Board of Directors - Mar 24, 2023

March 24, 2023 · Board of Directors

Agenda

6. Approval of Consent Calendar Items: 12.A - 12.F

All Consent Calendar items are listed at the end of the agenda.

7. REGULAR CALENDAR

7.A March Legislative Update Staff provides a regular update on current legislative affairs. Receive and file. 7.B Capital Program Status Report Staff is providing an update on the progress of the Authority’s Capital Program, including the Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) Program and the State of Good Repair Program. Receive and file. 7.C Evaluation of Monthly Pass Discount In October, November, and December 2022, the Authority conducted a fare pilot with a 30% discount on Monthly Passes. This item presents the results of an evaluation of customer response to the fare pilot. Findings indicate a 37% increase in pass sales with 10% of those sales coming from new customers. Receive and file.

Attachments (4)

8. Chief Executive Officer's Report

Authority Update

10. Chair's Comments

Board of Directors Meeting March 24, 2023 3

11. Closed Session

A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR – Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Designated Representatives: Ilyssa DeCasperis and Irma Rodriguez Moisa Employee Organization: Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1277 B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION – Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) – Metrolink Train Accident Cases, Los Angeles County Superior Court – Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4889, lead Los Angeles County Case No. BC607964 (Bruce Shelburne and Kathy Shelburne, et al. v. Hyundai Rotem USA Corp, SCRRA et al.) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION – Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) – SCRRA v. Hyundai Rotem Company, et al., United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 2:16- cv-08042- JAK-JEM CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION – Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) – Arch Specialty Ins. Co. v. Hyundai Rotem USA Corp., SCRRA, et al., United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 2:20-cv-10662-JAK-AFM C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION – Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) – Karl Tolp v. Metrolink, Los Angeles Superior Court, case no. 20STCV07549. D. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION – Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1) Title: Chief Executive Officer CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR – Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Designated Representative: Chair Larry McCallon Unrepresented Employee: Chief Executive Officer

12. CONSENT CALENDAR

12.A Approval of Meeting Minutes - February 24, 2023 Regular Board Meeting It is recommended that the Board approve the Minutes of the February 24, 2023 Regular Board Meeting. 12.B Financial Results for the Seven Months Ending January 2023 - Ridership and Revenue Recovery and Operating Statements In 2020, in response to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related decline in Metrolink ridership, the Authority developed a forecast for ridership and associated revenue recovery for FY21. This forecast has subsequently Board of Directors Meeting March 24, 2023 4 been updated, informed by economic data gathered from federal, state and private sources, with the most recent update produced in November 2021. This November 2021 update was the forecast used to produce the FY23 Budget. Monthly reports to the Board will continue for as long as the effects of the pandemic and post pandemic issues significantly impact the financial position of the Authority. Receive and file. 12.C Quarterly Compensation Report - 2nd Quarter FY23 - October 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 In compliance with HR Policy No. 2.1, Wage and Salary Administration – Salary Program Administration, staff is required to make quarterly and annual reports to the Board on compensation matters. Receive and file. 12.D Redlands Passenger Rail Project - Amendment No. 6 to Cooperative Agreement No. 17-1001587 with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority The existing Cooperative Agreement and subsequent Amendments between the Authority and SBCTA provide for Authority support to the design, Positive Train Control (PTC) development, utility work, capital construction and pre-revenue service phases of the Redlands Passenger Rail Project. Approval is now needed to execute Amendment No. 6 to the Agreement to provide for further Authority support, with associated funding, for final project close-out services to achieve project completion. CONTRACTS, OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND SAFETY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED (5-0) the Board authorize the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate and execute Amendment No. 6 to Cooperative Agreement No. 17- 1001587 between San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) and the Authority that will increase the funding for capital construction support services for the Redlands Passenger Rail Project (RPRP) by $814,129, from an existing $17,293,551.40 to a new not-to-exceed total of $18,107,680.40. There is no budget impact since this is a Third Party funded Agreement. 12.E Design Services Agreement with City of Simi Valley for the Sequoia Avenue Grade Crossing Improvements Project Approval is needed to negotiate and execute a Design Services Agreement with the City of Simi Valley for funds to be allocated to the Authority to advance the Design (Plans, Specifications, & Estimates - PS&E) phase of the Sequoia Avenue Grade Crossing Improvements project. Board of Directors Meeting March 24, 2023 5 CONTRACTS, OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND SAFETY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED (5-0) the Board authorize the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate and execute Design Services Agreement between the City of Simi Valley and the Authority for a not-to-exceed amount of $1,400,000 for the Authority to lead the Design (PS&E) phase of the Sequoia Avenue Grade Crossing Improvements project. All funding for this project is provided by City of Simi Valley funds. 12.F System Safety and Compliance - Quarterly Update Staff is providing a quarterly update on the Authority's safety and compliance status and activities, including strike data, reportable injuries, rule violations, compliance audits, regulatory inspections, and public outreach. This update covers the 4th quarter of Calendar Year (CY) 2022 and a summation of CY 2022. Receive and file.

Attachments (13)

13. ADJOURNMENT

Board of Directors Meeting March 24, 2023 6 ITEM 7.A metrolinktrains.com/meeting ITEM ID: 2023-148-0 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 17, 2023 MEETING DATE: March 24, 2023 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Paul Hubler, Chief Strategy Officer SUBJECT: March Legislative Update Issue Staff provides a regular update on current legislative affairs. Recommendation Receive and file. Strategic Commitment This report aligns with the Strategic Business Plan commitments of: Connecting and Leveraging Partnerships: We will forge new and enhanced relationships with our public and private partners to integrate and coordinate connecting services, providing residents throughout Southern California with better, seamless, sustainable alternatives to driving. This commitment is met by sharing news, information and the Authority’s legislative priorities with elected officials. Advancing Key Regional Goals: We will grow the role of regional rail in addressing climate change, air quality, and other pressing issues by advancing toward zero emissions, making rail a compelling alternative to single-occupant automobiles and advancing equity-focused opportunities for all communities throughout Southern California. This commitment is met by encouraging federal, state and local support for Authority priorities. 7 Background Staff continues to engage with local, state, and federal government and community relations stakeholders relating to Metrolink service and relevant policy items. Discussion Local Metrolink Community Relations staff are working on several community outreach efforts, including: Next Door Community Survey On February 8, 2023, Metrolink posted a community survey available to users of the Next Door community web portal in our region. The post garnered approximately 60,000 views with 182 clicks to view the survey and 118 responses collected. The survey asked a variety of community-based questions intended to determine how Metrolink is viewed by community members who may or may not be Metrolink riders. Questions including familiarity with the Metrolink system, names of community groups, familiarity with programs and Metrolink usage were among the questions asked. The survey closed on February 28, 2023. The survey results included requests for more mid-day service, more Metrolink stations, better access to and from stations, more late-night trains and better access to work locations. Overall, respondents felt that Metrolink was a good neighbor and provided a safe transit option but needed to expand the service to provide better access to community members. Some concerns regarding fare prices and horn noise were mentioned. There did seem to be some continued confusion regarding Metro and Metrolink and what services were provided by each agency due to the similarity of agency names and as providers of rail transportation. Low-Income Fare Discount Program Outreach Metrolink received a grant to provide fare discounts to qualified, low-income community members. Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) cardholders may use the card at Metrolink ticket machines to purchase tickets at 50% off. The Community Relations team is working in conjunction with counties, cities and elected officials to ensure that likely qualifying participants learn about the program. Notices will also be distributed door-to-door at four public housing projects near Metrolink stations. The Low-Income Fare Discount Program will remain in effect until August 2023 or until grant funds are exhausted. Online School Safety Program Working with the Safety Department and using Operation Lifesaver videos and instructional material, the Community Relations team has created an on-line safety program distributed to more than 170 school district superintendents in the Metrolink region. The goal is to provide safety instruction to as many students in schools near railroads as possible. The program can be administered and led by teachers or may also be accessed directly by students. Metrolink Safety staff will also continue to provide in-person presentations requested by local schools. By-Line Presentation The Metrolink Community Relations Team has developed a presentation that will be shared 8 with cities along Metrolink service lines. As there are a number of issues that are common to each city along the line, the presentation is an opportunity to hear these issues and provide a forum for cities to work with Metrolink and neighboring cities to address common issues and to share local perspectives and concerns. The first meeting along the San Bernardino line is tentatively scheduled for March 22, 2023 and will discuss existing projects, planned projects, quiet zones, planning studies, and State of Good Repair and Maintenance of Way efforts. State The State Legislature is continuing its consideration of the 2023-24 California budget priorities. The Assembly Budget Committee held a budget oversight hearing on February 8 with an update from the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) on the Governor's budget. The LAO identified an $18 billion deficit driven by lower revenue estimates than the adopted June 2022 budget. The Governor has proposed to address the budget shortfall through spending reductions, delays and triggers. Of these spending solutions, there is a $2 billion trigger reduction to the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) in the 2023-24 and 2024- 25 fiscal years if budget conditions do not improve. The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee held a February 6th hearing on the state's housing and homelessness programs. Of note, Senator Maria Elena Durazo (D-Los Angeles) cited the need for transit operators to access state funding identified for homeless services. Staff have joined transit advocates in encouraging the Legislature to maintain transit funding to at least the levels enacted in the 2022-23 state budget, which includes restoring reductions to TIRCP funding. The Legislature and transit stakeholders, in collaboration with the California Transit Association (CTA), continue to discuss proposed new transit operations funding. These discussions are occurring in an environment with lower-than-expected state revenues. Staff are collaborating with Member Agencies and the CTA in advocating for immediate and ongoing funding while supporting consideration of possible long-term operations funding reforms. The California Air Resources Board held a public workgroup meeting on February 8 to discuss incentive funding included in the Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23 Advanced Technology Demonstration and Pilot Projects Program. Staff continue to monitor Air Resources Board workshops and announcements to advocate for funding to be available to passenger rail operators. Additionally, the Board held its regular monthly meeting on February 23-24. The Board is expected to hold its second Board Hearing to vote on the proposed In-Use Locomotive Regulation in Spring 2023. The regulation is expected to include three different compliance pathways for passenger and freight locomotive operators. Staff continue to coordinate with the Member Agencies, CTA, and peer passenger rail operators to ensure shared emissions-reductions goals are achieved without unintended financial harm to agencies. Federal President Biden addressed Congress during the State of the Union on February 7. The President used the opportunity to highlight the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) and bipartisan investments. These comments are notable given the divided Congress and need to address the debt limit. Additionally, the President noted his support for strengthening Buy America standards for federal infrastructure. Following the State of the Union address the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is proposing to revise guidance to support 9 implementation of the Build America, Buy America Act provisions of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Comments are due March 13 and the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) is coordinating a response on behalf of the industry. Staff will monitor the proposed rule and guidance for any impacts to the Authority. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released an updated report on February 15 relating to the federal debt and statutory limit. Of note, the report reiterates that the $31.4 trillion debt limit was reached on January 19. The current debt issuance suspension period is expected to be exhausted between July and September 2023 during the fourth quarter of the current federal fiscal year. If the debt limit is not raised or further suspended, the Treasury will not be authorized to issue new debt, leading to delayed payments for some government activities or a default on the government's debt obligations. Additionally, the CBO estimates that the Federal Reserve's target of reducing inflation to 2 percent will not be met until 2026 or 2027. The Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Ranking Member Susan Collins (R-Maine) released the full roster of Appropriations Subcommittee leadership. Of note, the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development (THUD) Subcommittee will be led by Chair Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) and Ranking Member Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.). House of Representatives Republicans released additional information on requests for Congressionally directed spending, or earmarks. New rules are expected to limit requests to those with a federal nexus. Staff are reviewing for opportunities to seek resources for regional rail projects with support from Congressional offices. The House of Representatives is expected to consider all 12 appropriations bills individually. Senate leaders have voiced their support for retaining earmarks without process changes. Metrolink is submitting to USDOT a Rebuilding America's Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant application seeking $45 million to match the $51.7 million in state Carl Moyer Program funds already awarded to Metrolink to procure eight additional Tier 4 locomotives to replace Tier 2 locomotives. Metrolink submitted two prior RAISE applications that were recommended but not awarded due to an over-subscribed grant program. Metrolink staff note that return of the state funds may be required unless matching funds are secured. Rep. Julia Brownley (D-Oxnard) is leading a congressional delegation letter in support of the application. Support letters are also requested of both California US Senators. The grant application was submitted on February 28 and award announcements are expected in June. The new locomotives will increase from 40 to 48 the number of Tier 4 locomotives in Metrolink's fleet of 55 locomotives. Tier 4s are the cleanest commercially available locomotives on the market, and when powered by renewable (plant and animal based) fuel, make Metrolink one of the cleanest diesel-operated passenger railroads in the country. Next Steps Staff continues to engage with local, state, and federal government and community relations stakeholders relating to Metrolink service and relevant policy items. 10 Prepared by: Jeffrey Dunn, Director, Government & Community Relations Alex Davis, Senior Manager, Government Relations Sylvia Novoa, Manager, Public Affairs Julie Nieto, Management Analyst II Approved by: Paul Hubler, Chief Strategy Officer Attachment(s) Appendix A - March 2023 Bill Matrix 11 Appendix A: Legislative Matrix Bill Number Bill Status Action Federal State Intent Bills Assembly Bill 6 (Friedman): This bill would May be heard in Monitor state the intent of the Legislature to enact Committee after legislation that would require regional January 5 transportation agencies to prioritize and fund transportation projects, including those funded by a local sales tax measure, that significantly contribute towards the goals outlined in a region’s sustainable communities strategy and the state’s climate goals. Assembly Bill 7 (Friedman): This bill would May be heard in Monitor state the intent of the Legislature to enact Committee after legislation that would eliminate single January 5 occupancy vehicle freeway capacity projects, and allow capacity projects only for bus rapid transit, rail, active transportation purposes, projects that significantly add safety, and projects that significantly reduce congestion, without interfering with existing maintenance and rehabilitation needs. Senate Bill 523 (Laird): A State Transit May be heard in Monitor Assistance (STA) Intent Bill, Details To Be Committee after Provided March 17 Constitutional Amendments Assembly Constitutional Amendment 1 May be heard in Monitor (Aguilar-Curry): Lowers the voting Committee after threshold for local affordable housing and January 5 public infrastructure projects from 2/3 of voters to 55%. Climate Related Bills Assembly Bill 9 (Muratsuchi) and Senate AB 9 is referred to Monitor Bill 12 (Stern): These bills would require the Committee on CARB to ensure that statewide Natural Resources greenhouse gas emissions are reduced to Committee. at least 55% below, raised from 40%, the SB 12 is referred to 1990 level by no later than December 31, Committee on

Attachments (12)

2030. Environmental

Quality. 12 Senate Bill 2 (Skinner): Establishes a to Referred to Monitor be determined maximum gross gasoline Committee on refining margin. Rules Project Delivery and Utilities Related Bills Assembly Bill 400 (Rubio): Permanently May be heard in Monitor extends the existing authority for local Committee after agencies to utilize Design-Build March 5 procurement processes. Assembly Bill 463 (Hart): Requires the May be heard in Monitor Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to Committee after prioritize transit vehicle charging March 9 infrastructure as a priority user for service restoration. Co-Sponsored by the California Transit Association (CTA) Assembly Bill 557 (Hart): Extends Bill introduced to Monitor indefinitely previous authorization for a print local agency to use teleconferencing without complying with specific Brown Act requirements during a declared state of emergency. Extends the period of time for a legislative body to make the described finding to not later than 45 days and every 45 days thereafter. Senate Bill 617 (Newman): Expands Bill introduced to Monitor Progressive Design Build Authority to print regional transportation agencies for non- state highway roadways. Senate Bill 706 (Caballero): Removes the Bill introduced to Monitor 15-project maximum and restriction to print water-related projects for cities, counties, or special districts to use Progressive Design Build Authority. Transit Bills Assembly Bill 610 (Holden): Creates the May be heard in Monitor Youth Transit Pass Pilot Program for the Committee after purpose of awarding grants to transit March 12 agencies for the cost of creating, designing, developing, advertising, distributing, and implementing free youth transit passes to persons attending a California Community College, State University and the University of California. Assembly Bill 761 (Friedman/Gonzalez): May be heard in Monitor Establishes the Transit Transformation Committee after Task Force, which would report to the March 16 Legislature how to grow public transit 13 ridership and improve the public transit experience, among other recommendations. Assembly Bill 819 (Bryan): Reduces May be heard in Monitor existing penalties from a misdemeanor Committee after and fine to only a maximum $400 fine for March 16 fare evasion and unauthorized use of discount tickets. 14 ITEM 7.B metrolinktrains.com/meeting ITEM ID: 2023-149-0 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 17, 2023 MEETING DATE: March 24, 2023 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Justin Fornelli, Chief, Program Delivery SUBJECT: Capital Program Status Report Issue Staff is providing an update on the progress of the Authority’s Capital Program, including the Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) Program and the State of Good Repair Program. Recommendation Receive and file. Strategic Commitment This report aligns with the Strategic Business Plan commitment of: Modernizing Business Practices: We will improve our operational efficiency through transparency, objective metrics and streamlined governance, reducing over-reliance on subsidy while bringing our system into a state of good repair and investing in the development of our employees. The report provides our Board with timely updates on the progress of the Capital Program. The new capital program, including SCORE, adds to the safety, expansion, and growth of the system while the State of Good Repair Program ensures the safety and reliability of the Authority’s existing assets. Background The Capital Program consists of two major components: New Capital Projects and State of Good Repair (SGR) Programs. The Authority’s Capital Program, outside of SCORE, is budgeted annually, and projects are typically delivered over multiple years. Funding for capital projects is provided by Member Agencies through the annual budget process. The Authority also applies for local, state, and federal funds for additional SGR and New Capital Projects. 15 New Capital Projects expand railroad infrastructure and include items such as new sidings, safety enhancements to grade crossings, modernizing signal and communication systems, and new rolling stock. The SGR Program addresses existing capital assets to keep them in a state of good repair through activities such as: Rehabilitation of tunnels, bridges, and culverts Replacement of worn ties and rail Replacement of worn or outdated signal system components Programmed rehabilitation of rolling stock components such as car door operators and heating/ventilation/air conditioning (HVAC), and mid-life overhaul of rail cars and locomotives All project progress is tracked through the Authority’s project reporting system, which is maintained by Program Management Oversight (PMO). Regular meetings are held with project managers to review the progress of active projects. Staff also prepare quarterly project expenditure forecasts to estimate cash flow requirements. As part of the PMO’s effort to improve its reporting and tracking capabilities, key performance indicators (KPIs) have been developed and are included in this report. This item has been updated to reflect financial expenditures through December 31, 2022, while project schedule and status are up to date as of February 6, 2023. Discussion Key Activities Since the last Capital Program Status Update, multiple key accomplishments were achieved, as follows: SCORE Program Simi Valley, El Monte, and BNSF Fullerton-Esp. – Received award of $107M TIRCP Supplemental 2023 Cycle 6. Burbank Jct. Speed Improvement – Completed signal work and cutover. Antelope Valley Line Capacity & Service Improvement Projects – Finalized evaluations of proposals for final design. Cogswell Road Crossing Improvements – Completed public outreach and filed CEQA Notice of Exemption. Atwood-Esperanza 3rd Track Project – Executed work order with BNSF for final design. South Perris Station & Layover Facility – Executed funding agreement with RCTC. Link US Phase A – Received and commented on independent value engineering report. 16 Bombardier Car Rebuild Program - Eight (8) cars were conditionally accepted and are in service. Four (4) additional cars to be conditionally accepted by March 2023. Twelve (12) cars are in the Milwaukee factory undergoing rebuild. Six (6) cars to be delivered to LA by March 2023. FY23 Capital Budget funding of $30M will be used to exercise an option order with Talgo-SYSTRA to rehabilitate another eighteen (18) cars. LA Union Station Rail Yard Rehabilitation & Modernization (RYRM) Project – Track work on switches and turnouts for Control Point (CP) Mission began in February 2023. Track Contractor finishing punch list at CP Terminal. Signal contractor continues to provide support to the track contractor as well as installing conduits and boxes to new CP house locations. Procurement of the switches, signal houses and cable are completed. Pending delivery of the last remaining special track materials and track turnouts for CP Mission. F125 – Tier 4 Locomotive Procurement Project – All forty (40) units have received Final Acceptance. Submittals of Operators Manual, Parts Catalog, and Service Manual are completed, closed, and paid. Provisions of Amendment are being implemented. Locomotive warranty will expire in August 2024. Anaheim Canyon Station Improvements Project – New platform opened in January

Attachments (37)

Agenda Items

  1. 00:00:00 Safety Briefing Staff reviewed emergency procedures for fire alarms, earthquakes, medical emergencies, active attackers, and severe weather events.
  2. 00:03:13 Roll Call The board introduced new alternate Lauren Hughes Leslie and acknowledged Roxana Martinez for her prior service on the board.
  3. 00:04:52 Public Comment The clerk summarized written comments on Union Station run-through tracks and a San Clemente inland bypass, and Paul Dyson urged improved regular-interval Metrolink service in the San Fernando Valley.
  4. 00:09:16 REGULAR CALENDAR The board received reports on legislative advocacy and funding, capital program progress including SCORE and state of good repair projects, and results from the discounted monthly pass fare pilot.
  5. 00:30:56 Chief Executive Officer's Report The CEO reported on weather resilience, San Clemente track and landslide work, Union Station modernization, upcoming service for local events, Metrolink-Amtrak ticket coordination, and the passing of employee Leon Batista.
  6. 00:39:36 Closed Session The board entered closed session on items 11a through 11d and later reported that there was nothing to report out.
  7. 00:40:44 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned in memory of Leon Batista, with condolences extended to his family and colleagues.

Transcript

Warning: This transcript is automatically generated by machine and may contain errors, including misheard words, misattributed speakers, and omitted passages. Always listen to the audio or video recording before assuming the transcript correctly reflects what was said. Do not rely on the transcript alone for quotation, reporting, or any other purpose where accuracy matters.
2. Safety Briefing
I ask for our safety briefing, if we may, from Frank Costa-Lone.
Sir, please proceed.
Good morning, MetroLink board members.
So I'm going to provide to you a brief safety briefing to prepare you for an emergency so
you don't become an emergency.
The event of a fire alarm activation, I'm going to ask my nice gentleman over there
from LASD to lead us all as a group, including folks in the audience down into Patzwaris
Plaza.
We're going to stage off to the left of the bus entrance.
We're going to do a head count, make sure everyone's accounted for,
and let the emergency first responders know if anyone's missing.
So don't go run off to another meeting or catch a train.
We want to get an accurate head count, so we can let our emergency responders know.
We'll wait for building security to let us know if there's an all clear
and make a decision after that what we're going to do.
The invention of an earthquake, I'm going to ask everyone to shelter underneath a large object.
Desk is a good place.
Folks in the audience underneath the doorway is more sturdy.
part of the building even the folks that are remote. In the event of a first aid
and or CPR is necessary I'm going to be the one providing that hopefully CPR
won't be necessary if so I will ask my trusted partner Jerry to go contact a
front desk add them call 911 get the AD and we're going to get to know each
other a little bit more closely. In the event of an active attacker again I'm
I'm going to look to my partner from LESD to support us,
and we will stand behind him.
But we always use the saying, run, hide, fight,
invent of an active attacker.
And again, I know we've had a lot of weather here lately.
Mud slides, rock slides would be prepared,
even if there's an electric slide.
So that is it.
That is my safety briefing.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Any questions of any director of our safety briefing?
Seeing none, thank you, sir, very much.
At this time I would ask Director Bergson if you would lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance.
I'd ask the clerk to do our roll call please.
Certainly.
Director Wapner, Director Dutray, Director Marquez, Vice Chair Chaffee, present.
Director Nguyen, Director Murphy, here.
Second Vice Chair Bergson, here.
Director Spiegel, here.
Director Middleton, here.
Director Vargas, here.
Director Tremblay?
Director Chavez?
Director Barger?
Director Krekorian?
Director Najarian?
Here.
Director Solis?
Director Hughes-Leslie?
Director O'Connor?
Here.
Director Allen?
Director Presiato?
Here.
Chair McCallin?
We do have a quorum present.
Thank you, Madam Clerk.
4. Roll Call
I'd like to take this opportunity
to introduce our new board alternate.
I'm sorry, Lauren Hughes Leslie.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Lauren Hughes Leslie.
at Southwestern Law School. Prior to attending law school, I served in the United States
I received my commission from the United States Military Academy at West Point where I met my husband.
I was raised in the Antelope Valley where I'm fortunate that my husband and my two children and I now call home again.
Thank you so much again to Ms. Pena and to the rest of the board for the warm welcome.
I look forward to joining the team and serving our community alongside of you all.
Thank you.
Welcome to our board.
We look forward to working with you.
Mr. Chair, if I could just real quickly chime in.
Please go ahead.
I'd also like to thank Roxana Martinez for her service on this board.
She had been the alternate supervisor for several years and so I just want to make sure
we acknowledge that level of service that she provided in serving also the northern
portion of Los Angeles County and the San Gabriel Valley communities.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I believe she actually served as the owner for seven and a half years.
It's a remarkable achievement and so we owe her a word of thanks and if we could send
her a recommendation, a written one, that would be appreciated I'm sure.
5. Public Comment
It's now time for public comment.
Madam Clerk do we have any public comments?
We do.
So we received two written public comments that will be emailed to the board after the
meeting.
The first one is from Paul Dyson, President Emeritus of Rail PAC advocating for the run-through
tracks at Union Station and the second one is from Brian Yannity requesting
that Metrolink and OCTA work with Caltrans, Amtrak, BNSF, and other
stakeholders to support a study of the San Clemente inland bypass as a permanent
solution to the coastal erosion along the low sand quarter. So those two
comments will be emailed to the board after the meeting and we do have a
request to speak from Paul Dyson. Mr. Dyson would you please come forward look
Look forward to your remarks.
In a while, Mr. Chairman, good morning.
Good morning, board members.
Paul Dyson, I'm representing the Rail Passengers Association
of California, your most loyal, consistent,
and unpaid supporters.
I'm here specifically to talk about service
in the San Fernando Valley.
I live in Burbank, and I also happen
to serve on the Burbank Airport Authority.
Three years ago, I attended an opening ceremony
for Van Nuys' new platform track.
The key significance of that track, of that ceremony
and of that investment was that it removed a bottleneck.
Previously, trains had to wait.
Only one train could come into the station at a time.
The new platform enabled two trains to pass each other
or both to stop at the station.
and it removed a key bottleneck along that line.
As a result, according to, as an old railroad man,
my calculations and other people with greater expertise
to me, it is now possible to run at regular interval service
from, say, Union Station to Chatsworth
and possibly beyond along that route.
Now, it is the ambition of this organization
and of the state to run at least half-hourly services
along these lines.
Now not all of the desirable investments have been made along that route, but nevertheless this is a low-cost way to provide some useful transportation to people in the Valley.
The City of Burbank, and I used to serve on the Transportation Commission, the City of Burbank is waiting to get additional service and wants to coordinate its Burbank bus service to provide the necessary connections in Burbank.
and I'm sure the same arrangements can be made with LADOT
and I'm absolutely sure that Glendale B-line is also ready and waiting
to provide connections to an improved service.
This would be a good demonstration of SCORE21.
This would show just on one line what could be done with, for the most part,
existing resources.
You have the train sets.
The main cost will be fuel maintenance and, of course, train crew costs.
but the rest of the tools are there, the stations are there.
And I do believe that this is something that could be implemented
after a relatively short planning period
and demonstrate to the public that Metrolink can be relevant
to the transportation needs
because right now unfortunately it isn't.
Thank you.
Thank you, sir.
And there are no more public comments.
There are no more requests to speak.
Thank you.
We now move on to the consent calendar,
which are items 12A through 12S.
Would ask if any member of the public wanted to pull an item,
do we have any request?
We do not have any request to pull any items off consent.
Ask if any board member would like to pull an item.
Seeing and hearing none, may I have a motion of approval?
Move to approval, is there a second?
Thank you.
Is there any objection or abstention from any of the items?
Seeing none, the motion carries unanimously.
7. REGULAR CALENDAR
We now go to our regular calendar, our first item, item number eight, I think, which is
our March legislative update presented by Jeffrey Dunn, who is our director of government
and community relations.
Sir, please proceed.
Good morning, sir.
Thank you, Mr. Chair, members of the committee.
Next slide, please.
For this month's update, starting with local matters, we continue to see similar responses
to the community survey that we sent to residents across the network.
Over six weeks ago, we sent the notice through the Nextdoor app, and we've received well
over 65,000 views and several hundred responses to date.
As noted on the slide, the themes remain the same with a great majority of those responding,
over 90 percent having a very positive impression of Metrolink.
Most of the respondents or many of the actual written responses that we've received are
requesting for more service, midday service and also later evening service to help passengers
return home after evening events or work activities, as well as the ever-present request for reduction
of horn noise where possible.
Additionally, as reported last month, we've been reaching out to raise awareness of Metrolink's
low-income FAIR program.
It's been in existence since September of last year and it is funded by a state LC Tops
grant to subsidize and offer 50% discounted pass to qualified low-income riders.
We've completed direct, door-to-door campaigns at thousands of units in low-income housing
near stations, including the William Mead Housing, the Pueblo del Rio, Romano Gardens,
Nuevo Maravilla, the Hilda Solis Supportive Housing, and Pico Aliso.
This has been a targeted approach to make qualifying residents aware of the programs
and how to access it.
We've also worked with the Los Angeles County Department of Public and Social Services who
sent notice of the program to over 42,000 EBT recipients of their service in LA County
as well as the San Bernardino County DPS who also shared with over 7,000 qualifying card
holders.
We are presently reaching out to the other counties now to do the same thing.
efforts with the enhanced efforts of our marketing team are working. We've seen a
result of a 32% increase in sales of the discounted passes that are funded by the
grant from the months immediately prior to this effort, so it's very encouraging
news. Finally, of note and local matters is the outreach we made to over a hundred
and seventy school districts representing requesting that they share
with students Metrolinx online school safety program. This focuses on rail
safety and best practices for schools and students near the railroad. We've
received excellent response and from the few schools already who have implemented
it into their classes they have gone through and have very positively reviewed
the course. We're going to have further updates to you as this program is
adopted by more schools across the network and the goal as always is to
enhance safety and to minimize or avoid any occurrence of accident of injury.
Next slide, please.
In State Matters, your report details relevant numbers from the proposed budget released
by the Governor, among which I would note a proposed reduction from $2 billion to $1
billion of funding to the Transit and Inner City Rail Capital Program, or TIRCP, unless
the budget outlook improves between now and its passage, which must happen by or before
June 15th.
We continue working with our member agencies and transportation agencies statewide through
our membership on the California Transit Association transit operations funding subcommittee charged
with leading the advocacy statewide in this area, including for full funding of TIRCP and for
flexibility of that funding to use part of it for operational as well as capital needs for access by
agencies like Metrolink that are experiencing acute operational funding shortages arising from the
pandemic and its recovery. The relevant assembly and senate budget subcommittees have begun hearings
on this year's budget, and our CEO has met with the chair
of the Assembly Subcommittee on the budget with jurisdiction
over transportation on two occasions.
In the Senate, the Budget Subcommittee chair has also noted
the need to restore full funding of TIRCP
in the subcommittee's first full hearing, as well as the need
for more robust transit funding generally.
MetroLink has previously met with Budget Committee staff
to highlight the need for more operations funding
and will continue its advocacy in conjunction and in parallel
with our state transit partners, consistent with this priority adopted by this board.
With respect to the in use locomotive rule, consideration by the California Air Resources
Board of the final adoption of the regulation will occur at its April board meeting, and
Metrolink has previously reported to you we have commented on the proposed final rule
during the comment period. Metrolink, in its comments, recognized the work of CARD to include
an alternative compliance pathway other than the mandatory spending account as provided
in the draft rule as a means to achieve the objectives of the regulation, as well as for
working with passenger rail agencies across the state to craft a regulation for all operators
to move the industry eventually to zero operations.
We have also emphasized as crucial the need for incentive funding to implement the adopted
rule in order for it to be effective.
Next slide, please.
The federal government, on federal matters, it has hit its dead limit, as you probably
are aware, in January, but it will be able to maintain mostly current-level spending
until summer.
However, negotiations centering around the budget and how to achieve a balance between
funding for essential government services and real spending reductions sufficient to
forge agreement on raising the debt ceiling will occupy much of the effort and activity
of the Congress in the first half of this year.
There will be strong impetus to reduce spending without imposing significant cuts to defense
or Social Security and Medicare as a precondition to raise the debt ceiling and avoid potential
default.
Earlier this month, the administration released its proposed fiscal year 2024 budget, and
while the budget proposes $5.4 billion in cuts to congressional priorities out of various
discretionary programs, and this includes earmarks, the budget makes no changes in funding levels
authorized by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, or IIJA, authorized funding
levels, which were increased substantially when it passed in 2021 for Federal transportation
programs, including specifically for passenger rail.
The proposed budget does, however, request eliminating the appropriation for RAISE grants
for the 2024 fiscal year only.
However, RAISE would still get $1.5 billion
in advance appropriation that was provided
by the IIJA for fiscal year 2024.
What this means is that current RAISE applications
that are selected for award would be funded,
even if this budget passed.
The proposed budget also actually increases funding
for a few other grants for fiscal year 2023 spending,
including for the FRA federal and state partnership grants
by an additional $460 million, these are nationwide figures,
FRA great crossing grants by $250 million,
as well as a modest funding increase request
for the ANTRAT network.
There are many other proposed cuts and appropriations
to other USDOT programs such that overall discretionary
appropriations from the proposed budget would be $882 million
below current year funding.
Finally, of significance, of significant importance
as a provision in the budget as proposed
that would allow recipients of Section 5307 formula funds,
which includes Metrolink, in large urbanized areas,
the ability under certain conditions to flex these funds,
which are currently available only for capital use
to operational needs for one year only,
in recognition of the acute operational needs
of many passenger rail operators.
Of course, all of these proposals
will come under the scrutiny of Congress
in the discussions of lifting
the aforementioned debt ceiling,
and we'll keep you apprised of all the relevant developments as we advocate to preserve existing
federal funding levels for passenger rail in addition to the priorities identified by
you.
I want also to advise you, as noted on the slide, that Metrolink has submitted again
its RAISE grant application of $45 million to procure additional Tier 4 locomotives to
match the $51 million of state funds already secured as we seek to replace our remaining
older rolling stock with the cleanest commercially available locomotives today.
We will continue to encourage robust support from the congressional delegation representing
all areas of the network to urge a word at this grant.
The state-matched component with other grant criteria we feel make this submission a compelling
one and our advocacy will be vigorous.
Finally, with regard to earmarks, we are presently submitting our House requests for
for congressionally directed spending,
having submitted our Senate requests already
as the Senate deadlines were first.
House member deadlines are rolling throughout March
and into early April.
Very generally speaking, Senate earmarks
can go up to about $10 million.
And on the House side, up to about $5 million,
unless it is a joint submission by members.
Because of the factors addressed previously
here in this report, earmarks will be highly scrutinized
and extremely competitive this year.
Generally, we are seeking earmarks to be funded
the CRISSE account because it will likely be less oversubscribed than other infrastructure
funding in direct competition with bus and highways.
Our submissions are based upon our assessment of exigency of need across the network, as
well as how likely they are to be successfully funded, assessed in close coordination with
our Washington advocates.
They are from across all areas of the network, and we will have approximately a half dozen
submissions.
We thank our entire board for its support and especially our chair and our vice chair
who have submitted support letters for our submissions.
We will provide a more detailed report to you of these in future reports as they are
fully compiled and submitted.
Next slide, please.
This concludes my report.
Thank you very much.
I'm happy to take any questions.
Are there any questions from any director?
Yes.
Go ahead, please.
Just maybe it's an absolute, but when you use the word outreach back when you were talking
about the schools and you were talking about the carbon.
One time you used direct outreach
and the other time you used for the schools, just outreach.
What kind of outreach do you talk about?
The outreach that we conducted to the schools
was from our CEO, principally we sent a letter
to all of the superintendents and then we followed up
with other administrative personnel
about the school safety program.
So it was primarily done over the internet through email
with follow up with phone calls and that kind of thing.
Please, Mr. Burks.
You may or may not have the answer to this,
but you talked about the grant funding
for the tier four locomotives.
Yes, sir.
And I was curious that 90 something million, 90,
what is the remaining number of stock that we need to use?
Well, currently we have, of course,
55 locomotives in the fleet.
40 of those are tier fours.
This specific request would be for eight more.
If we were successful, that would bring us to 48,
Which is roughly 90% of the fleet tier four cleanest in the world. So we need seven more to get to our 55
Tier twos that we currently operate. Yes, sir
Director Spiegel your light is on are you have further question? No
Mr. CEO, do you have anything you'd like to say? Okay
This is a receive in file item and if there's no objection that is the order
Go on to our next item
Program status report
receiving filing item again, no actions required, but in a presentation by
Tarek Diab if I say that name, right? Yes, absolutely correct. Thank you. So a program and management oversight, please
Good morning chair and member of the board
I'm providing an update on the progress of the capital program including score and state of good upper next slide, please
for the period ending December 2022 the authority expanded
20.5 million in state of good repair and 11.7 million in a new capital projects next
I will now provide an update on a few projects in our portfolio starting with the Union Station modernization
procurement of switches a cable as
Signal houses and cables are complete track contractor finishing punch list at CP terminal and track contractor was support from the
signal contractor began turn out replacement at CP mission
Next slide please.
As for the Anaheim Canyon Station Improvement Project,
new platform opened in January
and final station communication items
to be installed in April next month.
Next slide please.
As for the SCORE program,
I'm just gonna highlight a few of the bullets on the slide.
The authority received an award of 107 million
from California State Transportation Agency
for Simi Valley, El Monte, and BNSF follow-up projects.
Also, we completed signal work and cut over
at Bellbank Junction Speed Improvement Project.
As for the Bombardier Car Rebuild Program,
eight cars were conditionally accepted and are in service
for additional cars to be conditionally accepted
later this month, and we secured 30 million
in fiscal year 23 funding, which would be used
to rehabilitate additional 18 cars.
Next slide, please.
As for the capital program risk,
no major update from last quarter,
but I would like to highlight that
For our major program and projects,
we have a comprehensive risk adjusted in place
with mitigation plan and is being tracked on a regular basis
to ensure appropriate contingencies are allocated
and maintained for the duration of the project.
And just to deep dive a bit on this core program,
I'm just gonna highlight a few of the mitigation plans
we have in place while working with member agencies
to identify value engineering opportunities,
update our program project adjusted on a regular basis
with our mitigation plans,
And the estimated completion has also been updated
on a regular basis to ensure we have sufficient contingency
maintained for the duration of the program.
And finally, exploring additional funding opportunities.
Next slide, please.
This concludes my presentation,
and I would be happy to answer any questions you may have.
Any questions from our directors?
I see none, so thank you for your excellent report.
Thank you, sir. Thank you, sir.
This is a receive and file item.
If there's no objection,
it will be deemed received and filed onto 7C,
which again is another receive and file item
presented by Henning Eichler
talking about our evaluation of the monthly past discount.
Good morning, Mr. Vice Chair and members of the board.
I'm reporting on item 7C with a report
on our last year's fair pilot.
As you may remember, last year we lowered the price
of our monthly passes by 30% for three months,
October, November, and December.
Before the pandemic, our monthly passes accounted
for most of the ridership on Metrolink.
Of course, during the pandemic, that has changed
as more of our commuters went on a hybrid schedule
and only this fare pilot was intended to test customer
response if we lower the price of the monthly passes
to lower the break even point to just two and a half round
trips, meaning somebody traveling two and a half round
trips in a week would find the monthly pass the cheapest fair
media.
Next slide, please.
What we have found from ticket sales
is that the customer response was immediate
and it was strong.
The number of passes that we sold
during that three-month pilot increased by 37%.
Most of that increase does reflect existing riders
who switched from other ticket types,
from seven day passes, five day, 10 day passes,
but also from round trips to use the discounted monthly pass.
But what's important that the increase
also reflects 10% new customers.
In addition to that, we also found that 3%
of the increase came from lapsed riders.
That is, Metrolink riders, who had not taken a train
in more than a year, it was the monthly pass discount
that brought them back to the system.
Next slide, please.
This chart illustrates the actual impact
of the monthly pass pilot.
During the three months before the pilot,
So during July, August and September,
the average monthly number of passes sold was 3,551.
During the pilot, that number increased
to 4,868 per average month.
Once the pilot ended in January,
the number of passes sold dropped again,
just as we would expect.
But what is significant is that the post-pilot sales
numbers were significant above the pre-pilot numbers.
In fact, they were up 10% than they had been before.
What I also want to point out that we've
seen the sales numbers for both February and March,
and they also continue to be 10% higher.
Actually, in February, they were 18% higher
than the pre-pilot numbers and stayed
at that same level during March.
So we're seeing a very strong continuing interest
in monthly passes, even though they're back
at the full price.
That concludes my report.
Can I answer any questions?
This is legit.
When we track the new riders or the riders
that didn't do a year ago, how do we keep following up
and tracking of those new riders?
Is that 10% all new riders basically,
or is that the combination of the former riders
that are coming back?
How do we continue to follow up?
Is that just asking, or how do you do that?
Well, these numbers come from mobile ticket usage and sales,
where we exactly know for, you know,
what is the history if somebody has bought a pass
or any kind of fair media in the past?
We know whether or not they stopped and we know the lapsed riders, if they have bought
anything during the last one, two, or three years, and we've seen some of them have come
back once the monthly pass went on sale.
So that's the 3% of the increase that I refer to.
And then of course we see from the mobile ticket sales, there are new mobile accounts
that were opened, riders who just opened the account and started purchasing that monthly
So that's the 10% of new riders where we have no prior history for them.
I see a question possibly from Director Preciado.
More of a comment. Thank you very much for your presentation.
My wife is a frequent rider of Metrolink.
You know, we live in Pomona. She works in downtown L.A.
And part of your presentation that I really appreciated was,
you know, how many trips does that mean, does that equal for the monthly pass?
And I know that she's making a concentrated effort to come back into the office and we were deciding on whether like
All right
How many times does she has to come out and should we get the monthly pass or should we just continue to get single ridership?
And now that I know that I'm gonna go over there and advocate for that and be like hey
Sign up for this great monthly pass thing and hopefully she shares that so thank you very much for your presentation
Are there any further questions or comments some directors? I see none again. This is receiving file item
No objection. It will be received in file
8. Chief Executive Officer's Report
Now we come to the highlight of the meeting our CEOs report. Sorry. Would you give us an update?
Mr. Vice chair every time you guys say that it sets the bar so high and I always feel like I'm gonna let you down
But we do have some good information to share this month. First of all, we'll talk a little bit about the weather
And the fact that our system once again
Handled the weather that we've encountered
About as well as we could have hoped again. I think it's a testament to our state of good repair program
That we continue to need to invest in but the investments
We are making are delivering on on what we needed to deliver you may have seen the news a couple weeks ago
And I'm going to shift a little bit to San Clemente. So first the
There was the news in San Clemente where there was a fairly significant
landslide, not at the location where we have been spending the last couple of years working
so hard on, but not too far up the coast from that location where there was a significant
landslide and there were questions about how did it impact our system.
Our maintenance of way team, HRZOG, our contractor, was able to, what we found, it was nearly,
Don Felipe is in the audience, our COO, but someone that ordered about 18 inches or 2 feet of mud
had to be cleared off of our tracks at that section right near the, right at that landslide.
So it didn't interrupt our service, and because it happened on a weekdays, we did not have any
impacts on our service, and we had it cleared in time that BNSF was able to run their freight
trains through in the evening hours. So again, our system is generally handled. The weather
very well and where we've had to deal with issues.
Our contractors have been extremely responsive.
On a bit of a positive note, great progress continues to be made by the contractor, OCTA's
contractor at the landslide risk location that we had with the wall anchors that are
being constructed in San Clemente.
And we're hopeful that certainly by mid-April we should be back to seven days a week full
service on the corridor.
So things have been going very well and the engineers are saying the project is actually
doing its job.
So we're really pleased to talk, share that news.
I want to talk a little bit, Tariq mentioned a project this, you know, we do discuss State
of Good Repair regularly here at Metrolink.
It's an important part of our investment in our system.
Tariq mentioned one project that I want to highlight today.
It's the rail modernization project here at Union Station.
It's a state of good repair project, one of the most critical and ongoing projects that
we have that are part of our SCORE initiative.
The project has a budget of $67 million.
There are multiple funding partners that have been involved, including CalSTA, the Federal
Transit Administration, our member agencies.
We work with Amtrak and CalTrans for funding support.
And the completion date is planned for September of this year.
We do have a quick video that we would like to share with you and then I'll describe
a little bit about how this happened following the video.
It's only about 30 seconds long, I believe.
So that 28-second video was actually time-lapse from starting at 8 p.m. on Friday, February
10th through 5 a.m. Monday, February 13th.
So over the weekend, cruised, I think you'll recall from Tariq's report about a switch
replacement, that is the switch replacement that you just witnessed there at Union Station.
And just to remind the board, we have somewhere on the order of right now with our current
service levels of about 115, 120 trains every day going in and out of Union Station.
So this work happened on the weekend.
It didn't impact our service levels.
The contractors that are involved include Delfor Beatty, Rail Works, Pacific Railway
Enterprises and our construction manager is Rail Pros.
So again, just another important part of what we do at Metrolink that sometimes just goes
unnoticed but at Union Station, it's an impressive level of work that takes place there in that
one weekend.
We'll have some other projects actually coming up later in the spring that are at this location
that will require likely the full closure of Union Station over a weekend, and when
that does happen there will be a significant amount of community outreach, public outreach
to let users of the system know that the Union Station will likely not be operating for trains
on that weekend.
Next slide.
So we're really excited about some things that are happening over the course of the
next few days.
We have worked with the City of San Juan Capistrano to make sure that we have service to the Swallows
Day Parade in San Juan Capistrano.
So you will be able to use, this is all part of a partnership, a growing partnership between
Metrolink and Amtrak Pacific Surfliner where you will be able to use a Metrolink ticket
on our trains, but also Pacific Surf Liner trains.
And so not only though can you go
to the Swallow's Day Parade,
but you can also attend what has been known
as the I-5 series, and we're gonna rename it
the Metrolink series, because you will be able
to take our train to either the two ballparks,
and if you're at Anaheim Stadium for the second games
on Monday the 27th and Tuesday the 28th,
we don't run trains late enough that night,
but Amtrak's Surfliner does,
so you will be able to use your Metrolink ticket
to board a Surfliner train to get back to Los Angeles.
So please, we are making sure that this is getting out,
obviously, through all of our social media,
and we're looking forward to, yeah,
if we can figure out some way to name that I-5 series
is something a little bit more transit friendly,
I think we will have pulled something off pretty special.
So there are late night transits on the surf liner
that you'll be able to take back to LA.
And then lastly, Mr. Chair,
and I'll be prepared to take questions,
I'm gonna ask that at the close of our meeting today,
you do so in the memory of Leanne Batista.
Leanne was a member of our Metrolink team
working in our IT, our IT department.
He passed away after a brief illness on February 28th.
He was instrumental on several key IT projects
as well as our critically important
positive train control projects.
His colleagues described Leon as quiet,
hard-working man who had a major impact.
And so on behalf of the Metrolink family,
we extend our heartfelt sympathies to Leon's family.
So again, Mr. Chair, when we do adjourn,
we'd ask that you do so in memory of Leon Batista.
Mr. Chair, that concludes my report.
Thank you for the sterling report.
And yes, we will certainly close the meeting
in memory of Leon.
Thank you, sir.
Are there any questions of our CEO?
All right, now it's time for board member comments.
Anyone care to comment total darkness on the lights?
Well, it's been my pleasure to chair the meeting.
I wish our regular chair well, who is not here, and
look forward to his expedited return so I can continue learning from him.
11. Closed Session
With that, we come to our closed session, and I believe the clerk needs to let us know.
General counsel.
General counsel, I'm sorry, I don't want.
Thank you, Chair.
I'm running it like our own, my own board, I'm sorry, and please go ahead.
The board will now go into closed session on item 11a, 11b, 11c, and 11d as described in today's agenda.
Thank you.
We are back from our closed session.
Mr. Del Rio, do you have anything to report out?
Nothing to report out at this time.
Thank you, Chair.
Thank you.
13. ADJOURNMENT
We do want to remember Leon Batiste and the great service he gave us.
And we send our condolences to his family and those that worked with him.
If there any comments any would make otherwise, we'll just close the meeting in his memory
Thank you all for coming here today. We are adjourned