if you recall we phased in a
lower discount rate over time so we did a six and a half percent over a 15 year
period however it was determined when we were looking at it going forward that it
was overly conservative and it really impacted the forecast significantly so
based on what we know we've decided that we would continue with the six point
eight percent I'm asking about that sure how bad was it if we lowered it from six
to assume that it was 6.5.
It impacted the forecast around 2.5 million annually.
So it was more of a deficit.
Like this next year.
Beginning in fiscal year 28 is when
we had originally factored that in.
Yes.
So it is a significant impact.
Thank you.
So for our other expenditure assumptions for our operations
and maintenance costs, beginning in fiscal year 26 and beyond,
we included an inflator again of that 2.9% CPI.
For the capital contributions per council policy,
we contribute 2% of the general fund revenues to capital,
and that is also included.
And then again, as I mentioned earlier,
measure O, those costs, the ongoing costs for measure O
of roughly $3.8 million would return
to the general fund in fiscal year 34.
One more.
Sorry, I had to make a roller-eyes once out of this.
Thank you, regarding the measure O assumption.
Right now we're spending 3.8 million of ongoing measure,
of funds from Measure O for ongoing operations costs,
and that could be police personnel, et cetera.
How do we balance that those costs will be rising
at a rate of 2.9% against what the sales tax measure
is likely to collect such at the end?
Is it really 3.8 million of costs will have to be absorbed
by the general fund or is it a higher number?
I know I'm getting into the weeds.
Do you follow my question?
I believe so.
So actually the current costs that are in Measure O
that are ongoing are 2.67 million.
So this 3.8 number does factor in the same growth pattern
as the forecast.
So we're assuming that in fiscal year 24
that's what the cost would be.
That was the answer I was looking for.
Thank you.
So there are no other questions.
Then next, we'll look at the forecast scenarios
that we presented in the report.
So the first scenario you see here
is the impact of the mild recession beginning
in fiscal year 27.
So we have surpluses.
We have some small surpluses.
With the budget deficits, they reach just under 7%
in fiscal year 28 of the general fund budget
until the next recession occurs in fiscal year 24.
So you can see in fiscal year 27 where it dips lower
because that's when the first recession begins.
And then we start to recover
over that shorter period of time,
which is the two-year recovery.
And in this scenario for a mild recession,
we get to 100% recovery on our revenues
at the end of that two years.
So you can see with the moderate recession,
again, second recession would begin in fiscal year 34,
And then the ongoing, as I mentioned before, the ongoing cost for Measure O would come
back in.
And again, this is an 18-month downturn, and at the end of the three-year recovery, the
revenues would only come back to 90% at the end of those three years.
That's what's assumed in the forecast.
And so to make it easier to look at, the next slide shows you the two side-by-side.
So you can see they basically go along the same trend, but it's the severity and length
of time that makes the impact on the differences between the two.
And then this next slide shows the effects of ongoing budget balancing in these scenarios.
So what we are looking at is the moderate recession that begins in fiscal year 27, but
if the gap that was shown in fiscal year 26 was solved for on an ongoing basis, you can
see the compounding impact year over year of that budget balancing.
So where you see the white blocks, you see that's how much the deficit would be reduced
by, as well as an increase in some of the surpluses in those middle years.
And so in summary, the timing of the next recession really is uncertain.
The scenarios we've presented will give you an idea of what the impacts would be on our
revenues, if we reach that recession.
The fiscal year 26 and 27 budget development is underway, and the budget allows for greater
nuance in our revenue assumptions and spending plan, and as I mentioned we would ultimately
bring forward a balanced budget for your consideration for fiscal year 26 and 27.
What we're looking towards is a strategic allocation of resources and really focusing
on maintaining current services.
And then also we will bring back to you the pension trust strategy in February and March
of 2025.
And what we are asking of you today is to accept the report, and we have staff available
for any questions you may have.
Thank you.
Thank you very much, Kirsten.
It's a great report.
One of the things I wanted to, we added when we brought it out
of Finance Committee, one additional recommendation,
and if you wanted to.
Sure.
So at Finance Committee, the recommendation
was to be very cautious about adding any additional costs
to Measure O that would be ongoing.
Because that's a revenue stream that is not one time,
but is really short term, or some time,
if I can use the phrase that you coined mayor we want to be careful not to continue to add
ongoing costs with the assumption that that would likely also then need to come back into
the general fund so this forecast assumes only those existing ongoing costs would be coming back
into the general fund thank you and questions councilmember Silva I know you have some more
well thank you for the public explain what can you translate fiscal year 26 and fiscal
year 27 at the calendar time frames because there's two ways to do it and we have actually
changed the way we describe it somewhere in about six years ago so so fiscal year 26 will begin on
july 1st of 2025 and ends June 30th of 2026 and so and then fiscal year 27 follows and so when
we're doing our two-year budget cycle we refer to it as fiscal year 26 and 27 because we do a
do a biennial budget, biennial budget?
The number that we use, the year number
is actually the end date, not the start date.
Correct.
The fiscal year starts in 25 but ends in 26.
So we're really projecting the recessions
to start in 27, two plus years from now.
Or are we doing it, is the assumption
that it could start as early as July 1
26 it would be July 1 of 26 is the assumption so it would last it would
begin at the beginning of fiscal year 27 really hard to track that just because
most of this is end dated but we're not saying that the recession would start at
the end of fiscal year 27 we're saying at the beginning which is a year and six
seven months from now correct correct councilmember Francois just one more I
I believe we've done this long-term financial forecasting now for at least
ten years. Is that something like that? We've been through a ten year cycle.
I believe we first brought it forward in 2017, but Dan. This version, I believe
this city had used some different versions of forecasting, but this is the
first one came forward, I think, in 2018, if I recall. I was just curious, have we
done a look back and seen how accurate those long-term financial forecasts were
and what the deviation was from is there anything that can be gleaned from doing
that look back that that's a good question I know you know we do
incorporate what actually occurred into our forecast scenarios going forward so
we do use historical data to build from but we haven't gone back and done kind
of a how accurate were we generally because things change so quickly it's
all based on a moment in time.
And I would just add to that,
that's certainly easier to do on the revenue side
because we can look at how revenues grew over time.
The thing about the forecast,
one of the things that's worth emphasizing
that shows the current trends
without any budget balancing actions whatsoever.
So that assumes that revenues are,
or I'm sorry, that expenditures are not adjusted
in order to balance with revenues.
It assumes no use of reserves,
no use of the pension trust,
any other budget balancing ideas that we might think of.
This is just the pure trend.
So in terms of a look back,
we could do a more formal one on the revenue side,
but expenditures is a little harder
because when we actually balance the budget,
we're making changes,
so it's not a true apples-to-apples comparison.
Sorry, maybe two more.
Then in terms of the comparison,
we look at the long-term forecast,
there's 3.1 million mild recession,
3.1 million deficit in fiscal year 26,
8.0 million in fiscal year 28.
Remind me what our annual operating general fund budget is?
It's just over 100 million.
Okay.
So even 3.1 would be then 3.1 out of the 100th
that we would have to make up through budget,
accounting and cost savings measures.
Correct.
All right.
and then what was the other one?
Let's see.
Oh, just on the discount rate,
I think we are all aware of what that is,
but that's the CalPERS estimated rate of return
on the pension investments, is that right?
Correct.
So the higher that is,
then the less the city's contribution,
annual contribution to CalPERS would be?
Correct, because they're assuming
that there would be more investment returns
that would offset the costs in the future.
So we have to, we can contribute less in the short term.
Yeah, so let me just add an important asterisk to that.
That's only if those actual investment returns are met.
Because if you set it higher,
and we're getting into some of the details on pension,
but if it's set higher, it reduces the normal cost.
If that higher number return is not met,
then there'll be unfunded liability.
So I always, I really like to simplify this.
it costs what it costs.
Whether it's normal cost or unfunded liability,
what we need to look at is that total payment.
So one thing that I don't necessarily agree with some
of my peers to be candid is that the discount rate, you know,
should never be changed.
It shouldn't be lowered, because when it's lowered,
it drives up costs.
Well, that's not, it does, but if they don't meet it
in a tire, it's going to drive up costs anyway.
So what we really want to look is that package
of unfunded liability and normal costs
to see what the total bill is.
The other thing I wanted to mention,
just to expound upon pension for a moment,
and you hit on this Council Member Francois,
there are three revenue sources for the pension fund.
There are employee contributions,
employer contributions, and then the investment returns.
So to the extent that the investment return does better,
it lowers the total cost to employers
and potentially to employees.
To the extent it does worse, the other costs go up.
and the way that works is CalPERS sends the bill to,
in our case, to the city.
If we want to try to share those costs with employees,
that's a meet and confer negotiation issue,
which as you can imagine can be a challenging negotiation.
So certainly in the shorter run,
those costs fall on the city to make up.
They might be able to be recouped somewhat
through negotiations over a longer timeframe.
You should teach a masterclass on this.
that was a great explanation thank you I'm curious to the 21 percent rate of
return that they got in 2021 how did that happen can they do that again
investments were doing well that year I think everywhere along those lines they
have but I do actually want to give you know you don't hear this very often our
profession I will give a shout out to PERS and particularly to their president
or their CEO, Marcy Frost.
She's been very, very focused on investment returns
and looking at the investment mix
and they've changed their mix of investments over time
in order to better meet that investment return.
And they've done a better job.
And as you saw in one of the slides,
if you look at the 20-year and 30-year trends
on investment return, that 6.8% is right in there.
So in theory, over the long haul,
which is what pensions are supposed to be targeting,
that investment return should be fairly attainable
with ups and downs, of course,
based on the current investment mix.
But CalPERS has been very, very focused
since she came on board six to eight years ago,
much more so than they were prior.
My recollection is they also have fewer tricks
that they play that a lot of the original attempt
to drive up return was investing in things
that were not necessarily a sound.
That's accurate.
Well, the other thing is that there's always pressure
on CalPERS board from the legislature
to not invest in certain things.
Oh, you can't invest in this and you can't invest in that.
It makes it very difficult to achieve the.
They're a group of people with many, many bosses
and many expectations and many crabby people
when they don't meet their returns.
You good? I'm good.
Okay, Council Member Definney?
Yeah, I was wondering, it looks like
the mild recession scenario is mild to moderate,
but since this is cyclic and we do have reserves,
aren't we expecting the economy to then do well
for a period of time, and how necessary is it
for us to change the way we run the business
based on these sort of expected cycles?
Well, since we typically don't know
when the recession will occur, you know,
we factor those assumptions into the forecast.
But we look at that every two years
when we analyze our budget
and when we come forward with the proposed budget.
And so we would factor into any economic downturns
that we know at the time
into what we are projecting forward for the budget.
Yeah, I'll just add to that a bit.
Certainly using reserves in certain extents
is one of the budget balancing practices,
one of the policies that councils adopted for some time
is not to use one-time funds
to support ongoing operational costs.
It's one of the financing policies that councils adopted.
So to the extent that we are applying any reserves,
we'd wanna ensure that it's covering some one-time costs
that are in the budget as a matter of practice.
That said, as Kirsten noted,
we'll be coming back to your council
in the March timeframe
to talk about the pension trust reserve.
That is a unique reserve different from rainy day funds
or financial funds that fund is meant to be spent,
the pension reserve over a period of time.
And we're now in that timeframe where we may want
to think about using it before too long.
And so we're gonna lay out some considerations
for your counsel as that relates to the budget
and the pension costs.
Because what coming up in the early 2030s
we're expecting to start seeing that taper off and then.
That's correct. Yeah.
Yes, if that proves to, it always seems to be
getting pushed out when it starts bending down,
but yeah, and somewhere in the 2032 to 2034 timeframe,
it should start bending down.
Mayor Pro Tem.
I'm good.
You're all good.
I asked all my questions at finance,
and I really appreciate all the work you guys put into this.
I always look at this as just kind of a Rorschach blot test
of where we're going, and I'm always happy to see
that if the bars on the top and the bars on the bottom
are roughly because that means to me
that we're going to be able to do what we need to do.
So there are no more questions.
I'll go ahead and go to public comment.
Thank you very much.
Any public comment?
No public comment.
Okay, we'll close public comment and bring it back.
Since there's no public comment,
I assume our questions are asked, been asked and answered.
So we'll go to council member comments.
I wanna thank staff and the finance committee
for the work on this.
And just so we can get the record straight.
It was 2015 when we had the first full one.
We changed our methodology about 2017 or 2018.
We've been doing this and it is hard work.
And as staff does this,
they know that every year further out
is less and less clear.
So it's really a trend-setting piece of information
as we go into the budgetary process, which I appreciate.
Thank you, happy to make the motion if.
Mayor, if I could just add one comment
before we go to a motion to close up.
Just one thing I wanted to highlight,
and I think I mentioned this to each of you individually,
but what I wanted to underscore,
if you look at these models here,
whether it's the mild or moderate recession,
you look over the 10-year,
and I'm taking the liberty of generalizing a bit,
but we are more or less break even.
There's some years where we're in the red,
there's some years we're in the black, it fluctuates.
It's largely dependent upon the recession assumptions
that are driving those numbers either being slightly
in the black or slightly in the red.
And I just wanna highlight that
because we only see our forecast.
There are other cities where the red lines are very long
going out over a 10 year timeframe
where it's very clear the trend is very negative.
There are a much smaller number of cities
where the lines are black and are very big,
meaning they have significant budget surpluses,
which is much less common.
And that's also very clear on those trends.
Whereas ours are more or less in this break-even
for the general fund.
And as your council knows,
this is somewhat similar to two years ago,
a little different profile, but more or less break-even
if you look at it generally.
And that was largely why your council
You decided to pursue Measure O because the capacity of the general fund is about where
it's at and you wanted to be able to provide additional services and programs and infrastructure
for the community.
So Measure O is really where we've added those additional services.
I say all that because most likely we're looking at this next two-year budget cycle is, at
least in the general fund portion, is not being able to accommodate a lot more.
I'm not suggesting we can't do some things more,
maybe a few things less, but on the whole,
it wouldn't be a significant departure
if the forecast is accurate
in terms of what we'd be looking to budget
for the next two years.
And that's, in large part, why the timing of this
is what the forecast is to give your council a sense
of where at fiscally one,
before we head into priority setting,
and then two, before you start receiving budget updates
and budget recommendations from staff
that you'll be considering in April, May, June of this year.
Thank you and and do my comments now because you're on the topic and that was
part of the reason for the recommendation that we look at measure
O as some time money and that we were coming up on some important timelines
where we're going to be looking at what the pool is going to cost and a few
other things like that and I think it's really I strongly urge us to make sure
that we are very careful to not add to the general fund.
The portion of measure O funding that's going to need to come back because it's going
to be coming back at a point in the future where we're not quite sure where we're going to be.
And I've seen budget creep.
People start thinking, oh, we've got money.
And as a state employee for years, I've seen where that's led, so I urge restraint on that.
any other did you have
Appreciate the work you and the finance team has done just keeping us on track to the ups and downs over the last five years and
We've all seen many cities that have really suffered deep financial hardships over
Since the pandemic and even before then and the fact that Walnut Creek came out of the pandemic
Looking as good as we did which is in the top tier of the entire state of cities is really testament to you in the team
Kirsten, I really want to thank you and I'm looking forward to the next decade. I think that
I'm confident in the city and I think that we're going to be in good shape to prepare for the next
10 years. And I also want to say thank you to the existing council members when I came on because
you guys had to do all the budget cutting at the beginning of COVID that, you know, as Kirsten's
graph shows, if you take the budget cutting measures at the first get-go, it makes it less
painful. I mean, and I watched that on TV and I was really glad that you did it before I got elected.
Well and having been through the Great Recession and the COVID recession there's a significant
difference in COVID recession we had to basically turn on a dime and close a 12 million plus dollar
gap in hours but I mean in hours as whereas the Great Recession of 2008, nine, ten, eleven
it was slower it felt really fast when it started to happen but it was much slower rolling in
than this, and so that's the other challenge
with these recession predictions,
is they predict almost, they don't predict a cliff.
They predict a more gradual falloff,
and when it happens like a cliff,
yeah, you're scrambling from the get-go.
And nobody can predict a recession.
I mean, we all like to think that the economists can.
Councilmember Defendee, did you have anything?
I just wanted to thank you Kirsten for the report and also for being so available on the outside to go over so many of
These things. Thanks. Yeah, I saw the little
There's a lot of inside baseball going on here, so I'm glad you
anyway
Who wants to make a motion? I'm happy to go ahead
move to accept the
fiscal financial forecast report and and I think
Thank and thank staff for their work.
Second.
We'll call.
Council Member Silva.
Aye.
Council Member Davini.
Aye.
Council Member Francois.
Aye.
Mayor Pro Tem Wilk.
Aye.
Mayor Darling.
Aye.
Motion carries unanimously.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
And we've been going for an hour and a half.
So why don't we take a, come back at a quarter till.
Okay, I'll reach out to her.
Okay, now next agenda item for consideration
is the draft 2025 to 2030 consolidated plan
community needs assessment for the community development,
otherwise known as CDBG,
and I invite staff to make their presentation
and it's a staff person who gets through
her first presentation, so welcome.
Thank you, thank you, Mayor Darling
and members of the council.
I'm excited to be here with you tonight.
Tonight, as you mentioned, we will be discussing
some results of a needs assessment
was done for the draft 2025 to 2030 consolidated plan. This draft consolidated plan will be presented
later to council this year and later in spring. So tonight's presentation will be touching upon
the city's community grant program and the importance of the federal CDBG program within
that budget, as well as the planning requirements that are established by the US Department
of Housing and Urban Development or HUD as we like to call them.
Then we will cover the needs assessment and how it was performed as well as some of the
highlights of the results and following that we will briefly touch upon the draft priorities
that have been identified in response to those results.
The city's community grant program is funded by a combination of local, state, and federal
sources to provide our residents access to services, housing, employment, and public
amenities.
The graphic on this slide shows the various funding sources that contribute to the grant
program.
As you can see, the federal CDBG funds indicated with the yellow color is nearly half of the
program's budget.
funds are indicated by orange and the local funds are indicated by the green
color. To continue receiving CDBG funding from HUD annually, the city
must comply with many rigorous program requirements like the consolidated plan
and the needs assessment which are required every five years. The current
consolidated plan will be ending this year in June and so in anticipation of
that a needs assessment was initiated last year. The consolidated plan is a
policy document that outlines the priorities, goals, and strategies for
guiding expenditure of HUD funding specifically. It seeks to address a
variety of community development needs especially for vulnerable populations.
The community needs assessment is required by HUD to incorporate feedback
feedback from the public on housing, services, infrastructure, and public facility needs
that directly impact residents and special needs populations.
Annual action plans are submitted to HUD each year of the five-year consolidated plan period,
and they allow us to choose specific projects to implement the goals of the consolidated
plan.
the consolidated plan is a document that is drafted in collaboration with the Contra Costa
County Consortium. Each member of the Consortium has the opportunity to distinguish their own
needs within it. And they are also responsible independently for choosing local projects
to fund in their own action plans. The Consortium consists of several HUD grantees in the county,
including the cities of Walnut Creek, Concord, Antioch, and Pittsburgh, as well as the Contra
Costa County, Urban County, excuse me, which covers the unincorporated areas of the county
and 14 smaller cities across the county as well.
The partnership with the consortium allows members to share expertise and tools, data
and consultants to ease the administrative
and financial burdens of the robust federal requirements.
And so members of the consortium invited residents,
community organizations, social service agencies,
and others to participate in the needs assessment.
This was done to help guarantee
that the needs assessment reflects real challenges
faced by different groups across the county.
The needs assessment was conducted through a layered outreach approach, which was established
by the consortium, and that consisted of several community meetings, an online questionnaire,
which came in two parts, and several focus groups with stakeholders.
City staff additionally supplemented this effort with three additional focus groups
in the City of Walnut Creek by itself, which consisted of members and staff of the Trinity
seniors and formerly homeless low-income residents of St. Paul's Commons which is
an affordable housing project. Consortium members advertised these
activities on their websites as well as imprint on flyers in public locations
and via community newsletters like the Rossmoor News. So when you come to the
results for the city of Walnut Creek they can be categorized into non housing
and housing needs. For housing needs, participants recognized that all types of affordable units
are needed in the community, but particularly those for seniors and those with disabilities.
There is also a desire expressed for housing services like home rehabilitation assistance,
as well as eviction or foreclosure support, and transitional housing with integrated services
for those at risk of and experiencing homelessness.
Our non-housing results also reiterated a priority
for both services and public facilities for seniors,
those with disabilities, and those experiencing
homelessness.
Other services that were highlighted across the city
include mental health, information referrals,
nutrition, and job training services.
When we compare the results of the city
to that of the countywide consortium,
we both recognize that there are significant needs
for creation and preservation of affordable units,
but also homeless services.
The city of Walnut Creek further prioritized
special needs for supportive housing,
temporary emergency shelter,
and senior and disabled services,
whereas the consortium sought to seek,
sought to, they had preferences additionally
for prioritizing public services, infrastructure,
and family and youth services.
The differences in the results between the city
and the consortium are not surprising
when we consider community characteristics
of the city compared to the county.
The city's population has more seniors, less youth,
and smaller households with fewer children.
Can you go back and pause there,
because the slide is very informative, thank you.
Yes, yeah.
So as you can see, the age groups of five to 19,
the county has many more population
in that age group range than the city.
And then compared to the age range of 65 to 79,
the city's population is much higher than the county's.
And the 80 and over is?
Yes, yep, that one as well.
So it's roughly 30% 65 and older.
Yes, it is.
It's about, yeah, it's almost a third of our population.
We don't segment that out by Rossmer though, do we?
This is just overall.
It's over.
50-50.
Yeah, okay.
Thank you, this is really interesting.
Thank you.
Yes, you're welcome.
After reviewing results of the needs assessment,
the consortium proposed draft priorities
that are identical to the existing consolidated plan,
as you can see on this slide,
The needs across the county remain strong
for affordable housing, homeless prevention,
and non-housing community development projects.
Staff would also like to note
that the proposed priorities continue to align
with both the projects that we currently fund
in our community grant program,
as well as the goals of our grant program.
So next steps will include staff anticipate
reviewing applications with our housing
Community Development Committee for the next action plan this spring as well as
presenting those recommendations and the draft con plan later this spring. So with
that staff recommends that City Council consider and discuss the results of the
needs assessment and staff will relay any feedback to the consortium at
Council's direction. We are available for questions. Thank you Alison you survived.
Thank you. I'm gonna turn to my right and see if council member Defeney has any questions.
Yeah, I was it's so 50% of our funds for community needs come from these block grants.
Is that that was what those first slide? Yeah about 49% almost. Okay. Yeah, and it looks like we do
the consortium where we come up with a con plan because by collaborating with those other cities we bring down the costs of the
Administrative costs of doing all these surveys. Yes, we do benefit by partnering with them
It's a it's a collaborative effort to draft that document
It does it does it ever wind up being an issue where when we're applying for the block grants?
We're applying based on like county
Needs or county or not county but the the group that we're collaborating with that their needs
Let's say are different than ours and then we go to apply for those grants for specific projects within the city that winds up being
That's a good question
So the city and the other jurisdictions in the consortium are entitlement communities
Which is a definition that HUD creates for the city we meet that
Threshold by being a city of over 50,000 population
And so because of that we just received this annual allocation based on a formula
The formula is defined by HUD and there are different factors that go into that but our
City's allocation is independent of the other jurisdictions in the consortium, but we okay
Are we anticipating that to go up or down or what is the the projection?
It's hard. It's hard for us to say
Generally, there's very
Minimal fluctuation in terms of going up. I think over the past couple of years and my department may speak to that
It's gone up incrementally
but we don't see vast differences from year to year.
That being said, we don't know what the next administration
is going to do.
That was kind of where I was going with that.
Yeah, allocating funding.
We still see this as like an ongoing,
consistent, like, recognition for this project.
We hope that it does continue at least at the same level,
but there's a chance that it could decrease.
We just, we won't know until April
when HUD will release our next fiscal year's
worth of funding to us.
They just release it.
they'd release it directly to the city. Yeah so we don't receive it right away
but it is a reimbursement grant but we do get our total allocation number from
HUD in about April. Okay thank you. Yeah thank you.
Do you have a relevant clarification? This isn't a series of grants from the
it's community development block grant. Yes and we receive an allocation from
HUD annually and they tell us the categories that we can allocate it to
yeah provider agencies yes and there there are some stipulations on those
amount but yeah so how are we compared to other cities that we would consider
our peers whether by population or by budget well by population I think our
slide on demographics shows a little bit of that in terms of general trends that
we see and by age and household size. I guess what I'm looking at is our city
peers so the ones that are similar to whether it's in size of Walnut Creek are
we are we in the right ballpark do we typically get more or less or the
allocation from HUD is the amount that we receive is based again on that the
formula that HUD has so it's different factors go into that like our our level
of poverty and I think different like economic trends yeah the number of
people that participate in government assistance programs and things of that
nature so it is variable dependent upon needs yeah yeah okay high need risks high
by risk populations in each city and other factors as well.
All right, thank you.
Yeah.
Thank you.
Council Member Silva?
So just to further clarify, we can expect,
there are community development block grant funds
being distributed and allocated across the United States.
Great.
And the 50,000 population threshold is what qualifies you
to receive a direct funding allocation
as opposed to competitive.
Brenda a Lafayette Pleasant Hill have to get theirs
from the county, there's an intermediary.
Yes.
There's a lot of discussion at that.
Yes, being part of the urban county is more complicated.
And we probably get a lower allocation
than many of our counterparts like Concord
and Antioch and Pittsburgh because they in fact
have a higher poverty level and greater need.
Right.
Okay, thank you.
Councilmember Francois?
You're good.
And I just want to give you the award
for robust federal requirements
as the best euphemism of the year.
Thank you.
No, I think you did a great job walking through it.
And seeing no more questions,
we'll go ahead and start and look for public comment.
See if there is any public comments.
No public comment.
So at this point, we'll bring it back to council.
The action that you are looking for is
consideration.
And discussion.
If you have feedback for us,
we can share that with the consortium
as they're working and collaborating on the draft
consolidated plan.
Okay.
You may not have feedback for us, but it's open to you.
Any general feedback, comments?
council member Francois and I are on the housing
and community development committee
and I really appreciate the changes that you initiated
because I had the same questions
after reading the report over the weekend,
which is how are we different
from the other entitlement communities
and therefore how might our allocations
of the funds we receive look different than they might
to what Antioch and Concord and Pittsburgh do
and that graphic that shows
how we are much more senior-focused
and the needs reflect that,
then youth and family service is focused
just because of our demographics of our population,
as well as our income levels
that our demographics are really driving that.
And I appreciate that because it helps us say
we can be different.
Yes.
Yes, the needs assessment reiterated that point
many times in the data.
Thank you.
Yeah.
Yeah, I agree.
Thank you, great job.
You hit it out of the park, you did a really good job
and explained everything very clearly
in a complicated federal program.
But I think that you summarized the priority areas
that came from all the other member entities
I think are consistent with what we would look
to have be priorities here in the city,
maybe with an emphasis more on doing all those things
targeted more towards a senior population
in terms of affordable housing or homeless prevention
and all the other categories,
but I think it accurately reflects
kind of what we wanna continue to be the priorities
for the next five year period.
Thank you.
Well, I know for the Trinity Center
that the transitional housing
with supportive services is priority
based on our last discussion,
so I saw that on the list.
Yes, that feedback was part of their participation
in the focus groups that we have.
Thank you, great job.
Thank you very much.
I think you guys captured the needs I've heard
from our community, and I think we're,
do you need a vote?
No, no vote.
So we'll give you two thumbs up and tell you good job
on your first presentation.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much.
And with that, we are adjourned.
Thank you all.