Human Welfare and Community Action Commission - June 17, 2026

Agenda

3. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Matters

Update/Action Items The Commission may take action related to any subject listed on the agenda, except where noted.

Attachments (9)

m
P
P
P
Action
Action
Action
-
-

5. Presentation from JOHN JANOSKO, Community Organizer and Activist

Berkeley Community Action Agency Board Business

Attachments (1780)

https://cityofberkeley-info.zoomgov.com/j/1653212609
hhcshwcac@berkeleyca.gov.
o hhcshwcac@berkeleyca.gov.
t ada@berkeleyca.gov, (510) 9
Return to Reports Page
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 3
Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 3
Federal CSBG Programmatic Assurances and Certification ................................................................. 3
State Assurances and Certification ........................................................................................................ 3
Compliance with CSBG Organizational Standards ................................................................................ 4
What’s New for 2026/2027? .................................................................................................................. 4
Checklist ................................................................................................................................................... 5
Public Hearing(s) ...................................................................................................................................... 7
Part I: Community Needs Assessment Summary ..................................................................................... 9
Narrative .............................................................................................................................................. 11
Results ................................................................................................................................................ 14
Part II: Community Action Plan ............................................................................................................... 17
Vision and Mission Statements ........................................................................................................... 17
Causes and Conditions of Poverty ...................................................................................................... 18
Tripartite Board of Directors ................................................................................................................ 20
Service Delivery System ...................................................................................................................... 21
Linkages and Funding Coordination .................................................................................................... 23
Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................ 28
ROMA Application ............................................................................................................................... 29
Federal CSBG Programmatic Assurances .......................................................................................... 31
State Assurances ................................................................................................................................ 34
Organizational Standards .................................................................................................................... 35
Part III: Appendices ................................................................................................................................ 36
ng on State Accountability Measures
Information Memorandum (IM) #138
January 26, 2015,
he Local Agencies Portal.
Community Action Guide to Comprehensive Community Needs Assessments
Community Needs Assessment Tool
Poverty Data
Economic Data
Housing Data & Report
PIT and HIC Data Since 2007
Housing Needs by State
IPEDS
School Data via DataQuest
Various Data Sets
UI Data by County
Demographics
Open Justice
Data Portal
Data by County
KidsData
National Public Data
Racial and Economic Data
Census Data
SNAP Benefit Gap
California Racial Disparity
Fair Market Rent by ZIP
Data
California Self-Sufficiency
Poverty Statistics
Standard
County Health Rankings
Volunteer Time Calculator
Family Budget Calculator
Living Wage Calculator
California Government Code § 12747(
California Government Code § 12760:
California Government Code § 12768:
Katz, Mary-Claire
Katz, Mary-Claire
Larrowe, Kathryn
mfine@hceb.org
dfrazier@self-sufficiency.org
aqadri@self-sufficiency.org;
dngiraingas@self-sufficiency.org;
jharrison@thevillageoflove.com
; jerri@thevillageoflvoe.com
; taneshah@thevillageoflove.com
andrew@berkeleyfoodnetwork.org
dgomez@habitatebsv.org;
JGray@HabitatEBSV.org;
betti@riseyouth.org
emartin@thecil.org
vpineda@thecil.org;
jbenson@thecil.org
; azaldivar@thecil.org
jonathan@echofairhousing.org
; christina@echofairhousing.org
; r.atkins@dorothydayhouse.org
r.montoya@dorothydayhouse.org
r.atkins@dorothydayhouse.org;
jgaona@dorothydayhouse.org
leslie@womensdropin.org;
dr.veronica.ephesiancc@gmail.com
dr.veronica.ephesianscc@gmail.com
JW@RTEBN.org;
rich@easydoesitservices.org
; ayanna@easydoesitservices.org
; bruce@easydoesitservices.org
dorth@ebclc.org
; sfujimoto@ebclc.org
; jkim@ebclc.org
; zpolk@ebclc.org
; bgoldstein@lifelongmedical.org;
tshepard@lifelongmedical.org
ceo@lifelongmedical.org
; bgoldstein@lifelongmedical.org
asimson@lifelongmedical.org
nnappi@lifelongmedical.org
; gardenia.campos@berkeley.edu
sandrab@berkeley.edu
; carriedonovan@berkeley.edu
kkokotilo@larkinstreetyouth.org
cthomas@larkinstreetyouth.org
; sadams@larkinstreetyouth.org;
ericmagana510@gmail.com
tamiko23@sbcglobal.net
info@bayareaclt.org
tracy@bayareaclt.org
jessieluxford@berkeley.net;
nkelley-
farias@bacr.org
jmok@bacr.org
jdarby@self-sufficiency.org
akiani@self-sufficiency.org;
seaddy@self-
sufficiency.org
jdarby@self-sufficiency.org
jmarley@homelessactioncenter.org;
mgilg@homelessactioncenter.org;
adavis@homelessactioncenter.org
opattiewall@yahoo.com
nstovall@ymcaeastbay.org
fgallati@ymcaeastbay.org
jeffreys@risingsunopp.org
hatton@risingsunopp.org;
mirna@mionline.org
; wilhelmenia@healthyblackfam.org
; lasara@pacificcenter.org
; shanna@pacificcenter.org
alula@bonitahouse.org;
Laura@bonitahouse.org
; lauraw@bonitahouse.org
; jonathan@stileshall.org
jay@borp.org
emily@borp.org
; rick@borp.org
abowers@acnetmhc.org;
kkillian@acnetmhc.org
kkillian@peerwellnesscollective.org;
mtampoya@peerwellnesscollective.org;
eve@niahouse.org
kfeck@toolworks.org;
klin@insighthousing.org;
aupshaw@insighthousing.org;
cegan@insghthousing.org;
klin@insighthousing.org;
aupshaw@insighthousing.org
; cegan@insighthousing.org
aupshaw@insighthousing.org;
klin@insighthousing.org
; usha@breadproject.org
; escott@fvlc.org
; diane@j-
sei.org
Beatriz@bahiainc.com;
JLopez@bahiainc.com
; kym@bananasbunch.org
ni@bananasbunch.org;
bjenkins-league@bayareacs.org;
jbaker@bayareacs.org;
nschwab@optionsrecovery.org
jphillips@optionsrecovery.org;
jhugenberger@biotechopartners.org
lgayden@biotechpartners.org
middeen@icsworks.com;
ppamintuan@lookingglass.org
; mkirshbaum@lookingglass.org;
tlockett@byaonline.org
sloving@byaonline.org
cruiz@byaonline.org;
lhairston@byaonline.org;
danthony@bayareacs.org
gtia@bayareacs.org
; dolson@bayareacs.org
; corinnehaskins@yahoo.com;
cbookhart@rcdhousing.org;
dsawislak@rcdhousing.org
; crystal@supplybank.org
; benito@ktocollege.org
sfriedland@sahahomes.org
cegan@insighthousing.org;
sburmaster@insighthousing.org
; klin@insighthousing.org;
cegan@bfhp.org`;
supreet@streetsteam.org
jim@streetsteam.org;
duffyross@berkeley.net
; blackcollabheration@gmail.com
duffyross@berkeley.net
sherry@berkeleyscholars.org
seena@thebbbp.org
; khanh@cep.ngo
gchau@berkeley.edu;
collegeboundprograms@gmail.com;
drwillis63@gmail.com
; benjamingoff@berkeley.net
Alex@ecologycenter.org;
martin@ecologycenter.org
brsaunders@getontrack.org;
mcrucker@getontrack.org;
lisa@eastbaysanctuary.org
bree@eastbaysanctuary.org
sistermaureen@eastbaysanctuary.org;
owen@eastbaysanctuary.org
via Zoom on
click here
your public comment to Mary-Claire Katz at mkatz@berkeleyca.gov
Boards & Commissions
webpage
mkatz@berkeleyca.gov
please check the City of Berkeley Homepage at https://berkeleyca.gov/
Katz, Mary-Claire
Katz, Mary-Claire
Larrowe, Kathryn
Amiri, Wahid
Bondi, James;
Bronson, Darlene;
Bryant, Ginsi
Burns, Anne M
; Cash, Anna
Chin, Khin
; Cole,
Shamika S.;
Covello, Zoe
; Crane, Fatema
; Ernst, Margot
; Garcia, Claudia;
Gregory, Thomas
Harvey, Samuel;
Heath, Julia
Hersch, Anne
Jacobs, Joshua;
Knox, Kellie
Kouyoumdjian, Aram
Lovvorn, Jennifer
May, Keith;
Mayer, Tess
; McCoy, Vincent
; Miller, Roger
Moore, Sarah M.
; Murillo, Jose
; Rose, Emily
Shen, Alisa
Slaughter,
Kieron;
Terrones, Roberto
Updegrave, Samantha
; Vance-Dozier, Okeya
Works-Wright, Jamie
via Zoom on
click here
your public comment to Mary-Claire Katz at mkatz@berkeleyca.gov
Boards & Commissions
webpage
mkatz@berkeleyca.gov
please check the City of Berkeley Homepage at https://berkeleyca.gov/
Katz, Mary-Claire
Katz, Mary-Claire
Larrowe, Kathryn
mfine@hceb.org
dfrazier@self-sufficiency.org
aqadri@self-sufficiency.org;
dngiraingas@self-sufficiency.org;
jharrison@thevillageoflove.com
; jerri@thevillageoflvoe.com
; taneshah@thevillageoflove.com
andrew@berkeleyfoodnetwork.org
dgomez@habitatebsv.org;
JGray@HabitatEBSV.org;
betti@riseyouth.org
emartin@thecil.org
vpineda@thecil.org;
jbenson@thecil.org
; azaldivar@thecil.org
jonathan@echofairhousing.org
; christina@echofairhousing.org
; r.atkins@dorothydayhouse.org
r.montoya@dorothydayhouse.org
r.atkins@dorothydayhouse.org;
jgaona@dorothydayhouse.org
leslie@womensdropin.org;
dr.veronica.ephesiancc@gmail.com
dr.veronica.ephesianscc@gmail.com
JW@RTEBN.org;
rich@easydoesitservices.org
; ayanna@easydoesitservices.org
; bruce@easydoesitservices.org
dorth@ebclc.org
; sfujimoto@ebclc.org
; jkim@ebclc.org
; zpolk@ebclc.org
; bgoldstein@lifelongmedical.org;
tshepard@lifelongmedical.org
ceo@lifelongmedical.org
; bgoldstein@lifelongmedical.org
asimson@lifelongmedical.org
nnappi@lifelongmedical.org
; gardenia.campos@berkeley.edu
sandrab@berkeley.edu
; carriedonovan@berkeley.edu
kkokotilo@larkinstreetyouth.org
cthomas@larkinstreetyouth.org
; sadams@larkinstreetyouth.org;
ericmagana510@gmail.com
tamiko23@sbcglobal.net
info@bayareaclt.org
tracy@bayareaclt.org
jessieluxford@berkeley.net;
nkelley-
farias@bacr.org
jmok@bacr.org
jdarby@self-sufficiency.org
akiani@self-sufficiency.org;
seaddy@self-
sufficiency.org
jdarby@self-sufficiency.org
jmarley@homelessactioncenter.org;
mgilg@homelessactioncenter.org;
adavis@homelessactioncenter.org
opattiewall@yahoo.com
nstovall@ymcaeastbay.org
fgallati@ymcaeastbay.org
jeffreys@risingsunopp.org
hatton@risingsunopp.org;
mirna@mionline.org
; wilhelmenia@healthyblackfam.org
; lasara@pacificcenter.org
; shanna@pacificcenter.org
alula@bonitahouse.org;
Laura@bonitahouse.org
; lauraw@bonitahouse.org
; jonathan@stileshall.org
jay@borp.org
emily@borp.org
; rick@borp.org
abowers@acnetmhc.org;
kkillian@acnetmhc.org
kkillian@peerwellnesscollective.org;
mtampoya@peerwellnesscollective.org;
eve@niahouse.org
kfeck@toolworks.org;
klin@insighthousing.org;
aupshaw@insighthousing.org;
cegan@insghthousing.org;
klin@insighthousing.org;
aupshaw@insighthousing.org
; cegan@insighthousing.org
aupshaw@insighthousing.org;
klin@insighthousing.org
; usha@breadproject.org
; escott@fvlc.org
; diane@j-
sei.org
Beatriz@bahiainc.com;
JLopez@bahiainc.com
; kym@bananasbunch.org
ni@bananasbunch.org;
bjenkins-league@bayareacs.org;
jbaker@bayareacs.org;
nschwab@optionsrecovery.org
jphillips@optionsrecovery.org;
jhugenberger@biotechopartners.org
lgayden@biotechpartners.org
middeen@icsworks.com;
ppamintuan@lookingglass.org
; mkirshbaum@lookingglass.org;
tlockett@byaonline.org
sloving@byaonline.org
cruiz@byaonline.org;
lhairston@byaonline.org;
danthony@bayareacs.org
gtia@bayareacs.org
; dolson@bayareacs.org
; corinnehaskins@yahoo.com;
cbookhart@rcdhousing.org;
dsawislak@rcdhousing.org
; crystal@supplybank.org
; benito@ktocollege.org
sfriedland@sahahomes.org
cegan@insighthousing.org;
sburmaster@insighthousing.org
; klin@insighthousing.org;
cegan@bfhp.org`;
supreet@streetsteam.org
jim@streetsteam.org;
duffyross@berkeley.net
; blackcollabheration@gmail.com
duffyross@berkeley.net
sherry@berkeleyscholars.org
seena@thebbbp.org
; khanh@cep.ngo
gchau@berkeley.edu;
collegeboundprograms@gmail.com;
drwillis63@gmail.com
; benjamingoff@berkeley.net
Alex@ecologycenter.org;
martin@ecologycenter.org
brsaunders@getontrack.org;
mcrucker@getontrack.org;
lisa@eastbaysanctuary.org
bree@eastbaysanctuary.org
sistermaureen@eastbaysanctuary.org;
owen@eastbaysanctuary.org
via Zoom
Community Action Plan, please click here
6, 2025. Please send your public comment to Mary-Claire Katz at mkatz@berkeleyca.gov
Draft 2026/27 Community Action Plan
Draft 2026/27 Community Needs Assessment (direct link)
low-income representative, please visit the Boards & Commissions webpage
mkatz@berkeleyca.gov
https://berkeleyca.gov/
http://www.cityofberkeley.info/citycouncil
katz@berkeleyca.gov
1
2.
3.
4
5.
6.
7
8
9,
e mile.1
es.2
tes.3
4
t Preferential Housing Policy5
Reparations Task Force6
look
alth.7
.8
tions.9
Climate Action Plan10
d.11
ession.12 F
13 T
xpenses.14
15 in the
17
).16 I
reimagine public safety
18 that includes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
full CHA f
DRAFT_AG_06_17_2026.pdf
05_20_2026_DRAFTMinutes.pdf
BCGC_FY25_PR.pdf
BCGC_FY25_Q4 SOE.pdf
CSD Approved_Final Draft_2026-2027_BCAA_CNA CAP Template.pdf
Final Draft_2026-2027 CNA CAP Template.pdf
Introduction
Purpose
Federal CSBG Programmatic Assurances and Certification
State Assurances and Certification
Compliance with CSBG Organizational Standards
What’s New for 2026/2027?
Checklist
Public Hearing(s)
Part I: Community Needs Assessment Summary
Narrative
Results
Part II: Community Action Plan
Vision and Mission Statements
Causes and Conditions of Poverty
Tripartite Board of Directors
Service Delivery System
Linkages and Funding Coordination
Monitoring
ROMA Application
Federal CSBG Programmatic Assurances
State Assurances
Organizational Standards
Part III: Appendices
Noticing_Outreach_Combined.pdf
Proof of Publication_Public Hearing Notice_Berkeley Voice.pdf
Public Hearing_HWCAC Webpage.pdf
City of Berkeley Public Hearing Public Notice - June 4, 6_30 p.m., City Hall.pdf
FW_ City of Berkeley Public Hearing Public Notice - June 4, 6_30 p.m., City Hall.pdf
Reminder_ City of Berkeley Public Hearing Public Notice - June 4, 6_30 p.m., City Hall.pdf
CSBG Public Hearing_Public Comment Documentation_060425.pdf
Final Draft_2026_2027_Community Needs Assessment.pdf
Data Collection Method
City of Berkeley Demographics
U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, ACS, 2023
Key Findings
Health Inequities in Berkeley
Recommendations
BWB-CHA Accessible.pdf
Structure Bookmarks
Document
Article
Figure
BERKELEY WELLNESS BLUEPRINT
BERKELEY WELLNESS BLUEPRINT
BERKELEY WELLNESS BLUEPRINT
COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY
HEALTH
HEALTH
HEALTH
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This Community Health Assessment is the result of robust input and partnership from all of the individuals below:
This Community Health Assessment is the result of robust input and partnership from all of the individuals below:
This Community Health Assessment is the result of robust input and partnership from all of the individuals below:
Berkeley Health, Housing, and Community Services Department
Berkeley Health, Housing, and Community Services Department
Tanya Bustamante, Interim Deputy Director
Janice Chin, Manager, Public Health Division
Kellie Knox, Future of Public Health Coordinator
Catherine Roseman, Public Health Promotion & Prevention Officer, Community Services Specialist III
Patricia Zialcita, Supervising Epidemiologist
Community Steering Committee
Rosio Almaguer Andrade
Penelope Collins
Michai Freeman
JW Frye
Kaitlyn (Kati) Khov
Isabella Ledezema
Matt Matusiewicz
Israel Nikodimos
Claritza Rios
Michael Rodriguez
JSI Research & Training Institute
Jeremy Cantor
Emma Gier
Deanna Lewis
Corina Pinto
Alison Salomon
Anupam Sharma
Hannah Young
Figure
Figure
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Introduction 1
Introduction 1
Key Findings 5
Key Findings 5
Finding 1:
Finding 1:
There is a lot to be proud of when it comes to wellness in Berkeley
6
Finding 2:
Finding 2:
Diversity is highly valued and racism is deeply rooted
9
Finding 3:
Finding 3:
Health is connected to where people live
13
Finding 4:
Finding 4:
More transparency and collaboration are needed
to increase
trust and effectiveness of health improvement efforts
Finding 5:
Finding 5:
Berkeley is becoming a more difficult place for people to afford to live well
19
Finding 6:
Finding 6:
Connection and safety are essential for supporting mental and physical wellbeing
22
Conclusion 26
Conclusion 26
Appendices 28
Appendices 28
16
16
16
Figure
Figure
Story
Introduction
Introduction
Introduction
Story
body_span_first_paragraph_serif
In 2023, the City of Berkeley Health, Housing and Community Services (HHCS) Department engaged JSI Research and Training Institute (JSI) to lead a Community Health Assessment (CHA) and create a Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP). Together, the CHA and CHIP processes are called the Berkeley Wellness Blueprint (BWB). This CHA document is the culmination of an extensive research process, guided by the community steering committee (CSC). The CSC is a diverse group of individuals who live and/or work in Be
BERKELEY AT A GLANCE
BERKELEY AT A GLANCE
Berkeley is a vibrant city in the heart of the San Francisco Bay Area, known for its progressive politics, social and academic innovation,culture and history. Home to over 121,000 people, Berkeley’s diverse population reflects a multitude of racial and ethnic groups, with nearly half (48%) identifying as non-white. The city is also home to a significant immigrant community: more than one out of every five residents (22%) was born outside of the United States and over 6% of the population has limited English
21.5%
21.5%
21.5%
Immigrant Population
Immigrant Population
121,385
121,385
121,385
Total Population
Total Population
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2018-2022
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2018-2022
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2018-2022
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2018-2022
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2018-2022
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2018-2022
6.4%
6.4%
6.4%
of People ages 5+
of People ages 5+
Limited English Proficiency
Limited English Proficiency
51.8%
51.8%
51.8%
Bachelor’s Degree
Bachelor’s Degree
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2
018-2022
Note: Limited English Proficiency is definied as
Note: Limited English Proficiency is definied as
speaking English less than “very well.”
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2018-2022
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2018-2022
Source: US Census Bureau ACS 5-year 2018-2022
ercent of the Population by Race/Ethnicity
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%
Story
FRAMEWORK
There are a range of factors that shape health,
There are a range of factors that shape health,
safety, and equity in a city like Berkeley. In the
Berkeley Wellness Blueprint, we are thinking about
three groups of factors:
INDIVIDUAL
INDIVIDUAL
:
What does each person
need to be healthy and flourishing?
Examples
: access to affordable
culturally appropriate services, ability
to afford basic needs, opportunities for
connection and belonging.
COMMUNITY:
COMMUNITY:
What are the
characteristics of communities that
support individual health?
Examples:
safe and appealing parks,
enough affordable housing, clean air and
water.
SYSTEMS
SYSTEMS
:
How do systems and policies
support the health of communities and
individuals?
Examples:
How are harmful
products and substances controlled?
How are historic racist housing policies
being addressed? How are resources
distributed throughout the city?
These domains are useful both to understand
These domains are useful both to understand
what is currently happening and to organize
action. For example, if we were trying to increase
physical activity in Berkeley, we might focus on
getting information about exercise classes into
doctor’s offices (individual), cleaning up parks in
areas of the city with low physical activity rates
(community) or providing additional funding to
afterschool sports programs (systems). In many
cases, effective solutions are going to involve
strategies in more than one domain.
PURPOSE AND PROCESS
PURPOSE AND PROCESS
This assessment is one part of a health and wellness improvement process that is intended to be repeated over time (see Figure 1). We decided to use the metaphor of a blueprint because there are parallels to building a physical structure. First, information is gathered and a vision is developed (Assessment); then, specific and workable plans are drawn (Improvement Planning); and finally, work begins (Action). Similar to a building process, new information and challenges will emerge along the way that requir
GOALS OF THE
GOALS OF THE
COMMUNITY HEALTH
ASSESSMENT (CHA)
The goals of this CHA phase are to:
•
•
•
•
Engage community members in deepening shared understanding of the health andwellness status of Berkeley residents;
•
•
•
Gather existing data on health, resiliency, and equity in Berkeley’s communities; and
•
•
•
Have enough information at the end of this phase to make an informed decision on priorities for the CHIP.
Figure
Figure
Figure
FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:
Health and Wellness
Improvement Process
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
Improvement
Improvement
Improvement
Planning
TABLE 1: HEALTH TOPICS
TABLE 1: HEALTH TOPICS
Community Safety
Community Safety
: how often people get hurt or
experience violence and whether everyone feels
safe in all areas of Berkeley
Disparities in Health:
Disparities in Health:
some people have better
or worse health based on their race, ethnicity,
and/or where they live in Berkeley
Drugs and Alcohol Use:
Drugs and Alcohol Use:
use, misuse, and
availability of legal and illegal drugs and alcohol,
and if people can get the help they need
Environmental Health:
Environmental Health:
being safe from things
like pollution and wildfires, having clean air, water,
and land, having access to parks and green spaces,
and dealing with the effects of climate change
Government Responsiveness:
Government Responsiveness:
City follow
through and communication on health projects,
and how much Berkeley residents help make
decisions
Housing:
Housing:
being able to live in a place that is safe,
affordable, and stable
Jobs and Money:
Jobs and Money:
having a steady job that pays
enough for food, childcare, healthcare, school, and
savings
Mental Health
Mental Health
: how common mental health
problems are (like depression, anxiety, and stress),
and if people can get the care they need
Physical Health:
Physical Health:
how often people get sick, hurt,
or have long-term health problems, and if they can
get the care they need
Sense of Belonging:
Sense of Belonging:
feeling included, respected,
and connected
CHA PROCESS
CHA PROCESS
This report comes at the end of a data collection and analysis process that began in fall of 2023. JSI and the CSC, with substantive input from the Berkeley HHCS team, have:
•
•
•
•
Reviewed existing reports related tohealth and wellbeing in Berkeley, suchas the Alameda County Department ofPublic Health health assessment;
•
•
•
Searched databases of healthinformation including the census andnational health interview survey as wellas locally collected data;
•
•
•
Conducted over 15 interviews with localleaders and community members;
•
•
•
Held 4 community focus groups; and
•
•
•
Fielded a community wellness surveycompleted by over 320 communitymembers from across Berkeley.
Span
PRIORITY POPULATIONS, HEALTH TOPICS, & THE COMMUNITY SURVEY
Following an initial data review and first round of key informant interviews (n=16), several priority populations were identified by JSI and the CSC.
Individuals from these priority populations were engaged via focus group discussions (n=4), additional interviews (n=6) and were target audiences for the community wellness survey (n=320). The reports, data review, interviews, and focus groups were analyzed by JSI and the CSC.
From that analysis, ten topics were identified (see right sidebar) that shaped the community-wide health survey. The survey aimed to gather a diverse range of perspectives on these topics. More details on the CHA methods, including the survey development and response, are available in the appendices.
Priority Populations
Priority Populations
An extra emphasis was placed on including
An extra emphasis was placed on including
information and perspectives from these
populations.
•
•
•
•
Black/African American people
Black/African American people
•
•
•
Latine/Latinx/Hispanic people
Latine/Latinx/Hispanic people
•
•
•
LGBTQIA+ people
LGBTQIA+ people
•
•
•
Residents of South and West Berkeley
Residents of South and West Berkeley
•
•
•
Youth
Youth
Figure
Story
Key Findings
Key Findings
Key Findings
FIGURE 2:
FIGURE 2:
FIGURE 2:
CHA Process
Reports & statisticsInterviews & focus groupsCommunity surveyCSCCSC10 Health, Safety, and Equity topicsPriority Populations6 Key Findings
Story
h2_span
body_span_first_paragraph_serif
Span
body_span_first_paragraph_serif
body_span_first_paragraph_serif
body_span_first_paragraph_serif
body_span_first_paragraph_serif
body_span_first_paragraph_serif
KEY FINDINGSAt the conclusion of the community survey, JSI and the CSC systematically reviewed all of the data collected via survey, interviews, focus groups, reports and statistics. Based on that review, a set of 6 key findings emerged. Although not all of the input, data and voices could be included in full detail, this report summarizes the information as best as possible to tell a clear story of the current situation and perspectives in Berkeley regarding health and wellness.Finding 1: There is a lot t
Figure
FINDING 1
FINDING 1
There is a lot to be proud of when
There is a lot to be proud of when
There is a lot to be proud of when
it comes to wellness in Berkeley
it comes to wellness in Berkeley
Berkeley residents consistently highlight three
Berkeley residents consistently highlight three
Berkeley residents consistently highlight three
strengths that contribute to the city’s health and
wellness: its inviting physical environment, the
diversity and character of its people, and the
effectiveness of local community organizations.
Citywide health statistics are generally positive
compared with other geographies. For example,
Berkeley has consistently had a higher life
expectancy than Alameda County and California
(see figure 3).
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
In Berkeley, it’s easy to step outside and find a place to walk, roll, or simply breathe. Home to 59 parks, Berkeley boasts almost 6 parks per square mile. The community sees this as more than convenience—these walkable, wheelable routes bring people closer to nature, reduce stress, and create a more connected environment. The numbers support these general sentiments: Berkeley stands out for its high walkability, scoring 15.9 on the Environmental Protection Agency’s Walkability Index - surpassing the count
1
1
1
2
2
2
callout
Span
Span
Span
“There’s so many pretty places to go. And it’s right on the water. There’s the Berkeley Marina. I have great memories there with my dog and my kids at different stages in our life” -FOCUS GROUP PARTCIPANT
Berkeley is filled with places where people naturally come together. Whether it’s a farmers market, the Ed Roberts Campus, a church, or a senior center, these gathering spots foster a strong sense of belonging. They are spaces where people connect, feel seen, and know they belong.
“Quiero [tratar de] relacionarme con gente, platicar con gente, eso mismo como que te va a ayudar a no hundirte y hay unas tiendas donde puedes encontrar ese ambiente, donde se puede simplemente [conversar].”
Span
-FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANT
Translation: “I want to [try] to relate with
Translation: “I want to [try] to relate with
people, talk to people, that will help to not
further dig into a hole and there are stores
where you can find that environment, where
you can simply [converse].”
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
At the heart of Berkeley’s community are the people who live here. Residents describe themselves and their neighbors as resilient, caring, diverse, and passionate, from people looking out for one another to city leaders’ commitment to the city. Berkeley also has a proud tradition of activism. It was the first city to start municipal recycling, make sidewalks wheelchair accessible, and implement a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Residents engage with issues of justice and equity both historically and today. Th
“The community is really connected [...] even if [...] we don’t know each other, the people from the Todos Santos de Cuchamatán are united. So if one of our community members is hurting or in danger or their family member had an accident and they need support and anything.”
-COMMUNITY INTERVIEW PARTICIPANT
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS
Community organizations–such as the Multicultural Institute, Center for Independent Living, and Healthy Black Families–bring a feeling of connectedness and support the Berkeley community to feel healthy, well, seen and understood. They are powerful resources, providing essential support, services, and advocacy. In many ways, community residents see these organizations as the backbone of Berkeley’s health and wellness, working to meet the diverse needs of the community and foster a sense of belonging for all
“I was going to the food pantries. I have 3 kids and it’s all different types of people and the volunteers that work there are so kind they never make you feel less than, are always smiling, and they really love what they do.”
-FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANT
FIGURE 3:
FIGURE 3:
FIGURE 3:
Life Expectancy at Birth
Age in YearsLife Expectancy at Birth in Berkeley, Alameda County and CaliforniaSource: California Department of Public Health, California Community Burden of Diseaseand Cost Engine *Estimates are for Alameda County excluding BerkeleyAlameda County*BerkeleyCalifornia7476788082848620102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Figure
Figure
Figure
FINDING 2
FINDING 2
Diversity is highly valued
Diversity is highly valued
Diversity is highly valued
and racism is deeply rooted
and racism is deeply rooted
Berkeley has a reputation as a diverse and welcoming city, not afraid to be at the vanguard of social and cultural movements. This diversity is a source of pride and a significant strength to the community. Activists and leaders in Berkeley continue to work on a range of issues through many initiatives. However, as in other places, issues related to demographics and identity are complicated and reflect historical and structural factors that are difficult to address. The data on disparities in health make bo
Berkeley has a reputation as a diverse and welcoming city, not afraid to be at the vanguard of social and cultural movements. This diversity is a source of pride and a significant strength to the community. Activists and leaders in Berkeley continue to work on a range of issues through many initiatives. However, as in other places, issues related to demographics and identity are complicated and reflect historical and structural factors that are difficult to address. The data on disparities in health make bo
h2_pink
Span
body
DISPARITIES ACROSS RACIAL GROUPSAcross nearly every indicator of health and wellbeing collected for Berkeley there are significant differences for racial and ethnic groups. For the most comprehensive health indicator, life expectancy at birth, African Americans have consistently been projected to live 9 fewer years than the overall city average. It is also estimated that the life expectancy among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders (NH/PI) is significantly lower than
DISPARITIES ACROSS RACIAL GROUPSAcross nearly every indicator of health and wellbeing collected for Berkeley there are significant differences for racial and ethnic groups. For the most comprehensive health indicator, life expectancy at birth, African Americans have consistently been projected to live 9 fewer years than the overall city average. It is also estimated that the life expectancy among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders (NH/PI) is significantly lower than
DISPARITIES ACROSS RACIAL GROUPSAcross nearly every indicator of health and wellbeing collected for Berkeley there are significant differences for racial and ethnic groups. For the most comprehensive health indicator, life expectancy at birth, African Americans have consistently been projected to live 9 fewer years than the overall city average. It is also estimated that the life expectancy among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders (NH/PI) is significantly lower than
Health disparities are the result of decisions, practices, and policies enacted over time that provide unjust advantages to some based on race and ethnicity, geography, and/or socioeconomic status. Any data point that highlights differences by race should be taken as a measure of the effects of racism. This type of systematic racism is evident across all sectors including housing, education, employment, and law enforcement. For example, numerous housing policies in Berkeley restricted non-white residents to
4
4
4
Preferential Housing Policy
Preferential Housing Policy
5
5
5
Reparations Task Force
Reparations Task Force
6
6
6
callout_pink
Span
“There’s a lot of redlining in [Berkeley]...I think historically, if we have a community that has been here long enough to remember the train tracks and they talk about not crossing the train tracks, that is generational...it’s historical trauma that they experienced.” -FOCUS GROUP PARTCIPANT
Story
callout_pink
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
“I love Berkeley because of the diversity…I just appreciate how open Berkeley is. Ideas and different types of people.” -FOCUS GROUP PARTCIPANT
FIGURE 4:
FIGURE 4:
FIGURE 4:
Life Expectancy at Birth in Berkeley
Figure
Age in YearsLife Expectancy at Birth by Race/Ethnicity in BerkeleySource: City of Berkeley Public Health Officer Unit, Epidemiology & Vital Statistics, US Census Bureau *Due to small population sizes, life expectancy estimates presented for American Indian/Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander are based on data for the entire State of California.WhiteHispanic/Latine/xAmerican Indian/Alaska Native*All Race/EthnicitiesAfrican AmericanAsianNative Hawaiian/Pacific Islander*6080100201020112012201320
FIGURE 5:
FIGURE 5:
FIGURE 5:
Historical Redlining Grades
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Redlining, a practice sanctioned by the federal government from the 1930s until the late 1960s, systematically denied access to mortgages, not only to individuals but to entire neighborhoods, based on their racial and ethnic composition. The above map of the City of Berkeley shows how neighborhoods were rated for mortgage lending using this practice. Red areas were labeled “hazardous” and deemed the riskiest for lending. Yellow areas were considered “declining” with elevated risk. Blue areas were marked as
Redlining, a practice sanctioned by the federal government from the 1930s until the late 1960s, systematically denied access to mortgages, not only to individuals but to entire neighborhoods, based on their racial and ethnic composition. The above map of the City of Berkeley shows how neighborhoods were rated for mortgage lending using this practice. Red areas were labeled “hazardous” and deemed the riskiest for lending. Yellow areas were considered “declining” with elevated risk. Blue areas were marked as
DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES
DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES
Based on survey data and input from focus groups and interviews, it is clear that members of identified priority populations view their own health and the health of their communities differently from other Berkeley residents. For example, of the ten health topics (See Table 1), mental health ranked as the second highest priority for African American survey respondents, but it did not make the top three in the overall survey results. Similarly, drugs and alcohol use ranked among the top three priorities for
“As a person of color and minority, I have experienced or know others who have experienced worse living conditions or limitations in access to health and resources because of socioeconomic factors in which race plays an important role, historically speaking.”
COMMUNITY SURVEY RESPONDENT
Differences are also reflected in responses to other community survey questions. For instance, 20% fewer youth agreed with the statement “Berkeley residents have access to resources necessary to be healthy” compared to the overall survey results. Similarly, nearly 40% fewer African Americans agreed with the statement, “Overall, I’m satisfied with my quality of life [health, comfort, happiness] in Berkeley.”
FIGURE 6:
FIGURE 6:
FIGURE 6:
Community Survey Responses by Population
Figure
Figure
FINDING 3
FINDING 3
Health is connected to
Health is connected to
Health is connected to
where people live
where people live
where people live
Berkeley has neighborhoods with distinctive geographic, architectural, and cultural features that elicit strong feelings of connection from residents. However, some neighborhoods in the city face greater health challenges than others. South and West Berkeley residents, in particular, experience worse health outcomes and face more environmental hazards compared to those in the North and East, underscoring the importance of addressing geographic inequities to improve community health.
Berkeley has neighborhoods with distinctive geographic, architectural, and cultural features that elicit strong feelings of connection from residents. However, some neighborhoods in the city face greater health challenges than others. South and West Berkeley residents, in particular, experience worse health outcomes and face more environmental hazards compared to those in the North and East, underscoring the importance of addressing geographic inequities to improve community health.
7
7
7
LIFE EXPECTANCY
The average Berkeley resident can expect to live to age 86 (see Figure 4), an impressive number that reflects the city’s overall health. However, this longevity is not evenly distributed. Residents in the Berkeley Hills, where resources are more abundant, have the highest life expectancy in the city, with one census tract averaging 91 years. In contrast, residents in South and West Berkeley face significantly shorter life expectancies; one tract averages just 78 years – a striking 13-year gap (see Figure 7)
“I live in a part of the city that sometimes feels as if it is not as well-resourced as other parts of the city, and I’d like to see a more equitable distribution of resources”.
- COMMUNITY SURVEY RESPONDENT
FIGURE 7:
FIGURE 7:
FIGURE 7:
Life Expectancy at Birth by Census Tract
Figure
Story
NormalParagraphStyle
Span
Span
NormalParagraphStyle
Span
Source: City of Berkeley Public Health Officer Unit, Epidemiology & Vital Statistics, US Census Bureau 5-year estimate 2019-2023Note: Life expectancy for the census tract where the University of California, Berkeley campus is located is omitted because a very small number of people actually live in this census tract.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK
Berkeley faces significant environmental risks, which are unevenly distributed across the city and exacerbated by climate change. Areas in West and Southwest Berkeley are disproportionately burdened by pollution, including diesel exhaust from vehicles, toxic emissions from facilities, and hazardous chemicals from cleanup sites (see Figure 8). These areas experience higher rates of asthma-related hospitalizations compared to the rest of the city. Meanwhile, in the eastern, wealthier neighborhoods, residents
8
8
8
9
9
9
“Climate change is the number one collective issue impacting all of us. Low-income communities of color are disproportionately impacted and need support to be safe during these precarious times.”
- COMMUNITY SURVEY RESPONDENT
In addition to these localized hazards, Berkeley as a whole is increasingly affected by worsening air quality. Climate change has led to more frequent and severe wildfire seasons in California, causing spikes in particulate matter and “bad air days” that pose serious health risks for everyone, particularly children, the elderly, and those with pre-existing respiratory conditions. However, as highlighted throughout this report, some communities face greater risk due to social vulnerability, leaving them less
FIGURE 8:
FIGURE 8:
FIGURE 8:
Environmental Hazard Vulnerability Percentile by Census Tract
Figure
Source: California Office of Environmental Health Hazard, CalEnvironScreen 4.0 2021
Source: California Office of Environmental Health Hazard, CalEnvironScreen 4.0 2021
Source: California Office of Environmental Health Hazard, CalEnvironScreen 4.0 2021
Note: The CalEnvironScreen 4.0 percentile for the census tract where the University of California, Berkeley
Note: The CalEnvironScreen 4.0 percentile for the census tract where the University of California, Berkeley
campus is located is omitted because there is a very small number of poeple that actually live in this
census tract
FIGURE 9:
FIGURE 9:
FIGURE 9:
Integrated Fire Hazard by Berkeley Fire Zones
Story
In the community survey, the environmental health topic emerged among the top three for both the general population and for many of the priority populations. It was ranked as the third most important topic area for South and West Berkeley residents and the Hispanic/ Latine/ Latinx community, and it emerged as the second most important topic for LGBTQIA+ and Youth respondents (See figure 6). Community survey respondents also highlighted climate change as a key area of concern and a desire for more efforts li
Link
Span
Reference
Link
Span
“If you die in a ﬁre or have your health ruined from breathing polluted air, the question of how much you enjoy living here becomes no longer relevant.” -
COMMUNITY SURVEY RESPONDENT
Figure
Integrated Fire Hazard
Integrated Fire Hazard
Integrated Fire Hazard
Lowest Value Highest Value
Lowest Value Highest Value
Source: City of Berkeley’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Community Base Map, last updated 2023
Source: City of Berkeley’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Community Base Map, last updated 2023
Source: City of Berkeley’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Community Base Map, last updated 2023
NormalParagraphStyle
Span
Note: The percentile for the census tract where the University of California, Berkeley campus is located is omitted because there is a very small number of poeple that actually live in this census tract
Figure
FINDING 4
FINDING 4
More transparency and collaboration are
More transparency and collaboration are
More transparency and collaboration are
needed to increase trust and effectiveness
needed to increase trust and effectiveness
of health improvement efforts
of health improvement efforts
Figure
Berkeley is known for a very active and participatory political culture. Robust debates and campaigns are not uncommon on a range of topics. There are more than 30 boards and commissions to guide aspects of public decision making. Berkeley is also one of only three cities in California to have a Public Health Department, along with Long Beach and Pasadena. This is intended to allow for more responsiveness to community needs. However, there are substantive concerns about capacity and follow-through when it c
Berkeley is known for a very active and participatory political culture. Robust debates and campaigns are not uncommon on a range of topics. There are more than 30 boards and commissions to guide aspects of public decision making. Berkeley is also one of only three cities in California to have a Public Health Department, along with Long Beach and Pasadena. This is intended to allow for more responsiveness to community needs. However, there are substantive concerns about capacity and follow-through when it c
“Even though Berkeley has some incredibly difﬁcult bureaucracies to deal with… when you can make contact with an individual, you feel seen and heard and cared for, which is not what I’ve experienced in other cities in California”
- COMMUNITY INTERVIEW PARTCIPANT
CAPACITY
CAPACITY
Most sentiments about city employees were positive, though there was a consistent thread about agencies and departments being understaffed, over-stretched, and operating in limited siloes. Community members referenced limited capacity and lack of collaboration specifically around mental health, a topic where residents see a lot of complexity and barriers to service. Barriers mentioned included limited coverage, the need for different providers depending on condition and severity, and lack of integration wit
“If Multicultural Institute wasn’t here. If Berkeley Food Network wasn’t here offering the food to folks. If Lifelong wasn’t offering those services, who would be offering the services? Would the city have the capacity and the ability to offer services the way that our community organizations are able to offer it in a more appropriate way…the answer right now I think is no, right?
- COMMUNITY INTERVIEW PARTICIPANT
Berkeley has diverse and strong Community Based Organizations (CBOs) that are deeply connected to communities. However, systems can be difficult to navigate for both clients and staff at these CBOs. Referrals across organizations of care require multiple steps and often organizations cannot share data with one another. Increased coordination with each other and the City would further their impact and efficiency. However, funding for developing and improving operations and collaboration is hard to come by.
PROCESS ACCOUNTABILITY
There are many planning and assessment processes underway at any moment in Berkeley. While seeking community input is an important step and intention, relationships are undermined when a process ends with simply identifying problems. Community members can feel frustrated and lose trust when they are not included in sharing power to design solutions or when there is little follow-up or communication about progress.
h2_orange
PANDEMIC EFFECTS The COVID-19 pandemic caused, or exacerbated, a wave of health, mental health, and social challenges that extended far beyond the direct deaths and illnesses it caused.11 As one survey respondent put it, “Understand that all of us have PTSD from the pandemic.” Young people in particular are experiencing significantly higher rates of anxiety and depression.12 For many, connections to neighbors and friends became a matter of life-or-death, especially for the most vulnerable, such as older adu
Reference
Link
Span
Reference
Link
Span
Story
“A lot of requests are for the
“A lot of requests are for the
community to tell us your
story and then in return,
they feel like they don’t
get anything so…there’s a
feeling of hopelessness. If
you’re gonna promise people
things, at the very baseline
deliver on that promise.”
- COMMUNITY INTERVIEW PARTICIPANT
Figure
Figure
FINDING 5
FINDING 5
Berkeley is becoming a more difficult
Berkeley is becoming a more difficult
Berkeley is becoming a more difficult
place for people to afford to live well
place for people to afford to live well
Berkeley residents feel strongly about their community and want their families to have the option to stay in the city. However, the high cost of living, particularly housing, has created a lot of stress, displacing long-time residents and forcing individuals and families to make difficult economic decisions. These decisions–like whether to prioritize spending on housing, utilities, food, or medicine–have profound impacts on health and wellbeing.
Berkeley residents feel strongly about their community and want their families to have the option to stay in the city. However, the high cost of living, particularly housing, has created a lot of stress, displacing long-time residents and forcing individuals and families to make difficult economic decisions. These decisions–like whether to prioritize spending on housing, utilities, food, or medicine–have profound impacts on health and wellbeing.
FIGURE 10: P
FIGURE 10: P
FIGURE 10: P
ercent of Homeowners by Race/Ethnicity in Berkeley
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY AND DISPLACEMENT
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY AND DISPLACEMENT
The rise in housing costs has significantly impacted Berkeley residents, forcing some to live in overcrowded conditions, move to other communities, or become unhoused. Displacement due to unaffordable housing can have serious health and social consequences, such as living in homes with health hazards, losing access to essential services, and becoming disconnected from communities of belonging.
Importantly, rising housing costs have not affected all groups equally (see Figure 11). White residents, for example, are much more likely to own homes than other racial and ethnic groups (see Figure 10). This inequity is particularly felt by Berkeley’s African American population, which has declined by more than 50% over the past 50 years. Today, African Americans make up just 7.5% of the city’s population but account for over 40% of its unhoused residents. For African American residents who are housed, ma
13
13
13
UC Berkeley students, who account for a large share of the city’s renters, also face challenges, with 10% of undergraduate and graduate students reporting being unhoused due to the high cost of living and education expenses.
14
14
14
“There have been several people that I’ve met who are living in a car or staying with friends living on a couch, and if you don’t have secure housing and food, you can’t have good mental health. You can’t have good health. You’re stymied from the beginning.”
FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANT
body
Span
Individuals who do not have stable housing have much worse physical and mental health outcomes and also affect the overall health of the city by overtaxing systems and services. While the city recently reported significant improvements in the number of unhoused individuals, the reality for those lacking shelter remains grave. Housing emerged as the top issue for both the overall survey respondent pool and for all five priority populations.
15
15
15
“Berkeley has so much afﬂuence, but resources are not equitably distributed. I have seen many families of color leave my area in South Berkeley because the rent became too high to afford. Better public services and more affordable housing could allow people to stay in Berkeley.”
- COMMUNITY SURVEY RESPONDENT
h2_darker_blue
INCOME INEQUALITYMedian household income, a key measure of economic stability that is highly correlated with home ownership, is just under $105,000 for the city overall; well above the median for the state ($92,000) and the nation ($75,000). However, this overall number masks significant disparities: when disaggregated by race and ethnicity, we see the median household income for African American households is $52,000, not even half that of the citywide median (see Figure 12).
callout
Span
“We’re going on strike because we’re not getting paid salaries that are livable anymore. A lot of teachers are on strike as well because the wages aren’t affordable. No one could afford to live in Berkeley anymore. It’s a reality, right?” -FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANT
The median for Hispanic/Latine/Latinx households ($67,000) is also much lower than the average. Much like life expectancy, median household income in Berkeley varies significantly by geography. Census tracts in the Berkeley Hills report the highest median household income levels (more than $200,000) while census tracts in South Berkeley and West Berkeley report the lowest levels (less than $100,000). In the community survey, the topic of jobs and money was near the bottom for the overall population, but it
Span
16
16
16
There is a deep emotional component that underlies these statistics. The influx of white and affluent residents, that many describe as gentrification, threatens the character and long-standing narrative of Berkeley as home to an economically thriving Black and Brown community at the forefront of social movements.17 Although the toll of displacement is hard to measure, there is not only a need to prevent displacement but to remember the stories of the communities that shaped Berkeley into the place that so m
Reference
Link
Span
Figure
Percent of Homeowners by Race/Ethnicity in BerkeleySource: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey Data, 5-year estimates 2018-202253%53%53%34.2%34.2%34.2%31.2%31.2%31.2%23.3%23.3%23.3%20.6%20.6%20.6%14.3%14.3%14.3%WhiteAfrican AmericanAsianHispanic/Latine/xAmerican Indian/Alaska NativeNative Hawaiian/Pacific Islander0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%
Percent of Homeowners by Race/Ethnicity in BerkeleySource: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey Data, 5-year estimates 2018-202253%53%53%34.2%34.2%34.2%31.2%31.2%31.2%23.3%23.3%23.3%20.6%20.6%20.6%14.3%14.3%14.3%WhiteAfrican AmericanAsianHispanic/Latine/xAmerican Indian/Alaska NativeNative Hawaiian/Pacific Islander0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%
FIGURE 11:
FIGURE 11:
FIGURE 11:
FIGURE 11:
FIGURE 11:
Percent of Berkeley Households Paying More Than 30% of Their Income for Rent
by Race/Ethnicity
Percent of Households Paying More Than 30% of Their Income for Rent byRace/Ethnicity in BerkeleySources: US Department of Housing and Development, Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Data 2017-2021 *Due to the small number of households that identify as Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, the percent shown for this race are based on data for the entire state of California.60.8%60.8%60.8%59.3%59.3%59.3%53.8%53.8%53.8%47.5%47.5%47.5%45%45%45%35.3%35.3%35.3%African AmericanHispanic/Latine/xAsianNative H
Figure
FIGURE 12:
FIGURE 12:
FIGURE 12:
Median Income of Berkeley Households by Race/Ethnicity
Figure
Median Income by Race/Ethnicity of Householder in BerkeleySource: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey Data, 5-year estimates 2018-2022 *Due to the small number of households that identify as Native Hawaiian/PacificIslander, the percent shown for this race are based on data for the entire state ofCalifornia.$138,398$138,398$138,398$95,021$95,021$95,021$81,250$81,250$81,250$80,386$80,386$80,386$79,596$79,596$79,596$66,916$66,916$66,916$62,541$62,541$62,541$52,125$52,125$52,125WhiteNative Hawaiian/Paci
Figure
FINDING 6
FINDING 6
Connection and safety are essential for
Connection and safety are essential for
Connection and safety are essential for
supporting mental and physical wellbeing
supporting mental and physical wellbeing
Community safety ranked just behind housing in the community survey. Notably, the two highest-ranking topics are not directly related to health or within the jurisdiction of public health agencies. This suggests that members of the Berkeley community are thinking broadly about what determines health and how to achieve wellness. The responses to the survey and discussions in our focus groups and interviews about safety reflected a focus on reducing crime but also on reducing stress and creating spaces where
Community safety ranked just behind housing in the community survey. Notably, the two highest-ranking topics are not directly related to health or within the jurisdiction of public health agencies. This suggests that members of the Berkeley community are thinking broadly about what determines health and how to achieve wellness. The responses to the survey and discussions in our focus groups and interviews about safety reflected a focus on reducing crime but also on reducing stress and creating spaces where
Link
Span
Reference
Link
Span
Annot
h2
MENTAL HEALTH AND CONNECTEDNESSMental Health emerged as a significant concern, ranking as the fourth highest priority in the overall survey and the second-highest priority among African American respondents. Many participants correlated their mental health with feelings of safety and community connectedness and belonging. In addition, responses reflected a desire for responses that address a range of mental health issues from anxiety and loneliness to serious and persistent illness as well as the need for m
“When folks feel like they are part of a community, they’re happier, they feel more included. They feel overall better.”
COMMUNITY INTERVIEW PARTICIPANT
“[I prioritized Community
“[I prioritized Community
“[I prioritized Community
Safety because] I think it can
be an indicator of community
wellness. No, I do not think
we need more police, nor do I
think they need more funding.
But I would love to see more
funding for social services,
including providing housing
security for our unhoused
residents.”
Span
- COMMUNITY SURVEY PARTCIPANT
FIGURE 13:
FIGURE 13:
FIGURE 13:
FIGURE 13:
Percent of Residents 18 Years Old+ that Needed Help for Mental Health Problems
Percent of the population over 18 yearsPercent of Residents 18 Years and Older that Needed Help for MentalHealth Problems in Berkeley, Alameda County and CaliforniaSource: University of California, Los Angeles, California Health Interview Survey,Neighborhood EditionBerkeleyAlameda CountyCalifornia15%20%25%30%35%40%2013-20142015-20162017-20182019-20202012-2022
FIGURE 14:
FIGURE 14:
FIGURE 14:
FIGURE 14:
Rate of Mental Health Related Hospitalization Among Residents 18 Years old+
by Race/Ethnicity in Berkeley
Hospitalization Rate per 100,000Rate of Mental Health Related Hospitalization Among Residents 18 Yearsand Older by Race/Ethnicity in BerkeleySource: California Department of Health Care Access and Information, HospitalizationData 2020-2022, Esri Demographics 2020-2022 *Due to the small number ofhospitalizations among residents 18 and older that that identify as NativeHawaiian/Pacific Islander, the percent shown for this race are based on data for theentire state of California.16,43916,43916,43914,32314,3231
Source: California Department of Health Care Access and Information, Hospitalization Data 2020-2022,
Source: California Department of Health Care Access and Information, Hospitalization Data 2020-2022,
Source: California Department of Health Care Access and Information, Hospitalization Data 2020-2022,
Span
Esri Demographics 2020-2022
Note: Due to the small number of hospitalizations among residents 18 and older that that identify as Native Hawaiian/
Note: Due to the small number of hospitalizations among residents 18 and older that that identify as Native Hawaiian/
Pacific Islander, the percent shown for this race are based on data for the entire state of California.
Story
h2
LGBTQIA+ SAFETYParticipants shared particular concerns about the health and safety of the LGBTQIA+ community, especially the mental health and personal safety of LGBTQIA+ youth. Young people who identify as LGBTQIA+ experience higher rates of attempted suicide, depression and anxiety. There are very few programs that provide mental health services to this demographic. Existing services may also not be set up to meet the specific needs of LGBTQIA+ people. For example, individuals who identify as nonbinary a
callout
Span
“[LGBTQIA youth have] over 120% higher chance of being unhoused than non-queer youth. Youth may feel the need to do survival sex work...LGBTQIA youth are at risk, they are a population that is not prioritized in funding…I want to see LGBTQIA youth prioritized as a population.” -COMMUNITY INTERVIEW PARTICIPANT
Figure
DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES ON SAFETY STRATEGIES
DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES ON SAFETY STRATEGIES
There are a range of ideas about how to improve safety in Berkeley including support for expanded resources for the Berkeley Police Department, a focus on community connected law enforcement, diversion of police resources into alternative response models, a focus on improving traffic safety, and a recognition that safety is connected to a number of other issues, like housing, economic security, and belonging. As noted above, many participants in this assessment discussed safety in terms of both physical and
“… when we actually center connection and belonging as a public health matter, we can see that the community starts healing itself.”
- COMMUNITY INTERVIEW PARTICIPANT
FIGURE 15:
FIGURE 15:
FIGURE 15:
Rate of Violent Crimes
Rate per 100,000Rate of Violent Crimes in Berkeley and Alameda CountySource: State of California Department of Justice, OpenJustice Data Portal, EsriDemographics 2005-2022 *Estimates are for Alameda County excluding BerkeleyAlameda County*Berkeley050010001500200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
FIGURE 16:
FIGURE 16:
FIGURE 16:
Rate of Non-violent Crimes
Rate per 100,000Rate of non-violent crimes in Berkeley and Alameda CountySource: State of California Department of Justice, OpenJustice Data Portal, EsriDemographics 2005-2022 *Estimates are for Alameda County excluding BerkeleyAlameda County*Berkeley05k10k15k20k25k200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Figure
Story
Conclusion
Conclusion
Conclusion
Berkeley is considered a great place to live, start a family, and grow old. Its physical and social environments make it a unique small city. However, there is still work to do to ensure that Berkeley is a place where all people thrive. The priority populations that were identified during the CHA process deserve particular focus and investment in order to advance and achieve health equity.
Berkeley is considered a great place to live, start a family, and grow old. Its physical and social environments make it a unique small city. However, there is still work to do to ensure that Berkeley is a place where all people thrive. The priority populations that were identified during the CHA process deserve particular focus and investment in order to advance and achieve health equity.
Participants in the CHA process expressed desire that the city of Berkeley provide sustainable investments to improve services, center community voice in non-extractive ways, encourage collaboration across community organizations, and work to change harmful systems.
Although the challenges are significant, with commitment and thoughtful allocation of resources, the Berkeley community can improve the ability of all residents–regardless of factors such as neighborhood, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation and gender identity– to live healthy, fulfilling lives.
Endnotes
Endnotes
body
Note
Link
1 National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA): Parks by Census Tract, United States, 2018 https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/117921/
version/V1/view
body
Note
Link
2 “National Walkability Index.” 2021. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://epa.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.
html?useExisting=1.
NormalParagraphStyle
Note
Link
3
California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI), Patient Discharge Data 2020-2022 (for hospitalization rates), and the California De
partment of Public Health, California Comprehensive Death File (2020-22) (for death rates and YPLL).
body
Note
Link
4 Boyd, Rhea W., Edwin G. Lindo, Lachelle D. Weeks, and Monica R. McLemore. 2020. “On Racism: A New Standard For Publishing On Racial Health
Inequities.” Health Affairs. https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/racism-new-standard-publishing-racial-health-inequities.
body
Note
Link
5 Arreguín, Jesse. 2023. “Berkeley Council Adopts Housing Preference Policy as Redress for Redlining & BART Construction.” Mayor Jesse Arreguín.
https://www.jessearreguin.com/press-releases/2023/7/24/berkeley-council-adopts-housing-preference-policy-as-redress-for-redlining-amp-bart-
construction.
body
Note
Link
6 BUSD Reparations Task Force. 2024. “Reparations Task Force.” Berkeley Public Schools. https://www.berkeleyschools.net/reparations-task-force/.
NormalParagraphStyle
Note
Link
7 California Office of Environmental Health Hazard, CalEnvironScreen 4.0, 2021 release
NormalParagraphStyle
Note
Link
8 California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) , Patient Discharge Data 2020-2022
body
Note
Link
9 City of Berkeley, Fire Zones Map, https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/Berkeley-Fire-Zone-Map.pdf
body
Note
Link
10
Klein, Jordan. 2022. “Climate Action Plan and Resilience Update”. City Council Report. https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/2022-11-29%20Item%2016%20Climate%20Action%20Plan.pdf
body
Note
Link
11
Hosseinzadeh P, Zareipour M, Baljani E, Moradali MR. Social Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Systematic Review. Invest Educ Enferm. 2022
Mar;40(1):e10. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v40n1e10.
body
Note
Link
12
California Health and Human Services Agency, Youth at the Center: Calls-to-action for a reimagined behavioral health ecosystem from children, youth,
and families across California. https://www.chhs.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/CYBHI-Youth-at-the-Center-Report.FINAL_.pdf
body
Note
Link
https://dailycal-projects.netlify.app/2022-01-21-exodus
https://dailycal-projects.netlify.app/2022-01-21-exodus
13
Fozi C, Roseborough V, Lin A. Black exodus from Berkeley. Daily Cal Projects, February 2022.
body
Note
Link
14
UC Office of Planning and Analysis, Housing Survey Findings, https://housing.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/HousingSurvey_03022018.pdf.
body
Note
Link
15
Yelimeli, Supriya. 2024. “Homeless count shows 45% drop in unsheltered people in Berkeley.” Berkeleyside. https://www.berkeleyside.org/2024/05/15/
homeless-count-shows-45-drop-in-unsheltered-people-in-berkeley
body
Note
Link
16
ACS 2018-2022 5 year estimates.
body
Note
Link
17
Truly CA. “Welcome to the Neighborhood”. 2018. PBS. https://www.pbs.org/video/welcome-to-the-neighborhood-truly-ca-zag6fb/
body
Note
Link
18
City Manager’s Office. 2024. “Reimagining Public Safety”. City of Berkeley. https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Reimagining%20
Public%20Safety%20Fall%202024%20Update.pdf
APPENDICES
APPENDICES
Appendix A:
Appendix A:
Berkeley Health Profile
Appendix B:
Appendix B:
Methodology
Appendix C:
Appendix C:
Community Steering Committee Members and Bios
Appendix D:
Appendix D:
Participating Organizations
Appendix E:
Appendix E:
Principles
Appendix F:
Appendix F:
Qualitative Data Findings
Appendix G:
Appendix G:
Survey Findings
APPENDIX A: BERKELEY HEALTH PROFILE
APPENDIX A: BERKELEY HEALTH PROFILE
This section includes a selection of data points relevant for understanding the landscape of wellness in Berkeley.
This section includes a selection of data points relevant for understanding the landscape of wellness in Berkeley.
Figure
Demographics
Demographics
The population of the City
The population of the City
of Berkeley continues to
grow. Close to half (48%)
of Berkeley’s population
identifies as a race other than
white.
1
Approximately one-
third of Berkeley’s overall
population are students and
staff associated with the
world-renowned University
of California, Berkeley.
2
Over
20% of the population are
immigrants that speak a
number of different languages
(Spanish, Indo-European
languages, languages from Asia
and the Pacific Islands, etc.).
The population is clustered
by race/ethnicity and
socioeconomic status across
the city map.
Figure
Figure
Figure
1
1
1
US Census Bureau, American Community
Survey Data, 5-year estimates 2018-2022
Survey Data, 5-year estimates 2018-2022
2
2
University of California, Berkeley, Office of
Planning and Analysis Quick Facts 2024; US
Planning and Analysis Quick Facts 2024; US
Census Bureau, American Community Survey
Data, 5-year estimates 2018-2022
Figure
Behaviors
Behaviors
Differences in socioeconomic
Differences in socioeconomic
status and other social
determinants of health affect
the health behaviors of people.
People with less resources
have been found to be more
likely to smoke tobacco,
be less physically active,
and are less likely to attend
routine, preventative medical
check-ups than people with
more resources. In Berkeley,
disparities in socioeconomic
status are across different
races and ethnicities, which
correlate to the disparities
seen geographically.
Figure
Figure
Story
body_span_first_paragraph_serif
body_span_first_paragraph_serif
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Span
Health OutcomesDisparities in resources and health behaviors result in impacts on health outcomes. More adults in West and South Berkeley report fair or poor general health than in other parts of the city. Rates of asthma are higher in West, Central and South Berkeley. Death rates from all types of cancer are different among the different racial and ethnic groups in Berkeley, with African Americans experiencing the highest mortality rates from cancer. Overall, African Americans suffer a disproportionate num
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
APPENDIX B: METHODOLOGY
APPENDIX B: METHODOLOGY
Formation of the Community Steering Committee
To ensure that the Berkeley Wellness Blueprint is a community-driven process, the JSI team assembled a community steering committee (CSC). CSC members are expected to:
•
•
•
•
Attend regular meetings for the duration of the project
•
•
•
Provide feedback on the design of the CHA and CHIP process
•
•
•
Review materials that will be distributed to the community
•
•
•
Support in prioritizing action items for the CHIP
•
•
•
Help to identify and connect with community members and organizationsto participate in interviews and focus groups
•
•
•
Help develop data collection tools such as the questions that are askedduring an interview or focus group
•
•
•
Lead or co-lead community engagement activities, such as focus groups orcommunity listening sessions
Recruitment
An open application was used to recruit CSC members, with flyers distributed both electronically and in public spaces throughout Berkeley (e.g., libraries, community organizations, parks, grocery stores). Over 60 applications were submitted. The eight members were selected based on several criteria: residency or employment in Berkeley; a demonstrated interest in Berkeley’s health and wellness; experience with accessing, providing, or advocating for improved services or policies; diverse identities and backg
Acknowledging that each member would be making a significant time commitment, a stipend was given to either the individual or to the community-based organization they represent. Due to resource limitations, the CSC was only eligible to individuals who are comfortable communicating in English.
Qualitative Data Collection Plan
Through a codesign process with the CSC, four guiding questions emerged:
1.
1.
1.
1.
In what spaces do you feel cared for, seen, and loved?
2.
2.
2.
How does lived experience and identity affect the way individuals interactand feel connected with(in) the Berkeley community?
3.
3.
3.
What are the assets and challenges in the Berkeley community that affecthealth and wellness? And how can assets be used differently to addresschallenges?
4.
4.
4.
What initiatives (existing or not) would help in achieving a vision ofwellness for all Berkeley residents?
These guiding questions shaped engagement methods used for CHA, as well as questions to be asked during interviews and focus groups, and the analysis plan for the data collected.
Identifying Priority Populations
While it would have been ideal to engage with every group represented in Berkeley, this was not feasible. As a result, it became necessary to prioritize populations for the Community Health Assessment (CHA) data collection. CSC members, drawing on information from the landscape scan as well as their knowledge and experiences in Berkeley, were asked to:
•
•
•
•
Define priority groups for CHA data collection
•
•
•
Provide insights into the best ways to engage with each priority population
•
•
•
Identify key locations and spaces for connecting with these groups
•
•
•
Determine how to engage in a respectful, culturally relevant manner thatfostered trust and avoided an extractive approach
Through this process, several priority populations were identified as disproportionately affected by health inequities in Berkeley. These included asylum seekers, immigrants, refugees, the Black community in South and West Berkeley, the Latinx/Latine community in South and West Berkeley, and the LGBTQIA+ community. These perspectives were crucial to center in the CHA data collection, as they were likely to be most impacted by the recommendations emerging from the Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP). In
Priority Populations
•
•
•
•
Black/African Americans
•
•
•
Latine/Latinx/ Hispanics
•
•
•
LGBTQIA+
•
•
•
Youth
•
•
•
Residents in South and West Berkeley
We spoke to members of these communities along with staff fromorganizations who directly work with these groups.
Recruitment of CHA Interviewees and Focus Group Participants
After prioritization, the CSC and JSI team began recruiting individuals and organizations who either represented the priority populations or who worked closely with the priority groups. Existing relationships were crucial in recruitment. We conducted five individual interviews, 2 group interviews, and three focus groups.
Interviews were completed with community and nonprofit leaders as well as direct service providers. The three focus groups engaged priority populations and were completed in collaboration with nonprofit organizations based in Berkeley who have established relationships with and trust among community members. The focus groups took place with 1)the Pacific Center for Human Growth, the oldest LGBTQIA+ center inthe Bay Area whose mission is to enhance the mental health and overallwell-being of the LGBTQIA+ and
All focus group participants were given a $50 gift card for their participation in the discussion and for filling out a demographic questionnaire. Organizations were provided with a $200 gift card for their support in organizing and recruiting participants for the focus groups.
It is important to emphasize that, while the number of participants may seem small compared to the total population of Berkeley, the purpose of the interviews and focus groups, and qualitative data collection more generally, is to gain deeper insights into perspectives and experiences. Rather than seeking a large volume of responses, this approach aimed to explore the complexity and nuance of lived experiences of community members, particularly those from priority populations and individuals who work closel
We also acknowledge that people hold multiple intersecting identities, which cannot be fully captured by a single checkbox. We encouraged participants to share any aspects of their lived experience they felt comfortable discussing, knowing that identity is multifaceted. Additionally, we recognize that one person’s experience reflects their unique perspective and does not necessarily represent the views of everyone who shares a similar identity. Our goal was not to generalize but to gain a deeper, more nuanc
Qualitative Data Analysis
Following interviews and focus groups, a team of three analyzed the notes and transcripts to identify a set of themes and sub themes that emerged (see table below). For example, if a focus group participant talked about how they feel appreciated and heard when they spend time in the senior center that quote was highlighted and coded as a community strength, sub-theme community organization.
All findings and coded passages were de-identified and quotes were presented in a way that did not directly attribute it to any participants. These major themes and de-identified quotes were then brought to two sense-making sessions, one with JSI
team members and the second with CSC members. The goal of the sense making sessions was to understand what story the data was telling and what major themes emerged. These sessions also informed and shaped aspects of the community survey.
Community Survey
The stories and insights that emerged during interviews and focus groups and internal sense making sessions were utilized to inform a community-wide survey aimed at assessing people’s views on health and wellbeing in Berkeley. The goal of the survey was to receive input from the wider Berkeley community on their health status and recommendations on the priorities for the Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP).
The CSC guided the development of the survey to ensure that the survey was accessible to the wider Berkeley community.
The survey had three main sections: Sentiment Statements, Focus Area Prioritization and Demographics (Appendix J). We collected extensive demographic data in order to disaggregate and analyze the responses from priority populations.
For the second section of the survey, respondents were asked to prioritize three out of ten areas as “the most important for the Berkeley Wellness Blueprint to focus on in order to improve community health and wellbeing in Berkeley.” These ten focus areas emerged from the Landscape Scan, interviews, focus groups and CSC consultation.
Community surveys provide valuable insights but have inherent limitations that can affect the representativeness and accuracy of results. One challenge is participation bias, as individuals who choose to respond may differ significantly from those who do not. Respondents are often people with more time, higher education levels, or stronger opinions, which can lead to an overrepresentation of certain perspectives.
Additionally, access and outreach barriers may prevent some groups - such as individuals with limited internet access, non-native speakers, or those with lower literacy - from participating. Even among those reached, survey fatigue can reduce response quality, with some participants choosing not to complete the survey and dropping off part way through.
For this survey, we had low engagement from some of the priority populations we had identified, meaning that key perspectives may be missing from the data. In particular, we struggled to reach non-English speakers and individuals identifying as Hispanic Latine/ Latinx. These limitations underscore the importance of using complementary methods, such as focus groups and interviews, to ensure representative and actionable insights.
APPENDIX C: COMMUNITY STEERING MEMBERS AND BIOS
APPENDIX C: COMMUNITY STEERING MEMBERS AND BIOS
Span
Rosio Almaguer Andrade (she/they) Rosio works at Berkeley’s Ecology Center focusing on food systems and is currently getting their master’s in urban planning. They identify as a non-binary, Latinx first-generation college graduate who works with farmers market professionals as well as local government and community members to expand food access. Rosio views public health through the intersectional lens of food justice and urban planning and hopes the Community Steering Committee experience will give them th
Penelope Collins (she/her) Penelope is a retired veterinarian who is currently on the Commission on Aging for the City of Berkeley and whose family has lived in Berkeley for generations. She currently lives in the South Berkeley house her grandparents built in 1929 and brings a deep understanding of Berkeley’s history with hopes it can help inform the development of realistic wellness goals for Berkeley residents. Penelope doesn’t want Berkeley to lose the magic she has experienced as a lifelong resident.
Michai Freeman (she/her) Michai is the Systems Change Advocate at the Center for Independent Living where she works to reduce barriers to accessibility and inclusion in community and public programs. She identifies as black woman with a physical disability, with experience in disability and health education, as well as wellness delivery services. Michai feels it is essential for people with disabilities to be involved in the Berkeley Wellness Blueprint, especially when it comes to community engagement.
JW Frye (he/him) J.W. is the Executive Director at Rebuilding Together East Bay Network where his work focuses on addressing health equity in housing and senior services through workforce development, opportunities for older adults, as well as intergenerational engagement and skill sharing. He believes there are ways to continue improving public health through uplifting the diverse lived experiences of Berkeley’s residents. J.W. sees his background in public service as valuable to the Community Steering Com
Kaitlyn (Kati) Khov (she/they) Kati is a transfer student at UC Berkeley majoring in urban studies who has experience in advocating for policy change and proposal writing. As a cancer survivor and member of the disabled and LGBTQIA+ communities, her goal for the Community Steering Committee is to work collaboratively to inform funding initiatives and development in disenfranchised communities. Kati’s highest priority is to serve local communities in highly exposed areas facing displacement.
Isabella Ledezema (she/her) Isabella is a junior at Berkeley High and is also involved with Berkeley’s Youth Equity Partnership with experience presenting deliverables to the city and school district. She is excited to be part of action oriented work to impact community health.
Matt Matusiewicz (he/him) Matt is a research analyst for the Division of Health Equity and Society in the Department of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. Drawing on his family’s experiences and strength, Matt is dedicated to advancing the health and well-being of low-income and immigrant communities. Since 2019, he has been heavily involved with East Bay Sanctuary Covenant/Santuario in Berkeley, working to enhance the health and welfare of asylum seekers through comprehensive social,
Israel Nikodimos (she/her) Israel is a student at Berkeley High who also has been involved in Berkeley’s Youth Equity Partnership is a volunteer at UCSF children’s hospital shadowing doctors and seeing what it means to be heavily involved in medicine. She has participated in a numerous amount of services that help benefit my community such as black student union president and student council as well as read and reviewed grants to help fund our local programs that help benefit young children.
Claritza Rios (she/her) Claritza is a physician from South Berkeley who has experience providing care in emergency, internal, and palliative medicine. She identifies as an immigrant Latina as well as a member of the LGBTQIA+ community who wants to be able to “slam doors open for people,’’ by being an agent of change towards health equity and becoming a voice for the oppressed. Claritza appreciates the importance of addressing health equity by tackling social determinants of health and advocating for better
Michael Rodriguez (he/him) Michael is a physician and the Executive Director of the California Alliance for Academics and Communities for Public Health Equity and currently resides in Berkeley’s Oceanview neighborhood. As a bi-lingual, first-generation Latino American, he has experience providing health care for low income communities and people with mental illness. Michael has a passion for promoting health equity in his city and around the world.
APPENDIX D: PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS
APPENDIX D: PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS
Pacific Center for Human Growth
Provides resources and services supporting and enhancing the mental health and well-being of LGBTQIA+ and QTBIPOC people.
Multicultural Institute
Provides resources and services for immigrant communities, particularly Hispanic/Latinx/Latine immigrants.
Healthy Black Families
Provides resources and services to support and uplift Black individuals and families in Berkeley
La Peña Cultural Center
Fosters and hosts cultural events, gatherings, and performances rooted in the Latin American and Caribbean diaspora.
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant
Provides programming to asylum seekers, refugee, and immigrant communities for legal, social, and advocacy services.
APPENDIX E: GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE CHA
APPENDIX E: GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE CHA
Principles
•
•
•
•
Share and build from existing information: We aren’t asking questions without providing relevantdata (conclusions from other reports and assessments, quantitative data); qualitative data collectionshould help interpret quantitative information.
•
•
•
Lead toward solutions: Qualitative processes should both expand understanding of needs/issues andpoint toward potential solutions; community perspectives should be centered throughout the CHA/CHIP.
•
•
•
Emphasize balance between upstream and downstream perspectives: Questions and dialogues shouldmake connections between health and safety outcomes and community and structural factors.
•
•
•
Emphasize balance between asset and deficit perspectives: Assessment processes tend to focus onwhat is wrong; it is important to also identify community strengths as those can be instrumental tosolutions.
•
•
•
Acknowledge but don’t be limited by resource and accountability constraints: Set realisticexpectations for participants; some ideas are more readily actionable than others, but we want agenuine perspective on the issues that are shaping health in Berkeley.
•
•
•
Strive for broad understanding: Bias and professional language can create barriers andmisunderstandings; focus on deeply listening and providing space for arriving at shared meaning.
Theme
Theme
Theme
Theme
Theme
Theme
Theme
Analysis from CHA Community Data Collection
Analysis from CHA Community Data Collection
Strength
Strength
Strength
Strength
In Berkeley, the physical environment is:
In Berkeley, the physical environment is:
Accessible and walkable/wheelable routes
Nature: like Parks, Mountains, Water
the environment as places of connection and acceptance
Strength
Strength
Strength
Strength
In Berkeley, community members
In Berkeley, community members
Characteristics: Resilient, Passionate, Caring, Treat people well, Diverse, Welcoming
Passionate and caring city leadership
Build spaces of connection and networks of support
Community activism
Strength
Strength
Strength
Strength
In Berkeley, Community Organizations
In Berkeley, Community Organizations
Are helpful and kind
Places where community members feel seen, heard, and understood
Have a good amount of resources and services
Opportunity for
Opportunity for
Opportunity for
Opportunity for
Improvement
Jobs and Money in Berkeley
Jobs and Money in Berkeley
Need for more access to jobs that pay a living wage
Job training and placement services and supports
HIgh cost of basic necessities and services (food, transportation, healthcare)
Opportunity for
Opportunity for
Opportunity for
Opportunity for
Improvement
Housing in Berkeley
Housing in Berkeley
People are having to live in overcrowded housing situations
Low access to affordable housing
Concerns about the health and safety of unhoused people
Gentrification and displacement a topic of concern
Opportunity for
Opportunity for
Opportunity for
Opportunity for
Improvement
Mental Health in Berkeley
Mental Health in Berkeley
Need for more access and affordability of mental health services
Need for more availability of a range of services and supports that match community need
Need efforts to destigmatize mental health issues
Need more coordination across mental health, physical health, and other social services
Stress and social isolation are connected to mental health
Opportunity for Improvement
Opportunity for Improvement
Opportunity for Improvement
Sense of Belonging in Berkeley
Sense of Belonging in Berkeley
Need for more safety and welcoming public spaces
Need to create spaces where people come together and build connections
Opportunity for Improvement
Opportunity for Improvement
Opportunity for Improvement
Unsupportive Systems and Structures in Berkeley
Unsupportive Systems and Structures in Berkeley
challenge around government accountability
need for improved community engagement
Lacking representation, discrimination and racism is prevalent
APPENDIX F: QUALITATIVE DATA FINDINGS
APPENDIX F: QUALITATIVE DATA FINDINGS
The table is a summary of the themes and findings from CHA data collection. This included focus groups (n=4), and community interviews (n=6)
APPENDIX G: SURVEY FINDINGS
APPENDIX G: SURVEY FINDINGS
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Community-Health-Improvement-Plan.pdf