the city council meeting. I'm.
in a while or it's your first
time to a meeting. This is a
reminder that if you have a
conversation, please take it
outside so that we can hear
everything that's going on.
There will be no booing and
hissing. I understand there are
a lot of strong feelings. And
I know that it's your first time
in a while or it's your first
time to a meeting. This is a
reminder that if you have a
conversation, please take it
outside so that we can hear
everything that's going on.
There will be no booing and
and we have a lot of young folks
that are gonna be here this evening
and so I really want us to set a good example for them.
So I ask folks to be respectful
as they're giving their comments and keep in mind
there are many things on the agenda this evening
so we have much to get through
before we even get to our action items.
So I will, we have no ceremonial matters this evening
so I will pass it over to our city manager
to see if he has any comments.
I don't have any comments tonight.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
Okay, very good.
And is Mr. Alpert here?
Yes, do you wanna come up, Mr. Alpert?
So before we go to public comment on non-agenda matters,
I'm inviting Dr. Alpert to the podium
to redo his public comment from May 19th.
Mr. City Clerk, if you could please put two minutes
on the clock, or I guess Denise,
if you wouldn't mind putting two minutes on the clock, please.
Thank you.
I'm Dr. Steven Alpert.
Berkeley residents have reason to be disappointed
by the actions of this committee,
its commissions, and council.
We're here.
Sorry.
Shh folks, please.
There's a lot of whispering.
Shh.
Councillors have demonstrated pro-developer bias.
Local residents and business owners
were not consulted about the plans
to observe North Shattuck, Solano, or College Avenues.
In fact, the council met first with developers.
On February 24th, this council overturned
Berkeley's labor standards.
passed in 2023, which required developers and large projects
to provide contractors with fair pay, health insurance,
and funds for apprenticeship training.
During the planning commission meeting last fall,
over 30 attendees expressed concerns
that the proposed up-loading building heights were excessive.
Every commission member then stated
increased heights were not a problem.
Foremost, this council supports the false narrative
that building market rate housing
will readily produce affordable units.
Real world data contradict this.
A recent study by Buchholz
done to even under overly optimistic conditions
in our area, it takes over 20 years
for newly built market rate housing
to filter down and become affordable,
whereas with historical data, it takes over 100 years.
Evidently, these findings were troublesome
to Council Member Humbert,
who tried to discredit Buchholz
to showing him his composite screenshot from his website.
Please note the highlighted last sentence
with two underlying links.
As written, it clearly implies that Buckholtz
has received serious and swift
mythological criticism from other economists,
but neither link addresses the study.
Council members also assert
that building market rate departments
will invariably drive rents down.
Housing data from nearby Emory will refute this,
and the YIMBY Supply Site ideology they champion.
As reported in Emoryville Tatler,
Emoryville went the YIMBY way.
Now it has the most expensive rent in the East Bay.
Building more is supposed to bring cheaper rent.
What happened?
Our council's further to build bucket rate housing
may produce a similar outcome
without addressing housing affordability.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Okay, so we will now take public comment
on non-agenda matters.
There are multiple seats up in the front,
and if you have a seat next to you,
if you could make sure to wave your hand so folks can see.
There are folks, I just wanna make sure everyone
has a seat who wants one, especially if you are holding
a small child and need a seat, there's some seats up front.
Okay, all right, so if you have public comment
on non-agenda matters, we have the list right here, folks.
Okay, so we will have five in-person speakers
for items not on the agenda, and then we will go
to the first five hands raised on the Zoom.
Each speaker will have one minute each.
I'll pick the names for the five in-person speakers
and you can come up in any order.
And again, this is just for public comments
for items that are not on tonight's agenda.
So if your card was picked,
but you are speaking on an item on the agenda,
just let us know and I'll pick a new card.
Okay, the five non-agenda speakers for in-person
are Kara Houser, Juliet Leftwich,
Dennis Fanton, Maria Sol, and Derek Abasi.
You can come forward in any order.
Hi, good evening.
My name is Juliette Leftwich.
I'm a long-term Berkeley resident and an attorney.
I served on the Berkeley Police Accountability Board
and Police Review Commission for seven years.
I'm speaking out tonight to express my strong objection
to the incredibly aggressive new parking meter
rules that were adopted by council in June.
Under those rules, meters will operate until eight o'clock
and all day on Sundays.
Finds will increase from $43 to $64,
and new meters will be installed throughout the city,
including on Hopkins Street.
These rules were adopted hastily without public input
or input from small businesses,
many of which are already struggling to survive.
there was also no consideration of the impact
on churches throughout our city.
Oakland and San Francisco adopted similarly
egregious parking meter rules and reversed course
in response to public outcry.
Our hope is that you will, thank you,
be equally responsive to your constituents.
Thank you.
Okay, anyone else whose name was called?
Thank you.
Hi, John Caner, Downtown Berkeley Association.
I am so pleased to introduce-
which time are you?
What, Kara?
How's her?
We're together.
He's with me, Kara who's here.
Okay, Kara who's here?
Kara starts on Monday.
We're gonna have two months overlap.
I retire September 30th, Kara.
Hello, just wanna say hello and I'm delighted
to be here and join working with the city.
I'm very happy to meet each of you who I haven't met yet
and thank you.
Thank you so much, welcome.
And John, we will follow up with you later
to thank you for your service.
Good evening, my name is Derek Abasi
and I'm part of a neighborhood coalition
alerting this council that the developer
at 1130 Oxford Street is abusing state housing laws
to escape public discretionary review.
Streamlined by right approvals are meant
for small scale missing middle projects
that follow the letter and spirit of the law.
Instead, this developer is using aggressive,
bad faith tactics to claim the city is powerless.
But these laws have strict criteria.
To bypass SB 1123's hard 10 unit camp
and build 32 luxury homes,
The developer is illegally piecemealing a lot
into eight separate parcels.
Furthermore, SB 1123 applies exclusively to vacant lots
unless existing buildings are abandoned and uninhabitable.
Legally, the buildings are neither.
It also sits directly within the known landslide
and high fire hazard zone and the hillside overlay.
And it won't even address the housing crisis as intended.
As a result, will be $2 million homes
with zero affordable housing.
The city still retains oversight.
Do not treat this as a done deal, thank you.
Thank you.
You can begin your time whenever you're ready.
Okay, thank you.
My name is Dennis Fanton.
I'm talking about the project that is being proposed
for 1130 Oxford Street.
And I have really one major point.
At the May 28th meeting, the developer of this 32 row home
project on a steep hillside on Oxford Street
said that these 32 homes were level in and ADA accessible
and all that good stuff.
That was the exact comment.
What I want to say is that these homes are, in fact,
level in but if you're in a wheelchair you can't get into the living space of
the home I assume this is by design not necessarily to preclude people in
wheelchairs thank you that is that my time yes that's your time thank you very
much for your comment the fit card was for Maria soul no that's okay good thing
I can almost run. I just want to mention that I'm really happy that you all are going to
get to take a little break. I'm going to miss you, but I'm very glad you might get to rest
and play and do what serves you. But I want to also remind you most sincerely that most
of us won't get to, which is why we're all here, because all sorts of things matter to
each and every one of us. And again, I am trying to emphasize that if we stop and breathe
and remember it's not just me, it's we. We've got to figure out a way to get along because
because we can't help some people and hurt others.
We can do better.
So I hope again, you have a fine time.
Thank you.
Thanks, Mariah.
Okay, and we'll go to the first five hands raised on Zoom.
Again, this is for non-agenda public comments.
First is Sharon.
I think if I'm on agenda item 27,
Is this my time to speak or is it later?
It's later actually.
We are only addressing things
that are not in the agenda at this time.
I'll wait till then.
Thank you.
Next is, it says call in user.
Should be able to unmute for non-agenda public comments.
Hello, can you hear me?
My name is Gordon Alderson and I live in Modoc County.
I hate homeless people.
They are vermin.
They are destroying our communities
and destroying our small businesses.
I have to go out of business because of homeless people.
They're all vermin and they're all niggas, trannies.
Yeah.
OK.
Next.
Apologies, everyone.
When comments are going, there are only certain times
we're able to cut them off.
and so I apologize for that person's speech.
Next is Mackay Freeman, so two minutes.
Mackay, we'll put extra time on the clock for you.
You can speak when you're ready.
Oh, here she goes.
Go ahead, Mackay.
Yeah, can you hear me?
Yes, go ahead.
Yes.
So if you didn't see council members
and maybe she has called.
But literally, as seniors and sister-in-law
are in the grocery drive, senior and disabled children,
many disabled people and seniors are at virtually affected
by the facility's reduction in services,
but not that our community is not consulted beforehand.
There is a memo written by General Matthew Hagen suggesting fraud in the program.
Here I would like examples of fraud and how reduction in services was derived.
Many seniors cannot offer a smartphone or the wrist interface.
They are without transportation that is needed for them.
They cannot ask for treatment, community events, and worship.
Nothing about us without us and we ask for a meeting, which is there, and see that we're talking about reductions in this program.
Thank you very much. Thank you, Mackay. Okay, let's see, next is Michael Pierce.
would like to see my time to on item 27 to Aaron Friedman. I'm sorry you can't
you have to wait until the speaker is here just see the time at the time the
comments on that item are being held so you can stay on for that. Thank you.
Next is David.
Hello, I just wanted to well, I had a non agenda comment I was going to talk about how great the new Baywheels expansion is and how helpful it's been to me.
But unfortunately, I wasn't able to get into the meeting right now.
I mean, notice it's at capacity.
Folks are being turned away at the door,
and it's just a continuation of,
I think, a really consistent problem that we have around public comment and around
public feedback where people who have,
I just got off work and we just picked up the kids.
If I could have been here an hour ago,
I would have been here an hour ago.
And so I really hope that, you know, over time, we're able to find ways of including
people who have more obligations on their time because our voices matter too.
Thank you.
Thank you.
And I'm sorry that you and others were not able to get inside the meeting.
So as people exit the meeting, though additional people are allowed in, and of course people
can participate through audio, visual, platform, zoom, so after public comments and perhaps
after the consent calendar there may be some additional capacity in the board room.
Yes, thank you Mr. City Clerk.
I think that's correct that as folks are making their comments, they might also step out. So there's more room for others
Are you gonna say something? Yeah, may I ask a question? I the commenter referenced. I think he referenced the
Zoom meeting being that capacity is that possible or is there that's not okay. There's there's a limited capacity on zoom that well
There's I think up to a thousand people
I mean he was on this it right, but he okay. I just wanted to check that yeah
I think it's a room a physical room capacity issue. Thank you though for checking
So that is
There's no more hands
one
Hand rate. No, there's no more hands raised online. We could take two more cards
We have Alec and Jackie. Oh
It's for an item on the agenda, okay
Good evening mayor and council. Thank you so much for offering this opportunity for public comment
I would like to comment on the proposal for corridor up zoning in opposition to that plan on
The grounds of something that one of our previous speakers said we can't help some people and hurt others. I
Agree that the nimby yimby divide has come to define this discussion. I
Don't think that's a productive way to look for a solution. I
I have a different proposal that I think should appeal to all of you because it helps all
of you and your constituents in every district.
I call it E.B., I.E.B.Y., improve everyone's backyard.
Help all of the neighborhoods in the city become similar to these three places that
we agree make Berkeley wonderful.
Wouldn't each of you like to have a Solano or an Elmwood or a Shattuck in your district?
can do better you can make it happen. Thank you. Thank you. And we just have one we do have a hand
raised on the Zoom so this will be our final speaker. Andy. Thank you I'm curious on the Zoom
presentation is it possible for Brent Blackaby's video feed to be minimized until he is speaking?
thank you very much i'd be happy to minimize my video thank you thank you um i think that was our
final of agenda public comment so um all right we will um we will move on to our consent calendar
but first there is an urgent item that we need to vote on i will pass it over to council member
of Olenapara to introduce it.
Thank you.
This is an item showing our support and solidarity
with the workers at the Graduate Hotel in District 7,
which they will be voting to unionize
with Unite Here Local 2 this Friday.
So it's a resolution in support.
Second.
I guess I'll make a motion to accept this into the record.
Thank you.
And a second from Council Member Traitor.
part of the consent calendar. Yes, thank you. Um, any comments or questions before we vote?
Okay, go ahead, Mr. City Clerk. To accept the the urgent item, uh, to on the, uh, to the consent
calendar. Councilmember Kessarwani? Yes. Tapplin? Yes. Bartlett? Yes. Tragov? Aye. O'Keeffe? Yes.
Blackaby? Yes. Nopara? Yes. Humber? Yes. And Maryishi? Yes. Okay, motion carries.
Okay very good. Councilmember Tracob did you want to also make some comments as well before we start?
Yes thank you. I would like to see if we can move item 28 which is a referral to the city manager
to update definitions in the CGMU district and review restrictions related to the establishment
of adult-oriented businesses in the Berkeley Municipal Code
to consent for the purpose of sending it back
to the Land Use Housing and Economic Development Committee.
Thank you.
So Mr. City Clerk, could you just speak to?
Yeah, so if there's no objection,
that item can be moved to consent.
Thank you.
for the purposes of moving it to the land use committee?
Yeah, yes, that would be the action that would be recorded.
No, so there are no objections?
Okay, all right.
Then it will be, then it will be so, thank you.
All right, anything else?
I have comments on the consent calendar.
I guess this would be the time.
Great, thank you.
Sorry, and folks, because we know we're gonna have
quite a long agenda.
If I could ask that our folks keep their comments
to a minimum, that would be great.
Thank you.
Yeah, thank you.
First of all, I would like to appreciate
my colleagues' collaboration on the urgency item
that we just moved to consent,
the resolution supporting the rights of workers
at the graduate hotel,
as well as to the mayor for item 21,
which is the rescission of the greenhouse gas
endangerment finding and modern vehicle greenhouse gas
emission standards under the Clean Air Act
to allow us to join Amicus Brief
in opposition to that rescission.
And also wanted to appreciate Council Member Bartlett's
authorship of item 22,
relinquishment of council office budget funds
to support the city-wide Berkeley School Supply
Distribution and Resource Fair.
And excited to sponsor all three of those items.
I would like to ask that we withdraw item 23
from the consent calendar and from this agenda.
Item 23 is the relinquishment
of Council Office Budget Funds
to the Downtown Berkeley Association
in support of the Social Service
Outreach Coordination position until further notice.
Thank you to Councilmember Humbert for sponsoring item 25.
I would like to donate $150 for my discretionary funds.
And last but not least,
I would like to express my sincere appreciation
to my co-authors, to city staff,
and to the many stakeholders who helped shape item 24,
which is our Renaissance item, revitalizing enterprise
and neighborhoods through activation, investment, safety,
streamlining, accessibility, networking, collaboration,
and equity, part one, performance standards
for commercial district activation and life mitigation.
This is the first of several items
we intend to bring to the council
to help continue to make our downtown
and all commercial spaces,
both those specifically named in the referral
and any that were not even more vibrant
and attractive for residents and visitors.
I can't wait to receive our staff's recommendations
back to the council for final adoption.
And thanks again to everyone
so generously devoted their time and knowledge to this item.
Thank you very much.
Moving on to Council Member Humbert.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
I'll try to be brief here.
Item 23, no, that's dropped.
I'm talking about item 22,
the relinquishment of council office budget funds
to support the citywide Berkeley school supply distribution
and resource fair.
I'd like to donate $150.
Thank you.
I think it's council member Bartlett for authoring that.
And then I brief comments about item 25,
which is the Russell Street Halloween festivities,
2026 through 2029 relinquishment of council office
budget funds to general fund and the grant of such funds.
And I authored that.
I know we have a long meeting ahead of us,
so I will be, thank you Eric Panzer, booreaf.
I just wanted to thank the Claremont Elmwood
Neighborhood Association and all the neighbors
who volunteer for this fang-tastic event each year
and make it possible.
I will always go to bat for neighborhood events like this
that are the lifeblood of our community.
And I'm pleased to be able to do
this monster-sized funding item
so that neighbors can keep working their magic
for at least another four years.
Thank you.
Thank you for that very punny, those very punny comments.
I'm gonna go online to Council Member Blackaby, please.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
I'll also be brief.
I wanted to thank Council Member Luna Parra
for bringing the urgent item
on the Graduate Hotel Labor Support
and for allowing me to join as a co-sponsor.
I was also proud to join with Council Member Luna Parra
and Council Member Tragob on Friday
to walk the picket line with workers
supporting their fight to form a union.
As we all know, Berkeley is a proud union town
And we strongly stand with workers
and fight for their right to self-organize.
So thank you, Council Member Luna Parr
for bringing the item.
On item three, I just wanted to thank Council Member Taplin
for making his nomination of an A-sharma
to join the Police Accountability Board.
With this nomination,
we have a full Police Accountability Board with an alternate.
That may be the first time in history
that we've actually had a full compliment plus alternate.
So I just wanted to thank everyone,
the Mayor and all colleagues
for getting the Board back on full footing.
On the couple of council relinquishment items, item 22,
thanks to Councilman Bartlett for bringing this.
Our office would like to relinquish $200
towards the citywide Berkeley School Supply distribution
and resource fair.
And on item 25, I don't have as many puns
as Council Member Humbert, I don't have any,
but we'd like to contribute $250 towards that.
And with that, I'm done, thank you.
There's a green Toyota Celica convertible that's parked outside here and it's leaking
quite a bit of oil into the curb, off the curb area.
So an engine company is coming to investigate that.
So if that's your car, please check in with the fire department staff at the front gate.
and I'm not going to be able to
do that. I'm not going to be
able to do that. And just for
everybody else, don't be alarmed.
That's what the fire engine is
here to look at. Thank you.
convertible. Thank you. So if
that is your car, please, please
move it or address it. Thank
you. All right. Moving on to
councilmember Luna Parra. Thank
you. Um, I want to thank the
I'd like to donate $200 for my discretionary fund to each.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Moving on to Council Member Kesser-Wunni.
Thank you very much, Madam Mayor.
I wanted to recognize item number 13.
This is awarding funds pursuant to the item
that I authored to the Berkeley Food Network
to address the issue of food insecurity.
I see Andrew Crispin is here, as are some board members,
so I'm really pleased that we can make that funding award.
I also want to thank Council Member Lunapada
for the item related to the workers at the Graduate Hotel.
And finally, I want to be recorded as donating $100
to the Berkeley School of Supply and Distribution
Resource Fair, item number 22,
as well as $100 for the Russell Street Halloween festivities,
item number 25.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much, Council Member Tapuin.
Thank you, good evening.
I'd like to thank Council Member Lunapada
for the urgency item and items between two and 25,
I would like to have your record
as relinquishing 200 to each.
Thank you.
Thank you very much, Council Member Bartlett.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
I'd like to thank everyone
for helping to supply bank.
It's really crucial, crucial service
they provide for schools.
And item 13, I wanna congratulate
the Book of Food Network
and thank Council Member Casa-Ronni for your work
and City Manager for putting forward
this much needed food support.
As I said before, we're becoming more
are food stressed, so look out for food and help people eat. The Renaissance, good work
Councilmember, are you Vice Mayor? No? Okay, oh, sorry, I can't say that. Congratulations,
Councilmember Trigo, Renaissance, good work. This addresses blight in the community, basically.
The stores and buildings that are unbuilt. We've had to go through exorbitant lengths
to get people to build on fellow properties, where rats will come and people come to you
You have bad things.
It's just a good system that you designed here to help jumpstart the process.
Thank you for that.
I'd like to have $200 for the Russell Street Halloween party.
Coming up, I guess, kind of soon, huh?
Okay.
Kind of, right?
It's like July.
Okay.
And Councillor Loomapada, thank you so much for your resolution in support of the workers
at the Graduate Hotel.
Good, good people over there.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Keith.
Thank you, Mayor.
I would like to start by thanking Council Member
Luna Parra for bringing the urgent item.
I'm really happy for a chance to support my,
well, I was gonna say my union brothers and sisters,
but I guess my potential union brothers and sisters
in their fight, so thank you very much.
It's really, it's a great item.
I'd like to also thank Council Member Trigu
for his work on Renaissance
and for inviting me to co-sponsor,
and I'm very happy to be part of that work,
and I just wanna say that downtown has a lot of issues,
And I just want to really honor your work
in representing the downtown.
I think you're really taking that seriously
and taking it head on and doing an excellent job.
So I'm really happy to support you.
Thank you for the outcome.
Oh, yes, I helped him with the ridiculous acronym.
But I helped beyond that too.
So anyway, thank you for that.
And then regarding the relinquishment of funds items,
I will donate $200 to item 22 and $200 spooky dollars.
Should I do it right to item 25?
That's it.
Okay, thanks everyone.
I also wanna thank Council Member Leno-Pauro
for bringing the urgency item forward
and very proud to support the workers
in their union organizing campaign.
And I wish them luck on Friday when they have the vote.
Thank you so much.
We have a number of different grants that have come in.
So I really wanna thank city staff
for all of their hard work
to bring funding into our city.
Many folks don't know this,
but our city staff do a lot to leverage funding
and access other grants for us.
And I'd like to add Council Member Blackaby
to item number 21, which is the rescission
of the greenhouse gas endangerment finding
in motor vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards
under the Clean Air Act.
Basically, the EPA is saying that motor vehicles
do not cause greenhouse gases, which we know is not correct.
And we are signing on to the amicus brief
and really proud to be doing that.
and thank you so much to our city attorney's office
for assisting us by writing this item.
Excited to see item 24 moving forward.
Thank you very much for your leadership,
Council Member Tragob, and for item 25,
I will also give $100 for my discretionary count
for the Russell Street Halloween fair.
So thank you very much, Council Member Humbert, for that.
And with that, I will see if there is any public comment
on consent calendar and information items only.
Ooh, John is making his way up.
John Caner, downtown Berkeley Association.
I want to also thank Council Member Treggop
for his leadership on this Renaissance item.
I think we can all agree that the empty pit on Harold Way
and the boarded up Center Street across from Bama PFA
is not an ideal situation.
We have 17 stalled housing projects.
Actually, I think one's going forward.
We're hoping the course basis is gonna move forward
on the Center Street Project soon,
and as staff and council approach this,
is obviously making sure we don't have
unintended consequences that we're dealing with real issues
and also fixing them.
So for example, as we know, the Center Street Project,
it takes about nine months to get PG&E to decommission power.
So we're going to move ahead and decommissioning,
then the market turned, et cetera.
And then we had this vacant storefront.
So we want to be able to make sure
that we can bring back on pop-ups.
Thanks, John.
And one quick answer.
John, no, no, no, John, I'm sorry.
We've got a lot of comments tonight.
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
Okay, come on up, Andrew.
And Pam.
Good evening, Mayor, Council, City Manager.
I'm Andrew Crispin, the Executive Director
of Berkeley Food Network.
And I'm joined tonight by Pam Gray,
the Board Chair of Berkeley Food Network.
As many of us know, affordability is a crisis
facing so many community members,
especially here in Berkeley,
but we are so excited to be awarded this contract,
to be working with the city to address food insecurity
for our housing insecure community members.
We're really grateful on behalf of the community.
Thank you, and we're looking forward
to continued partnership with the city.
Thank you.
Thank you, and thank you all so much for your work.
Yes.
Thank you.
Sorry, come on up.
I'll be translating for her.
Me na stair des mi nombre estros alba rodriguez
trabajo en el hotel graduado
vor dosa y usa medio
esta muy luchando por la unión
porque es todo los días accesso de trabajo
y o tengo pruebas
todos los días dicío de cinó de cuartos
veinte cuarto de entiún cuarto
muchos checkados istamos cansados tamos el luchando
para que entre la unión y en estamos de su ayuda
y teso pollo muchas gracias
Thank you.
Hi, my name is Rosada Rodriguez.
I've been working for two years at the Graduate Hotel.
Me and my coworkers are organizing the union
because of the excessive work that happens at that hotel.
I've had to clean 18 to 22 rooms.
I have proof right here.
We're tired of this, and we're getting together
because we deserve the union.
Thank you for your support.
Thank you.
The last time, I met Maricela Castro in the last few years,
who has been working with me in the event of this event,
I had no idea where I was going to work with him,
because there are many people working with him.
And we had no idea where I was going to work with him.
He had a beautiful future, and he had no idea where I was going to work.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hi, my name is Maricela Castro.
I've been working at the Graduate Hotel for the past 20 years.
I'm also joining the Union because there is an excessive load of work
at the hotel. Me and my coworkers, we deserve better, and that is why we're
formed the Union and we would love your support. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hi there, my name is Angelica Salinas Chicas.
I am here because I am asking for your support
in our fight for our union.
We deserve better respect
and also we're deserving better treatment in the hotel.
And that is why I'm here standing with my coworkers.
Thank you.
Muy buenas tardes a todos.
Muy buenas tardes a todos.
Abes es me dan este bente, o disiucho, dicise iscense, y cuantante eso, abes es no me dan tiempo de lonchar y un poquito tiempo de descansar y pues me guste ese trabajo lo que pasar el que esta en cargado sobre eso me poso una este un papel y ono sabia y tu beque viermar,
In medio opportunida de algo que mejor pero en estanto de algo que no ise.
Y entonces mejiva despéder pero le diejo por favor que me de este opportunida por qué yo quiero
esca trabajo.
Gracias adiós yo lucha por esse trabajo.
Gracias adiós que encontre, estoy muy felicines esca trabajo.
No más que yo beo el herente no tiene por quito de passiencia y la que está en cargado
sobre eso.
Pero espero?
I don't know if you know, I have a lot of problems, I don't know if you know or not.
I know I have a lot of problems, I know I have a lot of problems, I know I have a lot
of problems, I know I have a lot of problems, I know I have a lot of problems, but I don't
know if you know or not.
I'm not sure what's happening with the sound. I'm sorry about that. All right. My name is
I'm Lorentina Salas.
I've been working at the Graduate Hotel
for the past six months.
Reason why I'm fighting, it's because at work,
it's very excessive work.
I was recently given a warning for not completing some work
because I was not able to finish within the amount of time.
I felt that that was really disrespectful
and that is one of the reasons
why I'm fighting for the union.
I really enjoy working there
and I wanna continue working there,
but it is really the things I need to change
in the hotel is the workload.
Thank you.
Anyone else have public comment
on consent calendar information items only?
Muchas gracias.
Muchas gracias, porvenir.
Okay. Okay, so we now go to speakers on.
Oh, one more consent, okay.
I know we have so much to do,
but this is the general consent calendar.
Now, what does relinquish mean when you were?
We're happy to talk about that later.
We don't usually do the back and forth,
so if you have questions, you can ask them later.
All right, well I just want to remind us
that there's earthquakes everywhere, fires everywhere,
and we need to consider safety and response times.
I'm really in support of the child resources
and the police accountability and Berkeley Food Network
Oh my god, please, people are hungry.
How right, and anything to do with youth services,
dogs and playgrounds.
So yeah, and then I don't understand what's going on
with the social service outreach coordinator,
and I understand that this is a response,
but I'm really wanting us to choose wisely
what we invest in, thank you.
Thanks Maria, and relinquishment just means
we're giving it from our different accounts.
So, all right.
Okay, so now we'll go to public comments
on the consent calendar for those
with their hands raised on Zoom.
And the first is caller with a phone number ending in 211.
Hi, this is Ed.
So I have a very important comment about consent time,
item three, lease accountability board.
Very clearly always through the ages
as one of the best police department in all countries.
Second, I'd like to bring the memory of the great beef police of Berkeley that have dashed Butler.
He, we had a theft in our San Francisco store of embellishment to actually open a million dollars.
He was a great because I was threatened from the criminals from jail.
And he appointed two policemen in front of our house in Euclid.
We paid $6,000 a month which went to the city of Berkeley, not to the policemen.
We really have to look forward to saying the other thing I'd like to man the please everybody
walking downtown Berkeley see how many stores are closed you are sending all of the business
to the current and every well let's work together and please give me a call 5 1 0 8 4 8 5 0 0
0 52 years old phone number thank you I will call again thank you okay.
Next is Benito.
Yeah.
Hi.
Good evening.
Can you hear me?
Yes.
Okay.
Very good.
Well, hi.
Good evening.
My name is Benito Delgado Olson.
I'm the ED of SupplyBank.org.
Really just calling in to say thank you to all of the council members who contributed
to the 16th annual resource fair and school supply distribution scheduled for August 8th.
It's San Pablo Park.
For 16 years, what began as a pilot
at the former South Berkeley YMCA,
it now serves about 1,300 BUSD students annually.
And we really appreciate council member Bartlett,
as well as the mayor and council member Traguib,
and all the council members who have contributed
and helped us seek funds to keep this important event going
for the Berkeley community.
I'm also happy to share
that before all of your contributions this evening,
We're at about $28,000 and our goal is $30,000.
So I'm very confident that this program
and event will move forward.
So just thank you all so much again.
Thank you so much.
Okay, next is former council member Cheryl Davila.
Oop, wait a second.
It jumped around.
Hold on.
Wait, all right.
Let's go ahead.
Hold on a second, James.
We'll come to you next.
former Councilmember Cheryl Dattler.
Um, yeah, so there's a lot of things on the consent calendar.
Um, I guess the food network is a good thing.
And honestly, I don't even know what's on the consent calendar because I really didn't look at it, but, um, I'm hoping y'all do the right thing.
And it's just, today I was listening to my friend talk about her trip back from Palestine,
and things are just so egregious over there.
And you all are just sitting there not doing anything about all the things that you could
be doing for this world and this country by passing a resolution in support of getting
a bit of apartheid and Palestine and freeing Palestine and but you're into surveillance
and control and domination. But I'm praying that you all change and things change for
everyone in the city of Berkeley. Thank you, thanks Cheryl.
is James White. Oh James James raise your hand if you there you are okay go ahead James.
I'd like to take kudos to Cheryl for calling in on that important topic and kudos to your
boards for allowing her to speak. This is Judy Stroyer city council desk squad we've been
challenging boards like yours for years as genocide's been continuing and you continue
to silence people. So in this case, I am happy that you're
Sorry, this is a public comment on consent calendar and
information items only. So
what I'd like to speak about the women trying to do the union.
And I'd like to give a thought that maybe if we could imagine a
situation where a group of white European men went to Honduras or
Guatemala, or anywhere this I have a free speech here. So
please do not jump down my throat with your liberal viewpoint
intolerance but imagine some white guys going to Guatemala and going to a city council speaking
English and one after another just like that telling people that work is so hard and you know
something we need more of this and like treat us like this come on man seriously there's a lot of
people in this country okay and next is Todd Andrew I just want to say I strongly disagree
with the comments and we welcome anyone who comes to speak in any language and we'll give them time
for translations so I wish those kinds of people would stay out of here I did
not raise my hand for comment right now all right I think that's our final
comment on the consent calendar so I will come back to see if we can approve
the consent calendar is there a motion to approve so moved second can we take the
on that please. To approve the consent calendar. Councilmember Kessarwani? Yes.
Kaplan? Yes. Bartlett? Yes. Tragedy? Aye. O'Keefe? Yes. Blackaby? Yes.
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and Mary yes, okay.
Consent calendar has passed and then just as another quick note the TV has
been set up in the gymnasium for overflow for people to watch the meeting.
It's just the gymnasium is the building next to the parking lot right there on
of Browning Street.
So we'll let the people in line know
so they can participate from there as well.
And like I said earlier, as people exit the meeting,
additional people will be admitted into the boardroom.
Thank you very much, Mr. City Clerk.
And so just so folks know where we're at,
we've just finished the consent calendar,
we're moving on to the action calendar.
And we have item 26,
which we have our staff right in front of us.
And I believe you do not have a presentation,
but you're here for any questions, is that correct?
Okay thank you very much. Are there any questions? We are moving on to action
calendar item 26, referral response inclusionary housing in move fee
analysis and fee update for single-family residential units. I see no
hands raised for any questions. So is there any public comment for item number
26? Anybody online? So this is to raise your hand online if you wish to
give comments on the inclusionary housing in lieu fee analysis. Otherwise please lower
your hand. Okay to comment on item 26 we have former council member Cheryl Davila. I'm sorry
what's the name of this item? This is for item number 26 and if you don't have a comment
on 26 I'd like to ask that you put your hand down so we can hear comments on this item
Well, I'm going to make a comment.
I just you wouldn't tell me what it was.
So I'm going to look it up real quick.
And you took three seconds off my time last time,
which was not nice, but 26.
You could have just repeated it referral for response inclusionary housing.
Yeah, inclusionary housing.
We need to have inclusionary housing.
We need to have 100% affordable housing.
housing. We don't need to have market rate. A lot of those units are empty. People need
to be able to live and stay in Berkeley at an affordable rate. And the way things are
going, black and brown people are going to not be in Berkeley. So that's what you need
to make sure that you take the highest percentage,
charge them the highest amount not to include,
if they try to do the in-loofies,
they should be very expensive.
Thank you for your comment.
Next is Sarah Bell.
Hi, I assume you can hear me.
I am chair of the Housing Advisory Commission
And I wanted to give some color on the HAC recommendation
on the residential unit floor area deduction.
We voted to advance the 2,500 square foot exemption
because that was what was studied.
But a number of members of the commission
thought that reducing the in lieu fee by that much
for single family homes
was too much of an exemption for them.
A brand new 2,500 square foot single family home
in Berkeley is a luxury.
I'm getting into my personal opinion now.
Someone building one should contribute more
to our housing trust fund.
It is my personal opinion
that our housing trust fund monies build housing
for people at risk of experiencing displacement
or even homelessness.
And this exemption should be eliminated
for single-family homes, or at least greatly reduced.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, Sarah.
All right, next is James White.
Yes, I want to say that I think the comments were pretty racist
that the geral woman was talking about.
And as a white man, take offense or black and brown comments,
I think that's pretty distasteful.
Excuse me, do you have a comment on item number 26?
We're taking public comment for item 26.
Yes, I do.
And please don't interrupt me.
I'm going to make my point, but you can't interrupt
when people are making their point.
The reason why we have this problem with the housing anyway
is because the Boomers printed money for 20 or 30 years.
We should be looking fundamentally
why our housing is unaffordable for our youth.
And it's not a black and brown thing.
It's a generational thing.
The Boomers sold us out to the Jews.
And since then, we've been basically eating crap
while we go to war for them over and over again.
Again, folks, I'm very sorry for these comments.
I apologize.
Okay, next is Seth.
Hello, people of Berkeley.
I'm sorry for the disgraceful act of our previous speaker.
I think it's really important
that we start looking towards a rent-to-own model.
We need some high rises built here in Berkeley.
We need 15, 20, 30 story high rises with rent to own public housing, and we also need any kind of job facilities and things like that in the lower level so that people can go and get services in the same building that they live in, as well as maybe a food distribution place.
So Canada's putting us to shame.
We have rampant homelessness, rampant poverty,
rampant crime, you know.
It's basically, you know,
I feel like I'm living in a fetid country
that is completely falling apart
and is not taking care of the poorest of the poor.
You judge a nation by how well it treats its poor people
and America is abysmal.
We need public housing for all
and we also need rent to own property
so that working class families can get microloans
either through the government or even through the landlord.
Thank you.
Next is Andrew Talbot.
Thank you for the chance to comment on this item.
I just wanted to mention the inclusionary fees,
if they're less they're funded as a subsidy,
are generally just a tax on new housing.
And I generally think we should be taxing existing housing
if you want to pay for new housing
rather than taxing new housing.
And we do want new housing.
We want a lot of it as much as we can.
And so as much as we can balance those fees, it makes sense.
And I agree that balancing those towards multifamily
versus single family is a way to go
if we're gonna have those fees at all.
So thank you for the comment and I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Okay, and we have one more commenter.
We have Virginia Browning.
Virginia should be able to unmute.
Last call, Virginia.
Let's see, let's try to see.
Okay, Virginia can you unmute?
Oh, it's okay.
Virginia, can you hear us?
You should be able to unmute.
No, no, okay.
No, it's not.
I don't think she's fully connected.
Okay, we'll have to move on.
Sorry. Okay.
I'm sorry, Virginia.
Send your comments in writing to the Council at Berkeley CA.gov and Council will receive
your comments.
Thank you very much.
Okay, we're coming back to Council for comments starting with Councilmember Humbert.
Thank you Madam Mayor.
I want to thank the staff in the Planning Department and the City Manager's Office
for their work on this item.
I think it's a sensible approach to ensure that the very largest single-family homes
are as well making a contribution to our affordable housing fund.
In my view, at least, there's very little reason
for most homes to be more than 2,500 square feet,
and with this approach, the size of the fee
will still scale with the amount
by which a single-family home exceeds that level,
exceeds 2,500 feet.
This seems square feet.
This seems to me very fair,
and I thank you again to all who worked on it.
I'm prepared to move it forward.
Thank you very much.
Councilmember Luna Parra, did you have comments?
I just really wanted to thank staff
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
I'm very thankful for the work.
the motion is seconded by the.
yes black be yes are yes number yes and thank you also to councilmember Luna
para and Mary yes thank you motion carries thank you very much to our
staff thank you for being here and for being available for questions in your
work okay great we are moving on to item 27 which is the referral to schedule
hopkin street for paving with enhanced safety improvements for all users so the
way that this is going to go, since I'm guessing all of the rest of you are here
for this item, is that we are going to have a presentation by the author of the
item, Council Member Keslewani, and then we will have presentations by the rest
of the council members who have supplementals, and then we are going to
take any questions from council members, and then we'll move to public comment. As
in the past, if you have a small child with you or a child with you, I will
that you may take them home for
dinner or bedtime, etc. And then likely at some point we will need to take a break and we will continue to do the comments. And then we will come back to do council comments and our votes.
So, and one thing else I want to say,
if you cannot stay and you still want to make sure that you give some kind of comment,
feel free to email it to us.
If you give your comment and you're thinking about maybe heading out and watching from home,
please do so so that way we can allow folks who are in the overflow room
to come in and be able to give their comment.
So, I just ask that when you've finished,
if you can watch at home,
that you allow others to give their comment here in person.
Okay, passing it on to Councilmember Kesirwani. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Madam Mayor. I want to begin by thanking Interim Public Works Director Wahid Amiri, who I know is online, and the Public Works team, Fire Chief Sprague and City Manager Paul Boudinhagen for their work in helping us get to this point tonight. I also want to thank my co-sponsors, Mayor Adina Ishii and Councilmember Mark Humbert on this item.
I also want to thank every member of the public who has engaged on this topic.
My office has received more than a hundred emails on Hopkins Street and I
want to say something that may surprise some people. The emails from District 1
and from across the city have actually been pretty evenly split between
support and opposition. That tells me this is a genuinely contested question
in our community and I have tried to take all
of those voices seriously.
I wanna acknowledge up front that this item
does represent an unprecedented change
in how the public right of way is used
in a residential neighborhood.
I do not take that lightly,
but I also want to explain why I believe
this action is necessary and overdue.
Hopkins Street has been recommended
as a low stress east-west connector route
in Berkeley's bicycle plan.
And it is a documented high injury corridor.
The proposed safety treatments in this item
are not arbitrary.
They are directly informed by where people have been killed
and severely injured on this street.
A pedestrian was killed at Hopkins and Monterey
in April 2017.
4 cyclists suffered severe injuries on Hopkins at Carlotta Monterey the Alameda and Albina between April 2016 and November 2023, a pedestrian suffered a severe injury at Hopkins and Peralta in June 2021.
The median age of those killed or severely injured on this corridor is 67 and a half years old. These are our neighbors, our seniors, our community members.
This is also a corridor home to King Middle School,
the North Branch Library, and multiple preschools.
It is a street that children walk and bike to every day.
All of us deserve a safer street.
To get into the details of this item,
this item asks the city manager to repave Hopkins Street
from Sutter Street to San Pablo Avenue
with enhanced safety features for all users.
Specifically, the item directs staff
to design one way class four separated bikeways
that is physically protected bike lanes
on each side of Hopkins from the Alameda to Peralta Avenue,
essentially the Ohlone Greenway.
This configuration was considered to be the safest
by our Public Works staff because it allows cyclists
to travel in the same direction as adjacent vehicle traffic,
reducing conflicts at intersections.
The item also calls for class two buffered green painted bike lanes from Sutter Street
to the Alameda, similar to what we have on Monterey Avenue.
Traffic calming features west of Peralta Avenue to Stanage Avenue, a raised intersection at
Hopkins and Monterey, California for pedestrian safety, bus boarding islands at AC transit
stops and a comprehensive curb management plan to address parking, loading zones, ADA
and waste collection needs.
Critically, the item also requires outreach to businesses,
schools, houses of worship, and residents
as staff develop the detailed engineering design
if this item is approved tonight,
because we want that design to be responsive
to the operational needs of everyone along this corridor.
I also want to note that three years ago,
Fire Department concerns were among the reasons
this project was paused.
At the April meeting of the Facilities,
Infrastructure, Transportation, Environment,
and Sustainability Council Policy Committee,
Fire Chief Sprague's department confirmed
that bike safety infrastructure on Hopkins
retains workable emergency access.
That is a significant development
that made this item possible.
Finally, the pavement condition of Hopkins Street
is unacceptable.
Two segments are rated failed.
eight more are rated poor.
The street has been waiting for repaving for years
and it is critical, I think,
that the council provide direction tonight
so that our public work staff can move forward.
The time to act is now while Hopkins is already scheduled
for repaving in fiscal year 2028.
I look forward to hearing from the public tonight
and I look forward to the discussion with my colleagues.
Before I fully wrap up,
I would like to share screen
and just show a couple of really minor amendments.
Sure, and just so you know,
you're on here twice if you wanna.
Oh, I'm on twice.
If you wanna turn off your video on your computer.
Okay, but I'm gonna need that to share, right?
You don't need to.
We'll see.
Have your video on if you wanna just.
Oh, okay, I see.
So let's just do that.
Okay, well, I like to be.
Just in case, up to you.
Okay, I'm gonna make this bigger.
I think this is the right version.
So, okay, so I understand there was a lot of,
I think, reasonable fear about this bullet
related to removal of trees.
And I just wanna be clear,
I think one of the most beautiful aspects
of Hopkins Street is the tree canopy,
from McGee to the Alameda.
And my co-sponsors, I don't think Council Member O'Keefe,
none of us ever had an intention of destroying that.
And so I was thinking of a different tree,
which is also a problem.
So in any case, we just wanna make this language
better aligned to what our expectation is.
So we're deleting that bullet
and we are suggesting the new language that you see here,
assess street trees along the corridor
with arborist input and determine minimally invasive
appropriate treatments if old street trees
are intruding into the usable street
with impacting storm drainage.
So, we can look at potentially trimming roots
and things like that.
So we just wanna make that clear.
And then in the past, when we have talked about Hopkins,
there has been a placemaking piece.
So we wanna make clear that placemaking can be considered
based on available funds after prioritizing paving
and safety infrastructure, so we've added that.
And then finally, just to be very clear,
we are stating that this referral supersedes
all other prior council action
related to the design of Hopkins Street.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
I wanna pass it over to Vice Mayor O'Keefe
to give her presentation next
since your districts are both connected, so.
Thank you, and actually I don't have my screen sharing set up.
Council Member Casaroni, would you mind sharing your screen
with mine on it?
Would you do me that solid?
Thank you.
I can, I'm not gonna talk about the text of it just yet,
but I will get to that.
I just wanna make a brief statement
about where I'm coming from.
Well, I'll start by just summarizing.
My supplemental removes the,
it keeps almost all the elements in place,
that it removes the class for protected bike lane.
That's the primary change.
My reason for this is I do not believe
separated bike lane is necessary here.
There are other options for bicycle safety
and providing access for that area
that may not be as appealing.
We grant that as the protected bike lane for cyclists,
but given the trade-offs required,
it's more appropriate to have
different kinds of bike infrastructure.
I'm primarily concerned about the loss of parking spaces
required by their proposal,
namely 100% of the parking between McGee
and Peralta slash Eloni Greenway.
That's the projection.
And we'll hear from staff about that
to be able to comment on that more.
But that's the current projection.
And also approximately one third of the parking
east of McGee.
So that would be,
I think it would be the north side of Hopkins
would lose all of its parking as well.
I believe that this loss of parking
would have a severe detrimental impact to the merchants
as well as to the people who use cars, or many,
and who rely on this area, not just for shopping,
but also for exercise at the track and the pool
and the creation.
Many of the people who use these facilities
are older people, disabled people,
and people with small children.
and I have to speak up for those people
and I have to protect their access to these facilities.
My, nope.
I'd like to continue.
I appreciate it, but if we could hold that right now,
I do appreciate it, but it's better if we can,
if we could all just say our pieces,
I think that would be wonderful,
and then we're looking forward to hearing from everybody.
So my supplemental does keep the paving
and pedestrian improvements.
Paving is obviously necessary,
and I think that was very well laid out
by Council Member Kesser-Wani, so I won't repeat that.
I agree with that.
I want the street to be paved.
I want the pedestrian improvements.
It is a dangerous corridor for pedestrians.
Both of these are needed.
And so we keep that and we just make the major change
of changing the bicycle infrastructure so that the parking,
with the goal of the parking loss being minimized.
So just to get into some details,
thank you very much for sharing the screen.
So you can see this change here,
it just takes out the class four bike lane
it just says refer to pave the street.
And then as we go down, can you go down?
Thanks, appreciate it.
These changes just once again, they're enacting that.
And I do wanna read this paragraph here.
From McGee to San Pablo, so that's where the,
that's starting where the street narrows.
If you're heading west on the street, it narrows at McGee.
And so starting at that portion all the way down to,
to stanage, oh I'm sorry, this is just adjusting
her language.
Right, okay, so incorporate class three
bicycle infrastructure, which is a sharrow,
which I know is not very popular,
but that is the only real way to incorporate
bicycle infrastructure without losing parking.
However, I did include this language
that I wanted to provide flexibility.
So it says, and or alternative bicycle safety improvements
staff recommends that do not require
the removal of parking spaces.
There have been some designs floating around
by, not by city staff, but by other people
who have training in engineering,
where actually it's possible we could widen the street
or we can do different things.
And I really wanted to provide staff
with the flexibility to be more creative,
because I understand that sharrows are not popular.
And if we could do something better than that
without losing parking, I would be okay with that.
So we included that language to provide that flexibility.
And then if you could scroll down a bit more.
Thank you.
This is just, I don't think the bus boarding items
are necessary without the class four bike lane,
so I removed that.
And then if you scroll down just more,
there's two more things that I want to highlight.
Thank you.
I wanted to also pair this with a referral
to actually implement Rose Street as a bicycle boulevard.
It is marked as a bicycle boulevard on the bicycle plan.
It is not one right now.
but it's just a regular street if you drive it.
There's no bicycle Boulevard infrastructure on it.
But I do agree that we should have better bicycle access
to this area.
And I think we already have a plan in place to do that.
And so I would like to move forward with that.
Bicycle boulevards are a really under utilized way
of getting safe bicycle infrastructure.
We have a lot of streets in Berkeley.
A lot of them don't need high traffic
And we can take streets, and we can make them
into practically their own bike lane by just limiting traffic.
And you can limit traffic by putting up
very cheap, relatively concrete barriers and roundabouts.
There's a lot of relatively inexpensive interventions
that you can make on existing streets,
parallel to busy streets, that is such a better policy
that I want to pursue that instead of this.
So that's my proposal for addressing what I know
is not a satisfactory bike infrastructure for Benny.
So I think we should pursue a bicycle boulevard along rows,
which is once again already in the bike plan.
And then lastly, this is important,
I want everybody to understand this language
because I would hope that all of us
would be willing to incorporate this language
in our proposals.
We all saw the cost estimates which are huge
as much as $20 million, perhaps, for this project.
And our FF budget is only $15 million.
So when I saw that, I got very concerned that this project,
no matter what the outcome of this meeting tonight,
I got very concerned that it wouldn't be possible
to implement it at all because it's just too big.
So I wanted to add this language
that would give city staff the option
to break it up into pieces
and maybe do some of it one year and some of it another year.
Because the most important thing to me
is that the dang street gets paved.
It has been languishing for too long.
We have to, if we don't manage to pave the street
in the next five years, we have absolutely failed you all.
So I put in this language to maximize the chances
of actually getting done.
And I think that's it.
Thank you very much.
Thanks for your help.
Council Member Buenaventura.
I'm going to pass it over to councilmember Taplan to present his supplemental and then
we will go online to allow councilmember Blackaby to present.
Oh no, you can stop sharing.
Thank you Madam Mayor and good evening everybody.
I would like to thank my co-sponsor councilor Luna Pada as well as councilmember Casarrwani
and her co-sponsors Mayor Ishii and councilmember Humbert.
As I poured over the torrent of emails we received urging the repaving of popkins with
pedestrian bicycle and transit improvements. I was especially moved by
the testimony of West Berkeley families detailing the dangerous conditions they
risk on their commute to Ruth Actie Elementary, King Middle School, North
Branch Library and King Pool and shops on Hopkins. Given the collaborative effort
between the City of Berkeley and the Alameda County Transportation Commission
to add bicycle boulevard treatments on Standge Avenue as part of the St. Pablo
Corridor parallel bike improvements project, I am proposing that we extend
the one-way protected bike lanes from Peralta Avenue at the Elan Greenway to
to the city of Milwaukee.
The city of Milwaukee was
established by the city of
Milwaukee and the city of
Milwaukee.
The city of Milwaukee was
established by the city of
Milwaukee and the city of
Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
city of Milwaukee and the city
of Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
city of Milwaukee and the city
of Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
city of Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
city of Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
city of Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
city of Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
city of Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
city of Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
city of Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
city of Milwaukee.
The city was established by the
brings us to today.
I'd also like to thank Council Member Bartlett
for co-sponsoring the supplemental
that we're presenting now.
As we all know,
Hopkins Street is a vibrant commercial district
that's frequented by thousands
of Berkeley residents every day.
People shopping for groceries, grabbing coffee,
picking up lunch or dinner,
browsing for plants for their homes or gardens,
swimming, attending birthday parties, running on the track,
dropping off kids at soccer practice,
going to church, attending school, and so much more.
These represent people of all ages, from kids to seniors,
using all modes of transport, driving, walking, biking,
folks who are disabled and those who aren't.
Lots of people visit Hopkins,
including 20,000 or more Berkeley residents
who live in the 1,700-foot-high Berkeley Hills
that starts just steps away from the eastern end of Hopkins.
Most of those folks can't just bike home,
don't have access to reliable public transportation,
because we don't want the
potential to drive to and from
Hopkins, many of whom have been
in fact doing this for decades.
Many of these people are my
constituents, some of them are
councilmember O'Keeffe's and
others, and these people would
be negatively impacted by the
significant parking loss in the
item that we're considering
tonight.
So given the complexity of the
current situation and all of the
equities we're trying to
options before settling on one. My item simply would refer to staff the
development of two alternatives for consideration. One is the current plan
put forth by Councilmember Kesserwani centered around the Class 4 protected
bike lanes along most of Hopkins that would eliminate more than half the
parking spots in the corridor, 145 at our last estimate. And the second direction
would be an alternative plan that retains parking for as many residents as
possible who travel to and from Hopkins by car while expanding the potential
solutions space just a bit to think not just about Hopkins but also Hopkins
Ada and Rose streets together as potential pathways for bicycle
infrastructure. After all we're really talking about trying to do several
things all at once here. We're trying to figure out how to keep and expand access
to Hopkins for all Berkeley residents. How to maintain the vibrancy of the
businesses and community spaces there,
how to improve safety for all in this corridor,
how to connect North Berkeley and West Berkeley
for bicyclists, and how to do all of this
as cost-effectively as possible.
Respectfully, I think we would be better able
to evaluate whether a protected bike lane
all the way from the Alameda to Gilman along Hopkins
is the right solution if we look at it side by side
with the best possible alternative.
This is not an easy puzzle to solve,
but we do have a very capable and accomplished
public works staff that is well equipped to help us solve it.
And I think we should give them a chance.
I think we can all probably attest
to Interim Public Works Director, Wajita Miri and his team
and are looking forward to the leadership
of incoming director, Jamie Parks.
I will say that Council Member O'Keefe and I
have watched them plan and implement
an effective traffic calming project
all along Marin Avenue,
from the circle to the top of the hill.
Working with the fire department,
they've cleared sight lines,
They've slowed traffic up and down the hill,
having reviewed results to date,
they're looking further to improve safety.
They're now in the process of converting
four three-way stops into four-way stops,
knocking on a giant amount of wood.
They've seriously improved safety all along Marin Avenue
with no serious incidents since implementation.
So let's give Jamie and Wahid
and our Public Works team a chance.
Let's also try to find a way to bring our community together
around a solution here,
bring down the temperature a bit,
improve safety for everyone,
strengthen the vitality of this treasured neighborhood,
and do it cost effectively.
Let me just say, I have the utmost respect
for all of the advocates of the plan
in Councilmember Castor-Juanes' item.
These people, I know many of them,
they have the best interests of our community at heart.
I respect their advocacy so much.
Safety for all users of our streets
is one of the top priorities in our city.
But as city council members,
our job is to balance all the interests
and equities at play here.
While many bicyclists support protected bike lanes,
we've heard from many others who don't.
There's clearly not only one right way to do this.
I think development of a second balanced alternative
will give us the best chance to hold the two plans
up against each other and multiply make them
the best decision either way by having fully considered
all the options presented by staff.
So let me very briefly, I'll share my screen
with the language from the supplemental, which is here.
It's basically just an amendment,
like Council Member Ochuso has an amendment
to Council Member Castrowani's item,
which basically moves,
that we do want to move forward with the repaving.
We want to refer to staff the development
of two alternate plans for repaving Hopkins,
enhanced safety through the Hopkins Aida Rose Corridor.
We do need BFD to review and approve both plans
as the prior BFD approval refers
to two previous options.
The alternative on the table tonight
has not been approved by BFD.
We need to coordinate with AC Transit
on bus stops and traffic calming measures.
And as Council Member O'Keefe indicated,
this request and the resulting plans
would supersede the conceptual design
approved by Council in 2022.
Then we'd ask staff to return to Council
the final direction before developing
the detailed engineering plan.
So again, alternative one is as current.
Alternative two, as I've laid it out,
would ask for staff to have time
to give maximum flexibility
to develop a balanced comprehensive plan for the corridor,
minimize parking loss.
And the key principles here is
consider implementation of class two
or class four bike lanes
only where parking loss is less than 15%.
Expedite the study and implementation of safety enhancements
on roads and or ADA as part of a more comprehensive plan.
I think there are multiple ways to get bicycles
in and out of this area that don't just rely on Hopkins.
pedestrian safety, slowing vehicle speeds
by using traffic calming, curb management plan
to manage parking and so on.
So that's the item is to add the ask
for basically the second plan.
So in closing, let me just say the question to me
is not whether or not we support bicycle
and pedestrian safety as a city, because we do.
In fact, we've approved and implemented safety projects
all across Berkeley.
The question is what is the appropriate treatment
for this particular corridor, given its many users and uses.
And I think we could benefit from more staff input
before we make such a momentous decision.
I'll add that given that any Hopkins project
is likely a multi-year effort,
as Council Member O'Keefe suggested,
I'd also support a plan tonight that begins paving
on segments where we can reach agreement right away.
And I think there might be somewhere we could do that.
So we could begin the paving process
and then focus staff's attention on preparing an alternative
for consideration addresses the remaining street segments,
especially in that narrow area
in the Hopkins commercial district.
So thank you very much.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Did you have a question, Council Member Tracup?
I have questions whenever there's time.
Okay.
He's getting that.
So I think everyone has now presented their supplemental
and the original items.
So we are moving on to questions.
Go ahead.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
This first set of question, it's for staff, I believe.
Is staff available to answer questions?
Staff's available, everybody's all out.
Great.
All right, thank you so much.
I want to better understand how these proposals align
with the recently adopted 2026 bike plan
and other relevant planning documents.
Do I understand correctly that Hopkins
from Sutter to Monterey is designated
as class two bicycle infrastructure
and from Monterey to Gilman as class three?
Sorry, who were you asking this question to?
This is for staff.
For staff, we have our interim director of public works,
Wahidah Mary, who can field that.
Yeah, good evening. Mayor, council members, will hear the Mayor, the interim director of public works. I also have staff available with me. Mark Helmbrick, our transportation manager, will field that question.
Specific there about the bike plan.
The bike plan is identified as a complete streets corridor study.
And the actual designations there,
I'm going through the bike plan
to get to the underlying information.
Give me a minute.
It's gonna take me a few.
While he's looking, can I just ask Councilmember Tragob,
how many questions do you have?
I have five minutes worth of questions.
I will, I have more questions probably,
but I'm limiting them to within the five minute length.
Okay.
Can I maybe ask Fire a question in the meantime?
Yeah.
Great.
What is the Fire Department's position
on the various alternatives before us?
And are you at this point able to say
that you're comfortable with the range of options
being considered?
So Fire has reviewed and approved the traffic calming
features in the Hopkins alternative 1 and 2
that were run into fights.
that are either 11 or 10.5 feet are acceptable.
However, for the new proposed configuration
that you're discussing tonight,
we have not, there is not a design yet,
so we have not seen that, we have not reviewed it,
and we would need a complete design set from Public Works.
Once that's available, we can evaluate.
Folks, please don't.
Sorry, go ahead.
Okay, thank you.
Thanks.
sorry go ahead lies potential impacts to evacuation times and confirm the design maintains workable access for day to day fire and medical emergencies does that answer your question councilmember yes thank you for Mark are you ready it does call for a complete streets corridor study
complete streets corridor study and from looking at its get it up from Monterey to Sutter.
It is bike lane class two is the underline to the figure. Oh goodness and from Monterey to
You know, we have to go down
So I did notice that Hopkins
was not identified in the plan
community. And that the combined 2022 outreach comment density map shows Hopkins received
one of the lower number of public comments during the bike plan process, at least at
the time. So could you broadly explain how this proposal or these proposals align with
the recently adopted bike plan, the city's broader bicycle network priorities and other
planning documents. I just, and I will just have tried to say I support, you know, approving
something today, but I'm just trying to understand the general alignment with the broader vision
of where the city is going.
Can you ask the question again, Councilmember?
Yeah.
Or is he asking?
How does, how do these, like Hopkins,
how does low stress bike infrastructure
along the Hopkins corridor align
with the recently adopted bike plan?
The cities plotted bicycle network priorities
and other planning documents,
And I will note the project prioritization corridors
in the bike plan appear to prioritize roads
ahead of Hopkins in here one and two.
So I just wanted to try to understand how all of this squares.
Yeah, so Hopkins is identified in the 2026 bike plan
as to be studied as part of the low stress network.
So that is in the plan.
The complete street studies typically are looking at both on the corridor and adjacent to the corridor. So we do both of those as part of a complete street study. When we, we move those forward.
You know, the bike plan sees Hopkins as part of the citywide bicycle network and it shows up on the, on all of the mapping in the bike plan. And so it is looking for
cycling infrastructure to be on Hopkins.
Is that fair?
Sounds good to me.
I think this,
I think this next question is for Council Member Casper-Wany,
and I appreciate your work on this proposal.
Can you speak to how in your evaluation of this proposal,
we can ensure convenient access for seniors and people
with disabilities, the ones that are not able to depend
on a bike or able to walk, and as part of the parking
The demand management is, I was just there.
I noticed there were some four hour designated parking spots.
I was wondering if those are some of the ones
maybe under consideration for a shorter period of time.
Thank you, council member.
So, you know, I first wanna say, you know,
our community is very diverse and we wanna make sure
that this plan meets the needs of everyone.
And so to your question about seniors
and people with disabilities,
when we develop this comprehensive curb management plan,
we wanna make sure we have the adequate ADA parking spaces
close to the shops and close to the track,
loading zones, you're not asking about businesses.
So I won't get into that,
but we wanna make sure that people with mobility issues
can continue to access the commercial district and part of having the ADA
space is close to the businesses and looking at metering elsewhere and and and
by the way when you create the bike lane that's safe all of a sudden people who
were driving before can now get there without the need to park so we are
expecting that with all excuse me with all of no billing fees that we will
continue to maintain strong access for people with disabilities with the ADA
spaces. And by the way, you know, I go to the Hawkins corridor regularly. I
think there is a lack of the ADA spaces right now and so part of what this item
will do is make sure that we have that access moving forward. Thank you. I
I wanted to ask staff if these proposed designs have been coordinated with AC
transit or East Bay para transit and if not that's perfectly fair because this
is a referral I'm just wondering it's like whether or something to move
forward tonight, how would that coordination take place?
These proposed designs have not been coordinated with AC Transit yet.
Should something move forward, that would be a part of what staff does.
What metrics will the city use to determine whether the project is successful and meets
its objectives following implementation, shorter torment longer?
Similar to how we track and gauge other CIPs and projects, Councilmember will do pre and
post studies.
Although we don't have great data currently, we have data from a few years ago.
part of the process, we will do our best to gather information, do the curbside parking management
analysis along with other engineering and operational studies, and then from there we
can set our metrics. And we will do a post-analysis similar to what we're planning to do for Marin,
Adeline, other areas that we've brought in safety measures or infrastructure to see what we've done
good where things we need to tweak for the future so we have a good lesson learned type
of a protocol. So that's how we'll address that.
Thank you. Almost done. Between 2011 and 2026, the report states that there were 46 pedestrian
and bicycle crashes along the Hopkins corridor resulting in three fatalities, five suspected
serious injuries, 20 suspected minor injuries, 13 possible injuries and five unspecified injuries.
Could staff explain what is meant by those injury classifications and how they're determined?
Good question. Mark and I were looking at this a few minutes ago, so I'll hand it over to him.
He'll he'll hear this question.
There we go. Those are determined by Berkeley Police Department.
Um, so, um, as part of their crash analysis and doing police reports associated with crashes, uh, they characterize the results of those crashes and they get loaded up, uh, into sweaters, um, and then end up on the, um, Berkeley police transparency hub.
Okay, uh, I think those are all my questions. Thank you. Thank you very much. Vice mayor Keith.
So what are we looking at?
How did I become next?
Thank you.
Did you have questions?
Yeah, of course.
Just a couple.
Thank you so much, all of you
for being here.
My first couple of them were
already asked by Councilmember
Jacobs.
I appreciate that.
For interim director Amiri, have
you consulted the zero waste
plan that is not to up because I want his item yes we have as part of the
assessment I did touch base with our zero waste leadership and with the
separated cycle track we envisioned that we'll have ten and a half or at some
locations with wider krypto curb allowance will have 11 feet travelings
As I've said before, it allows us for vehicles for throughput.
Again, sometimes calculated depending on, you know, if it's a bus next to a zero waste vehicle or a firetruck. So it will have to be calculated movement, but operationally, there are challenges.
Throughput is one thing, but to be able to use our vehicles and in our operation, we do need to look at that in a deeper fashion during detailed design. So we know there are going to be challenges.
But the specific challenges hasn't been identified. All we know is that there will be operational challenges.
So just to make sure I understand you, are you saying that there could be challenges if a bus happened to come in one direction while the garbage truck was on the street?
Given the lane dimension, they would have to maneuver in a calculated manner just to make sure that there's no issue. So, again, we do feel it's safer.
10.5 feet to some areas of 11 feet wide is much safer than the original 10 that we were seeing flying around the community and some designs.
But nevertheless, some chassis and some of the larger vehicles with the side mirrors, they go a little bit above and beyond 10 feet. So, yes, depending on the driver, the skill sets, the environment, it will require some level of calculations maneuvering past each other.
Thank you.
Great.
Thank you very much.
And I want to just say, Director Amiri, that I know, I understand it's really, we're going
to ask you a lot of really detailed questions.
And I just want to say, just to acknowledge for you and for the public that they have
not done detailed design drawings.
And so it is very difficult to answer these questions.
And so I just want to say, I really appreciate you doing your best to give us the information
that you can, but I understand that it's hard until you've done the detailed drawings that
you cannot do until we give you direction.
So I appreciate you working with us.
So next question, has there been any sort of parking study or analysis of how the parking
loss might affect the emergence or access to the facilities at the park?
We have not done that assessment.
That will be part of the curbside management assessment and outreach that hopefully be
part of whatever option council directs us to pursue.
We have conducted visual conceptual based on site visits just to, again, get a better understanding between the 1 sided South side, dual cycle track compared to separate a cycle track what that means.
And between the 2, given the framework that protected bike lanes is the driving criteria, what design would save the most curbside parking?
that we have done on a conceptual level. But to your question council member, we have not done
any detailed walking, talking, and actual simulation or any engineering assessment for
anything further. That will be part of it. Once we get direction, then absolutely we will go
through the motions. Of course. Yeah, thank you. But you just want to clarify. You don't have that.
And this isn't a criticism. Just trying to understand what we don't know. You don't yet
know how the parking loss, you know what the parking loss would be approximately,
but you don't know how it would affect the area. Is that correct?
Because we have not done outreach to any of the businesses.
Again, our assessment and high-level conceptual feedback was just based on
eyeballing it, making some measurements because we had
a lot of requests and we were doing our best to be able to give some conceptual
feedback in a timely manner. Yeah, you're doing your best. I understand. Once
again, it's not a criticism that you don't have it.
So, thank you very much.
Changing topics a little bit, regarding, you know, I mentioned Bicycle Boulevard's in
my presentation.
Could you say just, you know, in the most general sense, what types of, if you were
to develop ROSE as a Bicycle Boulevard, what types of interventions would that typically
entail?
I'm not asking for a recommendation officially, just what would it look like?
in terms, and I'll defer this to our bicycle guru,
Mark Helmbreg, but in terms of bicycle boulevard
or protected bike lanes that will drive how we answer
the question council member.
I guess I'm wondering if you were to follow the direction
in my supplemental, which says go forward
with the recommendation in the bike plan
to turn Rose into a bicycle boulevard,
what would that look like on a general high level?
Sure, I'll hand it over to Mark, but just in general,
obviously we'll look at vertical deflection
for traffic calming a little bit.
I'm sorry, what's vertical deflection?
Can you?
Our speed cushions that is in a part of our toolbox now,
which again, it's spaced out
and we've done some live test runs
with our colleagues at the fire department
to make sure that it's more friendlier
to the fire engines and BC transit.
And then from there will also lower the speed limits.
There's other traffic calming measures that we have in our toolbox that we would implement along the corridor to make sure that it qualifies and the conditions for successful bicycle Boulevard is present.
With that, I'm going to also hand it to our bicycle guru, as I said, Mark Hambrick, if he wants to add anything else.
That's exactly right.
So he, the other thing is the current volume on Rose is above the volume that we try to
achieve on bicycle boulevard.
So we would likely have diverter at least one somewhere along Rose to lower the total
volume of traffic along Rose.
And like what he was saying, we need to bring the speeds down slightly.
And then we'd be looking at options under AB 43 to potentially lower the speed limit.
So great.
great. So slower traffic and a lot less of it. Great. Thank you. That is a goal. Yes.
Always. What is and I'm asking you this question because I believe you've already done this
calculation. Otherwise I wouldn't put you on the spot with this. But what is the approximate
and once again I know that your cost, you can say you're a disclaimer if you need to,
I know your cost estimates are very, very general
and your best guess and they could change.
So I do understand that, but given that,
what is the approximate cost differential
between my supplemental, which just has a class two painted
by a claim from Sutter to McGee
and then Sherro's from McGee to San Pablo,
versus Kesserwani's item?
What is the cost differential there?
Right off the top of my head, three, it'll be close to five, five, six million between the two, and that again is for this concrete separation.
And some other miscellaneous and again, between both of those, I'm taking out the place making element as well as part of that the GI is consistent no matter GI meaning the green infrastructure needs is consistent and is mandatory.
no matter what alternative council directs us to pursue.
Right, it's a matter of state law, is that correct?
Yes, it's per our permit.
And that's something that is a mandatory.
It is good for the environment.
So it's not, we don't have to be so sad about it,
but it is expensive.
Expensive, but good.
Yes, great.
Councilman, can I just ask how many more questions you have?
I know there are many children
I'd like to get to their comments too.
Okay, and I appreciate your indulgence
because this is, as you know, this is, this is my district, so I do actually have more questions, but I've chosen just these ones.
So, second to last question. Do you have any data on bike usage around the city or specifically in this area? Just Public Works keep track of that.
We have some data from 2022 that Mark analyzed. So I'm going to hand it over to him. I believe our consultant at the time
analyzed an intersection for bicyclists, vehicles, and also pedestrians.
So with that, I'm going to hand it to Mark to give you the numbers.
Questions. The 2022 analysis included traffic counts and pedestrian counts and bicycle counts at
Monterey and Hopkins performed by the consultant Perimetrics.
And at that time they took both weekday and weekend counts.
They had a Tuesday, Thursday, and a Saturday count.
Smooshing those kind of numbers together.
Roughly the numbers were,
and these were 12-hour counts.
So 7 a.m. in the morning till 7 o'clock at night.
Roughly 300 bicyclists a day.
roughly 3,000 pedestrians a day during those 12-hour periods and 8,500 vehicles during
that period.
So those were the gross numbers, kind of like synopsis.
Other than that, there's older counts down at Sacramento that had average daily traffic
around 8,500, so fairly consistent there.
and then the counts and the data get older and older.
So I don't wanna go too far afield.
And what about, this is related to the first question.
I was curious about that and also,
do you keep track of how much
our other bicycle infrastructure is utilized?
Like for instance, when we like the bike lane on Milvia
or the bike lane on Bancroft, do you keep track of that?
I don't need a full accounting.
I'm just curious if you have some general numbers
that you could share with us.
I know we have some data sets that are collected by the.
Sorry, go ahead.
Professor UC Berkeley that takes it as a class that takes annual bike counts, and we have we have those. I can share those data with counsel. I don't have those at my fingertips.
Okay, but we are looking at infrastructure because that's something I've heard many times and I know.
Funding is tight, but for example, at the Delaware crossing that we implemented the race crosswalks and auto detection, we were looking to see if we can get counters as well too.
So, but that's something that public works is looking into when funding is available. So, similar to how we're looking where we can improve as far as our safety projects or CIP pre and post implementation, we would like to as part of any future project to be able to collect the data.
so that way we have data and facts to talk about,
and not assumptions and predictions.
That would be, yeah, I support that,
not to get too editorial right now, but that's wonderful.
I wish we had more data.
And once again, not a criticism,
I'm glad you're working on it.
Okay, and last question.
Have we ever removed all of the parking
from such a long segment of any road in Berkeley before?
Not that I have read on or experienced.
I think the closest is Dana and Milvia from what I can recall.
How long a segment is that?
Mark, do you know?
Is it like one rock or four blocks?
It will be once all along Berkeley High, essentially,
although there's bus stops in there.
and then the Dana runs essentially Bancroft to Dwight?
Can you move all the parking from that?
Duran to Dwight, that's a two block difference.
Anyway, it's okay, I don't,
we don't need to get into the details too much,
but I was just curious if we had an experience
with this type of change.
It seems very dramatic to me, so I was curious about that.
I will, I do have another minute left,
So if I think of any more questions, I might flag you down.
But for now, I can stop.
OK, thank you.
So I do want to take a pause on our questions
and allow our younger members of the audience.
We've got some children here to give their public comments
so that they can go and have bedtime.
So if you have a small child, please
come up to give your public comment.
And there are some children that are also outside,
so I'm hoping that we can have them give their public comment.
you can cycle out, other folks can give their public comments.
And another thing I want to say is that
we have so many speakers here this evening.
We are going to limit our public comment to three hours.
That will be two hours in person and one hour online.
So if you are here with a child
and would like to give a public comment, please come up.
And then we will come back
and Council Member Blackaby, you are first for questions.
Come on up whenever you're ready.
Hi there, my name is Justin McAdams.
I'm a resident in the neighborhood
up near North Berkeley Bart.
This is my daughter Natalie, she's seven.
Natalie goes to Ruth Actie Elementary.
She will go to King Middle.
She grew up in Berkeley.
She learned to ride her bike here.
We love to ride our bike all over North Berkeley
and elsewhere.
We take the Greenway up to Solano Avenue,
down to Strawberry Creek Park.
But one area that we would love to go
that I won't let Natalie ride her bike to
is up to the North Branch Library.
We're there at least once a week,
and every time we go there, we have to drive.
It is really scary riding a bike up Hopkins.
If we do that, I make her ride on the sidewalk
or I ride in the middle of the street
because drivers there are not safe.
It is very scary, and so we ask the council
to vote yes on Councilman Casarwani's proposal.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Hi, my name is Naomi Shiffman.
This is Dahlia.
We live in West Bay, and one of the reasons
I was so excited to live and be able to raise our family
in Berkeley is for the bikeability,
for the accessibility.
And it's just been heartbreaking over the past eight years
to watch as we have just been unable to implement
this plan for so many reasons.
It feels like bureaucratic warfare at this point.
Nope, to reopen this and to continue doing more studies
and more thinking and more debating like we've done it.
We've done it, we've had the conversations.
Let's just implement this and move on.
Thank you.
Thank you.
folks please excuse me that's really inappropriate. You're yelling at a small child, go ahead.
Hi, so a lot of us are here tonight for a very simple reason. We want our kids to be able to
get to school and to move around the city safely and independently and we think that that matters
more than maximizing street parking. I'm thinking of course about my kids but also about the kids in
in West Berkeley and South Berkeley,
who a few years ago might have gone to Longfellow,
but because of our progressive values,
we now force them to go to MLK.
We are progressive enough to make them go across town.
Does that progressivism end as it so often does
when a driver is inconvenienced?
Rose Street is not an alternative.
It is too steep.
It is a cut through between SAC and MLK,
and it is busiest right when people are going
to and from school.
It is not an alternative, it is an excuse.
And it is identical to doing nothing,
and it should be rejected.
We also want our kids to grow up in a world
with a stable climate.
You know that transportation emissions
are the number one source of climate emissions in Berkeley.
Some of you have built your whole careers
and identities around climate change.
So I'm out of time, do the right thing.
Thanks.
Thank you.
Hi council members.
My name is Daniel Chang.
I go to the Evangel Bible Church of Berkeley
on Hopkins and Ordway.
And my daughter Evelyn, who's nine,
she has a few words to say.
Hello, my name is Evelyn.
and my family and I attend
Avanto Bible Church of Berkeley on Hopkins Street.
If you build a bike lane on Hopkins Street,
then all of our parking in front of church will be gone.
The moms at the church will need to carry their babies
for blocks and it will be tiring for them.
Please vote no for bike lanes on Hopkins Street.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you.
Hi, my name is Chris.
I've been a resident of Berkeley for 15 years.
My daughters are three and a half and one and a half,
and I expect they'll probably be walking
and biking to school before I'm ready for it.
I've spoken in support of Hopkins safety improvements
in the past, and now it's more important to me
than ever before.
Hopkins is a direct route for students
to get to middle school.
I appreciate all the work that's gone
into these proposals and supplementals,
but I wanna stress that sharrows and bypass routes
they do not protect the most
vulnerable road users.
They do not protect the most
vulnerable road users.
It's disingenuous to say that
Rose Street is a real
alternative.
It cannot be made safe for
children without physically
separated infrastructure and
removal of parking.
Police quote unquote save
Hopkins by taking sensible
action to prevent further
injury and death.
Do not let children trying to
get to school become a
statistic because you voted to
prioritize parking over truly
report improvements. Thank you. Thanks so much. Nice catch, Liza. Hi, my name is Sonia
Trous. Hopkins Street is more than 30 feet wide. There's enough room for parking and
a bike lane and one lane of car traffic. People going the other direction make it one way.
People going other direction can go on Rose Street. That's a street. I know that people
don't want like a new different plan, but I think the most realistic plan is something
that gives everybody what they want, right? You're hearing a lot of like, we need parking,
we need a bike lane, there is room for both. And going forward, we should be replacing
car, moving cars with moving bikes. Nobody ever got hit by a parked car. The parked cars
are not the problem. It's moving cars. So we say our budget is an expression of our
values. Our road budget is also an expression of our values. We want people to be going
in bikes, not going in cars, take lanes away from moving cars, give those lanes to moving
bikes. We could even wind up with more parking. Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
Hello, my name is Oscar. I am 15 years old, going into sophomore year at Berkeley High,
and I just wanted to come up here to say a couple words. First of all, I've been biking
the school since sixth grade. I went to Longfellow but something I wanted to say was that there's
many bike lanes in Berkeley but a lot of them are just like next to parking spots and something
I've always grown up like learning and like being aware of is that someone can open the
the door and you could get hit by the car door.
This has happened to me like two to three times and yeah.
That's okay, did you need more time?
No, I'm sorry.
Okay, thank you.
So, my name is Finn.
I go to Ruth Actie Elementary and oftentimes,
we have my friends after school walk to like
rocks and cold or something.
And it'd be nice if we could bike there
because it would make it a lot faster
and a lot easier to get there.
But since there's no bike lanes,
we can't really do that.
And like a lot of people have gotten injured
while they're biking or died because they were biking
and there's not a bike path and some car comes and hits them.
And that seems bad.
That's great thank you okay do
we miss any children.
I don't see any okay I think we
had those who were outside come
in as well.
All right so we are going to
take a 10 actually let's make
it it.
We're going to take a 15 minute
break and we're going to come
back and do questions from the
Council members.
Thanks everyone.
please take your seats please finish your conversations or take them outside
thank you so much okay thank you very much for your patience we are gonna go
back to councilmember questions with councilmember Blackaby great thank you
I hope we won't take the full five minutes is chief Sprague still on yes
Chief so just to re-up on the fire review part. So what are the next steps for fires review of the of this current alternative on the table.
The next steps would occur once public works gets us a full design set.
And at that point, we would evaluate 3 things 3 primary things 1 is if emergency vehicle turning movements.
We'd analyze potential impacts to evacuation time and we'd confirm that the design maintains
workable access for day-to-day fire and medical emergencies on and immediately adjacent to
Hopkins.
Okay, so it's evacuation from like catastrophic and then day-to-day emergency access, so it's
kind of that full gamut.
Right.
Okay, and how long might that process take to do that review study?
It'd be between 2 and 4 weeks, depending on complexity.
And what happens if we reach a gotcha, if something doesn't work? If you can't approve it, what happens? You come back to us? Just what's what happens?
If it doesn't pass the normal processes that staff from fire and public works.
Communicate and coordinate on these things every every time 1 of these projects goes through the process.
And normally they're able to make modifications to the design to.
To be able to approve it through the process. So, like, 1 of the 1 of the kind of fatal fatal things would be if we couldn't get the lanes to.
11 preferred or 10 and a half minimum for short distances that that could be something where we would have a substantial problem. But.
Outside of that, generally staff can work together to.
come to a design set that works for all users.
Okay, thank you.
It's a public works team.
Can I ask a little bit about the loading zone kind of issue?
So on the segment of,
again, in the current plan where
the cycle track might be on both sides of the street,
if you've got amenities like King pool, King track,
schools, libraries, all that kind of stuff,
what happens with loading zones in those areas?
How does that work in conjunction with car traffic with the, the protected bike lanes? How do we accommodate all that so it depends if there's in this areas.
Or blocks that have 36 feet cryptocurrency if we have to implement protected bicycle lanes, it removes the curbside parking. But there's other areas. This quarter.
Changes roadway with 3, 4 times.
and areas that are 41 feet,
which is again in the McGee area in the Monterey.
We can, depending on what directions we get from council,
we can look at what that means as far as protected bike lanes and travel lanes.
Getting to the wider sections,
we can design one side and that's in segments that are about 45 to 46 feet in width.
We can permit one side again,
floating with protected bike lanes.
But to your point council member,
for loading needs, etc,
we would have to look at side streets as well too.
When we were out there a couple of times,
we did observe that the Monterey market has
a few really large delivery vehicles that belong to them.
That is already parked on the side streets.
So, given that once we restrict or remove parking and we're able to only allow floating parking at specific segments that we have the geometry to allow it safely,
parking becomes scarce, right?
So, we have to take into account near King Pool, there's already ADA stalls and we have actually one or two more that have been requested a while back that we'll need to implement.
So that itself requires wider buffer to meet ADA requirements and additional curb cuts depending on where the layout of that specific is implemented.
So to your question, we would really have to look hard and be strategic as far as side streets and that again, as part of the curbside management plan, we'll also look at metering to make sure that we have sufficient turnaround for businesses and so forth.
So, again, all of that will be taking into account once we get direction and we implement the curbside management plan.
Okay, I'm thinking beyond even the commercial piece, the.
The pool tennis courts.
Birthday parties in the park, all of the Saturday, Sunday traffic with.
Soccer and sporting events and stuff at the at the at the at the park.
with no parking it's like you're gonna have even more loading unloading I think
than you do now because right now parents come and park and whatever leave
their kid or do their stuff now if we're removing or reducing parking we're gonna
have doing that just to me feels like an issue that we're gonna have to think
through a lot and there's parts of that long block along King pool there there
are not side streets right it's like you have a long extended block sorry can you
keep to your questions please just so we can move on to our public comment if you
of more questions since you're making some statements right now so I'm asking
if you can keep that to the comment period okay I was asking for feedback
on whether or not that how will we accommodate that yeah we would have to
try to look at size trees councilmember to your point yes towards the the king
pool area again as I mentioned there's already two to three 88 stalls that are
going in there, space is going to be limited.
So our only option is to look at the side streets once we get into curbside management and outreach to discuss the business needs and frequencies and so forth.
Okay, thank you on the parking piece. I think we received update from staff. I just want to make sure this is still accurate.
Roughly 274, so spaces along the whole Hopkins strip parking slots currently.
And in the current plan, we'd be losing about 145 of those again. It's order of magnitude. It's not perfect. As counselor keep said, we know you haven't done the detailed work, but that feels.
So it's about a little more than half of the parking sort of goes away and with this plan.
Order of magnitude. Okay, that's not taking it to standards. If we're going to stand edge.
One of the things we're looking
for based on the supplement I
heard earlier that adds another
47 just to be clear.
So maybe it goes from 145 to
190 or 192 or something.
Thank you.
Councilmember O'Keefe, if we go
with your plan on the cycle 2
extension to McGee and Sharrows,
what is your understanding, and
this could be back to public
works as well, what's your
that longer stretch to McGee and then do sharers or again,
something else from McGee to Gilman.
What happens to parking in those areas?
I definitely wanna let Public Works answer,
but I will say I actually,
so I asked for a class two bike lane,
which is just a painted lane.
We actually have that already.
It's just, you know, hard to read the paint
because there's, it's rubble.
But I don't believe it's buffered.
And once again, I really wanna defer to Public Works
to explain this.
I left the word buffered in on my item and I believe there's not room for a buffer between the, um, the bike lane and the traffic lane. So, assuming there's no buffer, which is my intent.
I believe we could keep all of the parking, but I want to hear from public works. Thank you for the question.
So we would have to take a look at a council member, but just in general, as you mentioned, there are segments that has already class 2. We can bring a higher visibility, whether it does the green pavement or fresh striping.
But again, in areas that we implement share rows or hybrid between class 2 and share rows.
Obviously, that doesn't impact curbside parking, so it would remain the same. But again, if there's any specific.
Details that's something that we'll have to take a look closer. Look and really see the true impacts, but I.
Again, based on the past referral that.
Was issued by you and council member based on that design.
When we looked at it, I think just having pedestrian enhancement that I think only impacted for curbside park installs just in reference.
can I do my to submit is that my recollection is that was to accommodate some ADA to an
additional space. Is that correct ad and also some bulb outs and some refuge. Thanks. So
the difference between the current Casa money plan and what council member briefly that
is recovery of a substantial amount of that last parking. Correct. If it's maintaining
the existing class 2 with again share rows and if traffic on this part of that hopefully it is
then yes we maintain current or close to current council. Obviously as I mentioned we'll have to
take a closer look at it but the numbers shouldn't change substantially. Okay last group of questions
that I'm done if if we did ask you to develop in my item we this alternative plan where we give you
more of an ability to say, here's the guidelines, come back with something.
What's the timeline order of magnitude for something like that?
Conceptual plan is not a detailed engineering plan.
It's a conceptual plan given the work you've got.
Like, what's the timeline for something like that?
If we prioritize a council member within the next 4 months,
we can probably deliver a conceptual that we feel confident with.
But again, if we're balancing multiple competing urgencies
we're not going to do that.
If we are not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
if we're not going to do that
You just look at the Hopkins Ada Rose corridor from the word way, like that piece that gets you from the commercial district.
Either to Sacramento or back on the Gilman to kind of get to the rest of us if we just did the shorter segment.
Does that save a little time? Can you do both a paving?
And move forward with paving on the Eastern side while you finish a study on the Western side.
Is that feasible and does that save you a little time if we did that?
It's more efficient if we do the design complete council member.
If costs are a challenge or a factor,
we can look at phase in construction,
which obviously as cost because of mobilizing and so forth.
But the preference is to be able to capture
the full corridor design at once.
When we do LiDAR, we do our measurements.
It just makes more sense and it's better engineering
just to put everything in perspective.
But again, we can phase out construction,
but the recommendation is to do whatever design holistically.
so we can see from San Pablo to Sutter
where the pieces fit and how things interact.
So that way we have the full picture going into design
completed and bid ready set.
Great, thank you so much.
I'm done. Thank you.
Okay.
Thank you very much.
Council Member Bartlett.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
I have a question for Mr. Ahari.
So is there a deadline by which we must choose
an option or a link figuration that will result
and delaying pavement paving?
Like, so in order to delay the paving,
do we have a deadline in which to make a decision?
So currently, we have about 6.1 or 6.3 million
program for fiscal year 28.
So we'll just have to work backwards.
Usually, we get into design six to eight months prior to that.
We roll out into packages, council member,
first the concrete curb repairs,
And then the pavement based on the time of the year, just to, you know, beat mother nature before the, the, the weather conditions change. So we can if there's a precise timeline you're looking for, we can provide that to you.
But that's generally the rule of thumb. So fiscal year 28 unless council directs us to change that, but that's where it's programmed right now. So that should give you a timeline of when we need to make decisions to align everything.
Thank you and seeing how there's so many elements here at play in this plan,
so many inputs that we're trying to negotiate and navigate here and, um,
with unstudied impacts, really, um,
could public engagement post decision by this council?
Um,
could that result in a different alignment being selected or the community be
consulted about mitigation only?
I mean, I can speak to that councilman, right?
I think whatever direction you give us,
that's the direction we're gonna go.
And so, part of the referrals that are out there now,
it sounds like what the direction is,
is we're not asking whether we should do this or not.
We're trying to understand how to impact loading,
how to impact ADA placement, things like that.
Not the basic structure of the proposal.
Okay, thank you.
And I guess lastly, this is a high level,
if you had just to guesstimate here.
What would you guess the cost differential
there's an alternative like the
road Street alternative.
I was need some time to take a
look at that council member.
There's a lot of moving pieces
elements.
We can get back to you with
some sort of a rough order
magnitude or planning purposes
costs.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you.
Excuse me, customer Humber.
Thank you, madam mayor, and I'm
I'm going to try to keep my questions fairly consistent,
and they're going to be in the nature of yes or no answers
to help to keep us on track here,
maybe in the nature of cross-examination,
but I don't want to say that.
And is maybe an option?
Well possibly, the first one is,
can staff please confirm that a cycle track
is shown as the envisioned network improvement
for Hopkins Street in figure two,
low stress bikeway network vision
of the Berkeley Bicycle Plan.
Can you confirm that?
Mark is looking that up right now, Mark Helmbrick.
Yeah.
And if you can't find it,
can represent that it that's the case it's shown on the low stress bike way
network vision as a study cycle tracking is a primary transit route yeah okay
thank you can staff please confirm that a cycle track is shown as the
recommended network improvement for Hopkins Street in figure 3 recommended
the city manager. And does.
doesn't and that's kind of a follow-up to council member Trigob's question.
Does plan Bay Area discuss Berkeley's bicycle network at the individual
project level? I don't believe it does but we'll have to double check. Pardon? I
do not believe it does but I'll have to check. Thank you. Here's another one. Is it
correct that the Berkeley Climate Action Plan includes as a strategy, and this is
a quote, accelerate implementation of the city's bicycle and pedestrian plans and
continue efforts to make walking and cycling safe, healthy, and enjoyable
alternatives to driving." Yes. Okay, thank you city manager. Is it also correct that
the bike's the Berkeley Climate Action Plan includes a strategy that reads
quote, manage parking effectively to minimize driving demand and encourage
and support alternatives to driving?
We'll have to double-check, but I'll represent that it does.
I'll assume the answer is yes.
That's what I do in depositions.
I'll represent that it does.
Is it correct that the City of Berkeley has an adopted and still enforced climate emergency
declaration that reads, in part, quote, the City of Berkeley endorses a just citywide
emergency mobilization effort to end citywide greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible.
Yes, yes. Okay, thank you. Is it correct that the complete streets policy adopted by the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission in 2022 includes the following language,
quote, safety shall be prioritized for all modes, especially the safety of vulnerable road users.
That includes people biking, walking, and rolling.
The safety of vulnerable roadway users
should not be compromised to achieve improved level
of service for people driving personal automobiles."
End quote.
We would have to check, but assume yes.
I'll represent that that's correct.
Councilmember, I'm sorry.
How many more questions do you have?
Just a couple more, Madam Mayor.
OK, all right.
But actually, just one.
Our staff aware of any adopted city policy or plans
or policies that explicitly prioritize the provision or convenience of non-disabled
car parking over pedestrian and bicycle safety, alternative transportation forms, or climate
action?
No, we're not, Councilmember.
Thank you.
Those are my questions.
Okay.
Thank you.
So...
Thank you, everyone.
you everyone. So all right so earlier I was saying that I wanted to limit the
comments to three hours, two hours in person, one hour online. We've already
used some of that time. We did miss a child so thank you for being first but
we actually need to vote on that so I would like to make a motion to to spend
the rules and allow us to limit public comment to three hours, two hours in
person, one hour online. Second. Thank you. Can we take the role in that please? Okay
I'm gonna vote yes, but I'd like to make a comment afterwards if that's okay. Yes, black of E. Yes
Yes
Yes, I
Was also told that there might be another child that's outside that also would like to speak is it this person here or
Okay, all right. If there are any other children that were missed, please feel free to come to the front
I'm gonna start over here with this mayor
No, I think we should keep your comment for the comment period because I really want to let everyone give their comments
Go ahead. Please come up
Go ahead
Go ahead
Hello. Thank you for taking the time to hear us out board members
Contrary to kiss or miss kiss warrior statement
It is not genuinely contested about the cycle lane. We had voted this on
For measure double F and we voted this down the people of Burke. They've already voted and decided we do not want to have
this
Public endangerment project and forced on us. I live on the 1600 block of Hopkins
I've been there for 30 years. My family's been in the neighborhood for 80
We definitely want to help bicyclists, but the problem is the
need a pants paint standard shoulder bike lanes on Rose and Hopkins in
Sacramento and paved the road we waited 10 years we've had two water main
brakes and bike walk Berkeley is holding our basic infrastructure product
projects hostage of the parents and children running stop signs on bicycles
as a child endangerment and must be ticketed as well as stop signs and red
light runners San Francisco makes millions of dollars in tickets each year
It is child endangerment.
People who...
Thank you.
Thanks for your comment.
Okay.
Come on up.
Hello.
My name is Thea and I'm an upcoming freshman at Berkeley High.
I'm a member of the Youth Commission but I'm speaking as an individual.
As a young person I know that many of my friends and peers bike all throughout Berkeley and
Hopkins Street is a really popular place for kids my age because of its proximity to King
Middle School and its various restaurants and shops.
Kids my age don't have driver's license or cars and a lot of people bike or use public
transportation to get around.
If you've like seen the bike racks at Berkeley High School, they're always packed.
And my friends have told me horror stories about how like stressful and unsafe it feels
to bike on Hopkins.
Young people want to be able to travel safely and that's why we want protected bike lanes
on Hopkins.
We deserve streets that make biking safer for everyone, especially the youth in Berkeley.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you.
Whoever's next, come on up.
Okay, so you have two minutes, okay, and so folks, if you have someone who's seeding you time, if you could just organize them so that we can move along as quickly as possible, that would be great.
Go ahead. Okay, good evening. I have two questions.
Who won the 2020 election?
Second question, who signed off on fire safety issues for one-way class four
separated bikeways on Hopkins that you are now proposing? The answer is Biden
won the election and no one from the fire department signed off. No one.
Fire Chief Sprague sent me the letter which I sent to you yesterday in which I've
distributed at this meeting. And I'd like you to read along with me. Despite
what Kesser Wani's assurance that the fire department signed off, Sprague
unequivocally states that he did not. He said he writes, it is also important to
distinguish what the fire department has and has not approved. The newly
proposed configuration involving one-way protected bicycle lanes on both
sides of Hopkins is a different design and the fire department has not reviewed
that configure configuration the council spot sponsors are lying to us the
lies on page seven updated review by fire department approval has not been
given I listened to the entire two-hour audio of the fights meeting that's
referred to as when the sign-off took place and at minute 40 member Humber
questions Sprague hypothetically on the emergency response with bike lades. He
says, Sprague says, it feels risky to me. I don't know that it's not an option but
it doesn't feel super safe for my and then Humbert interrupts him. Do you hear
that? It feels risky to me. I don't know that it's not an option but it doesn't
feel safe. Can't counsel I am asking you to drop this item. City manager and
attorney investigate how this deception and unauthorized proposal came before us
tonight. Thank you. When you're, yeah, please come on up, whoever's next. As soon as that
person's done, yeah, just come on up. My name is Helen Walsh speaking today as an
individual residence. Accessibility of public right-of-way is a title 2 civil
rights requirement. It cannot be treated as secondary to any transportation mode.
The three supplementums for item 27 highlight different priorities, but none
provide the accessibility structure that Title 2 requires. What is still missing
is a full accessibility analysis of ADA parking displacement, loading access, waste
collection access, tree root and curb damage, and impacts on floating bus
stops and mid-block crossings on residents with disabilities. These are
core public right-of-way functions. The fire department's emergency access
statement is important but emergency access is not the same as accessibility
title 2 requires access for residents with disabilities senior paratransit and
service vehicles emergency access does not replace accessibility analysis thank
you thanks so much for your comment I'm sorry thank you hi I'm Lisa Chow and
Andrea all she'll has to her minute mayor and council members I'm opposed to
the installation of cycle tracks in Hopkins as proposed by councilmember
Kesserwani. I park in the disabled parking spot at King pool several times
a week throughout the year. I'm glad it's right by the sidewalk at the entrance of
the path to the pool, because if a cycle track is installed by the sidewalk, I
fear for being able to have safe access to the pool. My experience with cyclists
is that the majority do not heed pedestrians. The cyclists ride right
through stop signs and if you say anything, they'll say fuck you. Now with
electric bikes that go faster and are more powerful, it's an even more
dangerous situation. I'm appalled by how much money over three million dollars
the cycle tracks will cost. How is it that you have money for that when we had
to supplement the budget with measure FF or repaving the streets and sidewalks.
How is it you have money for that but are laying off city employees? How is it
you have money for that, and you can't build housing for the homeless, and how is it that
you have money for that, but none for janitorial staff to clean our pools and showers, leaving
us in unsanitary conditions. Consider alternate routes like Rose and Ada. Work towards consensus,
not division. Hopkins needs to be repaid now. Safety and access for disabled. Seniors and
all of the residents in Berkeley don't violate the American disabilities act.
Can I start? Thank you. 14 year Hopkins McGee resident who shuttled the needed stop sign at
McGee Hopkins to installation. No deed will go unpunished if the Kesirwani item passes.
It will create further pedestrian hazards by adding concrete divided perilous bike tracks.
It will not have had the input of the blind population. Here's a reply I received today
from the center for the blind East Bay bike tracks and bus
islands absolutely done without us in mind equals us blind folks
for all pedestrians imagine being on foot trying to cross that Monterey
Hopkins with multiple stop sign intersections
east west north south while inexperienced kids on bikes merge with
e-scooters e-riders e-bikers move within concrete the riders have to
figure out who can apply first second third
indecision can confuse the drive around the pedestrian causing an accident
what about bike e-bike riders who want to supersede people in front of them.
E-bikes can speed up to 35 miles an hour.
Short O'Neill was killed trying to cross Monterey Hopkins.
Ten years later the same intersection will harbor increased dangers
with more lanes and rising indecision about traffic flow.
Michael Franz has asked me to use one minute of his time.
My name is Bryce Nesbitt and unlike Mr. Humbert I don't have the option of
interrogating staff, but if so, I would ask,
do you have access to temporary traffic lights
that can be installed within 24 to 48 hours?
Now, why the heck would I ask that?
Because you have a known unsafe intersection.
It's Ada at Sacramento.
It's miserable to cross.
It's the site of a cyclist death
where that cyclist was dragged by a car.
It's an incredibly fast, high-speed road,
and you could solve that right away,
and it would help walk to school with Actee
and bike to the Hopkins district.
Why are you not doing that?
The Aida route in general has been a subject
of community interest, including extensive drawings,
conceptual studies, counts for a long time.
There was even $50,000 in the budget
to study alternatives here.
And my drawing here shows the Three Little Monkeys.
Why would you take this action without having studied that route in terms of costing and practicality?
I know that it hasn't been done.
I know that Free Javendale, the director who is eventually fired over allegations of having cooked the books on Hopkins,
had resisted studying that for quite some period of time.
But just before he was let go by the city, he sent me an email,
Personally, no, which is in your council record
Actually quite warm to that
At the time it was called the ada bypass
I don't like that name even though I coined it because bypasses are very car centric concept
Think back to the 50s when towns were bypassed by the highway and then died
It's now called the ada ultra low stress bikeway because that's what it is
It's a great route beautiful way to get to the business district
Thank you today
I'm a cyclist. I'm trying to hydrate and and thank you Bryce good evening
Well, I'm glad he clarified that because to somebody like me bypass has a whole different meaning I
Pedal at 12 or 14 miles an hour
Good year. I might get 3,000 miles in I
Got a lot of competition for a bike lane officer valet
Berkeley police confirmed for me last Monday at coffee with a cop
motorized skateboards
rental scooters
There's stupid hover boards piloted by the Darth Vader young men and of course
Electric bicycles all go 25 legally guess where they do it in a four-foot wide bike lane
They're going 10 miles an hour faster than me
It's just like being out with cars, which I'm comfortable with.
Protected bike lanes don't protect pedal bicyclists.
Thank you.
Thank you, Diana, for the extra minute.
My name is Ann Parker.
I live in the area.
I'm a practicing physician primarily
for children and adults with neurodevelopmental
disabilities, cerebral palsy, things like that.
My primary concern is maintaining
safety on Hopkins Street.
To me, that means repaving the street now.
We've heard so much tonight about what we don't know
about the plan, the cycle track four plan
that is supposedly going for recommendation.
I had no idea we knew so little.
So to me, safety means repaving the street now,
improving crosswalks by repairing,
repainting and adding morning lights,
considering speed bumps to slow down cars and cyclists.
Scooters.
What is not safe is some of the things
that are being proposed.
By bus islands, I would love to demonstrate for you
what it's like when my blind kids try to go up curves
and across lanes where there are cyclists
often coming both ways,
and then to get up a curb and finally start to walk again.
So I don't want bus lanes, they're dangerous,
or I'm sorry, bike ons.
I don't want barriers, they're dangerous.
And losing parking is not something
that's just about losing parking.
If we lose parking, we have people
driving out of their driveways.
and the cameras that we now have on our cars
don't show you who's coming,
they show you who you're about to hit.
So please don't think it's just indulging wealthy people
by not being able to park on the street.
Tonight I encourage you to go forward
to reschedule paving as agreed to in February
and to reject item 20.
Thank you.
Thanks for your comments.
Oh, I have an extra minute.
I'm sorry, you got your extra minute,
so your time is up, thank you.
Could I have a minute?
Thank you.
Okay.
Pave now, appropriate, with appropriate improvements.
Every year of delay means more crack pavement,
more potholes, more accidents,
and a bigger repair bill for the city down the road.
We can't wait another decade.
We must decouple the repair of Hopkins
and safe bike infrastructure.
Move for general safety now,
continue working towards a bike plan
that suits the scale and culture of our neighborhood.
With regard to the development of bike lanes,
I encourage more time.
A quote from our mayor, take,
a quote from the mayor is, take a step back,
breathe, rest your mind, and come with a fresh perspective.
I thank you for that.
I really do, mayor, and I thank you for your time.
Thank you. I'm so sorry but if you've given your minute you but if you've
given your minute you can't speak. So thank you. Mr. City Clerk can you please
confirm? That's been our practice. Thank you. Thank you City Council. You probably
know me. My name is Derek Rodriguez. Today I'm speaking on behalf of Cal Berkeley
Democrats. In supporting improvements along Hopkins I would protect the safety
of our residents. That I believe is the true lens through which this decision
should be made. It should be paramount to address pedestrian safety concerns. It
is unfortunate if said concerns are only addressed after someone is injured
fatally or otherwise. It is with this in mind that I also advocate for bike lanes
and to address those concerned with business and living arrangements surrounding parking,
I say to the city, let the community be involved in the planning process.
If we can decide how to integrate greater bike lanes while I'm still maintaining accessibility
to people's housing and local businesses, I say we should listen to our community and
follow our concerns from either side to the benefit of everyone. We shouldn't let this
spill into partisanship. Let's create a solution with the people's approval and allow us to take
part of the planning process. Thank you.
I'm Theta Nika Fuchsin, the former Vice Mayor of Berkeley. What I'm concerned
about is that we're in a culture war and it's very, very, very painful to see
people on both sides fighting the way it's been going on. Tonight, there's one
point of agreement, and that is that Hopkins Street needs to be repaved. You
don't have complete information about anything else and you've heard that the
fire chief has not signed off on this. I will tell you something that someone
said to me the other day. I was talking, standing next to a cyclist, and I said
are you, have you heard about what's going on on Hopkins Street? And he said,
Oh, yes. And I said, well, what do you think about it? He said, well, I think we should
have bike lanes. And I said, have you thought about all the other people in the community
who may need other ways to go? And he looked at me and he said, you want to hear what he
said to me? Thank you. I'm sorry. You will not be here to know the difference. Okay,
this person's giving you a minute. That's culture war. I will not be here to know the
difference and I tell you I had everything I could do but to raise my hand to that young man.
Thank you very much.
Hi my name is Moni Gangarpathai. I am a candidate for city council in district one and I'm a West
Berkeley resident. We all want the same things believe it or not. We want safety, we want
on accessibility and we want to be able to participate
in this clean transportation future.
Council member Blackaby's supplemental proposal
in this item is the most safe, fair, sensible,
and environmentally sustainable plan.
I am an able-bodied biker and a driver.
However, I could not in good conscience support a plan
that serves a small number of able-bodied people
like myself, while reducing accessibility for elders,
people with small children, people with disabilities,
and people who can't afford thousands of dollars
to buy an e-bike, the kind of e-bike
that's required to carry small children uphill.
Remember, I'm from West Berkeley.
A clean transportation feature
should include clean transportation options for all.
The main proposal fails to do that.
Furthermore, we need to be able to identify the problem
and then address it at its source?
What's the problem?
A lack of safety.
What is the source of that problem?
Unsafe driving.
All the infrastructure in the world
will not address this behavioral issue.
As a biker, I have seen cars parked
in the protected bike lanes on Novea,
which I support the protected bike lanes.
I've also seen a car cut off a cyclist
to turn onto that cycle track.
We need to raise awareness and enforce traffic rules
which is not happening on Hopkins.
Furthermore, the main plan will result
in environmental harms resulting from increased
car traffic, traffic jams, and circling around Hopkins
thereby increasing our city's greenhouse gas emissions.
City Council, I ask you, are you somebody who is disabled?
Elderly, or do you have children?
Are you not able to afford e-bikes
to bring your families along?
Do you have kiddos like me who use King pool
and play sports on King field?
Well, I don't have a newborn.
While nursing a newborn or bringing your parents along
to watch their grandchildren play.
If not, I urge you to adopt a Mamdani level
of compassion on this issue.
Pave Hopkins now.
Be cost effective with the funds
that would have been allocated to the cycle track
and repave and maintain the long list of bicycle streets
that need attention across Berkeley,
and three, adopt the most humane and sensible plan
in this item, which is Council Member Blackaby's plan,
and thank you also to Council Member O'Keefe.
I appreciate you, I appreciate this work,
and thank you for allowing me to speak.
I have minutes being seated by Laura Parsons,
Lisa Oldsby and Marilyn Simons.
Right there, yeah, and I'm just gonna read this
because otherwise I will flub up and waste time.
So, okay.
The fight over Hopkins Street has been long and hard fought
and it has taken its toll on the community.
Distressed in city government is at or near
an all-time high and general community dissatisfaction
continues to grow.
I read in a recent Chronicle article
that Ben Gerhartstein of Walk Back Berkeley
reported the organization finally had enough political juice
to push the cycle track plan through council.
It's a troubling statement.
Without political influence, Friends of Hopkins Street,
a true grassroots organization with no clout,
no outside or city funding, no regional
or statewide well-funded organizational support,
must simply rely on facts and data to influence you.
Over the years, that approach has not worked.
To avoid having to address our facts and data,
we were maligned as too old,
as obstructionists and nimbies,
and as caring more about our cars than about children.
We were told that staff quit because of us,
you name it, and somebody has said it about us.
But by sticking to facts and data,
we've accomplished some things.
For instance, no one is now insisting
that a two-way cycle track on Hopkins
is a good or safe idea because it isn't.
And by sticking to the facts and data,
we see an opportunity to settle the Hopkins issue
once and for all.
It centers around actually permitting staff
to gather facts and data.
Council members have long substituted
their own amateur judgments
for the professional ones of staff members,
which has led to ideology creeping into policymaking
and further distrust of our elected officials.
But you have the opportunity to turn that around
by taking the handcuffs off staff
and letting them explore the many options
available for providing a great low-stress east-west connection to West Berkeley and
the Bike Boulevard network from North Berkeley. There is no inherent reason why the only option
ever considered is Hopkins, nor is there an inherent reason why it must include cycle
track, especially one on an almost 100% residential street. In fact, there are contraindications
for such a plan. That is an ideological desire, no more, no less. Let staff figure this out,
hands untied, and get clout and juice and influence and ideology out of the decision-making
process. Council member Blackaby included a plan in his most recent district newsletter
that is close to ideal. It would allow staff to evaluate the efficacy of a bypass and the use of
of Rose as alternatives to Hopkins.
After all, three out of the four local schools
cited as a need for a cycle track
are actually located on Ada and Rose.
The fourth St. Mary's College High School
is located at the north end of Albina Avenue,
which is the car entrance to the school.
It's heavily trafficked, especially in the morning,
and it's rare to see a student bicycling
to school at this entrance.
I know because I live there.
staff could look at the accident statistics on Hopkins
and actually analyze whether a cycle track
would make a difference.
In its analysis, it would certainly exclude the accidents
that didn't even occur on Hopkins,
whose inclusion supporting the cycle tracks
is a clear indication of ideological creep.
As it now is, we are beginning to understand
that your constant praise of staff
is in celebration of their having done
exactly what you told it to do,
not a testament to their ability
to do quality analysis work.
We believe they are capable of the latter.
It's hard to imagine why you would not support
Councilmember Blackaby's or O'Keefe's supplementals.
If you claim your support for cycle tracks on Hopkins
is truly grounded in facts and not based on ideology,
you will not be threatened by the study of alternatives,
since you must believe your preferred plan is the best one
and will emerge on top.
Please support their proposals and restore-
Thank you, Donna.
See the public.
My name is Chris Hamilton. You're about to put the cart before the horse if you approve
Kessarwani's proposal. How deceptively and ironically ironic it is to say that the failed
road condition on Hopkins demands immediate paving when the supporters of this proposal
and their minions on the infrastructure council ensured that it would not be paved so that
it would descend into this condition. Why should we listen to voices in support of this
referral by Councilmember Keshewani? They are the ones who shamelessly displayed their
children to you in the past, dishingenuously claiming an enclosed two-way bicycle track
was safe for their kids. The same ones who railed against supporters of Save Hopkins
for opposing this dangerous alternative,
claiming we wanted to put their children in danger.
Now everyone agrees.
Thank you.
This is not the right thing to do.
Thanks for your comment.
Hi there, my name is Benjamin.
This is Reuben.
We just put Reuben's younger sister, Frida, to bed,
and we came back here to join you all at the meeting.
Thank you to Council.
Huge thank you to the staff.
We've done an incredible amount of work on this project
over many, many years, often without gratitude,
without thanks, and subject to much vitriol.
So we wanna start by just saying thank you
to the staff of the city of Berkeley for the work that has gone into this and for the work
that will still come and will go into this. We want to speak in support of the current
referral. We think that it offers a direction that is aligned to the city's vision, to the
safety of the streets, to the safety of future users of the streets. And I also want to say
that I think it leaves an appropriate amount of discretion for staff to work out some of
the details that address some of the concerns that have been spoken. And I also want to
say that I think that the general tenor, the general dialogue is slightly
hyperbolic. I don't think Hopkins needs to be saved from this proposal. I do
acknowledge that there are some people who will be inconvenienced, that there are
real costs to this, but I think that overall it is in the right direction.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you Marishi and council members. Thank you for
listening to this item. I have three points that I'd like to bring up tonight.
item. The first is safety. The second is the importance of the commercial note at
Monterey and Hopkins. And lastly is cost. First, as an ardent walker, I, you know, I
used to bike in my childhood, but now I'm kind of prevalent, primarily a walker.
And I find those protected cycle barriers very confusing and actually
fairly dangerous. Because it's hard for me sometimes, you know, I'm in fairly good
shape, but, you know, 74 years old.
And I can still climb over these barriers,
but they're a little bit of a challenge.
There's a time when I can envision
when I won't be able to do that.
Second, the four block commercial node
from the gate of Sacramento, I would argue,
is one of the absolute jewels of Berkeley.
Monterey Market's not just a neighborhood grocery store,
it was founded in 54 by Tom and Mary Fujimoto.
I see one of the Fujimoto's here.
I'm gonna run out of time, so I'm afraid
I have to cut this short.
But people come from all over to shop there.
Hi.
I've sent a comment, and you've heard some good comments.
I want to talk about this young versus old thing that goes.
Somebody called it culture wars.
It's really awful.
I mean, why not encourage a dialogue between all of us?
We shouldn't be on different sides.
There's a few people at the top of this pyramid
that is owning most of the stuff,
and everybody else is paying.
We didn't create this.
I bought my house relatively recently with friends.
I wear rooms out that you could afford.
I keep them affordable.
There could be lots of people in Berkeley that could do that.
If a dialogue were encouraged,
encouraged different kinds of things
than just high rises or hatred of old people.
It is really not, you guys need to think about a dialogue
among community members to get rid of this.
It's awful, it's terrible, and disabled people too.
I'm disabled too.
Thank you.
Hi, I'm asking for three minutes.
So I'm the two minutes from Margaret Lee
and Martha Richards, good, thank you.
Okay, hi, my name is Sally Nelson.
There's three minutes, there we go.
My name's Sally Nelson.
I got the two here.
What was the third person?
Just the three total.
Okay, you said you were asking for three, so go ahead.
Total.
Okay, you heard my name, Sally Nelson.
We have two important issues here.
We all need low stress street
between North and West Berkeley.
Children in North Berkeley need a safe bicycle
right to school and actually there are lots of kids who were bicycling on Rose Street
these days and Hopkins Street with its many potholes and crevices needs to be repaired
and paved. Both needs can be satisfied by designated Rose Street rather than Hopkins
as a safest bicycle route for all of us including children. Rose Street is where the schools
are located. Three schools. I am a retired cyclist. For 40 years I used my bicycle for
buying groceries and running errands. Cycle tracks in the roadways are to be avoided.
They are dangerous. The city should not build them. Concrete curbs designed to separate
cyclists from vehicle traffic will not keep out electric scooters and bicycles who whiz
by at dangerously fast speeds. Cyclists have already sustained serious injuries. As a cyclist,
I consistently avoided roads that had cycle tracks. The shops on Hopkins Street need to
be accessible to people of all ages, including those of us who now use wheelchairs, walkers,
and canes. Now we need to park our cars, and we need the parking spaces. Cycle tracks on
and Hawkins would negatively impact the businesses there,
including Monterey Market.
People with their homes on Hawkins
need access to their driveways,
as well as street parking for maintenance
and repair people.
Postal service people,
postal service vehicles need access to street parking
since they are not allowed to double park
or block driveways.
Cycle tracks would interfere with mail delivery.
Caulkin Street without cycle tracks can continue to provide access to the swimming pool and
tennis courts and the Monterey market and other businesses.
Regarding the climate action plan, concrete is not environmentally safe and friendly at
all.
Manufacturing cement generates 8% of the carbon dioxide that is produced globally, plus it
produces a lot of other toxic gases.
There are plenty of other streets for cyclists to ride to their desired destination.
If safety is what today's bicycles seek, then the city should repair and repave Hawkins
Street without a cycle track.
So vote no on building a cycle track.
Vote yes to repair and behave Hawkins Street without cycle tracks.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I am Gail Alcock and I'm resident of D2
and I was really happy when I moved to Berkeley in 1990
and I could actually get up all the Berkeley Hills
which I could not do in San Francisco.
So biking is a great thing in the city
and I've had my share of accidents
and the worst one was on the concrete
of the bike barrier and I have bounced off cars
and bounced on the asphalt and I have been,
you know, I don't wanna think about it.
It makes me think that I shouldn't be biking,
except today when I got here, I took the bike boulevards.
They're fabulous.
People slow down.
Two kids are coming towards me rollerblading side by side
and then there's a big huge Amazon truck parked there
the city of downtown. So I'm a
Street redesign. I support paving improvements safer pedestrian crossings and expanded bicycle
infrastructure but I strongly oppose the current proposal to remove hundreds of parking spaces
along Hopkins Street to create protected bike lanes. First it's fiscally irresponsible. Berkeley
is facing a 30 million dollar budget deficit yet this project would go from 6.8 million to almost
15 million. At the same time other neighborhoods are still waiting for basic street repairs which
which is a top priority for safe cycling.
Second, NACDO and Caltrans Bikeway design guidelines
strongly recommend that cycle tracks not be installed
in places with frequent driveways and intersections,
which Hopkins Street has.
Also, cycle tracks would not have prevented
as a serious accidents listed in exhibit three,
all occurred at intersections
which cycle tracks do not protect.
Third, removing all of that parking
will be detrimental to our neighborhood.
Not everyone has a physical ability
or circumstances to bike everywhere.
We have spoken with business owners
who believe this could threaten their livelihoods.
Churches, preschools, and people using the King Fields pool,
playgrounds, and tennis courts.
Plus, cedar roads, tennis, and pickleball courts
all depend on nearby parking.
It'll make it especially difficult for people
from other districts to use all these amazing businesses
and facilities.
For the people like me and my family
who live on Hopkins Street is not just a thoroughfare
to get from point A to B.
We are a neighborhood of families with children,
elderly, and pets, and we have asked for years
traffic calming such as to add a stop sign on Hopkins and Ordway to no avail.
This proposal will cause cars to go even faster than they hardly do because the
street will appear wider. Now there will be four lanes of vehicles making it like
a freeway of wheels. Along Hopkins Street many of the lots are more than one unit
and do not have off-street parking. Nowhere else in Berkeley has all of the
parking been removed from a residential street. For residents it will be very
difficult for things we depend on every day. Deliveries, caregivers, maintenance
vehicles, especially those with large equipment, and visiting friends and family all have nowhere
to pull over a park. I think about how it would make it very difficult for my elderly father who
uses a walker to visit us. It will also be difficult and dangerous for families with small
children to have carpools if there's nowhere to pull over. There is a better way. Our North
Berkeley design team made of architects, engineers, planners, and landscape architects drafted plans
and street sections and show that there are viable options for a balanced alternative to have both
bike lanes and only 50% parking reduction our group provided five options to the
council members and public works please don't vote for this proposal just to
prove you have gotten something to prove when is not the best solution
approve a balanced option like that back to me I'm sorry if I'm saying anything
wrong that works for everyone thank you very much I have three seated minutes
sorry can you hold your hand up the people in the back okay wait there are a
a lot of people holding their hands up.
You just need three.
I have six minutes.
You just need three, so could you,
can you decide who the three are, please?
One, two, and my wife, and you're not my wife.
Okay.
Okay, so one here, second person there, thank you.
And the third person is in the back, thank you.
Thank you.
So, my name is Martin Hammer.
I'm an architect and I've lived on Hopkins Street
for 27 years.
Saturday I distributed flyers in front of the shops,
notifying people of the city's current plan
to install cycle tracks and remove all street parking
from the gate of Peralta,
which almost no one on Hopkins was aware of
until our North Berkeley design team began informing them
two and a half weeks ago,
when the significantly changed current plan
was first made public.
I handed a flyer to a man getting into his car
to explain the city's plan.
He said, I don't care man, I'm pro bike.
He doesn't care.
After this, after he had just accessed the shops
with his car and parked in a spot
to be eliminated by the city's plan,
I had just talked with the co-owner,
a co-owner of Manani's who described
the vast majority of comments she received
from customers who drive from all over
some of them needing wheelchairs,
stating the importance of retaining street parking.
She also described nasty attack comments
from pro bike people.
All of that said, I'm pro bike.
I've bicycled 100 mile bike rides,
I've bicycled all over Berkeley and the East Bay.
I want safe bicycling in Berkeley.
However, I'm also pro pedestrian,
pro business and their customers and staff,
pro-Hopkin Street residents and nearby residents,
pro-recreation facility users, pro-churchgoers,
pro-preschools.
As an architect for 40 years, every day,
I work to create balanced designs.
I know a balanced design when I see it.
This is not a balanced design.
It gives a subset of bicyclists everything it wants
and harms virtually every other constituent group.
most of it due to the staggering unprecedented removal
of street parking.
175 of 239 spaces from the Alameda to Peralta
and a now another 83 spaces if CM Taplin's supplemental
extending the tracks to Stanage occurs,
including 100%, 122 spaces over seven contiguous blocks
from McGee to Peralta.
It's never been done for good reason.
It causes significant harm,
including matters of safety, access, and equity.
I'm confident no one in Berkeley,
including council members,
would support the removal of 100% of parking
on the street they live on.
And how can you approve a plan
that removes 175 to 258 parking spaces as much as 80%
when a parking study admittedly has not been done?
That is mind-boggling.
I can't even, I'm almost speechless,
but I'm gonna continue.
Berkeley prides itself on innovation
and representative democracy.
One solution to this seemingly intractable conflict
is to put representatives of all key stakeholders
together with an independent mediator
to work out a consensus conceptual design.
What do they all want and need?
where can they compromise.
In my profession, I've seen mediation work
and believe it can work here in a matter of months,
not years.
I strongly encourage Council to approve
the original referrals by CMs O'Keefe and Pessarwani
for repaving pedestrian and pedestrian improvements
that everyone agrees on
and to facilitate independent mediation
resulting in a consensus design
that can be overlaid on the original referrals plan.
and I wanna get a show of hands for people
who oppose this, the city's plan,
to see if it comports with CM Pessawani's 5050 store.
Can I see?
Thanks for your time.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Good evening.
It's been really cool seeing this whole process.
My name's Nick, I'm the head coach
for the Berkeley Mountain Way team,
and I'm a shop owner in Berkeley
and a resident of Hopkins app.
I just wanted to come out here and really express
the need for greater safety on the Hopkins corridor.
I do believe that cycle tracks are a way towards that.
Right now, I consider the Hopkins Speedway,
especially where I live between the Alameda and Sutter.
The street is extremely wide.
I've seen drivers coming by at speeds in access
of 50 miles an hour.
the city of the city of the I'm.
So I think. I. Or big thing that we have here tonight is increasing safety and making sure that everyone feels like they have a place at the table. I just wanted to make sure that we really consider how we can makes traffic calming and safer for everyone I do believe the bike lines and bike infrastructure help protect the most vulnerable people in our communities and I thank you for your time. Yeah, thank you.
and Chris Kral, missing one.
Sorry, I see two.
Steve Jackson, Chris Baskin, Chris Kral.
Do you wanna give me a minute?
I don't know, I'm not so smart.
All right.
Okay, I see that third.
This is their hand.
All right, I saw that third person in the back.
Are you gonna give your a minute, sir, with the glasses?
I'm sorry, and the standing in the back?
Are you giving your a minute as well?
Yes, you, sir, with a collared shirt, no?
Okay, I'm taking one from this man with the orange shirt
and then this person with the backpack.
I'll give a mood.
OK.
And from the chat.
All right, we're all in a giving mood still.
So four.
That's four.
I've read four total, yeah.
All right, thank you.
So my name is Margaret Thorne.
I'm a walker, bike rider, and a climate change scientist
for my day job.
I oppose the referral by Kesir Wani.
I strongly support the supplemental by CM Blackaby.
and I want to say I'm not here to talk about parking.
What I specifically support is I support infrastructure
that enhances safety for bicyclists, pedestrians,
and motorists, and accessibility for all.
I really strongly support small businesses
that make Berkeley special.
I think we can demand progress that brings us together
by insisting on inclusive solutions,
and I'm sorry I'm not hearing very much of that,
and really looking for tight stewardship
of the city budget and taxpayer dollars,
especially before the city asks for more bond measures
and sales tax increases.
Most especially, I think we would all feel better
if we felt we had policy making
that was evidence-based and expert-based.
And a digression, I said I'm a scientist.
I am federally funded and it almost makes me cry
when I think that my own city doesn't wanna believe
in evidence and use it openly
and tells the staff what to do.
That's heartbreaking because we are better than that.
So good policy manages trade-offs,
trade-offs and compromise.
That might sound abstract,
but I think without some transparent
and inclusive governance,
what we will have is waste and failure and more stalling.
It's already taken a long time
and I'm sorry for the people waiting
for all these improvements,
but things will cost more, stall out again,
waste city resources,
and ultimately not accomplish our goals
if we don't practice a better process,
and that's why I support a black abuse amendment.
And in terms of evidence,
I wanna reinforce what we've heard that currently,
although the chief of the fire department said, yes,
they could consider 10 and a half feet and 11,
and that was a change,
let's not say that they've reviewed it
because they haven't seen this plan.
We also we need to prevent more injuries totally in favor of that, but we don't actually have an analysis that says, what can we do in intersections and how to cycle tracks intersect with danger in intersections.
And I guess my last main point is that I think we are being asked many people in the cross the city being acts to sacrifice for a greater good and that greater good is 1 thing that people had in mind, which was the cycle track.
And I don't think we've really asked,
what are we asking people to sacrifice?
And as a result, there's a real dissension.
And there's a lack of engagement with many stakeholders.
Who has studied the shops or tried to work with them
to mitigate options?
Who has done that?
Who has studied the effect of race, curbs, and tracks
in front of our disabled residents
and said, how can we mitigate it?
There's been really a lack of searching for a solution that
could bring people together.
And so we're sacrificing the money for other districts
who need it.
If we put in an extra six million,
which I think we heard earlier,
that's coming out of someone else's safety.
Let's make sure we know what that greater good is
for everyone.
And I think people would go along with the sacrifice
if we know.
But if we recognize that sacrifice is autonomy,
being able to live with accessibility independently
and safely, it's the shops.
It's schools, including the special needs pre-care,
near a house, and people need to drive there,
the churches we've heard from.
So these are sacrifices, and we can make them,
but we need to know why, and that the impacts really,
we try to engage and mitigate them.
Otherwise, it's just we want cycle tracks.
That was the solution.
Thank you.
That was three minutes or four.
That was four.
Perfect, thank you.
Thanks.
Thanks, speaker, please.
Hi, my name is Martino.
The last 20 years, I've been riding a bicycle
as my main way of getting around in this town.
I'm 86 years old, so I'm an elder.
Now, I am dead set against this proposal,
and here's why.
What it's going to do is destroy the small stores
and places to hang out on the avenue there,
just as traffic, parking spaces have been used
against small businesses all over town.
And we are losing the ability to find a place
where we can shop, where we can hang out,
We can just be with people anywhere in the city
because we're losing them.
Thank you for your comments.
Next.
Hi, my name is Mahmoud Hosseini.
What's the name of Mahmoud Hosseini?
Oh, I'm sorry.
My name is Mahmoud Hosseini.
I do the business next to the menary market for 24 years
as a flowers vendor.
And I see the sign here, black life is matter.
I think business life is matter and neighborhood life
is matter too.
If it's that thing I'm not against the bike,
I'm the biker, I do the two, three days biking.
If it's that things happen for sure I'm gonna be homeless
without any question, without any question
because I'm 60 years old, I don't think so,
anybody give me job.
And then I don't think so, the guys.
I think I know the Hopkins better than anybody
because I'm there from 10 o'clock to 7 o'clock,
six days a week.
I know the street very well.
I know the whole people.
I think the-
Thank you for your cup.
Is everyone gonna give them, you'll give them a minute?
Okay, go ahead, one more minute.
I think you guys didn't think about the money market.
Money market, they have 37 employee.
They have 37 car.
They coming at four o'clock in the morning.
Where, I mean, I'm not trying to talk about
behind the Monterey Market, behalf of the Monterey Market,
but where is those people they have to put the car?
37 employees coming at four o'clock in the morning.
There's no parking for them.
I think if it is not there,
you cannot have your vegetable and fruit.
Let me tell you that much.
Thank you very much.
Thank you. Can I start?
My name is William. I'm the mail carrier for 12, 13, and 14 Hopkins.
I'm opposing that parking,
the bike lane for the parking because it's going to affect me and I have deliveries to make.
It's going to cost me more time if you put that bike lane on that street.
So if you're going to put it,
where are we supposed to do in getting our deliveries made to the customer?
It's going to be you guys as a
customer need delivery too.
As we deliver the parcel to you
guys.
So if you put that bike lane,
it's going to be not good for
me and it's going to cost time
and it's going to delay and it's
going to really affect us.
Like I said, you already took
two parking spaces already from
us already.
So by putting that bike lane,
it's going to interfere with my
job and it's going to interfere
I thought this a couple years back and you thought about it.
So I hope you guys decide
and not putting that white line for my job.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hi, Carol Marasovic and Marvin Snow are donating minutes.
Two minutes.
Thank you.
My name is Nancy Rayer.
I live in District 6.
Opponents of the cycle track are cast as pro car,
anti-climate, anti-safety, and selfish,
and a big dose of ageism, for sure.
But let's be fair.
In 1976, Berkeley has voted to support street barriers
that greatly reduced traffic
on most residential streets in the flats,
a feature that's found in very few cities.
Berkeley's extensive bicycle Boulevard network
was built on that foundation,
allowing cyclists to get across town safely
on quiet, pleasant streets.
Although inconvenient to drivers,
virtually everyone supports these quiet streets,
even those of us in the hills who do not directly benefit
because we're not pro car, anti-climate, anti-safety,
or selfish, we are old a lot of us.
Protecting residential streets requires
that drivers use the major streets
unless they want to get lost in the maze.
But now a group of activists has decided
that the bike network isn't good enough
and that cycle tracks should be added
to our congested main streets
so cycles can ride directly to their commercial destinations
without having to walk a block or two,
and in the hope that drivers will get so frustrated
that they'll give up their cars.
In an ideal world, sure, but over 10,000,
maybe 20,000 of us live in the hills
with narrow roads and blind corners,
and not everyone has the luxury of working,
shopping, and caring for kids or family members
within bike-commutable distance,
nor does everyone have time in their busy lives
to bike miles a day with a cart in tow.
Most importantly, many people cannot safely bike at all.
Roughly 12% of Berkeleyans are over 70,
and about 8% of people under 70 have disabilities.
That's 20% of our population.
Now, a relative few of those folks do bike, but not many.
Whereas the ADA promotes universal designs
that benefit everyone, such as curb cuts
that allow strollers and rolling grocery carts
to easily use the sidewalk, or automatic door buttons
that allow people holding two coffee cups to exit.
Cycle tracks inherently harm people with disabilities
who need parking near their destinations
and safe access to the curb and public transit.
They also need unbroken streets and sidewalks
to avoid upturn wheelchairs and tripping and falling.
Berkeley has tens of thousands of ADA violations
that it is obligated to correct.
Yet this proposal would spend $5 million
on bike infrastructure
I would create new bike barriers for people with disabilities, new barriers, erecting
barriers in the town that was a cradle of disability rights and independent living movement.
So please let's care about all Berkeleyians, let's improve our bike network especially
on Ada and Sacramento streets, let's fix our broken streets and sidewalks and let's keep
our public spaces accessible to all.
also consider what the congestion that will be added will do to our emergency
response time. Thank you. Thank you. Hello. My name is Rachel Bradley and I've
lived here all my life. I went to middle school at King. I took my kids to soccer
games and swimming lessons next door. I drove my elderly mother to walk on the
track when she needed a level and protected surface to exercise safely. I
continue to shop every week at the Monterey market and I have invested
energy and love in this community for many years. I strongly urge the council
to adopt council member O'Keefe's practical and financially responsible
proposal to repay Hopkins with necessary enhancements for pedestrian safety. It
deserves special respect since the upper part of Hopkins falls in her council
district and she is herself a regular cyclist. The city's budget is in trouble
and this is not the time to sink millions of extra dollars into cycle
tracks on Hopkins, especially without properly evaluating reasonable
alternatives. It's home to many important civic amenities that we all
deserve access to. The current state is dangerous to everybody, especially
pedestrians. The longer we wait, the more it will cost. Please keep it
simple and repay pockets. Thank you.
Hello. Um, thank you to Council and staff. Uh, I'm a parent of two young
children and I live on Hopkins Street.
I'm the parent of two young children,
and I live on Hopkins Street.
Currently, Hopkins Street is not safe to bike on.
As a family, we choose to bike when possible.
Currently, I will not let my children
ride on Hopkins Street.
The traffic in the street moves incredibly fast,
creating an unsafe ride for cyclists.
The installation of bike lanes will naturally
slow traffic in the area,
making the street safer for everyone.
My wife saw, just about a month ago,
saw a middle school student hit on their bike
in the middle of the intersection from our front porch.
we constantly see close calls there.
I support the current referral to install bike lanes
on Hopkins Street to continue connecting the bike network.
The protected bike lanes will make the neighborhood safer.
We are right now deciding between safety
and the inconvenience of lost parking.
Safety should always take priority.
Let's plan for the future.
Let's give our children a safe route
to ride the bikes to school
and everyone else a safe route
to get around without driving.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Good evening, I'm Alice Green.
I'm 85 years old and I want safety riding my bike.
And on Hopkins, it is not safe.
It's so narrow, this is nothing.
There's no narrow bike lane, no nothing.
Please make that street safe.
I use it a lot.
And I lived in Berkeley for 32 years, very near Hopkins.
And I implore you to implement this plan
and make it safe for bikes, thanks.
Thank you.
Hello, my name's Lucinda Young and I also am a senior.
I will be 70 years old this year.
My primary form of transportation is bicycle,
although I also drive as well.
And I strongly support this recommendation.
Thank you, staff, for your hard work
and all the extensive outreach you've done on this.
I travel to Hopkins, usually on my bike,
though I also drive occasionally,
but usually on my bike.
At least weekly, I've been doing it for a decade.
It's extremely unsafe.
And in addition to, let's just not wait
for another fatality or serious accident
to correct this problem.
We've got a big problem, Hopkins.
My second reason, besides safety,
for strongly supporting this,
is we are in a full-blown climate emergency.
And half of our greenhouse gas pollution
comes from transportation, mostly cars.
Our climate emergency plan specifically calls for,
its number one recommendation is to reduce VMT
by making cycling, walking in public transit modes.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hello, my name is Stefan Zeiger.
I've lived with my family on Hopkins Street
across from King Park for 15 years.
I'm also probably the most experienced urban cyclist
you're ever likely to meet, or one of them.
I've lived and biked in North Oakland
and Berkeley for 35 years.
I also spent five years working full time
as a bicycle messenger.
I'm here to ask you to vote no on this motion.
The main problem with the current proposal
is that it is a blunt force, one size fits all design
that has badly matched to the quirks of Hopkins Street.
What makes sense for the residential blocks
does not make sense for the commercial areas.
The stretch from Gilman to Monterey handles
more vehicle traffic than the ones above and below.
The area around the tennis courts, pool, park and track
has its own unique requirements.
Say what you will about the previous design process,
but at least was an attempt in good faith to develop,
to tailor a plan to the diverse nature of the problem
and to hammer out sensible compromises among stakeholders.
The proposal under consideration tonight
has all the nuance of a Walmart parking lot.
And I know that the motion directs staff
to conduct outreach to stakeholders,
but the problem is that once you make separate class.
Thank you.
I'm sorry, your time's up.
A minute in the back.
Sorry, but the green shirt, I'm taking your minute.
Thank you.
Go ahead.
The problem is that once you make separated class 4
bikeways on both sides of the street,
the non-negotiable north star of the plan, well,
Hopkins is not that wide.
And it leaves no wiggle room for adapting to local conditions.
You have an opportunity to do something really great here.
Hopkins has a lot of room for improvement.
You also have an opportunity to really harm this neighborhood
and everyone who visits it for generations to come.
It's your job as council members
to consider all the stakeholders here
and to forge a reasonable compromise.
This is not that.
Thank you.
I think I have another minute from Carla.
Woman with a yellow shirt in the hat.
Thank you.
Okay, thank you.
I'm Cori Cody and I've lived and voted in Berkeley
for over 30 years and I consider this plan
to be flawed, first of all,
I think it's fiscally irresponsible.
My understanding, and I think I'm underestimating,
is that it would cost an extra $5 million.
That's a lot of money.
And this is a time when we're being asked
to vote for more sales tax and for bonds.
I'm not gonna vote for those things.
And you know what?
When the whole city realizes that something irresponsible,
like this plan has been, if it, God forbid, gets implemented,
people are gonna not wanna vote for these extra taxes.
So what I'm hearing today is that some people want this,
but the majority do not.
And so I think it's really, in my heart,
it's not just that it's fiscally irresponsible,
It's that it inflicts real harm on the majority of people
who are involved with this neighborhood.
This is a thriving intergenerational neighborhood.
And my understanding is that 100 parking spaces,
but now I've been educated that it's more like 175
parking spaces will be lost.
So what does it mean?
Is it a minor inconvenience to lose a parking space?
because that's what I've heard from the other side.
To lose a parking space means that many Berkeleyians
will no longer have access to a neighborhood.
They'll no longer have access to the services
of the small scale mom and pop businesses
that make this neighborhood so successful.
Realistically, we get to the, many of us,
get to these small shops by car.
And guess what?
If you have a car, you have to park it.
and many of us need.
Thank you.
Is that two minutes already?
Yep, that's it.
Oh my god. Thank you.
Well, please vote against this.
Thank you.
Good evening, Mayor and Council.
My name is Jean Walsh
and I am on the AC Transit Board of Directors.
This is my first Berkeley Council meeting.
I picked a great one to come to.
I'm speaking tonight in my personal capacity.
I've heard a lot of talk tonight
and in the media about cycling versus parking.
I haven't heard a lot about transit
and I just wanted to bring up the fact
that people who ride the bus are often seniors,
people with disabilities, people who can't bike,
people who can't afford a car,
and they depend on transit.
AC Transit runs line 12 along Hopkins,
and it carries an average of about 3,000 people per day,
and AC Transit staff have been working on this project
with your staff for several years,
have been following along,
and I know that previous versions,
the staff was concerned about bus boarding islands.
This current proposal by Council Member Kessarwani
has the bus boarding islands,
which make it safer and improve transit operations.
So I support that proposal as an individual
and I am confident that if your staff
continue to work with AC Transit,
you'll have a great project that benefits
the entire community.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
And Mayor, just a quick time check.
There's about 44 minutes left in in-person public comment.
Yep, thank you.
Good evening council, my name is Mark Headland.
Biking on city streets, including Hopkins, is legal.
The question before us tonight is whether Hopkins
will be safer for everyone, including people on bikes.
I strongly support council member Kesserwani's item,
with council member Taplins and Unapara supplemental,
and I urge you to vote for them tonight,
fund them, and get them done.
Please do not send this item back for more study and delay.
It's been eight years since the initial referral.
Making other streets safer will not make Hopkins safe.
And as Council Member O'Keefe notes,
delay only makes repaving Hopkins more expensive.
There is no magic compromise
that preserves all parking on Hopkins
and makes Hopkins safer for everyone.
You have to choose the policy
you believe is best for Berkeley.
Please choose safety for all.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Thank you. Mark also organizes kitical mass. If anyone has been on that, it's amazing. Go ahead.
Good evening, Mayor and Council members. My name is Interven Chatterjee. I'm a North Berkeley
resident and a car-free Hopkins shopper. I'm worried about the real and very immediate harm
that would be caused by ignoring Vision Zero and the climate emergency. Your worst option today
would be to refuse to actually make a tough choice or to refer this to staff and throw them
under the SUV by just making them deal with a political difficult choice without any kind of
support. Staff need your direction and policy please make a decision today and don't leave us
all hanging. Thank you. Thank you. Good evening council. I'm Liza Lutzger. In my day job I am a
traffic safety public health researcher and but tonight I'm speaking as an individual but also
on behalf of Rock Bike Berkeley. We understand that change is hard but we are in strong support
of Council Member Keserwani's referral and Taplin and Loonaparra's supplemental.
Ideally, we'd like to extend the protected lanes at least to Milvia to create a true
low-stress protected network connecting West Berkeley and our neighbors to the north
with downtown Berkeley and the Cal campus. We especially encourage strong curb management
strategies to meet the needs of people with disabilities and cherished local businesses.
As council members, you make the decisions for the benefit of the city.
This is what we plan to do
both as it stands now and what it will look like in the future.
We are at a crossroads as we add much needed housing
and also as the micromobility movement booms.
You must make a choice.
You can choose to meet this moment
by giving in to people's anger, speculation, and worst fears,
or you can choose to rely on the reams of evidence
that's made towards the success of a connected and protected network.
Please do safety.
Okay, thank you. Thanks.
Jacob Dadman, I'm here representing the Sierra Club.
We strongly support item 27 directing the city manager
to proceed with the Hopkins Street repaving project
while implementing protected bike lanes.
We also support extending the protected bike lanes
west to Stanage Avenue and east to Sutter Street,
consistent with Berkeley's adopted bicycle plan.
Transportation is the largest source
of greenhouse gas emissions in California and in Berkeley.
Meeting our climate goals requires
more than just transitioning to cleaner vehicles.
It requires creating communities where walking,
bicycling, rolling, and public transit are safe,
convenient, and attractive choices for everyday trips.
Streets are among the most important public spaces we have
and they should be safe.
For decades, Berkeley has adopted policies
calling for a safe, connected network
for walking, bicycling, and transit.
The Hopkins Project is a product of those commitments.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Good evening Mary she and council members.
Sam Greenberg here speaking on behalf of East Bay
for everyone.
We are here today in strong support of finally building
protected bike lanes on Hopkins for many of the reasons
that have already been shared here.
We know that protected bike lanes are how to make streets
safe for people riding bikes.
But I also want to speak briefly to how we know
that sharrows are not.
And in fact, studies have shown sharrows
to actually make streets less safe.
I want to read you a quote from traffic engineer
James McKay, who pioneered the use of Cherros
in the United States, who once explained
why he pioneered them in an interview.
Quote, part of it was the city of Denver's reluctance
to do much of anything for bicycles.
And quote, I was always under pressure
to do less as the Denver bicycle planner.
We have known for a long time that Cherros are unsafe.
It's not just that they don't make streets safer,
they make streets less safe.
And we've known for a long time
that this has been enough process.
It's time to end the process and are protected
by Clinton Hopkins.
Thank you.
Thank you, Sam.
Hello, Councilman Mayer.
My name is Brandon Young.
I'm here to voice my support
for Council Member Kessruani's item
with Council Members Lunapara and Taplin's supplemental.
That's all, thank you.
Thank you.
Hey, everyone.
If y'all could make a decision on this,
I could be at dinner.
I'm here to support Councilmember Kesirwani's proposal
and the supplemental by Councilmembers Taplan
and Luna Parra.
Change can be hard.
I understand people's frustration, fear.
Climate change is harder and it's harder already
on the people and the places where I come from
that may not be in the room today.
I wasn't gonna speak, but I couldn't help myself
because we have, I moved to Berkeley.
I'm not gonna say how long I lived here
because I don't think it matters,
but I moved here because I thought we believed
climate change. Process doesn't save lives, plans don't save lives. The only
thing that saves lives is bold and visionary action. And you have an
opportunity to do that today. That's why you're our electeds. This is not a
popularity contest. This is a contest of do we live in climate change? Are we
going to make changes to our infrastructure? So I hope you choose
the right thing the world is watching. Thank you. I will try and keep it brief
but I may use a minute from Sam here, if I need it.
So, my name is Maria Rubal.
I am a candidate for City Council District 1.
And first of all, I just want to recognize
what a difficult decision this is,
how many stakeholders there are on all sides.
And I want to encourage you to use your wisdom
to make a decision tonight and not delay this any longer.
As a 20 year resident of district one,
I use Hopkins regularly and I recognize
that parking is important, but lives are more important.
And a protected bike lane from Stanwich to Sutter
is the right choice.
I would be open to the possibility of a parallel path
for part of that passage that protects parking,
but we need to have protected bike lanes to save lives.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, Daria.
Good evening, Mayor Eshin City Council.
My name is Mia and I am a resident of Berkeley.
I'm speaking here in support of item 27
with the Lenapara Taplin supplemental.
As a pedestrian and micro mobility user in North Berkeley,
it cannot be overstated how crucial
these safety improvements are for our community.
This plan perfectly aligns with Berkeley's
Vision Zero Initiative and only benefits our community
by encouraging safe usage of bicycles
in other forms of micro mobility
while still fostering region connectivity.
Additionally, the repaving of the street
benefits all users of the road
and has a responsible use of city funds.
I also urge the council to keep the class
to buffered bike lanes and not compromise for share rows.
As someone who uses these streets as a micro mobility users,
I don't feel safe using share rows
and it's not a worthwhile compromise.
This has been on the agenda for a while
and I believe that North Lakeland residents
deserve a decision today.
Berkeley cyclists and pedestrians deserve to be safe
on their streets.
Their lives matter too.
Thank you.
Thank you, Mia.
Thank you, city council.
I live in District 3 and I recently frequently biked down
on Telegraph to visit my parents.
And if you've ever biked it, it does not feel safe.
You switch between just a painted bike lane
and being just in the road on a show.
And every couple of blocks you're merging in,
merging out of the traffic.
And every time I go through that,
I feel just a constant feeling like this time
that I merge in, a car might not see me
and that just might be it for me.
And I really not want that for Hopkins.
For that reason, I'm here to encourage you
to add bike lanes all the way down Hopkins.
Additionally, as we fulfill our part
of fixing California's housing crisis,
we need more ability for people to move around in Berkeley
for more people to live in Berkeley,
and I believe the best ideal solution
is to add more bike capacity,
because they can be added without needing more cars,
more parking structures, and everything.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I want to thank everyone here
for being positive in your responses.
I really appreciate folks not booing, and thank you.
Hello, City Council.
My name is David Woolsey,
and I live in the Hopkins area neighborhood
and shop at Monterey Market,
and I too am concerned about the loss of parking.
But what I wanna talk about is how bicycle paths
get planned into main traffic thoroughfares.
There's an issue with air pollution
that's generated by cars,
either by internal combustion engine,
tire wear, brake wear, et cetera.
This is not the place that I would choose to bicycle
is in a main traffic through fair.
Find a way parallel and make that the bicycle path.
Now I understand that that neighborhood,
the street grid is all wonky
and it's hard to find a parallel path.
This is a general piece of advice for other bicycle paths.
Don't mix them on the main streets.
Put them on the parallel streets as bicycle boulevards.
Otherwise, you wind up breathing stuff.
You really oughtn't be breathing.
Thank you.
Hi there.
Shh.
Focus in the back, please.
I live in District 5.
This is my first time attending a meeting.
I'm urging the Council to vote yes on the item
and the supplemental to build protected bike lanes
on Hopkins.
I ride a bike on Hopkins with my kids.
I have Sasha, who's seven and Zev, who's two.
I asked Sasha what she likes to do on Hopkins,
and she said, the library, King Park,
Joya Pizza of course,
and to visit our family in Westbury.
I brought their helmets.
This is Sasha with the butterflies and Zev.
This inch of foam is what protects them,
their precious, precious heads when we're riding on Hopkins
and other shared roadways.
I don't expect you to prioritize these heads
over all of the other lovely heads in Berkeley,
but I do expect you to weigh them appropriately,
and I'm going to give you a
I have to drive.
I'm just, because I can't ride a bicycle,
does that mean that I can't live and I can't eat in Berkeley?
What I'll do is I'll shop in El Cerrito
if I can't shop at Monterey Market.
I shop between 9.45 and 10.30 on Tuesdays and Wednesdays
because that's the only time I can sort of get in there
and park and shop at a regional,
without a huge crowd and then get out.
So I think maybe the demand that happens is too much,
but all of us are using that corridor.
I used to walk though to the North Branch library,
it's still my library, but now I have to drive there.
So I hope there's still room in Berkeley
for some of us who need cars.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hi, my name is Jocelyn Racinos
and I work at Berkeley Little School.
We're on Hopkins and McGee.
And so before this, there was a stop sign there.
Now, we used to have a loading zone
because the stop sign was added, it's now red.
And then we were giving a loading zone
like right next to the apartments next door.
But what's gonna happen if this is passed
is that we're gonna get rid of that loading zone
and where are we gonna drop off 42?
We serve 42 students between the ages of 18 months
to five years old and not everyone drives a bike
when they're dropping off their children.
So, and I might think about those parents
that are coming with an 18 month year old
and a two-year-old, it makes it really hard
for them to drop them off at school.
I'm also a parent.
I have my son that goes to work with me.
He's at Berkeley Little School
and it's gonna make it very challenging.
So I really want you to also keep that in mind
that we have a preschool there
that has been already affected
by the previous loading zone being removed.
And then now we're gonna have a, well, hopefully not,
but I don't want it to keep affecting.
Thank you.
I'm David White, I live in Peralta.
I met a lot of people in the last week
passing this flyer around on Hopkins.
In the back of it has all collision incidents
involving a bicycle on Hopkins
between Sutter and Stanage, 2011 to 2026.
15 years, eight accidents,
not the 23 that shows up in this flyer
that was at the meeting.
All eight of the accidents were in intersections.
There's no protection in an intersection.
Most of them are left-hand turns.
Cycle tracks don't stop left-hand turns.
But the most poignant person I met all the time,
and it was an accident, and we were in the same line,
I met a woman who thanked me for firing,
because she says, I have a son in the preschool,
and I won't be able to drive him to school anymore,
because there's no parking.
Think about it.
If there's no parking, it means all the...
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
There's someone over here.
Okay.
If there's no parking,
that means that machines have to be moving.
If they have to be moving,
it means there's no way to drop a kid off
or pick up an ant
or certainly not stuff a kid in the back seat.
You are stopping life on this planet
if you don't let people pause on a street.
100% parking, blocking it off, doesn't work.
How does branding work?
You call it a protected bike lane,
but you're sending kids through 100 driveways
with problems every single one as an intersection.
It's making things more dangerous,
It makes things harder to park.
Try to park after you get out of your driveway.
Go five feet and then get around a cement block.
That's what people are gonna have to do,
have a little cement rodeo twice a day forever.
Thank you.
Ready?
Good evening, Madam Mayor and Council Members.
My name is Sarah and for 16 years,
I've been part of Evangel Bible Church of Berkeley
and over the years at our facility,
I've helped to prepare lunches on Sundays,
refreshments on Wednesdays.
We also have special meals for large day conferences
on Saturdays, as well as evening events during the weekdays.
Removing access and parking to Hawkins
would limit my ability to contribute to my community.
And I really want you to hear that,
and it would limit my ability to meet urgent needs,
as well as it would put my safety at risk,
especially at night when I'm even more concerned
about my physical safety.
I really do urge you to make a decision
to continue the repavement of the roads, certainly,
but I do strongly urge you to not remove our access
to our church building.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Mayor, council members, thank you very much.
Mike Olsen, district fire resident.
On June 10th, I was riding my bicycle in West Berkeley
when I was hit from behind by a truck.
The BPD police report confirms that the driver
was completely at fault,
failure to provide sufficient room
when she was passing a cyclist on the road.
Fractured ribs, facial lacerations, road rash, bruising.
I am very lucky because it could have been much worse.
Council Member O'Keefe has suggested
that cyclists simply use a different road.
I moved to Berkeley in 1979,
and that's 47 years of city taxes and partial fees
and economic activities supporting local businesses.
I paid for those roads too.
Cyclists, including me,
should be able to use those roads safely.
I encourage a yes vote on item 27 and supplementals.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Knowledge and seed Jim and Lori Z here.
Jim, you're back there for two.
sorry, where was Jim?
Oh, thank you.
Good evening, I'm Bruce Chamberlain
and I live in District 4.
I've been riding my bike in Berkeley for over 20 years
and frequent the Hopkins Business District.
I'm a huge proponent of bike boulevards
and use California and or ADA to access this area.
My concerns for this action item are as follows.
The process and eventual council item
appear to have involved political manipulation
and fast tracking a solution.
I attended the February FITES Committee meeting
where Council Member O'Keefe
presented a February consent item
sponsored by Kessarwani and Ishii.
Based on a good faith compromised effort
to move forward with paving Hopkins
while including improvements.
During the meeting, both Luna Parra and Humbert
hijacked the proposal,
not only giving it a negative declaration,
but inserting cycle tracks into the item.
It went from there to the item before you now.
Many people are surprised that a solution to Hopkins
is being held hostage by the demand for cycle tracks
when there are other options to consider.
The authors and sponsors of this solution
are fixated on cycle tracks
being a foundational starting point,
rather than a review, discussion of options
that may not include cycle tracks.
It can only be seen as a political power move.
The bike lobby wants a victory,
but they've already had several victories,
and I write on them frequently.
Bancroft, Milvia, Oxford.
The key point is the appropriate application
of bikeway infrastructure, including cycle tracks.
The Hopkins corridor is not the appropriate place
for this design.
The agenda item is vague in many respects
and omits key details that are needed
to make an informed decision.
It lacks a map showing the impact on Hopkins,
a huge impact we've heard of all the parking spaces
is not mentioned as well.
The number is not mentioned.
With these and other deficiencies,
I don't see how a council member could approve this measure
in good governance, not to mention conscience.
The rationale under fiscal impacts is disingenuous
and has a cognitive dissonance.
As everyone knows, the city has a budget crisis.
Using three to four million dollars of additional funds
for the bikeway concept is unreasonable
and a profligate use of the citizens' budget,
especially when there are other
less expensive, effective options.
I have a strong sense you care about good governance
and practices and fiscal responsibility.
This agenda item fails in both of these categories.
Politicians are temporary,
but their policies can have long lasting effects.
Please consider the long-term impacts,
positive and negative, to the community at large
when deciding the fate of this plan.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hi again, my name is Daniel Chang.
My daughter spoke earlier.
I've been attending Evangel Bible Church
for the last 20 years,
and during my time as an undergrad,
I put 10,000 miles on my bike inside the city of Berkeley.
I'm supportive of safety improvements,
better signage, and street crossings on Hopkins,
but please do not remove access to our church.
100% of our church members have been priced out of the city.
There's no parking on Ordway multiple times a week.
We have at least a dozen cars and half dozen vans
that depend on Hopkins for access to our church,
including people with disabilities and many mothers
who are currently nursing newborns
and a few more on the way.
Unlike Monterey Market, we do not have a parking lot.
It's not just access only, it's safety.
Not just on Sundays, but multiple times during a week.
We have children's programs at night.
In the winter, that's always after dark.
And many of our members come in
and they would have to park for blocks
and walk in the dark with their children.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I'd like to request additional time
with representing the three wonderful children over there,
Phoebe, Mabel, and Simon Wong.
My name is John Michael Wong,
and I'm representing Evangel Bible Church of Berkeley.
I'm one of the elders, the corporate secretary,
and have been part of the church for over 20 years.
And we oppose the elimination of parking
for Class 4 separated bikeways
because for us, Hopkins Street
is no mere transportation corridor,
but it is a place of life and worship for us.
Christians from Berkeley and beyond
have been at Hopkins and Ordway since the 1930s,
teaching the Bible for nearly 100 years,
and curb access is essential for our gathering for worship
and keeping an open door to guests from all the nations.
We teach Jesus Christ and Him crucified and resurrected
and returning soon, and He is the only way of salvation.
And for us, Hopkins is no mere way
to get from point A to point P,
but it is the destination for us, for our life and worship.
Parking is already scarce, and I say to you
that no alternatives can substitute
for the loss of curb access to our building,
which has been built by sweat and tears
and giving sacrificially over many generations.
Those with special needs, disabled, blind, pregnant,
small children who come,
many who would love to drive or bike but simply can't,
and any substitutes, for example,
just adding a disabled parking spot
is no help to commuters and first-time guests
because our dear neighbors who live on Hopkins
will already need it first.
Adding loading zones adjacent to the building
There is also no help to anyone because it will actually remove even more parking, especially
for the residents with whom we share all the neighboring streets.
The decrease in parking we anticipate also will increase cruising and driver distraction
as people looking for parking will cause more risks to the entire neighborhood.
And so also as a registered civil engineer with these technical comments against the
a class four bike paths, I urge you to choose
a more sensible path in this decision.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
As a forever resident of Hopkins,
I want to say that personally,
I just, I don't know why we're having
this sort of existential conversation about driving.
There's over 400 streets in Berkeley.
We're proposing a cycle track on one street.
And yet, like now we're debating
whether we're going to become like Amsterdam or something.
The issue at hand is this.
The cycle tracks are necessary for the streets
where we cannot traffic calm them.
That's the main arterial roads.
The traffic calmings for the neighborhood streets
where cars don't need to go through the full length.
Now, even though there's no evidence to suggest
that cycle tracks destroyed businesses,
I think that there is some case to be made
about preserving the parking in front of the businesses.
I will concede on that.
And so I do think that we can find a way
to do a cycle track with the parking in front,
as Cassarani has suggested, that that would be a good idea.
But I just like, I don't understand
the existential conversation about driving.
Like, you still have 400 streets, I don't think.
Thanks, Harold.
Good evening, and Brian is seating me a minute.
Thank you very much.
I previously co-chaired Georgia Tech's
Bicycle Infrastructure Committee,
and I bike regularly in Berkeley and in the East Bay.
Mayor, as you know, I'm a professional scientist with a doctorate and in my work, I cannot
let opinion lead me to a conclusion not supported by the data.
In that spirit, I have brought hard data showing that the council is right to call for protected
cycle tracks on Hopkins.
I have a study here, an example, one of many, that says that bicycle infrastructure, specifically
separated and protected bike lanes leads to fewer fatalities.
Mr. Dregeb, that's our metric for success and better road safety outcomes for all users,
drivers included.
I will be happy to share the study with you.
Commissioner Blackby, I live in the hills.
I do bike from Hopkins into the hills on my e-bike with my groceries.
That constituency exists.
Sorry.
Can you just address the council as a whole, please, in your comments?
Thank you.
Certainly.
In this study, the authors say quote,
the research has boiled it down for city planners,
create cycling facilities and you'll see the impact.
They found that safer cities aren't due to increases
in cyclists but the infrastructure built for them
specifically separated and protected bike lanes.
This is significantly associated with fewer fatalities.
For example, in San Francisco, a 50% reduction
was seen when protected cycle tracks were installed.
I will be happy to share all of these studies with council
and in fact have already done so by email.
66% of businesses in San Francisco
saw increases in business when cycle tracks were added.
No study has shown a significant decrease in business
for any bicycle infrastructure.
Finally, regarding fire issues,
this has been done elsewhere.
These are not the first protected cycle tracks.
Other places for decades have solved the fire access issues.
This is a solved problem.
vote in favor please of protected cycle track.
Thank you.
So Mayor, we have 15 minutes left in this comment period.
Okay, good evening, Mayor and Council members.
My name is Abby Thorne Lyman.
I live in on Hopkins street between Sacramento and Gilman.
I back out of my driveway every morning at rush hour.
And I will tell you backup cameras do in fact,
see who is coming.
I can tell you from experience,
I see them on Hopkins every day.
I wanna address the matter of commercial parking.
If you had a use generating as many trips
as Monterey Market does today,
if you had that use coming in to the city of Berkeley,
you would not be looking for how many parking spaces
you can fit to accommodate that use if it were a new use.
You would be looking to do transportation demand
management measures to get people out of their cars.
You would have far, far more bike parking
in front of Monterey Market,
and you would probably tell them to build bike lanes.
I strongly support council member Keshawani's referral,
and so I appreciate your time tonight, thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Good evening.
I'm a long-term Hopkins street resident of 32 years,
and I'm urging you to oppose this plan.
I fully support model transportation,
but removing critical parking will harm our small businesses,
the residents and visitors, especially the seniors.
As someone who works in risk management,
I can tell you this plan creates new safety hazards.
On any given day, hundreds of kids jumping in
and out of cars will have to navigate fast moving scooters
and e-bikes now.
The fire department hasn't signed up on this project.
Staff have already set buses and garbage trucks
will face operational constraints.
Key studies haven't been completed.
What exactly are you voting on?
There are better options safe by corridors parallel
to Hopkins on a street without heavy traffic or bus routes,
we paved Hopkins Street.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
I'm married to him, a pediatrician.
So 32 years on Hopkins,
and I oppose the bike lanes specifically.
The reason is that safety is my concern.
And I feel like the safety has not been actually been addressed.
When you speak to the planners,
no one's really assessed what's gonna happen.
We know kids, especially preschoolers,
and I'm a pediatrician, so I know how these brains work.
They can, they do not navigate bikes that are coming down.
I'm also a biker, so I know how quickly
you can come down Hopkins Street,
and that can be very dangerous for kids
who are not quite functionally
varied developmentally.
So you guys, it's gonna be $20 million.
I would add a few more, maybe more millions
for all the lawsuits that are gonna come your way
because it's so poorly planned.
Thank you so much.
I would like an extra minute, my wife Cindy.
Hi, my name is Howard Goldberg.
My wife Cindy and I have lived on Hopkins Street
in the same house for 48 years.
And a lot of things I wanna say have been said
by people who are opposing this plan.
But I think about it in one different way.
I think I try to put myself now as the cycle tracks
and all the more bicycles and e-bikes and scooters
that are coming down and it's gonna be a raceway.
I mean, I have my own lane now, I can go as fast as I want.
And I'm trying to think of myself backing out of my driveway,
backing out, and if I lose just for a fraction of a second
my concentration, which is bound to happen,
you know, a phone rings or you're talking to somebody,
all of a sudden, you're immediately upon them, bam,
there's gonna be something happening, a bad thing.
And that doesn't happen when the cyclist
is seven or eight feet out.
There's parking there, and they're out further.
There's more time to respond
than just that fraction of a time.
So I think that this is a very dangerous situation
that you're creating if you put a cycle track there.
I just think there's gonna be more and more accidents.
And lastly, if we're such in a budget crunch,
why would you wanna spend all this more money on this?
I, in good conscience, cannot possibly think
about wanting to pass an extra sales tax
or vote for a $30 million bond,
and you're putting an extra five or 10 million
into this thing.
Please don't do it.
Thank you.
Yeah.
I'm Dr. Celeste Marks.
I urge that item 27 be rejected
in favor of passage of Councilmember Black or Rupees
or Councilmember O'Keefe's compromise proposals.
Alternative, much safer east-west bicycle routes
can be implemented on nearby Rose and Ada streets.
Protected bicycle paths on both sides of Hopkins
will significantly disrupt refuse collection.
Access for trainspeople, contractors, and caregivers
the city of Houston. The city of
We already heard from, a while ago, the flower seller, beloved flower seller, who sells flowers
from his cart on the near-moderate market at the curbside.
He's been described very accurately as the soul of the neighborhood.
We call him that because he not only sells beautiful flowers, which he arranges with
an artist's eye, but he greets all of us, so many of us, young and old, children, all
all sorts of people, including cyclists,
with great generosity and charm.
In 2021, 2022, there was a group of residents
who came together to support Mamoud,
to make sure that he did not lose his livelihood.
This is not an exaggeration.
He will lose his livelihood if he loses his spot,
some kind of spot in the neighborhood.
We had productive conversations with the city then.
We hope that as you continue your deliberations,
we'll be able to stay in touch with you
to ensure that he is able to stay in the neighborhood.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hi, I'm Zach.
I live in D1.
And I'm proud of my council members' leadership on this.
I travel across and also along Hopkins very frequently.
Every crossing is a nail biter.
High speeds are routine.
Visibility is poor, especially at night.
But drivers are creatures of habit.
Paint does not correct drivers who drift into bike lanes,
but physical protections do.
And Rose was repaid without protections.
now drivers of speed 15% faster with casualties mounting.
On the other hand, Millview with its protected bike lanes
feels safe.
We should be trying to bury Robert Moses,
not curl up next to him.
1970s bike policies like vehicular cycling and Sharrows
have had a half century to bring about the biking renaissance.
They haven't, they don't work.
Let's get these bike lanes built
along the Taplin-Luna Para lines.
Thank you.
Thank you, Seth.
Hi, I'm Pedro.
Do you have a question or
question for the council and
if I live in district one near
north Berkeley Bart and this is
my first time attending the
council meeting.
I'm here to urge you to vote
yes on council member because
our one is item with the
top and one of our amendments
my wife and I are walkers and
micro mobility users and don't
feel safe when we're on or
across Hopkins with the current
infrastructure.
Today's proposal is a huge step
in the right direction to build
on previous work done to make
mobility safer for all in
the city of Lincoln. Thank you.
to Monterey market as well as all the other shops.
While I've had multiple close calls and harrowing experiences,
one in particular stuck in my mind
when a driver continuously honked at me
and tailgated me nearly the entire length of my journey
for taking the lane to avoid being in the door zone.
It's very intimidating to know you have an aggressive person
behind you who could kill you with a simple press
of their gas pedal, gas pedal right behind you.
If I was a less confident cyclist,
I might have never biked on Hopkins again. We need to give people the opportunity to do. Thank you.
Hello, my name is Stephen and as a frequent pedestrian and a novice cyclist, I look forward
to a protected bike lane on Hopkins. I would love to take more trips through the city by bike,
but after many near misses due to dangerous drivers, I've self-limited my cycling trips
throughout the city. Please continue with plans for the separated bike lanes, ensuring our streets
the city of Milwaukee. And I'm
sure that the city of Milwaukee
is a good place to be. The
buildings are accessible and
safe for everyone. Thank you.
Thank you for your time. My
partner and I currently live on
standards within a quarter mile.
Hopkins Street corridor in
district one. Every day we both
bike along and across Hopkins to
commute to work and to patron
the shops on Hopkins. I've
recently been involved in a bike
we had to have the plan to
allow for a ask for bike lane.
It could have been completely
avoided.
I know that biking in Berkeley
can be dangerous and I'd like
Berkeley to fulfill its vision
zero action plan by building
the infrastructure required to
make biking a safe alternative
to driving.
I urge you to approve the
proposed plan to include the
protected bike lane.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you for your time.
My name is Jarrah Lewis.
I live two blocks from Hopkins
in D1.
I also drive and I support Council Member Casarwani's
proposal to repave Hopkins with protected bike lanes
and pedestrian improvements.
This has been said before Berkeley voters
have already made their feelings clear
by electing representatives who adopted the bike plan
and the Vision Zero action plan.
If Berkeley is serious about Vision Zero,
protected bike lanes are the only option here
and human lives must be valued
over the convenience of car users.
Physical barriers are not, quote, appealing.
They are life-saving, the only intervention
that has been proven to lower mortality rates for cyclists
and notably has also been shown to lower mortality rates
for elderly pedestrians.
Sherrows and the ADA or Rose Street alternatives
are not viable alternatives.
They are distractions to allow the city
to keep kicking the can down the road.
Please do the right thing and adopt Council Member
Custer-Wani's proposal with the extension to Standage.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
I just wanna give a warning.
I think we have three minutes left, is that right?
Two, two, three.
I was on the bubble, but I made it.
My name is Barry Feik.
I taught at Ruth Actie for 13 years.
I've lived in Berkeley since 1961.
I have two big fears at my age,
being hit by a car while on my bike.
Number two, a decline in my driving skills as I get older
and hitting a child on a bike or scooter
who drifts into my car lane.
Protected bike lanes address both of these well-founded fears.
Cherrows do not.
As for fear of business being hurt by the proposed changes,
that is not well-founded and runs counter
to numerous studies, all of which demonstrate
that there will be a positive or, at worst,
a neutral economic impact.
Change is hard, but I stand with the young
and the forward-looking on this.
The climate crisis is real.
Please support the younger generation's
hard-fought solutions to it.
please support Rashi's proposal.
Thank you.
May I think you're our final speaker in person.
We've got, I know, 40.
Good evening, mayor and council members.
My name is Ray Yip, I'm a district five residence.
I recognize that this is a difficult decision for you
and that you've put a lot of thought
and energy into the subject.
I'm here to tell you that your work is not done.
You don't have the right solution yet.
We have a very divisive situation here.
And I would like to see you find a solution
that where everyone sitting around the table
can say I can live with that.
Now that may sound like mission impossible,
but I think you have before you a proposal
by Council Member Blackaby that can get you there.
I have confidence in what he has stated.
I also have confidence in what Council Member O'Keefe
has proposed.
And I have confidence in Wahid Amiri.
I have gotten to know him.
Thanks, Ray.
And he has to-
I'm sorry, time is up, Ray.
Okay, wait.
How many people, hold on, hold on.
If you all speak, I will not let them talk.
So how many people are online?
One, two, three, four, five, six.
Maria, are you in line?
Seven?
Okay.
There are 41 people online, so at least,
because not everyone has raised their hands.
So I will let you all speak.
If you do not let people see you a minute,
because otherwise we're just really cutting it.
So come on up.
You have one minute, one minute each.
My name is Sandra and I have been a member
of the Evangel Bible Church of Berkeley for over 15 years.
I've seen pedestrians, and all my years here,
I've seen pedestrians greatly
outnumber cyclists consistently.
Rather than adding bike lanes,
I believe improving pedestrian safety at this location
should be a greater priority.
Our church members regularly cross Hopkins at Ord Way
to reach the church entrance,
yet there is no crosswalk or walk signal there.
Many of our church members keep watch
to routinely help elderly children
visually impaired visitors cross safely. At least one time the paratransit dropped
off our blind visitor BC across the street and she had no safe way of
crossing Hopkins by herself. She also wasn't within our site for us to assist
her and for me being pregnant myself right now I also double check multiple
times before crossing Hopkins because the cars go so fast. What we need here is
pedestrian safety and access to our church not a bike lane that can
to introduce e-bikes and e-scooters.
Thank you.
Good evening.
I'm Clara Wong with the Evangel Bible Church of Berkeley.
I strongly urge you to preserve parking
on Popkin Street for safety.
I've been part of the church since 2005
while attending UC Berkeley as an Air Force ROTC cadet,
and when I was injured in 2005 using crutches,
there were many times it was difficult to find parking
and had to ask church brothers to come and help me park.
We've been taught to love our neighbors
and we've been serving them by not parking
in front of their homes,
as well as preserving the parking spaces
immediately around our church building
on Hopkins and Ordway for families with pregnant moms,
young children, visitors, and guests,
with my three children,
even with existing parking on Hopkins Street.
I've often needed to park two or three blocks away
on Wednesday evenings for Bible study,
and this has become very difficult in the last year,
walking with my bilateral foot brace,
walker, or at times, wheelchair in the dark evenings
as I anticipate an ankle replacement surgery.
Removing parking on Hopkins will further exacerbate
and make it even more dangerous for our church families
and many young children walking across many streets
access to our church building for gathering and worship.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hello, I'm John Heller.
I use bicycle as my primary source of transportation,
but I am speaking in opposition to this proposal
because I don't believe we have done
what is the responsible thing to do here,
which is to conduct a business impact survey
to make sure that the businesses that are impacted
can survive a disruption of this nature.
We've heard this area described as a treasure.
A previous speaker described the Hopkins Monterey areas
as a treasure of small businesses, and it really is.
But a treasure of that nature needs to be nurtured
and honored and supported, not taken for granted.
I have no doubt that both sides hope that these businesses
will survive this disruption.
But hope is different from empirical evidence.
And we need to conduct a study to make sure
that that's the case.
Thank you.
Hello, my name is Kevin Jones.
I'm a Berkeley resident for over 20 years.
And I just want to suggest to you guys to read the book
Bike Lanes Are White Lanes.
This is seriously about gentrification.
This is not about safety.
let's be real, and these bike lanes will hurt the businesses.
Valencia, businesses on Valencia after their bike lane was
installed, lost 70% of their businesses.
It will close down businesses.
So if you actually care about the residents that are here,
the business owners that are here,
you will actually rethink this program, okay?
Because seriously, this is about gentrification.
I don't care what the people from the gentrifier land,
who, excuse me, the Turner Lab have to say,
or all these people that are pushing
for these bike lanes to help property values.
That is what this is about.
This is about plans happening in the future
and not for the people that already live here.
Wow, tough act to follow.
My name is Michael Boland.
I'm a landscape architect and city planner.
I worked for my whole career in the public realm,
working on complicated public realm projects.
I think we can all agree Hopkins Street is a mess.
But I have to tell you, I think this process
is a bigger mess.
And I think it's shocking that eight years have passed
and Hopkins Street is still unpaved.
But I don't think it's unexpected.
Why?
Because this process has pretty much broken every rule
around good governance and good planning processes,
starting with a solution, rather than actually defining the problem.
So unless you are all interested in experiencing this over and
over and over again, when every bike project comes along,
I urge you to stop and create an authentic, inclusive process that engages everyone.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Good evening, thank you all for your time.
My name is Casey, it's a pleasure to see many of you have spoken with you before,
you see me biking around town with my twins on the back of my e-bike.
I would love to bike to Hopkins.
I'd love to bike to King Pool and King Playground,
but it's not safe to do so.
I have an older kid as well who's riding on their own, and it's not safe.
Painted bike lanes are not sufficient.
I was on Alcatraz last week,
luckily without my kids, and I was hit by a delivery truck that
decided that they should cut into the bike lane.
And luckily, they hit the back of my bike
right where my kids would have been had they been with me.
Paint is insufficient.
We need protected bike lanes, especially on a collector
street, which is what Hopkins is.
Paint is insufficient.
Chairs are insufficient.
We need protection.
And if you build it, they will come.
So I don't care what the past has been.
You are hearing from people who would bike,
who would choose to get there in safer methods
if they had it.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hey, hey, excuse me, folks.
Come on.
Really?
Go ahead, Maria.
I am so impressed with all of us.
And I thank you, Mayor, for your gracious space.
Whatever we end up fighting over is not the right question.
Bicycles could create rickshaw, help everyone get around,
right, and they'd get all the exercise they ever needed.
I've already been through Milvia, and Temescal,
and the first church on Dana.
It's like, oh my god, we solve one thing
and we create other things.
And if there was just more paying attention and courtesy,
it would be better because we have lots of traffic rules.
And yet there's still endless accidents.
I've almost been run over more by bicycles than cars.
So it's like, can't we learn how to live together better?
Thank you.
Thanks, Maria.
Okay, we are gonna take a 10-minute break
and then we will return and do our online comment.
If you are here for online comment, please raise your hand.
We are up to 50 right now.
53.
Okay.
Yes, we are going to make, sorry, I will entertain a motion to extend until what, 1230?
1230.
1130.
Okay, folks, please, if you can keep it down so we can hear each other.
Shh.
I'm sorry.
A motion to extend until 1230.
Second.
All right.
Can we take the roll on that, please?
Okay, to extend the meeting till 1230 a.m., Council Member Kesterwani is absent.
absent. Taflin yes Bartlett yes Trega aye O'Kee yes
Blackaby yes Unipara yes Humber yes and Maryishi yes
Thank you.
Recording stopped.
Recording in progress.
Let's take your seats, please.
Quiet down, quiet down.
We're going to get started again.
We're moving to our online comments.
Shh folks, thank you, all right.
We have 53 comments online and we are starting
with Ben Gerhardstein.
Oh, and actually I know that you have been given a minute
by Libby, so I will give you two minutes.
Oh, and three, sorry, you've been given three minutes.
I'll take two.
All right, good.
to total but, you know, just to give you that.
Fair enough.
Good evening, Council.
I'm Ben Garris-Dine with Walk Big Berkeley.
I so wish I could be with you in person
for this important vote.
Walk Big Berkeley, together with North Berkeley Now,
Berkeley Neighbors for Housing and Climate Action,
East Bay for Everyone, Telegraph for People,
East Bay EMB, Sierra Club's Northern Alameda County chapter,
and bike East Bay, urge you to pass Councilmember
Casarwani's referral, along with Councilmember
chaplain supplemental. Our coalition of safe streets housing and environmental
organizations strongly supports repaving and rebalancing Hopkins Street to get
people of all ages and abilities more safe sustainable transportation options
to and through North Berkeley. As a Vision Zero City, Berkeley has
established that safety is our highest priority. At least 10 council approved
plans and policies support making pedestrian bicycle and transit
improvements on Hopkins when it's repaved.
We oppose Council Member Blackivis
and Council Member O'Keeffe's supplementals
as they seek to further delay
or deny bicycle improvements on Hopkins
to continue prioritizing car parking.
That's unacceptable because there are no alternative
bicycle routes that will provide critical safe connections
to West Berkeley into the schools, parks,
and shops on Hopkins.
We do not need more study on this issue.
Please think toward the future.
With increased housing development in Berkeley,
the city needs to redesign Hopkins
and other automobile-dominated streets
to encourage new neighbors to make walking, biking,
and transit primary forms of transportation.
Failure to do so invites more congestion,
traffic injuries, and climate pollution in Berkeley.
For too long, this Hopkins project has been a cloud
over our community.
Please pass Casarwani's and Taplan's items
and empower staff to move this project forward
without delay.
Vote for a smooth, safe Hopkins for all
and for a brighter, safer future for Berkeley.
Thank you.
Thank you, Ben.
Next is Andrea.
Andrea H.
Should be able to unmute.
And on deck are Charles Siegel, Sharon Friedman and Seth,
just so you know you're on deck.
Andrea.
Sorry about that.
I was dual screening.
Thank you for taking my comment.
My name's Andrea Horbinski.
I wanna echo everything that the pro bike lane
speakers have said.
I also want to correct some misinformation
that has been spoken both by commenters
and also by, I believe, some council members
about the mistaken belief that bike lanes
harm nearby businesses.
Worldwide studies and rebalancing have shown
that businesses in fact benefit when streets
are rebalanced for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Valencia Street in San Francisco,
a city report actually found that merchants were not harmed
by the bike lane contrary to their claims.
So for all these reasons and many more,
I would urge you to support rebalancing Hopkins.
And once again, remember that Berkeley
should not be a necropolis for boomers,
but instead it's a living city.
It should meet the needs of its residents
as they evolve for the future to confront climate change
and support the city's stated goals.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next is Charles.
Shh folks please.
Thank you.
Oh, hello.
I support the bike lanes on Hopkins.
And I also would like to correct some misinformation
that could have easily been corrected
if people have looked at Google
and learned the facts before speaking.
Some people have said that this will hurt businesses on Hopkins.
But Google will tell you that bike lanes help protected bike lanes help business.
Some people have said that this will make it more dangerous for pedestrians.
But Google will tell you that protected bike lanes make streets safer
for all users, including pedestrians and drivers, as well as bicyclists.
Council members black a bee's sub calls for a long process of considering two alternatives.
We did that years ago the conflict became worse and worse as the process went on.
A public works director and transportation director resigned as a result.
Two associate planners resigned. Thank you Charles your time is up. Thank you for your comment.
Next is Sharon.
OK, good evening, Sharon Friedman.
I am in support of the ideas proposed
by Blackaby and by Council Member O'Keefe.
I am really strongly opposed to the class four
bike lane with dividers.
I bike, I cycle and I drive.
What streets do I avoid when I drive?
I don't know that anyone has said this.
One person alluded to it.
I avoid Milvia in downtown.
it's the most dangerous place to be a cyclist ever why because drivers don't see the vehicles
anymore because cars are parked and they block the view people block the bike lane okay they
either put dumpsters or garbage cans in it door dash parks in those bike lanes and workers hang
out in those bike lanes and there you are driving you don't have a way to get out of the bike lane
because there's a concrete barricade it's totally treacherous the best part
of the bike ride is Milavia that says bikers may use the entire lane and it's
nice to bicycle Boulevard time is up thank you so Seth Michael Pierce T
Stephens you all are on deck and then Makai hello can I have an extra minute
I think you can get a minute
from Mariah, M-A-R-I-Y-A online
if you can get off.
Oh, Mariah, I see you're there.
Yeah.
Okay. Thank you.
Hi. I've been hit and run by
a bicyclist twice while living
on Hopkins in the past 30 years.
I was left bloodied and injured
on the ground.
tools as a contractor in and out of my house and my business area on the 1600 block of Hopkins.
Cyclists failed to stop at 96% of all red lights and stop signs and this is a human factors and
engineering society report. Also, we need more cheap stop signs and road paint applied in-house
by Union City employees, not scandalous million, $15 million cycle tracks. We don't need to eliminate
door swing zones and make dangerous areas here. It is dangerous for the fire chief's advising.
I also could obviously tell from Wahid Ameri's statement that he has no idea about how to go
ahead and advise on this as a public works person because he's so poorly prepared for this and
uninformed because this is just being rushed through. The Hopkins Street Wasteful Investment
is going to increase elderly pedestrian deaths and cycle deaths because they are inherently
unsafe to themselves and the public. They do not obey the rules of the road. They run stop signs
non-stop. They are not safe. Motorcycles that are electric must obey the rules of the road.
E-bikes are no different. Would parents go traveling around regularly with their children
on the back of a motorcycle? No, that would look kind of weird if there was a cultural thing.
But somehow doing it on a bicycle or on an e-bike is somehow normalized.
It is child endangerment. This is dangerous behavior.
We need to put stop signs on Hopkins and Carlotta and Beverly and Ordway.
We need to paint all the crosswalk intersections on Hopkins.
Hopkins Street must be made safe for all people.
And we need to put regular bike lanes all the way up and down Hopkins.
Thank you. Your comment is time is up. I do want to object to the comments made about
our interim director, Wahida Muri. He is a very professional and knowledgeable person and I'm very
grateful to him for his work. Okay next is Michael Pierce. Hi, I will give my minute to Sharon
and Friedman if she's on the line.
She already spoke actually.
Yeah.
Oh, OK.
Well, then I would say one thing that when
I was listening to her, she said she felt unsafe on Milvia
when she was driving.
What she meant to say is when she was riding her bike,
she felt unsafe because there are dumpsters in front of,
in the bike lane and that there are obstructions
in the protected bike lane.
And when you're in a protected bike line on a bicycle,
you can't swerve around them
because you've got the curb in their way.
So that was one of the points that she was trying to make.
So that's all.
It's been very interesting to hear the discussion.
I can't imagine how, given what the community has said,
I can't imagine how you guys could vote for this plan.
But anyway, thank you very much.
Next is T. Stephens.
Thank you.
I've been seated minutes by Kenny Yip and Scott Selmonoff.
Okay.
Hello.
I do not see Yip, Y-I-P.
Kenny.
I do not see Kenny up on there. And what was the other name? I see a Kenny.
If there's a Kenny, that must be it. And then the other is Scott,
Selman off. Scott has his hand raised. Yeah.
So do I have three minutes? That's fine,
but Kenny doesn't have his hand up just so you know. Okay. Um,
my name is Tina Stevens.
I'm a Berkeley resident and I would like to call attention to a troubling
decision-making loop in our city's transportation planning.
The city uses taxpayer funds to routinely partner with the regional group, Bike East
Bay.
Bike East Bay's annual reports have listed Berkeley as a premium $10,000-plus top-tier
donor and institutional partner.
Bike East Bay also receives financial backing from the private for-profit corporation ALTA
planning and design. ALTA's business model relies on securing lucrative municipal contracts
to design transportation projects. Bike East Bay fiscally sponsors local interest group
Walk Bike Berkeley and both of those groups lobby this council for projects that benefit
the corporate donor on this pipeline, ALTA planning and design. This is a closed loop
ecosystem, one that is amplified by the intense lobbying and political support
of members of this Council by well-funded trans-Berkeley urban
coalition groups like Yimby Action and East Bay Yimby. Consequently, voices of
local opposition are being muffled. In the meantime, ALTA has done significant
work in Berkeley, including developing the city's 2017 bicycle plan. It was lead consultant
for the updated Berkeley bicycle plan. And in 2025, it consulted on the Adeline Street
project and conducted outreach that targeted businesses and property owners to diffuse
potential dissent. When private firms affect public policy through lobbying pipelines,
It dilutes the voices of residents, neighborhood associations, and small business owners who
do not benefit from a taxpayer-funded, corporate-backed apparatus to echo their concerns.
In this way, democracy is subverted.
Please listen to the citizens who elected you, especially those disadvantaged by systemic
inequities.
Thank you.
Thank you next is makai freeman makai. We're giving you extra time
I
Wasn't going to talk tonight. I
raised two items
while mayor said
with these talks
Sometimes toxic I
Cannot stop
I'm new anymore. I
I used to shop at Ace Hardware for many years.
But getting out on my accessible van, I am like my caregiver and I almost got hit twice.
I don't represent my job at System Chain Dasket, but I can tell you,
There is I who contacted the city to help town hall at CIL.
I shot almost exclusively outside of Berkeley
because I am able to park.
Where I shot, scared off at the sidewalk,
I don't have to be ordered by cars coming down.
band cross avenue. My ramp would come directly out in traffic. I told this to these planets
and now I will let them. I understand why I could feel community is treated so this is
voting will continue the fight and allocate. Thank you, Mackay. All right. Thanks, Mackay.
Next is Lucas Cantor. And right behind is Francesca Cantor, Vicki Summer, Kathy Rye and then
Christopher Kroll, excuse me. Thank you, this is Lucas Cantor. Good
evening Mayor and Council. I'm a Berkeley resident who walks or bikes on Hopkins with my family
nearly every day. And nearly every day we're afraid we're going to be the next to die.
We love Hopkins despite its dangerous design and we're excited to see your plan to add protected
bike lanes. The evidence is clear. Cities that build one-way curbside protected bike lanes
keep them. Not one has ever been a failure. Not for safety, not for accessibility,
not for business. This is a solved problem. It does not require compromise. It requires political
and strong leadership.
Oakland had this exact debate
over their protected bike lanes on Telegraph,
but when the dust settled, the data showed,
sails up and crashes down.
Meanwhile, we've spent the past decade
waiting and debating on Hopkins
and dozens of our neighbors have been hit by cars.
Three of them died.
This is senseless and completely preventable violence.
Paint is not sufficient and it won't keep us safe.
Pass item 27.
Thank you.
Francesca Cantor.
Hi, good evening everybody.
I'm Francesca Cantor, my wife, actually a Berkeley resident.
I'm just here to add on to support item 27.
This isn't only about cyclists,
protect the right lanes make streets safer for anyone who can't or doesn't drive.
Least for users, kids, the elderly, and transit riders.
In Berkeley, we walk our bike for 40% of trips,
but pedestrians and cyclists absorb 60%
of our severe and fatal collisions.
I also want to address two arguments I've heard tonight.
First, parking.
I think my husband said a lot about this already,
but studies in New York, Toronto, and Chicago
found protected bike lanes had a neutral or positive effect
on local businesses.
Even after parking was removed, in some cases,
sales grew faster than on streets without them. Second, cost, a protected bike lane runs a fraction
of what it costs to build or maintain a car lane. Cars also cost cities more just by existing on the
road. Thank you so much. Your time is up. Thank you. Next is Vicki followed by Kathy, then Calla,
the Joanna. Good evening Mayor and Council. It makes no sense to intentionally work bikes onto a busy
commercial street. Spend our tax dollars to repave Hopkins and other streets and direct cycle traffic
to quieter side streets. Follow the plans for Hopkins that were proposed by O'Keefe and Blackaby
which are rational, fiscally sound and will best serve all stakeholders. Don't install parking
meters, that proposal is just anti-carpunative. And don't waste local tax dollars pandering
to the externally funded bike lobby. They pushed for a bike lane on the Richmond Bridge
which saw only limited usage. Be smarter than that.
And I'm distressed to hear that a cycle track is being proposed minus critical evaluations
of the space, safety, and parking. And regarding these cycle tracks, ask, how many blocks will
an elder without a disability placard carrying two big grocery bags have to walk to access
their car in the rain. Listen to O'Keeffe and Blackaby. Thank you. Thank you. Next is Kathy.
Followed by Coloschmidt, Joanna Dillon, Nick Pilch, Laura Eide, after Kathy. Hi Mayor,
council member, I'm Kathy Rye. I used to be a Berkeley resident. I still adore and shop at many
Berkeley restaurants and shops and it's just an amazing place to be and continue to patron.
I am sympathetic to the less abled churchgoers and the people who would be affected. Here's the
thing though, no one has died of inconvenience and extra time. I am sure those who lost loved ones
would happily chip in for an Uber or Lyft if it would have saved their loved ones from dying.
You know, maybe a bike or a helmet tax would help to fund something like that.
And I'm also an unreported injured where I didn't know my elbow was broken when I hit a bump
and I missed a car because the swelling didn't go away after two days I went to the ER.
So, Sheryl on Marin Avenue does not work. I was almost hit by a truck just this morning. Thank you for listening and yes, the more traffic, the more bicyclists, thanks so much.
Next is Calla. Hello.
Calla Schmidt, a professor of environmental science and a cyclist.
I want to speak in support of the referral to put protected bike lanes on Hopkins and the supplemental to extend them to Stannage.
We need safe and viable alternatives to cars to meet our climate goals and to live up to other city policy, particularly Vision Zero and safe routes to schools.
As a parent that currently bikes my child to school using ROSE, I want to strongly state that ROSE is not a workable alternative.
It is steep and the car and school bus traffic to Ruth and King, Ruth Actie and King Middle Schools do not have a viable alternative route.
our kids deserve safe routes to school, hundreds of parents are driving their kids short distances
because it doesn't currently feel safe to walk or bike. This is creating
congestion and dangerous conditions for pedestrians young and old.
It is already challenging to park in this neighborhood as many have spoken to tonight.
As we add more housing and residents at North Berkeley Bart and throughout the city,
we need to ensure this growth doesn't create more traffic. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thanks for your comment.
Next is Joanna.
Good evening, Mayor and Councilmembers.
My name is Joanna Dillon.
I'm a parent in a bike-first family that bikes every single day to Ruth Acty, the public
library, park and pool, and private businesses on Hopkins.
I'm also the daughter of an 80-year-old Berkeley residence in District 5.
I support Councilmembers Kessarwani's item with the extension to Saanich because I want
Berkeley to be a city where everyone has more ways to get around safely, not fewer. As my
parents age, I want Berkeley to offer them more choices. For people to stay independent longer,
they need safe places to walk, safer crossings, reliable transit, and streets where biking feels
like a real option. And I want the same independence for my children as they grow up,
so they can safely bike to school. Anyone who has ridden roads during drop-off can tell you
arrows are not safety. Cities across the country have shown that protected bike lanes can improve
safety while supporting vibrant businesses. Rose is not a viable alternative. Berkeley is growing.
Our transportation system needs to evolve with it. Thank you very much. Please move forward with
bike lanes. Thank you, Joanna. Next is Nick. Hello, good evening. This is Nick Pilch, former Albany
Mayor, a Sierra Club leader, 65-year-old senior, temporarily disabled, and user of Hopkins Street.
I was there today on my hand cycle. This is simply a matter of equity. Please vote for
the thoughtful referral from Councilmember Kesawani. I'm sorry, but it's simply insulting
to suggest that bicycles use ADA and or ROSE instead of Hopkins. Insulting because why do
we consider the desires of motor vehicle drivers over all others? Why do only motor vehicle drivers
deserve good access to King pool, the shops on Hopkins and all the other amenities, but not
bicyclists. Motor vehicle drivers use Hopkins to pass through or access these destinations,
but some are saying that cyclists should use other streets and not be allowed easy and safe
access to Hopkins and its amenities. Once again, insulting and detrimental to the businesses on
Hopkins as well because they are denied access to the many more cyclists who could have access to
their businesses. Do the right thing for the environment, for cyclists, for everyone who
who wants to save Hopkins and the world is watching.
Thank you, Nick.
Laura.
Followed by Michelle Tawati, Emily Stacey R,
and then a number ending in 211.
You're on deck.
Thank you.
I live on Hopkins Street.
And while I support bicycle lanes,
the cost, installation, and uncertain outcomes
of physical barriers doesn't provide a comprehensive solution
for the vast quantity of people who frequent Hopkins.
As many people do not or cannot bicycle, we need to make it easy and convenient to use
realistic alternate forms of transportation as in ride apps and the bus.
Concrete barriers could reduce areas for such vehicles to pick up and drop off riders.
There's a lot of congestion and illegal driving turns at the Monterey market intersection.
If we drastically reduce parking, there will be even more drivers circling around looking
for parking.
Is there another way?
Has the city studied the bike lane configuration parks in Brooklyn?
I lived near Prospect Park West,
which is a similarly wide street with buses.
They added a painted two way bike lane along the park side
and cars were allowed to park outside the bike lanes,
which provided a natural barrier from moving traffic.
It became a one way street, as has ever been considered.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Michelle?
Michelle?
Tawati, are you there?
Oh, so sorry.
Here, here we go.
Mayor Ishi, council members, my name is Michel Tsewadi.
I've biked in Berkeley for 42 years.
My wife, two kids, and I bike.
When I started a food delivery non-profit
with a group of neighbors during COVID,
the first thing we did was to start bike service.
My mom lives in Paris,
a bike-friendly city safe for cyclists.
Every year in Paris, I bike.
Paris has many bike lanes, but few separated ones.
Instead, the frequent strategy is to limit site streets
to resident traffic only and make them preferred bike
itineraries. I support bike lanes around Hopkins, but not this one. It divides us and it puts
us bikers in conflict with seniors. It'll cause many to oppose the November tax measure.
Instead, let's unify. I believe a plan that unifies us can be assembled that will provide
safe preferred bike itineraries in this neighborhood without impacting parking while costing a
lot less tax money. I urge you to request the staff to assemble it through Councilmember
for Black Abiy's supplemental, thank you.
Thank you.
Next is Emily, followed by Stacy and then our caller.
Hi, my name is Emily Walker and I live in D5.
Black Abiy and O'Keeffe suggests slowing down this process
and dragging it out even more,
but their watered down plans that they put forth tonight
will lead to inferior implementation,
which will later be used as an argument
that bike lanes don't work.
We've been through eight years of this
and we don't need to slow down the process.
We need to slow down the drivers
and keep cyclists and pedestrians safe from cars.
The share proposal is not the answer.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next is Stacy.
Hi, my name is Stacy and I live on Hopkins.
I'm a car free household, but it's currently very stressful
for me to bike up Hopkins to get my weekly groceries.
However, I deal with that stress
because I believe in reducing emissions
for our climate crisis.
If Hopkins is repaved without protected bike lanes,
I worry it will become too unsafe to bike
since cars would drive faster on a newly paved road.
I would seriously consider buying a car
to safely run my errands.
The opposite of the future Berkeley should be building.
As Berkeley plans for more housing
to address our state's housing crisis
and the future North Berkeley BART development,
we should be encouraging alternate modes of transportation,
not just driving.
I understand change can be hard and scary,
but unfortunately we have to make big changes
for our climate affordability and housing crises.
I support Council Item 27 with the supplementals.
It builds on years of studies,
takes a holistic approach to safety
and includes tree assessments
that will improve sidewalk accessibility for everyone.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next is a phone number ending in 211.
Hi, I'm the proud resident of Berkeley for 62 years.
He's been about two and a half decades at Cal, studying
and teaching physics.
The planet is dying.
The planet is dying.
Look at this horrible heat in Europe, east coast,
all of the storms.
we have definitely worked for the pipeline
and definitely, definitely, people walk.
People walk, take a bus, number 65 and 67.
They usually have one or two windows, it's empty.
Leave your car behind.
Go to shopping, buy groceries, do everything.
Walk, walking is good for you.
I walk about two miles a day myself.
So please have the resolution.
who needs the bike lane everywhere we can.
And I'm a scientist, I'm not be kidding.
The earth, Venus is called Earth's Evil Twin
because the temperature in Venus
is about 900 degrees centigrade.
We are going in that direction.
We are going in that direction.
I don't think even we're going to make it better.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comment.
Next is Stefan Brown followed by Tonya Benjean.
Hi, my name is Stefan.
Thank you so much everyone for, or thank you to the council
for going through this process.
I support the bike lanes on Hopkins Street.
I think that we need to be prioritizing opportunities
to save human rights and reduce climate emissions.
And those should be our priorities, not parking.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Next is Tonya.
Hi, my name is Tonya.
I live on Hopkins Street at the intersection of Sacramento,
and I would like to urge you to vote no on item number 27,
and I am in favor of the supplemental proposals
by Council Member Blackaby and Council Member O'Keefe.
I would like to note that class four biplanes
are not appropriate for streets
with a high density of driveways
as they create multiple points of conflict
between motorists and cyclists.
And I think there's a misunderstanding
that that's gonna make things safe.
They also don't add protection at intersections
where a lot of these conflicts happen.
Without a doubt, Hopkins needs paving,
it needs traffic calming.
I'm also alarmed at item number 27
that there has been no outreach by the city to residents
on or adjacent to Hopkins Street or to local businesses.
No coordination with AC Transit.
Thank you, Tonya.
Thank you so much for your time, Seth.
Next is Jean.
Can I get on?
Yes.
Hi.
So I'm Jean, I live in Berkeley.
I closely follow the spring CIP process
through the council and its committees.
And what I heard tonight from public works
is that there's $6 million reserved
for the Hopkins Project,
yet we're now looking at project options at 11 and up to 15 million dollars. And so I want to
point out that there are cost consequences to the choices that are being debated tonight
and if there's an extra nine or even four million dollars that are needed it's going to have to come
out of the council's already approved 20 27 31 five-year plan for paving and streets and bike
So, I urge the council to give very close thought to how you want to allocate fixed dollars across all the paving pedestrian and bike lane needs that we have in the city and your CIP document show that there's $260 million of unfunded street projects and $66 million of unfunded pathways.
pathways. Thank you. Next is former council member Cheryl Davila. Followed by Andrew Talbot
and Robert Davila. Robert's giving his minute to me. Okay. Can you just have to mute myself?
Okay, so you know, there's.
Can you stop the clock a second?
No, I'm sorry. Your time is still moving forward.
Thanks for being so fair.
The point is, that's the ability for all to offer able to well.
I'm going to be doing a lot of.
We have to go to the next stop here.
We have to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
So, I want to go to the next stop here.
My kids attend King and they bike there every day.
This year, my son's classmate was hit by a car on Hopkins.
He didn't want to talk about it.
My son starts high school in two weeks,
kindergarten to high school, while we've kept talking.
He didn't want to stay up tonight to comment.
So I'll read his words.
I biked to King every day.
I took Rose, even though it's too steep and dangerous.
I want to take Hopkins, it's quicker,
but there are too many cars and it's not safe for bikes.
Our family supports protected bike lanes on Hopkins.
thank you thank you um next oh next is uh david david mennelson
thank you um at the north berkeley senior center last month i was chatting with another bike rider
she was recently retired and used to drive to north berkeley every day for her commute
but now that the milvia bike lanes are there she feels safe enough to bike all the way from south
Berkeley as I had done. It feels so much safer now is what she said. It feels so much safer now.
When we build good bike infrastructure, we're making it safe for people to switch away from
cars. Fewer people feel the need to drive for every single trip. The Milvia bike lane gave her
the freedom to not have to drive. The Hopkins bike lane will do the same for thousands more.
If you believe in the city's safety and climate goals, and I think we all do, giving people the
freedom to not have to drive will be the best way forward. The safety and freedom to not have to
drive. Thank you. Thank you. Next is we have Tarmigan, followed by Samuel, then Leah, then Jackie.
So Tarmigan. Tarmigan are you there? Can you hear me now? Yes. Oh sorry about that.
Thank you again to the council members, mayor, and city staff for your work. Even though I live
on the other side of the city, my kids are currently taking swimming lessons at King pool.
We mostly get across Berkeley by bike, but on a bike Hopkins feels unsafe. Hopkins needs better
infrastructure, and the alternative parallel routes don't allow safe access to facilities
directly on Hopkins Street. I urge you all to support Councilmember Keshewani's support
proposal with the supplemental to extend to Standage. Thank you. Thank you. Next is Samuel.
Hi, my name is Samuel. Can you guys hear me? Yes. I just wanted to say I live on Hopkins Street
Between order and acting, there's not a lot of bikers in this specific area of Hopkins. So it doesn't seem like there's a lot of demand. I've been living here since 1989 never had a problem with the designated bike lane that goes along the Berkeley bar tracks.
Been using that for years. I don't really see a point of.
You know, wiping out all the parking spaces, especially like the mailman said, like, what if you got a big box? The mailman can't even deliver your box.
you know, stuff like that. Um, let me see how much time I got left. Uh,
also, if it was in front of your house, I'm sure you wouldn't want that to
happen. We can't necessarily use our driveway the way we would want to do it.
Also, the driver has poor visibility. If we do get a car in there more likely
to hit people coming out of the driveway, likely hit people in the
driveway that's trying to bike by. It's just gonna make it overall more
dangerous. In my opinion, I'm totally against it. Thank you. Thank you.
Samuel. Okay, Leah. Hello. Hello, my name is Leah Bushman. I'm a
home owner and resident in the Westbury neighborhood of Berkeley. For last eight
years, I've lived a block and a half from Hopkins Street. My family bikes to and
from work, to the gym, local parks, to be friends, buy groceries at Monterey
Market, and grab a slice at Joya. My five-year-old son Theo will be starting
school at Ruth Axie Elementary school as a consumer partner next month and he is a future
king middle schooler. He is extremely excited to start biking to and from school every single day.
Bike lanes on Hopkins would allow my family and others in the neighborhood to get safely around
town. I'm saddened that many families in my neighborhood have expressed concern about being
able to bike their children to school safely. I love living in Berkeley. We moved to yesterday
because we love getting around by foot and bike
and public transit.
Cycling saves lives.
People, yes, 27 and supplemental.
Thank you so much.
Thank you.
Next is Jackie.
Followed by Linda's iPad, Robert Munch, and then Matt.
Good evening, my name is Jackie.
I'm the manager at Asaka-Suchino-Hopkins.
I support six streets for cyclists,
but this current plan is not it.
Hopkins is more than just another commercial corridor,
it's actually a destination, we can all agree on that.
Every day we welcome not only neighbors who walk or bike,
but also customers from all over Berkeley
and across the Bay Area.
I've personally spoken with people who drive here
as far as Marin County and Belloho
because they value the unique businesses
and the character of this neighborhood.
And this goes the same for all businesses here on the block.
Removing so much parking without practical alternative
will discourage those visitors,
hurting the small businesses
that have made this area successful in the first place,
and that contribute to Berkeley's tax revenue.
My concern isn't just about parking,
it's about preserving the long-term vitality
and identity of North Berkeley.
Please reconsider this proposal
and work towards a balanced solution
that improves safety while preserving
the accessibility businesses.
Thank you, Jackie.
Thanks so much.
Next is Linda.
Hi, can you hear me?
Yes.
Hi, my name is Linda Harris
and I've lived in district five for 32 years.
As a longtime Berkeley resident,
one of the things I love most about Berkeley
is its diversity.
So considering, you know, all the points of views tonight,
I am advocating for a plan
that includes all the diverse shareholders.
So one, please let's go back to the drawing board.
First, council members O'Keefe and Blackaby's process
and designed an inclusive process representing
all the diverse stakeholders, not just cyclists.
Two, please vote to reject Council Member Kerouasi's
proposal.
Three, no matter what, please vote to make Hopkins
safer for all by repaving it and installing
the appropriate traffic controls, et cetera.
And finally, last bonus point,
please consider adding new parking on Hopkins.
There's a Connector Street.
I don't know exactly what it is.
the one that fronts Monterey Market and Berkeley Hort,
close it off through traffic
and make it not a connect to you, but parking.
Thank you, Linda.
Next is Robert followed by Matt, Jonah, and Theo.
Hi, my name is Robert Munch.
I'm a first-time commenter.
I got to say this has been a very illuminating experience,
so just hats off to the council and the mayor.
My wife and I own a house in District 3.
We decided to settle in Berkeley partially because of the accessibility that living in
Berkeley would provide for us and our future family.
We decided to invest in Berkeley, invest in a life, invest for the future, and invest
for a family.
I grew up out of a state and a town.
Like most American towns, I had no infrastructure outside of driving.
Seeing a friend playing pickup in the park or meeting a girl just couldn't happen unless
they could get a ride.
the ability for everyone in Berkeley to have access
to safe parts of the city,
is really something worth preserving.
I support the plan for the protected bike lane,
mainly because I like the bike.
It's good for your health, good for your wallet,
good for the environment.
But also as someone planning life in Berkeley,
I worry that the city,
when we prioritize parts of vehicles,
we become a bit more like those vehicles,
internalizing their lessons, staying in place
because it's easy, because it's cheap,
because that's the way it's been.
Sorry, thanks Robert.
Matt?
Followed by Jonah Theo and then Kerry Shulman.
Great, the good thing, excuse me,
the good thing about council member O'Keefe
and Blackaby's proposals are that they reflect
that they actually listen to the residents
and what the residents want.
And they show interested in the concerns of the residents
who overwhelmingly oppose this.
The other council members proposal, on the other hand, favors this bike lobby that's
part of this yimby group, and they're very dogmatic and they feel like, you know, I invested
in Berkeley and I came here for this and that.
Well, the long-term residents have also invested in Berkeley.
In fact, their tax dollars over the years and decades pay for the Berkeley that you
life that attracted you here, so their concerns ought to be taken into account as well, rather
than imposing this dogma on long time residents and denigrating them. Thank you.
Next is Jonah.
Hi. Thank you. So, we're a family of four. We're a family of three with a four year old,
we own a home, we live at the intersection of Hopkins and Peralta. We see cyclists here
all the time community to work school tennis sports the park we moved here in 22 believing
commitment to being a forward-looking community and I want to relate our strong support of putting
protected bike lanes on the streets. I think embracing biking has generally improved our
lives but I've also seen firsthand car bike accidents at our intersection because the city
has failed to invest in bike lanes on this critical corridor. We regularly drive to buy
Our groceries and Monterey one fourth drop off our kid at preschool, one mile, go to King's pool point five miles. But because of how unsafe Hopkins is, we oftentimes don't bike and it makes a lot more, I think we would much rather bike.
We would prefer to bike and we really would bike other places in Berkeley and Albany, but simply because infrastructure is not here, we don't. So I think adding the infrastructure is the right thing to do.
Thank you so much for your comment and your time is up.
Theo.
Hi, council members. My name is Theo Gordon. I'm a Berkeley dad and a homeowner.
I have 26 years left on my mortgage, so I think that makes me a long-time Berkeleyan.
Please support the Castor Juanita item, including the supplementals.
And please do not just consider the voices who can wait for hours to make public comment,
mine included. I think it'd be crazy to do this and I am.
But please consider the voters who passed measure FF citywide we we voted for funding for bike lanes like this
We did not vote for studies and meetings. We voted for concrete
We voted for protection and we voted for that to be done in our lifetimes
We already have a bike plan. We already have vision zero. We already have climate emergency legislation
So none of this should actually be a decision that we really need to wait tonight
It has already been decided Hopkins is a priority by corridor
So let's make it happen and please please please don't study this for another decade. Thank you. Thanks, Theo
Okay, next is carry
Followed by Brian McNeely yen track and Julia
We just have about three and a half minutes left. Oh, I think we started at 11 10
So we started because we took a break
Read that this I pause the timer during
Okay, yeah
Hello, can you hear me? Yes. Thank you
The Hopkins corridor the commercial corridor is the place it is the place that every placemaker
wants to make but it happened organically and that is so rare and so precious and it is fragile and
and unique, and comparisons to other cities are useless
in terms of, oh, more bike lanes increase business.
I don't think they will on Hopkins,
and I think you've heard enough from people to realize that.
But unfortunately, we can't know this
until the beloved locally owned businesses are gone
while it's too late.
Please pave the streets, put in pedestrian safety creatures
and preserve access for all.
Thank you.
Thank you we're going to take three more people because we are reaching our one hour time limit.
Okay so next is Brian McNeely then Yen track then Julia Cato will be the last speaker.
Hi I'm a current D3 resident who uses a bicycle as my primary need for transit. I actually moved
from western D1 to D3 in part to find cycling infrastructure both me and my partner felt safe
riding on. As future parents, if we feel in safe cycling somewhere, we certainly won't feel safe
cycling with our children or let them cycle on their own. Adding bike lanes will help create a
low stress bike network for riders of all abilities by reducing conflicts between cyclists, pedestrians
and cars. This is the kind of bold action that will make a meaningful change in the lives of not
just me, but Berkeley's future residents. I urge you all to vote yes on Council Member
Casarwani's referral and supplementals from council members Tapplin and Lunapara. I also want to thank
council for providing a Zoom alternative. I actually rushed from work to the council meeting
in an attempt to comment in person but had to go home to attend to family needs and now barely
still had time to comment so thank you all. Thank you. Okay next is Yen Trac. I will try to be really
brief but I think I got a minute from Jessica Livingston and one from Bob Matthews if they're
still on. I don't know how to confirm that. I'm sorry but we're running out of time so you'll
have your minute to speak and then we'll have to cut off. Okay all right so I'm just here to say
please vote in favor of council member Blackaby supplemental to item 27. I think it's a really
difficult issue that you have, because we have such a diverse community in Berkeley.
And I think, you know, my point is when I hear people make assumptions about,
you know, us drivers being resistant to change or being indifferent to environmental impact,
I really just want to address that. It's really unfair and honestly a very entitled perspective.
I grew up in the inner city. There was no way for me to learn to ride a bike. We also didn't have
money for me to have a bike. So as an adult, I work. I work all the time. I don't have time
to go and learn to ride a bike. I do a lot of errands. I have to do it efficiently in a very
tight schedule. So when you make parking impossible, it will mean that I cannot access the shops.
And thanks for your comment.
And then the last speaker is Julia Cato.
Hello, my name is Julia Cato, and I live near Sacramento, Martin Luther King, and Dwight,
and we have bicycle streets, but they are California and Channing.
They're not the major streets in my district, and it works for everybody.
I do not understand why bike lanes have to be on Hopkins.
When there are all kinds of streets around,
which you would not require you spend
a small fortune to build all of this apparatus,
when you could just paint a line down
the street designating the bike line.
But as they have done on California,
and as far as I know on California,
there have never been any serious accidents,
much less fatalities.
So I'm really, really concerned about why this insistence
on being on the most traffic street in the area
when you could have them on your street.
Your time is up.
Thanks so much.
I'm sorry, folks.
I know there are a number of you that are still online
that weren't able to give public comment.
So I'm sorry we weren't able to give you
that time this evening.
We are coming back to Council Members comments.
Excuse me, starting with Council Member Kesserwani.
Thank you very much, Madam Mayor.
I want to thank all of the commenters,
both in person and online.
I continue to reiterate what I said at the beginning,
that this is a really challenging issue for us.
I think for the purposes of discussion,
I would like to move my recommendation
with the amendments that I shared earlier on screen.
Second.
Okay, thank you for that.
And I do want to address the supplemental
from Council Member Taplin,
co-sponsored by Council Member Lunapada.
And first, I want to thank you for it
because I know we did hear from a lot of folks tonight
asking to extend to Stannage.
And I do want to explain in more detail
why I believe the proposal that I've authored
is the right one for now.
And I have said and I believe that the reallocation
of the public right of way that we are proposing
for Hopkins Street is without precedent in our city.
And when a big change like this is made,
I believe it should be justified by the data that we have
in terms of where the serious and fatal crashes are occurring.
And that is why my item includes information
about those locations and proposes safety treatments
to address them.
When we look at that far western segment,
which is the five blocks from Peralta Avenue,
Ohlone Greenway to Stanage Avenue,
we do propose traffic calming because we wanna make sure
when we repave that street, you know,
some of what we've seen on roads and other repaved streets
is the tendency for cars to go faster.
So we do want to have traffic coming there.
But when we looked at the data for the 15 years
that we have in our report, there
were no serious injuries that occurred on that segment.
For bicyclists, it appears from our map
there were three incidents that occurred.
None of them were serious.
This is over 15 years.
And so when I consider that, and I
consider the trade-off of the reallocation
of the public right of way for that segment,
it didn't appear justified to me.
And I do want to talk about connecting West Berkeley
to the amenities on Hopkins.
I think that that will still happen
because the Alameda County Transportation Commission
is going to improve the intersection of Camellia
and San Pablo Avenue.
So that if you live in Northwest Berkeley,
If you're around the Virginia street crossing,
you can easily cross and get on the Greenway.
If you're living farther north of that,
you should be able to cross safely at Camelia and cross.
And at that point, you'd have a couple options.
You could go up to Santa Fe and get on the Greenway
and you'd be on a protected route
and connect to the Hopkins bike lane,
the protected bike lane that we propose to start at Peralta.
So I want people to keep in mind,
those folks would have a connection,
a safe connection to the Hopkins amenities.
Once we have that parallel route
that's proposed for stanage,
that could be another option for folks
who would feel comfortable taking the Hopkins route.
And so it's not something that I wanna preclude.
Our item talks about doing pedestrian safety features
that would allow for a future bike lane,
but I think with the information I currently have
and the ability to connect West Berkeley.
I think this is the right location to pursue,
which is the Eloni Greenway and Peralta Avenue stopping point.
And then on the funding issue,
a lot of people were saying,
how can you have the funding to pursue this
when you have a deficit?
You just wanna clarify the funding
or paving and safety infrastructure.
If you look at our paving item from July 7th,
those are primarily special funds
that can only be used for paving and safety infrastructure.
And when we talk about our deficit,
we're talking about the general fund.
So it's, these funds are not,
they're not fungible with each other.
And I know it's very confusing and it may not make sense,
But in terms of thinking about Hopkins Street
and how we pay for it,
I feel comfortable with this proposal
because of the nature of how it is funded
through special funds.
So I did want to say that and help folks understand
that's the issue.
We can't use some of these special restricted funds
to pay for things that we're proposing
through our sales tax measure and our bond measure.
So I wanted to clarify that.
and I look forward to hearing comments from my colleagues.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Moving on to Council Member Taplin.
Thank you very much, and I wanna thank the speakers,
especially the people who spoke
who were themselves survivors of traffic violence.
I wanna really underscore how much courage it takes
to come here to us tonight and share that,
those stories with us, and I thank you for doing that.
And for me, that's really what's at the heart of this for me.
And there's like no end to what I could say right now.
But I want to circle back to what Councillor Humber was
saying during the question round,
really pointing out all of our policies
that we have, the bike plan, climate action plan.
These are things that we continuously adopt and declare
priorities and profess that will contribute resources to move these
things forward and then so far too often the choice comes to us and and you know
perhaps previously at times council has has not set forward in the way that it
should have and I think tonight we can correct that and for me it's I also want
to just point out that, I mean, I've been here six years, but six years ago, the
conversation has really, I'm actually grateful that we can choose between, you
know, the protected lanes and protected lanes for a larger stretch. The fact
that we're having that conversation right now, to me, is really indicative of
how far we've come as a community, so thank you to all of you.
you. With the ACTC project and with the Hopkins project, I did see the chance to integrate
these two things, but it sounds like you don't support that, and I certainly would. I would
even support sending it to Milvia, but it sounds like that's not really an option tonight.
Thank you, Council Member Chaplin. I do appreciate it. I know we heard that from a lot of commenters,
And I think we, you know, I sort of explained my feeling on the western segment in terms
of that eastern segment.
We do have the buffered, we're posing the buffered class two bike lane there.
It's the same reason that when we looked at the crash data, we didn't see the serious
injuries there that warranted the protected bike lane.
And on that segment, you have significant costs.
There's a church there that has parking and, you know, people are pointing out the cost
of this.
have to be sensitive to that because as we know, you know, these dollars, we have hard
choices to make in terms of funding this, doing the safety infrastructure, and then
trying to do everything else that we have in our paving plan and what we voted on for
FF.
So that is the reasoning behind really focusing the protected bike lane, where the serious
injuries occur.
but doing as much as we can to connect the network.
We do recognize the Milvia Bike Boulevard is there.
We wanna bring people down safely
and connect to the Greenway and other options.
Thank you.
Yeah, thank you very much.
Yeah, I think I really wanna thank you
for your leadership and your work on all this.
And I don't wanna let that perfect be the enemy of the good.
So I'm happy to support the motion.
Thank you, Council Member Leno Parra.
Thank you.
I know everyone has a lot to say and it's been a long night.
And given that I proudly and loudly helped organize
the Diane protest on Hopkins several years ago,
I know everyone knows where I stand.
So I want to thank all of the public commenters
and I just really want to hone in on a few points
that particularly struck me and that I think are important.
I know it seems to many as if these proposed changes
are not that serious for people on bikes.
but we have redesigned our streets and our cities
around cars and the consequences of that have been deadly.
I love our bicycle boulevards,
but when you are on a bicycle
and you are sharing a road with cars
without physical separation,
you are entirely at the mercy of the driver.
A driver that is operating a machine that can be
and is often used as a deadly weapon.
A simple moment of road rage
can and often leads to loss of life
for the person outside of the car.
And that is why sharrows and painted bike lanes,
especially with the goal of preserving
about the city safety and
independence of the city.
And it's important that the
city's non-blue curb up parking
spaces is a disservice and
feels like a slap in the face.
It especially feels like a
disservice to our young
residents who deserve the right
to move about the city safely
and independent independently
to a low income residents who
are most likely to rely on
modes of transportation other
than cars. To the many
residents of all ages who want
alternatives to driving but do
not feel safe using our current
streets.
fact that these are not passive decisions. Every fatality from
traffic violence on our streets is a policy choice and I know that maybe
connecting this issue to the threats of our democracy is a bit melodramatic but
I believe that part of our grander national problem is exactly what we've
been hearing about today. The City Council has been debating the single
street for almost a decade with residents especially residents at
disproportionate risk of traffic violence forced to wait. I believe very
very strongly that we need to fix the faults of our predecessors and prove to
the people that a better world or in this case better safer concrete
infrastructure is possible. That our government is actually willing to think
big and make actual decisions and to deliver for them. That's what I believe
will help rebuild our democracy and that's what Berkeley deserves. Thank you.
Thank you council member. Council member O'Keefe. Okay vibe shift.
So, I spent a lot of time thinking about this over the last week's months, years.
And there's a little part of a framework that I want to share with everyone that's how I've
been thinking about it.
And there's two important questions I want to talk about.
One is, what's wanted versus what's needed, and the other one is, what are the trade-offs?
Those are the two important questions to ask here.
are many many wants deserve considerations but at times of serious
financial constraints and just always in the business of running cities we have
to be highly discerning about how we allocate our increasingly limited
resources so I do agree actually that a class four bike lane would be better for
cyclists than a class two bike lane and certainly better than share ohs that's
that's not up for debate it would be a lot better but as civic leaders we are
not here to implement what's best for bicyclists we're here to implement what's
best for the community at large. And while the bike lane is understandably wanted by
some in the bike community, and I say some because we heard from many cyclists who do
not support this, but granted many people in the bike community very much want this
and for good reason. The fact that other alternative routes exist demonstrates that this is not
need. I understand Rose is a little steeper but bikes have gears. My son
graduated from Longfellow. He's gonna be so mad that I brought him into this but
he he graduated from Longfellow this year which is now in San Pablo and he
rode his home his bike home from from there to Spruce Street every single day.
It is absolutely possible for cyclists to take other routes and I recognize
is that Rose is not currently a great street to bike on.
I am not claiming that,
but it could with not much effort
compared to what we're talking about,
be turned into a proper bicycle Boulevard.
There is an alternative and we're serious about that.
I am serious about that when I put that into my motion.
That is staff direct, that is direction to staff.
They would do it.
They would make it a bicycle Boulevard.
And that is a fantastic alternative
that does not have these trade offs.
So all this to say, a class four by Clannon Hopkins
has obvious advantages, but it is not needed, it is wanted.
We have to be discerning about that.
What is needed is for the street to be paved
and for the street to get major pedestrian upgrades.
Those things are absolutely needed
and that is also not up for debate.
I think everybody agrees with that.
So the second question, what are the trade-offs?
I've already spoken about the parking
and many commenters eloquently summed up
their concerns about that.
I'm really glad we got to hear from some of the merchants
who are understandably terrified
of losing parking in front of and near their businesses.
It's hard being a small business owner,
so I don't have any interest in making it harder for them.
Parking loss should not be waved away as a concern.
We heard so many people worried about loading zones.
We have questions about garbage trucks, mail delivery,
fire access, preschool drop-offs, so many questions.
We've never removed all the parking before
along a busy commercial corridor.
We don't know what would happen,
but there's a lot of questions and a lot of concerns.
We would also be jeopardizing access to park amenities
for everyone who drives,
including, which is a group that notably includes
older people, people with disabilities,
families with little kids,
and those who live in the hills,
and anyone who visits from far away,
who visits our wonderful little corner of town.
That jeopardizing that access is a major trade off.
And then the second trade off, I might run out of time.
I hope I could be granted a little bit of grace,
given this is my district.
And I am almost done.
Second trade off is the cost.
$5 million is a huge amount of money.
That is a third of our yearly FF budget.
And I represent the area of Hopkins
that has the commercial area and the park.
And I am against this plan.
And I can tell you there are,
while there are some people in the neighborhood
who support it, I have met them, they exist,
they were here tonight, I acknowledge that.
The vast majority of the neighborhood does not want this.
And I'm not saying that because of who came tonight.
And I'm not saying that because of the emails.
I believe I'm the only person up here
who has knocked nearly every single door
in that neighborhood I have.
And I can tell you the neighborhood,
the significant majority of that neighborhood
does not want this and I do not want this for my district.
And we are considering spending $5 million once again
a third of our yearly FF budget on an infrastructure project
that the representative for the district does not want
and the neighborhood does not want.
This is absolutely madness, absolute madness.
And I try not to get upset up here.
I usually don't.
I try not to get mad at my colleagues.
I know we're all doing our jobs and we disagree
and I know that's part of it, but this is trying me
because please do not force this expensive,
disruptive, unwanted plan on district five.
We do not want it, and there are other alternatives.
So council member, your time's up.
I have 30 seconds of mine.
Oh, thank you very much, I appreciate that.
And I almost said, I actually want to say what I want now.
That's how I feel.
What I want is obviously I support my own supplemental.
I also can support black of these.
I think it cleverly addresses one of the biggest issues here,
which is lack of information.
It's a big problem.
So I'm happy to give a little more time to explore options.
I feel like his item wouldn't derail us
for getting it paved in 2020 as it's currently scheduled.
And so because of that, I would support it.
And I would actually like to,
I still want to have a discussion and hear from people,
but I would like to make a substitute motion
to move my supplemental with,
I'd like to adopt the change in the tree language
from Kesserwani and remove the word,
buffered from class two bike lanes,
but otherwise I'd like to make a substitute motion
for my supplemental.
And I thank you very much for the time.
Second.
Okay, moving on to Council Member Humbert.
Before I speak, I think we should move to extend
for maybe an additional 15 minutes.
We're 14 minutes from the end of the meeting.
So I move to extend. Second.
maybe, maybe a half an hour.
Sorry, I think you should give it a half an hour
just to be safe because then we won't have to do this.
Move to extend a half an hour.
Second.
Okay, to extend to 1 a.m.
Council Member Castor Wani?
Yes.
Tapplin?
Yes.
Bartlett?
Yes.
Drago?
Aye.
Okey?
Yes.
Flackaby?
Yes.
Munepara?
Yes.
Humbert?
Yes.
And Maryishi?
Only because I want us to vote tonight, yes.
OK, motion carries.
OK, thank you, Madam Mayor.
I want to thank Council Member Kessarwani.
I want to thank the mayor and all their staff
for their work on this item.
I also want to thank Interim Director Amiri and his staff
in the Public Works Department, and the former Public Works
staff who contributed to earlier iterations of this project,
as well as the city manager's office, and finally,
all the people who wrote to council
and who came to speak here tonight.
In some ways, it's honestly a little crazy
that this is the amount and intensity of discussion
that we need in order to install a protected bike lane,
but at the same time, it makes sense
because this is about more than just a bike lane
on one street.
It's about what kind of a city we want to be
and what we're willing to do to live up
to our professed priorities and principles
set forth in all of our plans.
Through our bicycle plan, our climate action plan,
our vision zero plan, our declaration of a climate emergency
And most importantly, through citywide elections,
Berkeleyans have shown what kind of a city we want to be.
Berkeleyans want to join the ranks of world-class cities
like Copenhagen and Paris,
and taking real action to make walking and biking safer,
not just for the health of their communities,
but frankly, for the health of the climate.
And these things are incredibly urgent.
Devastating wildfires have spread across Canada,
the Pacific Northwest, Colorado and New Mexico,
Spain, and even France.
We have to recognize that in a warming world,
the quality of life impacts from a black lane
will feel like nothing compared to the heat,
smoke, and severe storms we will increasingly face.
And if we are to fight back against the people
who say that climate change is a hoax,
we here in Berkeley cannot act like climate change
is a hoax by refusing to take action in our community
and in our lives.
We must avoid making Berkeley a city
that believes in climate action except if it would mean parking our second car further
away from our house. That said, I get it. I feel that same twinge of annoyance, yeah,
maybe more than a twinge, when the parking spot in front of my house is taken or I have
to park a block away from my destination. Less concerned about that. It's usually the
parking spot in front of my house. But you know who almost always has to walk, roll one
more blocks on either end of their trips, people who take the bus. Those of us who primarily
use cars need to recognize the privilege of our position and have some perspective on
the level of inconvenience that we face when there isn't a parking spot exactly where we
want it. I absolutely agree that we need to be cognizant completely of disabled access
and make sure that we're placing ADA parking spaces nearby, but at the same time I want
to recognize that disabled people are actually less likely to drive than those who are not.
Prioritizing bikes, micro mobility devices, and transit is the pro-disabled mobility approach.
And this is a good segue into the other reason we need to protect bike lanes, public safety.
Study after study have shown that protected bike lanes improve safety for not just cyclists,
but also pedestrians and even drivers themselves
because they push drivers to slow down, pay attention,
and be more conscientious of their surroundings.
The current toll of injury and death on Berkeley streets
is far too high.
No parking spot on Hopkins is worth a human life.
And that's not hyperbole.
Finally, I want to turn to the concerns of merchants,
for which I do have great sympathy.
For someone driving, walking a block
is a minor inconvenience.
but for a small business that decrease in foot traffic
can spell doom.
But I think it's worth thinking about that term foot traffic.
There's a reason we use it
because everyone who visits a business does so by walking
or using a personal mobility device
at some point in the process.
Improving street safety means
improved safety for all customers.
And just as importantly, the data are frankly conclusive.
Putting in bike lanes even at the expense of parking
does not hurt business districts.
In fact, many business districts see their business
increase after the installation of safe bicycle
and pedestrian infrastructure.
And we see this in neighboring cities like Oakland,
where Temescoll is more vibrant and busy than ever.
And parenthetically, pedestrian and cyclist safety
has vastly improved in the Temescoll
since the installation of those bike lanes.
In summary, I believe that safe bike infrastructure
is the right thing to do in Hopkins for our climate,
for our kids, for safety,
and even frankly for small businesses.
I want to thank again everyone who worked on this,
but especially Council Member Kesser-Wani and her staff,
and the Mayor and her staff,
all of whom have listened to all the perspectives
and put an incredible amount of care and effort
into this proposal.
I of course will be voting in support of Council Member
Kesser-Wani's item.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Councilmember Traged.
Thank you.
First of all, I want to say that everyone who contacted me
provided very valuable and thoughtful input
regardless of where they are on this issue.
I have read every single email.
My office has met with three different groups of neighbors.
I've done my best to respond to all emails
received from direct constituents.
I biked different sections three years ago.
The last time this was an issue before I was on the council.
I spent time in the Hopkins corridor today
just to take a look at it.
And like in council member Kasravanis district,
comments in mine have been split generally down the middle.
We received a great deal of feedback from avid bicyclists
who completely opposed protected bike lanes separated
by concrete barriers and said that they felt less safe
with that design, as well as from those who said
they feel safe biking on city streets only
when protected bike lanes are in place.
I myself started biking as a child in Europe
where my parents felt comfortable letting me ride
to school because there were protected bike lanes.
Since then, I've associated protected bike lanes
with bicycling safety.
Of course, as someone mentioned,
they have to be unobstructed by trash cans,
delivery vehicles, and other objects.
My office constantly works on that issue
to try to address it on Milvia.
We've heard from community members
who support this proposal because they believe
it restarts a project that has been under discussion
for years, improves safety for bicyclists and pedestrians,
and preserves more parking than earlier concepts.
The supporters have also pointed to the proposal's inclusion
of additional ADA parking and loading zones
as an effort to improve accessibility
while accommodating multiple modes of travel.
Many also shared that Hopkins is a key gap
in Parkley's bicycle network,
an important connector between the Alonning Greenway
and the Milvia Bicycle Corridor,
and a critical route to schools, businesses,
and other key destinations.
Some expressed that they currently avoid bicycling
Hopkins because they find it intimidating. Frankly, as do I, and I try to minimize the
distance I travel on a bike on that street as much as possible. And I believe that completing
this connection is an important step towards reducing dependence on cars. I understand
that this debate is not only about bicycling. It is about the safety of everyone who uses
our streets, our public commons. It's about accessibility of a residence, including seniors
and people with disabilities. It's also about ensuring that our beloved local businesses
have access and infrastructure they need to succeed. We've heard from many residents
and business owners who remain concerned that the proposal would still remove too much parking,
could negatively affect Monterey Market and other nearby businesses, does not adequately
address accessibility concerns and does not reflect what many neighborhood
residents want. Others suggested that staff should also study alternative
routes rather than focusing exclusively on Hopkins. And some have also questioned
whether Hopkins has been studied sufficiently, expressed concerns that
cycle tracks do not address the intersection safety issues where many
collisions occur, worried that traffic could be diverted onto neighboring
residential streets, and urge the city to allow staff to evaluate all feasible options
for improving bicycle access to the Hopkins area, rather than presupposing that Hopkins
itself is the best location. This is not an easy issue. It's clearly extraordinarily
divisive. We have received many comments expressing very strong opinions on all sides. Personally,
I would like to provide our staff, especially our fire department and transportation division,
with the greatest possible flexibility and trust.
They're professionals and specialists in their fields, and I would like them to present us
with a plan that really works, one that includes official outreach to all members of the community
and gathers feedback from nearby residents and those who use the corridor.
I also want to make sure that the Commission on Disability and Aging and Individuals and
and organizations representing our senior residents
have an opportunity to weigh in
before anything beyond the work forward
to study options is adopted.
Overall, I appreciate that Council Member Black
has this proposal provides flexibility
and includes multiple options.
I would love to see it move a little closer
to the main motion in some respects,
particularly around minimizing
or eliminating the use of shuttles,
which I agree do not make cyclists safe.
It also explicitly calls for coordinating
with AC Transit, which I think is essential,
given that Hopkins is a bus route.
I need 30 more seconds.
Is someone gonna give you 30 seconds?
Did I have 30 left on that?
I can give him 30 seconds.
All right, Councilmember Casarone
will give you 30 seconds.
Thank you.
I believe coordinating with AC Transit
is essential given Hopkins is also a bus route
and several bus stop reconfigurations are proposed.
I would also like to see if we can consult
display paratransit. I am concerned that if we were to constrain our staff's options at the outset,
we may be putting ourselves in a corner, both financially and in terms of the range of solutions
available to us. I would much rather allow our professional staff to evaluate the corridor
comprehensively, incorporate the perspectives of all affected stakeholders, and return to us
with recommendations that are informed by data, technical expertise, and broad community engagement
within a reasonable but expeditious timeframe.
With that said, I want to reiterate that I want to move
forward tonight so that we can have our staff assess options
and come back to us with their recommendations. Thank you.
Thank you. Councilmember Bartlett and then Councilmember Blackaby and then back to Councilmember
Taplin. Thank you, Madam Mayor. I'll be brief.
And I want to thank everyone for all the work you've done, all my colleagues,
different versions, supplementals, the staff, for the years of effort into this,
and the community members advocating for positions, where beside they are, I
respect them all. And while this isn't usually my issue portfolio, you know, I'm
not, this is more you guys thing, but you know, but people care about it, I care
about it, right? And so the two things that trigger my attention on this
matter which made me join Councilman Blackaby's item is that you know by
and large I try to I try to move for consensus when I when I deliver things
and when I ask you to submit to expense or sacrifice I think it's I think it's
healthy and sustainable to achieve consensus and in this one there's not
consensus there's not even close this is this feels like a wedge coming driven
And I think that's not sustainable and it might get overturned in the future learn that lesson
And also I don't think this is the the venue to litigate the details the plan
These are really interesting notes. I've heard about the different different modes and the different elements really interesting
However, this is I'm not an expert and I'd like to see this
Discussed in a room full of experts, right? That's our commissions. It's our staff
And then more importantly, I think, from my personal point of view, is that two streets, Ward Street and Stewart Street. If they're online, I guess you can't see. If you're listening, just send me a mental note. You know, these two streets, I've funded. I got them funded twice. The years and they both were removed from the paving plan. The streets look like the Flintstones. It's gravel.
the streets. And you know, it's
and to have our neighbors riding on gravel when we could look at a cheaper alternative to achieve the same amount of safety.
And I do not want to downplay the safety. It's super important to me that people are safe on our streets.
And of course, the businesses must thrive. And there's a way to do it all.
I know there is. If we put some evidence at work and really discover it, we can find some that works for everyone and achieve consensus and also save some money.
so that all of us have our streets like mine,
like like Harp, like Ward and Stewart
that deserve to be paved as well.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Council member of Rockaby.
Thanks Madam Mayor.
I made most of my comments
during my supplemental introduction.
So I'll be briefer.
I do want to pick up on what council member Bartlett said,
which is I do share the concern
that we're not reaching consensus here.
And that does not bode well for other items later this fall
and next year and that's too bad. I was hoping we could get there and I'm disappointed that we
couldn't. That said, I do appreciate the hard work that everyone has put into this. Emotions
have run pretty high and as council member Humbert said, in some ways it's just a cycle track but
yes, it's a cycle track and emotions have run pretty high but generally it's been a very civil
discussion so I want to appreciate everyone who's participated in that. I also appreciate the
the advocacy from all groups on all sides of these issues.
I will say something I've learned in the first two years,
I guess I've been on council that, you know,
we often are faced with tough decisions
and I think I disappoint someone or some group
with just about every vote.
And that's something that I live with,
but I find my mantra is to try and find the decision
that makes the most sense for the most amount of people
and is gonna deliver the most good
for the most amount of people.
And that's really what I endeavor to do
through my time on council and solve problems
in a pragmatic and level-headed way.
I still believe that we share the same concerns
about safety as well as neighborhood vitality.
It's really just a question of how we get there.
I think that we should be looking at other things
to deliver safety in this corridor.
I think there are other options
that we haven't fully explored.
So that said, I strongly support Councilmember O'Keefe's item.
I will vote for her item as a substitute
If the substitute does not pass, I do intend to offer another substitute. So before we before we proceed 2 other points. I do want to comment as the representative district 6.
There've been some kind of comments about folks who live in the hills and drive and sort of.
Why we do what we do and I wouldn't be a good representative if I didn't sort of defend the fact that we care an awful lot about climate change where we live.
We care so much about climate change that we are putting ourselves through extraordinary efforts to prepare ourselves for wildfire in a way that no other community in the state has and we've asked people to do a lot up there and people are responding and I'm gratified by that.
So I just, I want people to know that just because we drive cars and drive down the hill to go to Hopkins doesn't mean we don't care about climate change because we do.
And I want folks to know that and then last, um, about the parking spots.
Um, you know, I know people say it's just about, you know, it's just about parking. What's the deal about parking just a reminder 145 parking spots means.
And I'm just doing back of the envelope math. I don't have these aren't hard and fast numbers, but 145 parking spots. If you got 2 people in the car.
Is 300 people at a time if those parking spots turn over 5 times a day, that's 1500 people a day.
the course of the week, that's 10,000 people over the course of the week that go in and out of Hopkins.
So 145 parking spots isn't just 145 parking spots, it's 10,000 people
who come in and out of Hopkins using a car. And yes, maybe it's going to be a little more
inconvenient to walk a block, but some of those people, many of them are just not going to come
there as often. And I just want people to be realistic about the trade offs because these are
the trade offs. It's not just about parking spots. It's about who's going to use this neighborhood.
I've seen the same studies about overall economic output and the fact that I think those businesses probably can do okay. I think most studies say neutral to slightly positive. I don't dispute that.
It's just a question about these 10,000 people that are currently using Hopkins in and out every day. Many of them are my constituents or council member, O'Keefe's constituents are going to have to figure out other things to do and that's a shift.
And that's something that we should just be honest about.
So anyway, that's where I am. I will support council member keeps.
Supplemental that I would intend to offer something else in the event that it does not succeed. Thank you.
Thank you council member. Thank you.
I'll just say it very briefly the city does have a bike plan. So I hear what people are saying when they say that they want stakeholder engagement and they want to look at alternatives.
I do think that work does take place.
And that's how we got to the bike plan we have today,
which does include Hopkins.
And when we adopt plans,
we do have to assume that someday
we will implement these plans
that will perhaps never have unanimous consensus
in the community or even amongst the nine of us.
But I believe in the city's...
goals and the plans we adopt and I believe in our policies and that's why
I'll be voting for the main motion thank you okay I have some comments and then
we will take a vote sorry so first I just want to thank you all so much for
staying until this very late hour those of you here in person and those of you
online I know that this is an issue that people really care about and you know I
I quite frankly, I wish this energy was placed
behind some of the other issues that are in our community
that are really very serious
that we've been addressing recently.
I wanna thank everyone who has also written in.
My staff, thank you very much to Nella,
who has read over 1,000 emails in the last week
on this issue.
Thank you so much to everyone who sent me a postcard.
I've been sitting here looking at them.
I've got lots of pictures and letters
from young people in our community.
And I really wanna reiterate that the discussion tonight
will provide council direction to staff
so that they can do all of the analysis
that people are asking for.
I know a lot of folks are saying,
hey, why haven't you figured this out yet?
Why can't people answer these questions?
And that's because that's where we're at in the process.
We need to give them direction, policy direction
before they can do a lot of these studies
that people are talking about and analysis.
So I want people to understand that.
It's not that we haven't thought about this,
it's just this is where we're at in the process.
And I know that Hopkins Street has been a source
of controversy for a decade or so.
I've heard people's concerns about safety,
support for local businesses and parking.
And I am deeply invested in ensuring that our streets
are safe for all users, pedestrians, cyclists and drivers.
and that is why I support bike lanes on Hopkins Street.
I really wanna acknowledge that folks have different ideas
of what safety means, and I'm making my decision today
based off of the studies that have been referenced today
about safety, as well as my own personal experiences.
Something that I talked about a lot on the campaign
was the importance of street safety,
because I'm someone who was on a bicycle,
who was hit by a car on Milvia Street
before there was protected bike lanes.
And I think folks sometimes forget that.
But believe me, it's very painful to get hit by a car,
on a bicycle or as a pedestrian.
And certainly I don't want to disregard anyone's concerns
about getting hit by a bicycle.
I'm sure that that's also very painful.
But my dad used to say, between a bike and a car,
or a person and a car, like who's gonna win?
And so you just keep that in mind
as we're talking about safety here.
Cyclist infrastructure improves safety for everyone.
And the reason why we're doing this,
just to kind of take a step back as someone was saying,
I'd like to do, the reason why we're doing this
in the first place is because Hopkins
is a high injury corridor for pedestrians and cyclists.
And those numbers that we've talked about earlier
with 46 pedestrian and bicycle crashes occurring
in three fatalities is the reason why
we're talking about Hopkins Street.
And it's why we're not talking about the other places.
Excuse me.
There are many studies that show how bike lanes
and infrastructure can produce
also tangible economic benefits.
I know this has been mentioned multiple times.
I don't want to go into it too much more.
I understand that the loss of parking is a concern
because not everyone can ride a bike
or walk to the places they want to go,
and adding parking management in the commercial areas
will encourage turnover,
and we are retaining some parking along parts of the corridor.
I just don't want folks to think
that we're eliminating all parking.
I also wanted to briefly share that I've spoken
with wheelchair users who use bike lanes
to get around the city
because they actually feel like that feels safer
than riding on the sidewalk.
And I've also seen these really awesome tricycles
with folks that are older cyclers
and that feels safe to them that they can ride on a tricycle
and sometimes an e-tricicle.
Very exciting that we have all these other options now.
Regarding the concerns about accessibility,
we will ensure that it's incorporated into the design plans
with things like ramps, curb cuts, and loading zones.
I mentioned a few other ways that we are also thinking
about accessibility and I just wanna be clear
that we have not done a perfect job in bike lanes
and bus islands.
I understand that those have not always been successful
and definitely as we bring in our new director
of Public Works, I know that this is something
that he will consider and we on council will make sure
that these areas are accessible for people.
That is absolutely important to me.
As someone who is disabled, it's absolutely something
that I keep in mind.
we need to also balance,
we've talked about being fiscally responsible and safe
and by incorporating bike lanes now,
we're saving money compared to adding them later.
It will be a lot more expensive to add bike lanes in later.
They're only adding around $3 million to the project
compared to green requirements like green infrastructure,
which I also support, which costs $6 million
and that's a requirement.
Right now, Hopkins Street is unsafe for cyclists,
pedestrians and drivers alike.
We need to move forward with this referral
to repave Hopkins and implement bike
and pedestrian safety improvements
to help us reach our climate goals and keep everyone safe.
Thank you very much.
All right, so we have the sub.
Excuse me, you are being very rude, no booing.
You can be disappointed, you can be disappointed,
but you can do it quietly or outside.
Thank you.
All right, so we have a motion that's on the floor.
Excuse me, excuse me, excuse me.
You need to either step outside or please be quiet.
Okay, so we have two motions on the floor
and if you could, Mr. City Clerk,
just run us through what we're out.
Yes, so the first, the main motion
is Council Member Kessarwani's motion.
The substitute motion is from Council Member O'Keeffe to adopt the supplemental submitted
by Council Member O'Keeffe with the reference to the language from trees from Council Member
Kistarwani's item and to remove the word buffered from the edits that were made.
So that's currently the pending motion is the substitute motion from Council Member
O'Keeffe, seconded by Blackaby.
You ready for a vote?
Yes.
We're ready for a vote.
motion from council member O'Keeffe,
council member Kesserwani.
No.
Taplin.
No.
Bartlett.
Yes.
Traga.
No.
O'Keeffe.
Yes.
Blackaby.
Yes.
Unapara.
No.
Humbert.
No.
And Maryishi.
No.
Okay, that motion fails.
Great, Madam Mayor, I'd like to offer another substitute.
Go ahead.
Great, let me share my screen.
So this is an adjusted substitute on my previous sub
with a couple of amendments that I've marked.
One amendment is that I'm asking that as part
of the staff analysis that they do a parking impact analysis
including potential impact for the last parking
on local businesses.
I've also got confirmation again, just a reminder
that Mr. Miri confirmed that Hopkins is gonna be paved
FY2028 cycle and that he could do the study in six months or less. So my direction is that
we basically take the six months, do the extra work, and confirm that paving will commence on
Hopkins as planned in fiscal 2028, no delay. So what I'm basically saying is there's a way of
doing the analysis and developing an alternative approach that we couldn't put against the cycle
plan, do them both and we don't delay Hopkins one bit. There's nothing that we
do here that will move that back, so counter to some criticisms that we're
adding a bunch of time. We're putting it in the existing time. We're just taking
the time to look at one other option for consideration. And lastly is in
response to other people's concerns, which I agree are very valid. We've
basically said we want to make sure that share was or not. The default, they're
actually the very last resort if used at all and the way we get there is we say we're willing to
accept and look at class two or class four bike lanes and bump up the acceptable parking loss to
20 percent. So more parking loss is acceptable, share those at last resort, we really want to do
class two, class four bicycle boulevards as sort of the preferred options in whatever plan that
to make sure that they are
able to close the line that we
ask staff to do.
And so my motion is to offer my
item as a substitute to the
Kester Whining item with these
additional amendments.
And that's my motion.
Second.
Okay. Can we take a vote?
Can I just inform something?
Does your motion also take the
amended street trees language
Okay on the substitute motion from councilmember Blackby. Councilmember
Caro Casarwani? No. Applin? No. Bartlett? Yes. Dragos? Aye. O'Keefe? Yes. Blackaby? Yes. Unapara? No. Humber? No. Maryishi? No. Okay that motion fails. Can we vote on the main motion?
On the main motion, I would like to speak forward to that if possible.
Well, the main motion is the motion from Councilmember Kesterwani to adopt her
item as submitted with the amendments that were introduced at the meeting.
I would like to request that
you amend the motion to change
the end of the class two bike
lane from the Alameda to McGee.
So extending the painted bike
lane just along the park so
we'd be able to preserve the
parking along the park.
So my understanding is we will
be able to preserve parking on
one side from McGee to the
Alameda.
Yes.
yes and so with that proposal essentially you're asking for parking on
both sides with a class 2 green painted five feet bike lane and because of the
width of the street as you amended your item there would be no buffer. I
appreciate why you're asking I understand the concerns that we heard
tonight but given that there would be no buffer and no protection there
but you know, I think that's
where I am right now.
Unfortunately I can't accept
it. But I respectfully thank
you for asking. Thank you.
Okay. So on the main motion
from councilmember Kessarwani.
Councilmember Kessarwani. Yes.
Taplin. Yes. Bartlett. Yes.
Traga. Aye. Okey. No.
the public comment. So I'm a
not on the agenda there can you can raise your hand.
Makai Freeman tonight.
We all see that we're ready for you access
and equity and outputting idea.
I went up with the seniors and those individuals
to have few options and really realize for that.
The city is in it and made it to come and discuss the students.
How to maintain the independent community and access to our city.
Thank you, Mackay.
Sarah Bell.
Hi. Sorry to speak on a non-agenda item.
I know we're all tired. I'm tired. I just want to say that I called into this meeting
because I have a knee injury and so it's you know just a lot more difficult for me to come in person
and it doesn't feel great for some slack in like extra time given to to give speaking time to
to everybody who's trying to comment in person,
but then to have a hard cutoff for those 10 people
with hands raised on Zoom or however many.
Yeah, it doesn't feel great.
And so I would love a bit more equity in that process.
I do want to praise the city for listing out
all of the Zoom speakers who are on deck.
If you could do it even more consistently,
that would be amazing just so that we're not like,
for an hour wondering when we're going to come up.
So thank you for that piece.
Thanks for your feedback, Sarah.
I'm sorry about that.
Speaker with a phone number ending in 211.
Hi, good evening.
So now my last comment for the day feed is the density institute
came with a trigger for last week.
The actual deaths gather over 600,000.
This 70,000 years in the news is not correct.
More than half are babies and children.
We're all murdered by Israel.
Palestinian, John Hopkins University
made a DNA study in Israelis and Palestinians.
Israelis came to zero to 2% all the Hebrews.
Palestinians in 78%.
No way in hell could kill people because of the religion,
no more than killing them because of the color.
Imagine it was black or white killing whites
or white killing blacks.
that side. And they use the
machine file to blackmail Trump to go in this awful
Iran war, which did nothing good to anybody. It destroyed
the whole economy in the world, destroyed many functions in America.
Thank you.
Next is Connie.
Can you hear me now?
Yes.
Um, I am calling just to bring to your attention, a very large double standard.
All the lip service paid to public safety.
I just find absolutely ridiculous
because there is a cell antenna that is about to be built
right in front of the North Berkeley Library
on Josephine Street, about very, very close to Hopkins
and children, there are three preschools
within a half a mile of there and some are much closer.
I will not be able to use that library after that cell antenna goes in because I have severe electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
I know other people who will start who cannot use that library after that goes in and.
Thank you, me next is set. Hello. Thank you for being here this evening. Just want to make sure that we can address our homelessness crisis and our lack of childcare crisis.
And our lack of public health crisis and our lack of access to food crisis before we start wasting tens of millions of dollars on our ridiculous programs involving district five district that most of you representatives don't live in and don't represent.
So, hands off Hopkins mind your own business. If you don't live in district five.
Okay, but your comment has to be something
that's off the agenda, so.
Okay.
Zoom user.
Yes, go ahead.
I thought you would say my name.
I didn't see it on my screen, sorry.
This is item not on the agenda,
and it happened a week and a half ago.
I was walking down the street
after talking to a friend in the park at Civic Center.
And as I walked by the YMCA,
five foot tall young woman, fully unclothed,
no shoes, no socks, no clothes, nothing whatsoever.
And she was walking in a class clip
and I said to her quickly, you need clothes,
dear, you need clothes.
She just kept walking and I called 911.
When I went back to the civic center park,
I saw that she had been stopped.
They had two police cars, five men, five officers,
five male officers, one motorcycle and two officers.
The officers felt like they shouldn't be the ones
to answer the call.
And they had hoped that the outreach team
would be present.
They called the outreach team
and they were told that you were disbanded last night,
the day before.
We are in desperate need of the outreach team.
That was a successful program in the city of Berkeley
for 49 years.
So please look at that again.
Thanks.
Thanks, Moni.
That's it.
Is there a motion to adjourn?
Second.
Can we take the roll on that, please?
Councilmember Kesser-Wani?
Yes.
Taplin?
Yes.
Bartlett?
Yes.
Trago?
Aye.
O'Keeffe?
Yes.
Blackaby?
Yes.
Lenapara?
Yes.
Humber?
Yes.
And Maryishi?
Yes.
Okay.
We are adjourned.
I've got to finish this and then you can buy things there.
I got right.
I'll finish that.