Board of Directors - Feb 28, 2025

February 28, 2025 · Board of Directors

Agenda

6. Approval of Consent Calendar Items: 11.A - 11.N

All Consent Calendar items are listed at the end of the agenda.

7. REGULAR CALENDAR

7.A Title VI Public Hearing for October 2024 Schedule Change In October 2024, the Authority launched a systemwide schedule change which offers increased frequency, better connections, and more service during weekdays. In January 2025, the Authority adjusted the schedules for the San Bernardino, Ventura, and Arrow Lines to address on-time performance challenges and align services across multiple lines. Federal rail service guidelines require transit agencies to conduct a service equity analysis and public outreach effort for a major service change which remains in effect for more than six months. Executive Committee recommended (5-0) that the Board approve the initiation of the Title VI public comment process for the continuation of the systemwide schedule change launched in October 2024, as adjusted in January 2025. Title VI study and outreach costs are included in the Adopted Operating Budget for FY2024-25. 7.B February Legislative Update Staff provides a regular monthly update on current legislative affairs. Receive and file. 7.C Financial Results for the First Six Months of FY25 - December 2024 Ridership, Revenue, and Operating Results "Metrolink Reimagined" is the Metrolink term for the transition from commuter rail-based service to a regional provider of general transport. Initiatives designed to realize that transition require timely review of Ridership, Revenue, and Financial Operating Performance to provide assessment of the effectiveness of our efforts. Primary among these initiatives are the optimized services we began providing on October 21, 2024. Board of Directors Meeting February 28, 2025 3 This report covers monthly reporting on Ridership, Revenue, and Financial Operating Performance for the six months ended December 31, 2024. Receive and file. 7.D New Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for Qualification and Certification of Dispatchers (Part 245) and Certification of Signal Employees (Part 246) On May 21,2024, The Federal Railroad Administration announced to SCRRA and all other railroads new regulations to develop FRA-approved programs for certifying individuals who perform dispatching tasks and signal employees who work on signal systems and signal-related technology on their networks. Pursuant to this regulation, railroads are required to have formal processes for training dispatchers and signal employees, as well as verifying that each dispatcher and signal employee has the requisite knowledge, skills, safety record, and abilities to safely perform assigned tasks mandated by railroad rules and safety standards and Federal laws and regulations, prior to certification. Authority promptly started assessing the regulation requirements, including financial and human resources, necessary to comply with the regulations. Under this regulation, only the railroad can certify and recertify dispatchers and signal employees. The railroad's certification programs will encompass not only direct railroad employees but also contractors that perform dispatching tasks and/or signal employees who work on signal systems and signal-related technology on their networks. Receive and file. The administration of both certification programs will have a financial impact on the Authority. Staff is working to identify funding to fulfill the initial requirements of the regulation so that the Authority is compliant by September 17, 2025. The Operations department will continue to coordinate with Finance, Program Delivery, Human Resources, IDTS, Safety, and Legal departments on the budgetary elements associated with these new federal regulations. 7.E 2024 Year-End System Safety, Security, and Compliance Update System Safety, Security, and Compliance is providing a year-end update on safety key metrics. Receive and file.

Attachments (3)

8. Chief Executive Officer's Report

Authority Update

10. Chair's Comments

Board of Directors Meeting February 28, 2025 4

11. CONSENT CALENDAR

11.A Approval of Meeting Minutes - January 24, 2025 Regular Board Meeting It is recommended that the Board approve the Minutes of the January 24, 2025 Regular Board Meeting. 11.B Quarterly Compensation Report - 1st and 2nd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2025 - July 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024 In compliance with HR Policy No. 2.1, Wage and Salary Administration – Salary Program Administration, staff is required to make quarterly and annual reports to the Board on compensation matters. Receive and file. 11.C Assembly Bill 1234 Meetings Attended by Members of the Board of Directors A report on meetings attended by members of the Board of Directors is provided in compliance with the Authority’s policies and "Assembly Bill 1234" (AB 1234) (Government Code Section 53232 et seq). Receive and file. 11.D Adoption of Investment Policy 2025 California Government Code Section 53607 provides investing authority to the governing body and may be delegated to the Authority’s Treasurer for one-year periods. Under the Authority’s executive management structure, the Chief Financial Officer effectively functions as the Treasurer with approval of the designation by the Board. This item is to recommend the approval of said delegation for an additional year. In addition, the Authority’s Investment Policy (Policy) requires that the Policy is reviewed and approved annually by its Board of Directors. The Policy establishes guidelines under which the Authority’s funds can be invested with the objectives of ensuring safety of principal, availability of funds to meet current and future expenditures and achieving a reasonable rate of return on its cash and investments. Audit and Finance Committee recommended (5-0) that the Board approve the proposed Investment Policy FIN-3.1 annual revision and the designation of the Chief Financial Officer as Treasurer for an additional year. There is no budgetary impact as a result of this report. 11.E FY2024-25 Preliminary Quarterly Investment Report - Quarter Ended December 31, 2024 Board of Directors Meeting February 28, 2025 5 The Authority’s Annual Investment Policy requires the Treasurer to make a quarterly investment report to the Board of Directors. Section 53646 of the California Government Code encourages local agencies to file this report and provides requirements for report content and disclosures. This report is for the quarter ended December 31, 2024, and contains estimated information published prior to the conclusion of the Authority's fiscal year close and is subject to adjustment. Receive and file. 11.F FY2024-25 Quarterly Accounts Receivable Status Report - Quarter Ended December 31, 2024 This report presents an update on the Authority’s Accounts Receivable for the quarter ended December 31, 2024. The report covers outstanding receivables, unbilled balances and provides a status related to billing and collection efforts. Receive and file. 11.G FY2024-25 Quarterly Fuel Purchase Program Update - Quarter Ending December 31, 2024 Staff is providing an update on the Authority's Fuel Purchase Program for the quarter ended December 31, 2024. Receive and file. 11.H Internal Audit Department Quarterly Update for Q2 FY2025 The Internal Audit Department (Internal Audit) provides quarterly updates on internal and external audits and other activities. This item represents the second quarter of FY 2025 (September 30, 2024, to December 31, 2024). Receive and file. 11.I PMO Module Performance Audit (2024-14-IA) The Program Management Office Module Performance Audit (#2024-14-IA) is completed as part of our 2024 Annual Internal Audit Plan approved by the Board of Directors. Receive and file. 11.J Corrective Action Status Update - Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2024 The Internal Audit Department (Internal Audit) provides the Board with a quarterly report on the status of the corrective actions of prior audits. Receive and file. Board of Directors Meeting February 28, 2025 6 11.K Grants Quarterly Update - 2nd Quarter, Fiscal Year 2025 Staff is providing an update of grant acquisition, reprogramming and closeout activity for the period of October 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024. Receive and file. 11.L Contract Amendment for Contract No H1674-21 Trapeze Software Group for Maintenance of Way (MOW) Signals, Communication & Signal (C&S) Help Desk migration technical support and State of Good Repair/Capital Planning Module implementation in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Optimization Project The Authority needs additional technical support to complete the final implementation phases of the EAM system for the MOW Signals & C&S Help Desk disciplines and the State of Good Repair (SGR)/Capital Planning Module. The level of effort and complexity regarding the migration of MOW disciplines into Trapeze EAM system was greatly underestimated at the onset of the project due to a large number of assets and variabilities in components, inspections, and regulatory requirements. Leveraging additional technical support will allow the Authority to ensure the remaining MOW disciplines are configured and migrated in a matter that is conducive for longevity and asset visibility, as well as set up the foundation for the State of Good Repair/Capital Planning Module. This work is part of an agency-wide effort to consolidate existing siloed systems into a single system of record for all the agency's critical assets. Once this system is fully adopted, it will improve staff's ability to capture asset condition data, monitor asset performance, identify potential risks, and to prioritize future rehabilitation and new capital investments. Contracts, Operations, Maintenance, and Safety Committee recommended (4-0) the Board authorize the Chief Executive Officer approve amendment to extend Contract No. H1674-21 for additional technical support in Maintenance of Way Signals, C&S Help Desk migration support and State of Good Repair/Capital Planning Module Implementation to December 31, 2026, and increase contract authority by $803,907 to a new not-to-exceed amount of $3,290,569.00. The amount of $803,907 requested for this contract amendment is included in the Adopted Capital Program budget for FY2023-24. 11.M Purchase Order No. PO978-25 - Air Brake Components and Overhaul Services - Recommendation to Award - Knorr Brake Corporation The Authority's Materials Management Department requires an agreement with Knorr Brake Corporation to allow for the purchasing of new brake calipers, manifolds, and other air brake components and as needed brake overhaul services. These items are needed to perform preventive maintenance as required by the FRA on the air brake system of our DMU fleet. Board of Directors Meeting February 28, 2025 7 Contracts, Operations, Maintenance, and Safety Committee recommended (4-0) that the Board authorize the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to award Purchase Order No. PO978-25 to Knorr Brake Corporation for the purchase of as needed new Air Brake Components and Overhaul Services for a two-year term and an estimated not-to-exceed authority of $1,500,000. The amount for which contract authority is being requested will be included in the proposed Arrow operating budgets for FY26 and FY27 in the following amounts: $903,642 in FY26 and $596,358 in FY27. 11.N Quarterly Report of Contracts Awarded and Third-Party Agreements Executed Under the Chief Executive Officer's Authority The Board of Directors approved the Authority's revised Procurement and Contracting Policies (Revised Policies) on November 8, 2019. Section 3 of the Revised Policies requires the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to provide a quarterly report to the Board with a list of contracts awarded above $250,000 and under the CEO's contract award authority of $500,000. Receive and file.

Attachments (10)

12. ADJOURNMENT

Board of Directors Meeting February 28, 2025 8 ITEM 7.A metrolinktrains.com/meeting ITEM ID: 2025-143-0 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 21, 2025 MEETING DATE: February 28, 2025 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Paul Hubler, Chief Strategy Officer SUBJECT: Title VI Public Hearing for October 2024 Schedule Change Issue In October 2024, the Authority launched a systemwide schedule change which offers increased frequency, better connections, and more service during weekdays. In January 2025, the Authority adjusted the schedules for the San Bernardino, Ventura, and Arrow Lines to address on-time performance challenges and align services across multiple lines. Federal rail service guidelines require transit agencies to conduct a service equity analysis and public outreach effort for a major service change which remains in effect for more than six months. Recommendation Executive Committee recommended (5-0) that the Board approve the initiation of the Title VI public comment process for the continuation of the systemwide schedule change launched in October 2024, as adjusted in January 2025. Strategic Commitment This report aligns with the Strategic Business Plan commitment of: Advancing Key Regional Goals: We will grow the role of regional rail in addressing climate change, air quality, and other pressing issues by advancing toward zero emissions, making rail a compelling alternative to single-occupant automobiles, and advancing equity-focused opportunities for all communities throughout Southern California. The public outreach and equity analysis ensure that the schedule change launched in October 2024, as adjusted in January 2025, meet Title VI equity requirements. 9 Background As a recipient of Federal funding, the Authority is required to conduct public outreach for all major service changes. During the public outreach, staff will seek public feedback on the continuation of the schedule change launched in October 2024, as adjusted in January 2025. Discussion On October 21, 2024 the Authority launched a systemwide schedule change which offers increased frequency, better connections, and more service during weekdays. The new schedule focused on service growth in the current markets Metrolink serves by: Leveling train schedules to serve off-peak markets, thus enabling Metrolink to serve customers throughout the day; and Improving transfer opportunities between Lines at L.A. Union Station. On January 27, 2025, the Authority adjusted its train schedules on the San Bernardino, Ventura, and Arrow Lines to improve service reliability and align services across multiple lines. These adjustments ensure better operational flow and more dependable service across our network, enhancing customer experience for Metrolink riders. Service Plan On October 21, 2024, the Authority launched a systemwide schedule change which resulted in 32 new weekday trains, for a new total of 178 weekday trains spread across the day, providing more mid-day options and service into the evening. All 178 trains also operate five car-sets. On January 27, 2025, the Authority adjusted the train schedules for the San Bernardino, Ventura, and Arrow Lines to address on-time performance issues, as well as enhance train connections between lines. Taken together, the new schedule promotes optimized transfer opportunities through “pulse” scheduling across the system. The number of connections available throughout the day has increased by more than 300%, with more than 225 daily connections (up from 67) through L.A. Union Station, and most customers will experience wait periods of just 10-20 minutes. Public Participation Plan After initiating the public comment period, staff will notify the community of the schedule expansion. We will encourage the public to provide comments by distributing a Limited English Proficiency (LEP) news release, creating a webpage with the attached survey, and launching electronic blasts (E- blast), social media, and changeable message boards with relevant project information. The staff will hold a virtual bilingual community workshop on March 26, 2025 to explain the schedule expansion; we will remind community members that their input is welcome and essential. All comments will be gathered and provided to the Board for review. Equity Analysis As the operator of Metrolink service, the Authority is required to conduct a service equity analysis in compliance with Federal Title VI requirements (FTA C 4702.1B). The equity analysis is intended to determine if the expansion of service will result in disparate impacts for minority populations or pose a disproportionate burden to low-income populations. 10 Staff is now seeking approval from the Board to initiate the Title VI equity analysis and public outreach for the service expansion. Budget Impact Title VI study and outreach costs are included in the Adopted Operating Budget for FY2024- 25. Next Steps The full results of the service equity analysis will be presented to the Board together with the results of the public outreach effort during the April Board meeting. Suggested project timeline of activities includes: Board approval of the initiation of the Public Outreach process: February 28, 2025 Creation of e-comment and survey on Metrolink website: February 28, 2025 Public Meeting regarding the schedule expansion: March 26, 2025 E-comments due by April 15, 2025 Staff presents result of public outreach and equity analysis to the Board: April 25, 2025 The above dates are subject to change. Prepared by: Brian Jacob, Planning Manager II Sylvia Novoa, Public Affairs Manager Henning Eichler, Senior Manager, Market Insights and Analytics Approved by: Paul Hubler, Chief Strategy Officer Attachment(s) Presentation - Title VI Analysis and Public Outreach for Oct Schedule Change 11 Title VI Public Outreach for October 2024 Schedule Change 12 Background • Launched a systemwide schedule change on October 21, 2024 • Increased frequency; • Offered better connections; and • Adjusted schedules on Bernardino, Ventura, and Arrow Lines to address on-time performance challenges and align services across multiple lines. 13 1 Title VI Analysis and Public Outreach • The rail schedule expansion falls under the FTA Title VI requirement for transit agencies to conduct equity analysis and public outreach for all major service changes. • Public Outreach Plan: • Provide opportunity for public comments online starting February 28, 2025. • Electronic station message boards informing public of community meeting. • Email notification regarding public outreach meeting. • Posting meeting notices, information and online meeting on social media: • Notices will be posted in LEP languages (Limited English Proficiency) • Public meetings will be held in English and Spanish • Language translator will be provided if requested with 72-hours advance notice • Public meeting on March 26, 2025. 142 Next Steps • Public Meeting regarding the schedule expansion on March 26, 2025 • E-comments due by April 15, 2025 • Staff presents result of public outreach and equity analysis to the Board on April 25, 2025 15 3 Thank you. 16 ITEM 7.B metrolinktrains.com/meeting ITEM ID: 2025-128-0 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 21, 2025 MEETING DATE: February 28, 2025 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Paul Hubler, Chief Strategy Officer SUBJECT: February Legislative Update Issue Staff provides a regular monthly update on current legislative affairs. Recommendation Receive and file. Strategic Commitment This report aligns with the Strategic Business Plan commitments of: Connecting and Leveraging Partnerships: We will forge new and enhanced relationships with our public and private partners to integrate and coordinate connecting services, providing residents throughout Southern California with better, seamless, sustainable alternatives to driving. This commitment is met by sharing news, information and the Authority’s legislative priorities with elected officials. Advancing Key Regional Goals: We will grow the role of regional rail in addressing climate change, air quality, and other pressing issues by advancing toward zero emissions, making rail a compelling alternative to single-occupant automobiles and advancing equity-focused opportunities for all communities throughout Southern California. This commitment is met by encouraging federal, state and local support for Authority priorities. 17 Background Staff continues to engage with community, local, state, and federal stakeholders concerning Metrolink service and relevant policy initiatives. Discussion Local Community and Government Relations staff, in coordination with the Customer Experience and Fare Collections departments, developed a program to offer free ride passes to those displaced by the fires. As of January 17, 145 round-trip promo card passes have been sent to community-based organizations (CBOs) and elected officials to distribute to their constituents and community members in need. Additionally, staff distributed approximately 300 passes to organizations and residents at a donation site in Santa Anita on January 17. Community Relations staff will be conducting outreach in accordance with Title VI requirements for the Metrolink Reimagined schedule change. The process is scheduled to start on February 28, 2025 with a community meeting scheduled for March 26, 2025. A public hearing culminating the process would occur at the April 25, 2025 Board of Directors meeting. Working in conjunction with the Safety team the Community Relations Team continues to conduct follow up to all schools along the San Bernardino line informing them of the opportunity to participate in a safety briefing that will provide a free trip to the San Bernardino Depot station. This free trip will include a docent-led tour of the historic station, an age- appropriate safety presentation, and a free return trip to their station of origin. State CARB Withdraws Request for EPA Waiver Needed to Enforce In-Use Locomotive Rule The California Air Resources Board (CARB) withdrew its request for a waiver from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that, if issued, would have authorized state regulation of passenger and freight locomotive emissions. CARB’s April 2023 In-Use Locomotive regulation requires Metrolink and other freight and passenger rail operators in California to upgrade locomotive technologies to reduce criteria pollutants by certain deadlines. Without the federal waiver, key elements of the regulation are likely not enforceable. Staff will continue to monitor these developments. Committee Assignments Announced Sacramento statehouse leaders announced new committee assignments in January. Assemblymember Lori D. Wilson (District 11) will retain her position as Chair of the State Assembly Transportation Committee and Laurie Davies (District 74) will continue serving as Vice Chair of the Transportation Committee. Assemblymembers Juan Carrillo (District 39), John Harabedian (District 41), Dr. Corey Jackson (District 60), Tom Lackey (District 34), each of whom represent a portion of Metrolink’s system, will serve on the Assembly Transportation Committee. On the Senate side, Dave Cortese (District 15) will serve as the Chair of the Senate Transportation Committee. Senators Bob Archuleta (District 30), Catherine Blakespear (District 38), Sabrina Cervantes (District 31), Monique Limon (District 21), Caroline Menjivar (District 20), Kelly Seyarto (District 32), Thomas Umberg (District 34), and Suzette Martinez 18 Valladares (District 23) each represent a portion of Metrolink's system and will serve on the Senate Transportation Committee. Governor’s Proposed Budget Honors Previous Transit Commitments On January 10, Governor Newsom released his FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget and projected a modest $363 million surplus. The one-time funding provided by SB 125 for transit capital and operations remains intact in the Governor’s proposal, with the modified appropriation timeline agreed to in last year’s Budget Act. For the FY 2025-2026 year, $1 billion from the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) will be available, according to the modified appropriation schedule. The FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget also requests that the Legislature join the Governor in considering extending the cap-and-trade program beyond 2030, noting “extension sooner could provide greater certainty and attract stable investment.” Bill to Plus Up Transit Funding To Be Introduced Senator Scott Weiner (District 11) intends to introduce legislation that would provide an additional $2 billion from the General Fund to transit providers across the state. The funding would be distributed through the existing TIRCP formula and eligible uses would include capital and operations. Federal

Attachments (22)

2025. Marks Beginning of 119th Congress

The 119th Congress convened on January 3 with Republicans maintaining control of the U.S. House and assuming the majority in the U.S. Senate. Representatives Sam Graves (R-MO) and Rick Larsen retained their positions as House Transportation & Infrastructure Chairman and Ranking Member, respectively. The Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials is under new leadership, with Representative Daniel Webster (R-FL) assuming the chairmanship and Dina Titus (D-NV) taking over the ranking member slot. Newly elected Congresswoman Laura Friedman (D-CA), who represents the Burbank and Glendale portions of the Metrolink system, is a member of the Railroad Subcommittee. In the Senate, transportation policy matters fall into the jurisdiction of several committees. Senators Alex Padilla (D-CA) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) were both named to the Committee on Environment and Public Works, the primary committee responsible for drafting the next surface transportation authorization bill. USDOT Leadership Positions Begin to be Filled In November, President-elect Trump announced his intent to nominate Sean Duffy to serve as his Secretary of Transportation. Mr. Duffy, a former Congressman from Wisconsin, was approved by the Senate Commerce Committee by a vote of 28-0 on January 22. His nomination is expected to be considered by the full Senate in late January or early February. President Trump also announced his intent to nominate David Fink to serve as Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Administrator. Mr. Fink is the former President of Pan Am Railways. He is awaiting confirmation. Reauthorization Begins House Transportation & Infrastructure (T&I) Chairman Sam Graves (R-MO) convened a hearing to kickstart discussions on reauthorization of the next surface transportation bill. The current authorization, the Infrastructure Investment & Jobs Act (IIJA), is set to expire in September 2026. The T&I hearing was held on January 15 and Congressman Graves indicated developing a successor to the IIJA would be one of his committee’s top priorities in 19 the coming year. It is unclear the extent to which IIJA investment levels will be maintained, whether new funding sources will be identified, or if funding will be distributed primarily through formula or competitive grant processes. Prepared by: Jeffrey Dunn, Director, Government and Community Relations Anna Denecke, Senior Manager, Government Relations Sylvia Novoa, Manager, Public Affairs Julie Nieto, Management Analyst II Grayson Hahn, Grad on Career Track Approved by: Paul Hubler, Chief Strategy Officer Attachment(s) Appendix A - February 2025 Bill Matrix 20 Appendix A: Legislative Matrix Bill Number Bill Status Action Federal - - - State Climate Related Bills - - - Project Delivery and Utilities Related Bills Assembly Bill 35 (Alvarez): Would provide May be heard in Monitor for limited CEQA review of an application committee January 2 for a discretionary permit or authorization for a clean hydrogen transportation project by requiring the application to be reviewed through a clean hydrogen environmental assessment and would require the lead agency to determine whether to approve the clean hydrogen environmental assessment and issue a discretionary permit or authorization for the project no later than 270 days after the application for the project is deemed complete. Senate Bill 30 (Cortese): Would state the May be acted upon Monitor intent of the Legislature to enact on or after January 2 subsequent legislation to restrict the resale of decommissioned diesel trains and rolling stock for continued use. Senate Bill 79 (Wiener): Would make May be acted upon Monitor housing more affordable for California on or after February families, reduce greenhouse gas 15 emissions, and enhance public transit systems by, among other things, requiring the upzoning of land near rail stations and rapid bus lines to encourage transit- oriented development. Senate Bill 71 (Wiener): Would exempt May be acted upon Monitor from the requirements of CEQA a public on or after February project for the improvement of bus rapid 14. transit, bus, or light rail service, including the maintenance, public projects for the improvement, institution, or increase of shuttles and ferries, and for the maintenance, construction, or rehabilitation of stops which will be exclusively used by zero-emission, near- 21 zero-emission, low oxide of nitrogen engine, compressed natural gas fuel, fuel cell, or hybrid powertrain buses, shuttles, ferries, or light rail vehicles, as provided. The bill would exempt a project carried out by a public transit agency conducted in compliance with specified regulations of the State Air Resources Board relating to commercial harbor craft and in-use locomotives. Transit Bills - - - 22 ITEM 7.C metrolinktrains.com/meeting ITEM ID: 2025-132-0 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 21, 2025 MEETING DATE: February 28, 2025 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Arnold Hackett, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Financial Results for the First Six Months of FY25 - December 2024 Ridership, Revenue, and Operating Results Issue "Metrolink Reimagined" is the Metrolink term for the transition from commuter rail-based service to a regional provider of general transport. Initiatives designed to realize that transition require timely review of Ridership, Revenue, and Financial Operating Performance to provide assessment of the effectiveness of our efforts. Primary among these initiatives are the optimized services we began providing on October 21, 2024. This report covers monthly reporting on Ridership, Revenue, and Financial Operating Performance for the six months ended December 31, 2024. Recommendation Receive and file. Strategic Commitment This report aligns with the Strategic Business Plan commitments of: Modernizing Business Practices: We will improve our operational efficiency through transparency, objective metrics and streamlined governance, reducing over-reliance on Member support while bringing our system into a state of good repair and investing in the development of our employees. Providing current and accurate information to our Board enhances their oversight, and ability to provide direction based on factual data. 23 Customers Are Our Business: We respect and value our customers, putting them at the heart of all we do, and work hard to attract and retain new customers by understanding their needs and finding new and innovative ways to bring them on board. Our close monitoring of our ridership is a reflection of our unflagging concern for ridership trends, and to ensure our actions are serving their needs. Background This item will report on the ridership and revenue recovery as measured against FY2018-19 (FY19) results, which was the last full year of operations pre-pandemic. Comparisons and variance are shown between the forecast or budget and actual recovery. Comparisons will also be shown between the Ridership, Revenue and Expenses as adopted in the FY25 Budget and actual performance. For FY25, Staff continued its engagement with Sperry Capital/KPMG to lend assistance and additional expertise to our ridership forecasting. Sperry Capital/KPMG provided an analysis to determine the change in ridership and revenue which can be expected as a result of our Optimized Service Schedule. The Farebox Revenue in the FY25 Budget is based on the forecast provided by KPMG/Sperry Capital on February 21, 2024. Ridership and Revenue from the Student Adventure Pass Pilot Program are not included in the FY25 Budgeted Revenue. Operating Statement Comparisons On June 28, 2024, the SCRRA Board of Directors adopted the FY25 Operating Budget for Metrolink. The FY25 Operating Budget reflected Operating Revenue of $68.0M, Expense of $332.1M, and Member Agency Support of $264.0M. On June 28, 2024, the SCRRA Board of Directors also adopted the FY25 Operating Budget for Arrow Service. The FY25 Arrow Service Budget reflects Operating Revenue of $212K, Expense of $15.7M, and Member Agency Support of $15.5M. On September 13, 2024, the SCRRA Board approved an amendment to the FY25 Arrow Service Budget to adjust for a new equipment maintenance agreement. The amendment added $1.1M in Mobilization expense and $0.7 in equipment maintenance expense. The amended FY25 Arrow Service budget now has Operating Revenue of $0.2M, Expense of $17.5M, and Support of $17.3M. Discussion Ridership For the six months ended December 31, 2024, ridership recovery was forecast at a recovery of 59% or 3.5M boardings, while the actual recovery through December is 62% or 3.7M 24 boardings. Total ridership generated by the Student Adventure Pass Pilot program through December was 1.2M. Revenue Through the first six months of FY25, the Authority's farebox revenue actuals exceeded the revenue as budgeted. Farebox revenue is budgeted at $20.0M or a 52% recovery, while the actual farebox revenue is $20.6M, a 53% recovery, over budget by $0.6M. These revenue amounts include the Student Adventure Pass Pilot program. The total amount of revenue from the Student Adventure Pass Pilot program for the six months ended December is $4.1M. Operating Results The Metrolink Operating Statement for the six months ended December 2024 is based on accruals not actuals. Operating Revenue is $32.8M, over budget by $1.4M. Expenses (excluding un-utilized Mobilization) are $145.9M, below budget by $15.3M. Support required is $114.2M, below budget by $16.7M. Cash Issues Outstanding Receivables As of December 31, 2024, Metrolink had $39.2M of past due receivables outstanding. The majority of the past due amount (84%) is owed for the Working Capital Fund, Member Agency Support is 8%. Staff is in the final stages of approving an agreement for the Working Capital Fund monies. Available Cash In December 2024, cash available is $79.9M, which exceeds the $50M threshold established by the Board. Arrow Service Ridership For the first six months of FY25 ridership was forecasted at 68K boardings, while the actual ridership is 74K boardings. Total ridership generated by the Student Adventure Pass Pilot program though the first six months was 39K boardings. Revenue Through December 2024, Arrow Service farebox revenue was budgeted at $96K. Actual farebox revenue was $195K, above budget by $100K. This revenue includes $101K generated by the Student Adventure Pass Pilot program. Operating Results 25 The Arrow Service December 2024 Operating Statement is based on accruals not actuals. Total Operating Revenue is $323K, above budget by $222K. Expenses are $7.7M, below budget by $0.8M. Support required is $7.4M, below budget by $1.0M. Student Adventure Pass Pilot Program Total Student/Youth ridership was 1,192,638 for the six (6) month period July - December 2024, with the modes of purchase being 42% TVD, 58% Mobile App. Next Steps Staff will continue to report on Ridership, Revenue and Financial results monthly. Prepared by: Christine J. Wilson, Assistant Director, Finance Approved by: Arnold Hackett, Chief Financial Officer Attachment(s) Attachment A - Metrolink Operating Statement December 2024 Attachment B - Arrow Operating Statement December 2024 Presentation - December 2024 Financial Results 26 ATTACHMENT A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY PRELIMINARY OPERATING STATEMENT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024 FY25 FY25 VARIANCE FROM BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL OVER/(UNDER) Operating Revenue AMOUNT % Farebox Revenue 20,039,075 16,569,352 (3,469,724) (17.31%) SB Line Fare Reduction 199,606 166,422 (33,183) (16.62%) Mobility 4 All 0 390,508 390,508 0 Student Adventure Pass 0 4,077,447 4,077,447 0 Other Train Subsidies 1,282,711 1,304,960 22,249 1.73% Special Trains 0 39,200 39,200 0 Subtotal Pro Forma Farebox 21,521,392 22,547,889 1,026,497 4.77% Dispatching 1,103,496 1,391,812 288,316 26.13% Other Revenues 2,176,626 2,179,772 3,146 0.14% MOW Revenues 6,563,340 6,693,141 129,801 1.98% Total Operating Revenues 31,364,854 32,812,614 1,447,760 4.62% Student Adventure Pass Member Support 3,211,300 3,211,300 0 0.00% Operations & Services Train Operators 23,888,106 21,428,142 (2,459,964) (10.30%) Train Dispatch 2,828,718 2,800,795 (27,923) (0.99%) Equipment Maintenance 15,838,174 15,535,180 (302,994) (1.91%) Materials 6,198,740 6,740,169 541,429 8.73% Fuel 16,646,586 14,207,209 (2,439,377) (14.65%) Non-Sched Rolling Stock Repairs 75,000 6,048 (68,952) (91.94%) Operating Facilities Maintenance 1,286,903 973,538 (313,365) (24.35%) Other Operating Train Services 486,636 263,870 (222,766) (45.78%) Security - LA Sheriffs 6,392,394 5,969,946 (422,448) (6.61%) Security - Guards 2,669,946 2,593,213 (76,733) (2.87%) Supplemental Security 94,508 0 (94,508) (100.00%) Public Safety Program 26,670 22,875 (3,795) (14.23%) Passenger Relations 990,434 909,931 (80,503) (8.13%) TVM Maint/Revenue Collection 2,283,942 2,374,223 90,281 3.95% Marketing 1,494,830 949,805 (545,025) (36.46%) Media & External Communications 151,926 49,710 (102,216) (67.28%) Utilities / Leases 1,352,034 1,173,755 (178,279) (13.19%) Transfers to Other Operators 1,307,394 1,572,555 265,161 20.28% Amtrak Transfers 335,346 327,901 (7,445) (2.22%) Station Maintenance 3,132,936 2,317,240 (815,697) (26.04%) Rail Agreements 3,460,782 3,387,811 (72,971) (2.11%) Special Trains 266,736 224,178 (42,558) (15.96%) Subtotal Operations & Services 91,208,741 83,828,093 (7,380,647) (8.09%) Maintenance-of-Way MoW - Line Segments 22,447,776 22,815,508 367,732 1.64% MoW Labor & Benefits 2,265,870 2,073,497 (192,373) (8.49%) Overhead MoW Expenses 2,203,571 1,474,462 (729,109) (33.09%) MoW - Extraordinary Maintenance 320,142 251,888 (68,254) (21.32%) Subtotal Maintenance-of-Way 27,237,359 26,615,355 (622,004) (2.28%) Administration & Services Ops Salaries & Benefits 8,631,543 8,835,661 204,118 2.36% Ops Non-Labor Expenses 5,942,180 4,097,044 (1,845,136) (31.05%) Indirect Administrative Expenses 12,262,724 8,686,815 (3,575,909) (29.16%) Ops Professional Services 1,325,640 1,337,805 12,165 0.92% Subtotal Administration & Services 28,162,087 22,957,325 (5,204,761) (18.48%) Contingency 24,637 2,500 (22,137) (89.85%) Total Operating Expenses 146,632,824 136,614,573 (10,018,250) (6.83%) Insurance Expense (Recoveries) Liability/Property/Auto/Misc 9,327,468 8,108,199 (1,219,269) (13.07%) Net Claims / SI 920,376 167,172 (753,204) (81.84%) Claims Administration 1,097,772 994,648 (103,124) (9.39%) Subtotal Insurance Expense (Recoveries) 11,345,616 9,270,019 (2,075,597) (18.29%) Total Expenses 161,189,740 145,884,592 (15,305,147) (9.50%) Mini-Bundle Mobilization 5,169,216 1,124,258 (4,044,958) (78.25%) Total Expenses with Mobilization 166,358,956 147,008,850 (19,350,105) (11.63%) Unbudgeted Special Trains 27 Holiday Trains Revenue 0 246,760 246,760 0 Expense 0 241,592 241,592 0 Surplus / (Deficit) 0 5,168 5,168 0 Insomniac Trains Revenue 0 44,759 44,759 0 Expense 0 16,979 16,979 0 Surplus / (Deficit) 0 27,780 27,780 0 Other Special Trains Revenue 0 0 0 0 Expense 0 0 0 0 Surplus / (Deficit) 0 0 0 0 Net Effect of Unbudgeted Special Trains 0 32,948 32,948 0 Net Loss before San Clemente (134,994,102) (114,163,289) 20,830,813 (15.43%) Member Subsidies before San Clemente 134,994,102 134,994,102 (0) (0.00%) Surplus / (Deficit) before San Clemente (0) 20,830,813 20,830,813 N/A San Clemente Track Work 1,666,191 17,186 (1,649,005) (98.97%) San Clemente #2 2,912,911 17,466 (2,895,445) (99.40%) San Clemente #3 4,003,301 367,524 (3,635,777) (90.82%) Net Loss (143,576,505) (114,565,464) 29,011,041 (20.21%) Member Subsidies 143,576,505 143,576,505 (0) (0.00%) Surplus / (Deficit) (0) 29,011,040 29,011,041 N/A 28 ATTACHMENT B SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY ARROW SERVICE PRELIMINARY OPERATING STATEMENT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024 FY25 FY25 VARIANCE FROM ADJUSTED BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET OVER/(UNDER) Operating Revenue AMOUNT % Farebox Revenue 95,743 94,668 (1,075) (1.12%) Mobility 4 All 4,852 3,815 (1,037) (21.38%) Student Adventure Pass 0 100,613 100,613 0 Subtotal Pro Forma Farebox 100,595 199,096 98,501 97.92% MOW Revenues 0 123,613 123,613 0 Total Operating Revenues 100,595 322,710 222,115 220.80% Student Adventure Pass Member Support 0 85,416 85,416 0 Operations & Services Train Operators 2,099,070 1,939,297 (159,773) (7.61%) Train Dispatch 16,071 3,093 (12,978) (80.76%) Equipment Maintenance 1,675,704 1,707,201 31,497 1.88% Materials 75,000 59,790 (15,210) (20.28%) Fuel 255,108 226,706 (28,402) (11.13%) Operating Facilities Maintenance 166,278 45,083 (121,195) (72.89%) Other Operating Train Services 8,334 1,114 (7,220) (86.63%) Security - SB Sheriffs 1,312,410 1,138,914 (173,496) (13.22%) Security - Guards 134,430 130,917 (3,513) (2.61%) Public Safety Program 8,334 0 (8,334) (100.00%) Passenger Relations 7,038 11,365 4,327 61.48% TVM Maint/Revenue Collection 46,668 44,017 (2,651) (5.68%) Marketing 75,018 24,496 (50,522) (67.35%) Media & External Communications 2,082 0 (2,082) (100.00%) Utilities / Leases 177,456 159,924 (17,532) (9.88%) Transfers to Other Operators 2,002 2,672 670 33.47% Mobilization Arrow 645,624 645,624 0 0.00% Subtotal Operations & Services 6,706,627 6,140,213 (566,414) (8.45%) Maintenance-of-Way MoW - Line Segments 573,462 614,430 40,968 7.14% MoW Labor & Benefits 50,072 42,196 (7,876) (15.73%) Subtotal Maintenance-of-Way 623,534 656,626 33,092 5.31% Administration & Services Ops Salaries & Benefits 533,442 390,915 (142,527) (26.72%) Ops Non-Labor Expenses 110,646 135,019 24,373 22.03% Indirect Administrative Expenses 444,449 235,281 (209,167) (47.06%) Ops Professional Services 3,612 35,525 31,913 883.53% Subtotal Administration & Services 1,092,148 796,740 (295,408) (27.05%) Total Operating Expenses 8,422,309 7,678,995 (743,315) (8.83%) Insurance Expense (Recoveries) Liability/Property/Auto/Misc 52,230 52,230 0 0.00% Net Claims / SI 4,626 0 (4,626) (100.00%) Claims Administration 2,502 0 (2,502) (100.00%) Subtotal Insurance Expense (Recoveries) 59,358 52,230 (7,128) (12.01%) Total Expenses 8,481,667 7,731,225 (750,443) (8.85%) Net Loss (8,381,072) (7,408,515) 972,557 (11.60%) Member Subsidies 8,381,072 8,381,072 0 0.00% Surplus / (Deficit) 0 972,557 972,557 0 29 December 2024 – Financial Results 30 Ridership Actual vs Forecast by Month 31 2 2 FY25 Ridership Forecast vs Actual FORECAST ACTUAL PERIOD BOARDINGS RECOVERY BOARDINGS VARIANCE RECOVERY JULY-24 575,794 58% 587,449 11,655 59% AUGUST-24 604,565 59% 608,408 3,843 59% SEPTEMBER-24 583,347 58% 632,386 49,039 62% FY24 Q1 TOTAL 1,763,706 58% 1,828,243 64,537 60% OCTOBER-24 627,777 59% 676,687 48,910 64% NOVEMBER-24 581,182 59% 649,051 67,869 66% DECEMBER-24 573,564 62% 587,337 13,773 64% FY24 YTD Q2 TOTAL 3,546,230 59% 3,741,319 195,089 62% Fiscal Year to Date 3,546,230 59% 3,741,319 195,089 62% Student Adventure Pass Month of December = 191,433 32 1,153,699 3 3 Year-to-Date = FY25 Budget vs Actual – Farebox Revenue BUDGET ACTUAL PERIOD REVENUE RECOVERY REVENUE VARIANCE RECOVERY JULY-24 $3,653,703 57% $3,297,409 ($356,294) 52% AUGUST-24 $3,655,242 55% $3,369,765 ($285,477) 51% SEPTEMBER-24 $3,596,102 56% $3,475,165 ($120,937) 54% FY25 YTD Q1 TOTAL $ 10,905,048 56% $ 10,142,339 $ (762,709) 52% OCTOBER-24 $3,234,541 48% $3,704,168 $469,627 54% NOVEMBER-24 2,958,164 46% $3,550,259 $592,095 55% DECEMBER-24 2,941,323 50% $ 3,250,032 $308,710 55% FY25 YTD Q2 TOTAL $ 20,039,075 52% $ 20,646,799 $607,723 53% Fiscal Year to Date $ 20,039,075 52% $ 20,646,799 $ 607,723 53% Student Adventure Pass Month of December = $673,246 Year-to-Date = $4,077,447 33 4 4 Note: FY25 Student Adventure Pass reimbursed @ 50% Financial Results for December 2024 SUMMARY: • Before San Clemente, Total Expenses are under budget by $15.3M* • Overall Member Agency Support Required is currently in Surplus by $16.7M* Total Operating Revenue $32.8M or $1.4M Over Plan Total Expenses $145.9M or $15.3M Under Budget* Major Categories below budget: • Administration & Services below budget by $5.2M • Train Operators below budget by $2.5M • Fuel below budget by $2.4M • Insurance/Legal below budget by $2.1M Notes: • Expenses are based on Accruals not Actuals. • *Excludes $4.0M of unused Mobilization. 34 5 Accounts Receivable Update Past Due 35 6 Accounts Receivable Update Past Due 36 7 SCRRA Cash Position October – December 2024 Cash Category ($ in millions) Oct Nov Dec Agency Cash Position Operating Cash $67.3 $89.4 $105.5 Board Threshold 50.0 50.0 50.0 Unrestricted Cash Before

Attachments (4)

117.3. 139.5 155.5

Claims: Less: Claims on Cash (77.0) (76.7) (75.6) Available Cash to Spend: $40.3 $62.8 $79.9 Notes: • November Estimated prior to month/year-end close • Does not include Prop 1B, and Reserve funds (legal, Working Capital Fund) 378 Arrow Service 38 9 FY25 Ridership Forecast vs Actual FORECAST ACTUAL PERIOD BOARDINGS BOARDINGS VARIANCE JULY-24 11,008 11,201 193 AUGUST-24 11,566 11,173 (393) SEPTEMBER-24 11,280 12,272 992 FY24 Q1 TOTAL 33,855 34,646 791 OCTOBER-24 11,931 14,871 2,940 NOVEMBER-24 11,243 12,323 1,080 DECEMBER-24 11,000 11,754 754 FY24 YTD Q2 TOTAL 68,029 73,594 5,565 Fiscal Year to Date 68,029 73,594 5,565 Student Adventure Pass Month of December = 6,164 39 Year-to-Date = 38,939 10 10 FY25 Budget vs Actual – Farebox Revenue BUDGET ACTUAL PERIOD REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE JULY-24 $15,492 $30,484 $14,992 AUGUST-24 $16,279 $29,023 $12,744 SEPTEMBER-24 $15,876 $32,683 $16,807 FY25 YTD Q1 TOTAL $47,647 $92,190 $44,543 OCTOBER-24 $16,791 $34,194 $17,403 NOVEMBER-24 $15,823 $38,640 $22,817 DECEMBER-24 $15,482 $30,258 $14,776 FY25 YTD Q2 TOTAL $95,743 $195,282 $99,539 Fiscal Year to Date $95,743 $195,282 $99,539 Student Adventure Pass 40 Month of December $15,198 11 11 Year-to-Date = $100,613 FY25 Arrow Financial Results for November 2024 Service Financial Operating Revenue is $323K or $222K Results over plan Total Expenses are $7.7M or $750K below plan Support is $7.4M or $1.0M below plan 41 12 Student Adventure Pass Pilot 42 Student Adventure Pass Ridership – TVD vs. Mobile App FY25 Student Adventure Pass July – December 2024 Ventura Antelope San Orange Riverside IEOC 91 Line Arrow TOTAL % County Valley Bernardino County TVD 35,865 160,661 159,596 14,434 57,993 26,541 32,926 17,132 505,148 42% Mobile 74,944 100,671 174,364 20,313 134,233 69,605 91,553 21,807 678,490 58% App Total 110,809 261,332 333,960 34,747 192,226 96,146 124,480 38,939 1,192,638 100% 43 Thank you. 44 ITEM 7.D metrolinktrains.com/meeting ITEM ID: 2024-359-0 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 21, 2025 MEETING DATE: February 28, 2025 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Donald Filippi, Chief Operating Officer SUBJECT: New Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for Qualification and Certification of Dispatchers (Part 245) and Certification of Signal Employees (Part 246) Issue On May 21,2024, The Federal Railroad Administration announced to SCRRA and all other railroads new regulations to develop FRA-approved programs for certifying individuals who perform dispatching tasks and signal employees who work on signal systems and signal- related technology on their networks. Pursuant to this regulation, railroads are required to have formal processes for training dispatchers and signal employees, as well as verifying that each dispatcher and signal employee has the requisite knowledge, skills, safety record, and abilities to safely perform assigned tasks mandated by railroad rules and safety standards and Federal laws and regulations, prior to certification. Authority promptly started assessing the regulation requirements, including financial and human resources, necessary to comply with the regulations. Under this regulation, only the railroad can certify and recertify dispatchers and signal employees. The railroad's certification programs will encompass not only direct railroad employees but also contractors that perform dispatching tasks and/or signal employees who work on signal systems and signal-related technology on their networks. Recommendation Receive and file. Strategic Commitment 45 This report aligns with the Strategic Business Plan commitment of: Safety Is Foundational: We will stay on the leading edge by deploying new technologies and processes to enhance the safety and security of our riders, employees and the communities we serve. The Authority's compliance of new certification programs for dispatchers and signal employees will ensure an increase in safety standards for individuals performing safety-critical tasks of railroad dispatching and working on signal equipment and signal-related technology when working on the Authority's system. Background Per Title 49 CFR Part 245 and 246 FRA regulations, railroad dispatchers and signal employees play an integral role in ensuring the safety of railroad operations, as well as the safety of highway motorists. Dispatchers are responsible for allocating and assigning track use, ensuring that trains are routed safely and efficiently, and ensuring the safety of personnel working on and around railroad tracks. Signal systems are critical to the operation of every railroad and signal employees are responsible for the installation, testing, troubleshooting, repair, and maintenance of signal systems which railroads utilize to direct train movements; signal employees must also use specialized test and maintenance equipment to complete safety critical tasks on mechanical, electrical, and electronic signal equipment. FRA is codifying this regulation in response to section 402 of the RSIA, Public Law 110-432, 122 Stat. 4848, 4884 (Oct. 16, 2008), which required the Secretary of Transportation to submit a report to Congress addressing whether certification of certain crafts or classes of railroad employees or contractors, including railroad dispatchers and signal employees, was necessary to reduce the number of accidents and incidents or to improve safety. Section 402 further provides that the Secretary may prescribe regulations requiring the certification of certain crafts or classes if the Secretary determined, pursuant to the report to Congress, that such regulations are necessary to reduce the number and rate of accidents and incidents or to improve railroad safety. The Secretary of Transportation submitted a report to Congress on November 4, 2015, stating that, based on FRA's preliminary research, dispatchers and signal employees were two of the most viable candidate railroad crafts for certification due to the following: Dispatchers: complex safety-critical work dispatchers perform, the high turnover among dispatchers which has led to a less experienced workforce, and the need to prevent people with active abuse disorders from working as dispatchers. Given the safety critical role of dispatchers in facilitating safe railroad operations (which includes the coordination of emergency services in response to accidents and incidents), FRA determined that the number and rate of accidents and incidents would be expected to decrease and railroad safety would be expected to improve if dispatchers were required to satisfy certain standards and be certified. Signal Employees: with the introduction of Positive Train Control (PTC) technology. Given the safety critical role of signal employees in facilitating safe railroad operations, FRA determined that the number and rate of accidents and incidents would be expected to decrease and railroad safety would be expected to improve if signal employees are required to satisfy certain standards and be certified by each railroad whose signal systems they install, troubleshoot, repair, test, or maintain. 46 Discussion Certification programs will cover all employees (agency staff, contractors, and subcontractors) who are engaged in railroad dispatching and installing, troubleshooting, testing, repairing, or maintaining railroad signal systems or related technology. For the purposes of this regulation, signal systems include software and equipment for block signal systems, cab signal systems, train control systems, positive train control systems, highway-rail and pathway grade crossing warning systems, unusual contingency detection devices, power assisted switches, broken rail detection systems, switch point indicators, as well as other safety-related devices, appliances, technology, and systems installed on the railroad in signaled or non-signaled territory. This regulation requires railroads to develop written programs for certifying individuals who work as dispatchers and signal employees on their territories, and to submit those written certification programs to FRA for approval prior to implementation no later than September 17,

Attachments (184)

Agenda Items

  1. 00:00:15 Call to Order The chair opened the meeting and invited two new board members to introduce themselves.
  2. 00:00:18 Safety Briefing Staff reviewed emergency procedures for fire, earthquake, first aid, and active-shooter situations at the meeting location.
  3. 00:04:41 Public Comment Paul Dyson urged better coordination among Metrolink, Amtrak, LOSSAN, Union Pacific, counties, and the state to improve customer service and rail infrastructure.
  4. 00:08:44 REGULAR CALENDAR The board heard regular-calendar presentations on Title VI outreach for schedule changes, legislative and regulatory updates, six-month financial results, FRA dispatcher and signal employee certification requirements, and the 2024 safety, security, and compliance report.
  5. 01:15:09 Chief Executive Officer's Report The CEO previewed strategic business plan follow-up, reported on Washington, D.C. meetings focused on LA28 funding and FRA issues, and summarized the holiday train program's partnerships and financial results.
  6. 01:21:47 Board Members' Comments Board members asked about state budget support and contingency planning for LA28 funding and praised staff's Valentine's Day customer outreach.
  7. 01:25:46 Chair's Comments The chair encouraged directors to attend the upcoming board workshop to strengthen collaboration and shared understanding of the organization.

Transcript

Warning: This transcript is automatically generated by machine and may contain errors, including misheard words, misattributed speakers, and omitted passages. Always listen to the audio or video recording before assuming the transcript correctly reflects what was said. Do not rely on the transcript alone for quotation, reporting, or any other purpose where accuracy matters.
1. Call to Order
Good morning everyone. That's my pleasure to call this meeting to order and
2. Safety Briefing
We'll start with our safety briefing Hillary Kanzal our Chiefs of Safety and Security and compliance
We'll go as a safety precinct
Good morning board chair nice to have you on the job board members. Thank you glad to be here
As you know we're at one Gateway Plaza in the Metro boardroom in the event of a fire alarm activation
We'll head out the doors. We came into there to my left your right and
We'll go down the stairs head out to the front of the building and immediately go to our right
We'll congregate or we'll meet in front of the customer service area
in the event of an earthquake
we're going to drop down and take cover and wait till the shaking stops and
That is something new to me because I'm from Chicago, so I haven't been in an earthquake yet
Again, be aware of your surroundings
in case we do have to exit the building.
There may be some tripping hazards and that sort of thing.
In the event of a first aid situation,
we do have first responders in the back of the room.
They will get the AED device and perform CPR if necessary.
In the event of an active shooter,
we'll use the run, hide, fight tactic.
If there's any questions that'll conclude my safety briefing.
Any questions?
Thank you for the briefing, appreciate it.
We have two new board members who are here
for their very first board meeting.
I'd like to call on Linda Molina from the Riverside Transit
Agency, and Eric Olson from LA Metro.
Would you please introduce yourself, starting with Linda.
Good morning.
I'm an LA girl, so it's nice to be here.
I'm currently the Mayor of the City of Calimas and Riverside County, but I worked the first
three miles of Metroville back in the 80s.
I have my little brass tag from when you go under tunnels, you put your one on your body
and one on the boards of you, blow up, they know who you were.
So it's kind of come full circle, I'm so happy to be here.
I've waited a while to get on this board, I'm so happy to be here and contribute as
much as I can.
Thank you for having me.
Thank you.
And Eric.
All right. Well, in that case, Linda, would you lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance?
I'd be honored. Please join me in saluting our flag.
I pledge allegiance to the United States of America, and to the Republic.
Madam Secretary, do we have any public commenters?
I have to take a roll call first.
Sorry?
I have to do the roll call first.
Oh, I've...
I am out of order myself this morning. Sorry about that.
Oh, go ahead.
Do we have the roll call?
Certainly.
Director Nguyen?
Director Demetriu, Director Carroll, Vice Chair Burksen,
Director Spiegel, Director Vargas, Director Molina,
Second Vice Chair Tremblay, Director Engler,
Director Barger, Director Najarian,
Director Solis, Director Olson, Director Allen,
Director Presiado, Director O'Connor,
Director McAllen here director Wapner
directed you Trey
director Marquez
Chair Chafee present we do have a quorum just to know Riverside has everybody here
Nobody has everybody else here. So first time that we've been the only one with everybody here. I
Think we'll pass on any comments to that
All right now we have a
5. Public Comment
We comment any we do have a request to speak from Paul Dyson as a public comment and then also again for item 7c
All right, mr. Dyson
Mr. Chairman
Congratulations on your appointment as chair
Mr. Chair of board members, I'm Paul Dyson
Vice president of rail passengers Association of California and a Burbank resident
Last Friday, I took a trip up to Santa Barbara
to the Coast Rail Coordinating Council meeting
where one of the items for discussion
was a proposed service from Ventura County to Santa Barbara
and return using a Metrolink equipment, a Metrolink service.
It's something that we've been advocating for some time,
but it raised some interesting issues.
Part of the proposal is for a return trip
Santa Barbara to Los Angeles at about 10 a.m.
which fills a useful gap in the service.
But of course, the question is, is it a Metrolink train
or is it a Surfliner train?
How do you split the revenue?
What happens if you have a bicycle
and you want to go one way,
but the Surfliner train coming back won't take the bicycle?
What happens if you want to use a cafe car?
It brings up a lot of interesting administrative questions
that lead to confusion for the would-be passenger.
On the way back, it was unfortunate to be involved
in an incident with a car in the Strawberry Fields
of Ventura County, and our train was delayed
for some hours, but again, it highlighted the point
that involved were Union Pacific,
as we were on their piece of railroad.
Metrolink had trains coming in the opposite direction
that were heavily delayed, and the Amtrak train
that we were on, and the subsequent train
were also heavily delayed.
I was about five hours late getting home.
Again, the question is, with all these agencies involved,
who is really responsible?
Who is there to take care of the customer
and to make sure that we get the best outcome
for everybody's customer?
Those with Metrolink tickets
and those with Amtrak tickets?
Part of the problem with the reason
why the delay was so bad, of course,
was that we're on a single-track railroad
and we're still on a single-track railroad
because we've spent over 30 years with this agency
and with Losan accomplishing very little
in terms of infrastructure improvement.
Who is really in charge?
The county, the state, Losan, Metrolink.
Is there anybody that you can point out
and say it's your job to get this done?
SB 1098 was passed last year,
which is a very small move in the right direction,
but the request of you folks is not just to do your job
of running this agency, but to think in terms of how,
in the big picture of Southern California regional rail,
what's gonna be the best way to do the job,
would we not be better off unifying these agencies
so that we have a single point of contact for the customer,
we have a single organization running the trains,
and not have this confusion and overlap?
Thank you for your time.
Thank you for your comments.
That's the only public comment.
All right, our next item is our consent calendar,
which are items 11A through 11N.
Directors may ask for consideration on an item separately
as may the members of the public.
Do we have any members of public asking for a separate?
None?
Directors?
All right, we'll take that together then.
I have a motion for approval.
I see a light on.
Motion to approve?
Motion to approve, is there a second?
Are there any other comments, objections?
No, motion carries.
Thank you all.
7. REGULAR CALENDAR
Move on to our regular calendar.
And the first thing is item 7A presented by Brian Jacob,
our planning manager.
Please proceed.
Good afternoon, Chair, members of the board.
Next slide, please.
In October 2024, the authority launched
a system-wide schedule change,
which offers increased frequency,
better connections and more service during weekdays.
The authority further adjusted the schedules
for the San Bernardino, Ventura, and airlines in January
to address on-time performance challenges
and align services across multiple lines.
Next slide, please.
The authority is required to perform
a Title VI equity analysis and associated public outreach
for any major service change in effect
for more than six months to determine
if the changes have disparate impacts
for minority populations or post disproportionate burden
to low-income populations.
To this end, staff is requesting the board
to approve the initiation
of a Title VI public comment process.
Should the board approve this request,
the authority will notify the public
through different mediums including electronic
station message boards, email notifications,
social media, and public notices
in limited English proficiency languages.
Next slide, please.
In line with our public outreach plan,
a virtual public meeting will be held on March 26th
regarding the schedule change and Title VI analysis.
E-comments will be accepted through April 15th,
and staff will present the results of the public outreach
and Title VI equity analysis to the board
during the April 25th meeting.
Next slide, please.
This concludes my presentation,
but I'm happy to take any questions you might have.
Any questions?
Let's go ahead, Director McAllen.
Thank you very much.
I just have a comment to make on Thursday, Wednesday and Friday, I rode the train today
and they were on time to the minute.
So the adjustments we've made to the schedule, especially the San Bernardino line, are achieving
what we want on time performance and I understand that we've also got increased ridership and
The important thing at this point is to get increase in ridership and have on-time performance so our customers
Can rely on us?
Thank you, and I'll move the item
Any other questions do we have any public comment or send us item?
We do not have any public comment on this item
Hey
Moved and seconded any more questions injections?
Motion carries unanimously. Thank you
At this time we have a special guest
Thank you and a part also
No, I just want to know who you are and
How you're joining this organization, and I'd like to welcome you as well. Thank you so much
For those that don't know me my name is Eric Olson. I'm a council member in the city of Palmdale
I was just appointed to be the alternate to Supervisor Barger
I'm happy to be here even though it took me two hours and 15 minutes to drive 55 miles
Sorry, I'm late.
I would have had to have been here two hours early.
Yeah, we always are looking forward to schedule changes
that are increasing ridership.
All right, thank you for joining us.
Our next items are received and filed,
but as the presentations are made, questions and comments are
welcome as are public comments as well.
So now, Mr. Dunn, will you please inform us what's going on with the legislature if you can?
I will do my best. I promise nothing more. Next slide, please.
In local matters, let me begin with the highlights found in your report concerning wildfire assistance.
Metrolink has delivered in total hundreds of round-trip promotional passes to verified community-based organizations
and elected official offices to distribute to their constituents and community members who
are in need. Additionally, staff distributed over 300 passes to organizations and residents
at a donation site in Santa Anita shortly after the Eaton fire. We are proud to be able to offer
straightforward, easy-to-access assistance to affected individuals impacted by the fires and
needing the public transportation that we can provide. In other community events, on February 18th,
staff participated in the LA Metro's Girls Empowerment Summit with an
informational booth on Metrolink service and our programs such as the
Student Adventure Pass. The event was attended by 200 girls from area high
schools providing an opportunity for them to interact directly with public
agencies and private companies and transportation to both educate them
about and explore careers within the transportation industry. In addition,
staff also joined LA Metro at a community meeting on February 20th for
the Pico Rivera regional rail station feasibility study.
Metro and the city of Pico Rivera
are conducting the feasibility study
for a potential new passenger rail station,
which could be served by Metrolink
and or Amtrak in the future.
The meeting was an opportunity for community members
to learn more about the study,
the benefits of such a station and Metrolink staff
and informational booth to share details
about our expanded service schedule
and our discount passes that we now offer.
Next slide.
Turning to state matters, the California Air Resources Board withdrew its request for a waiver from the US EPA that, if issued, would have authorized state regulation of passenger and freight locomotive regulations.
Without the federal waiver, key elements of the state's end-use locomotive regulation likely are not enforceable.
Metrolink and CARB remain in communication on next steps as we await more information on how and if it will move forward with the end-use locomotive regulation.
With respect to the state budget introduced last month by Governor Newson,
projecting an overall state surplus, we should remember that the impacts of
state wildfires were not known at the time of introduction and are still not
fully assessed. And budget deliberations are just beginning in the State House. A
particular area of focus for Metrolink will be the reauthorization of cap and
trade legislation, which is expected to pass this year, extending authorization
of the cap and trade program and expenditures beyond 2030.
We will look to this program to continue and plus up existing funding MetroLink receives
from programs funded by cap and trade such as the LC TOPPS grant program funding our
student adventure pass as well as other opportunities to provide direct capital and operational
assistance to the railroad.
Additionally, a number of legislative bills have been introduced by or before the deadline
last Friday that we are watching closely but have not yet taken position on at least yet.
These include SB 30 by Senator Dave Cortese of San Jose, who is chair of the Senate Transportation
Committee. This bill would prohibit public agencies from selling or donating decommissioned
diesel engine locomotives and other track equipment. CTA soon will be circulating to
members statewide a sign-on letter detailing potential issues with the legislation next
week though they are not asking agencies to take formal position on the bill at
this early juncture. The next bill AB 939 by Assemblymember Nick Schultz of
Burbank recently introduced and co-sponsored by LA Metro authorizes the
issuance of 20 billion dollars in general obligation bonds to finance
transportation improvements making specifically four billion dollars
available to inner-city regional and commuter rail passenger rail
improvements such funding would only be available for capital and not operating
expenses finally AB 394 by assembly member Lori Wilson of Vallejo who chairs
the assembly transportation committee this bill would apply existing
punishments for assaults against transit workers and drivers to all transit
employees and contractors it broadens existing trespass protections and court
issued protection orders enhancing each to make railroad property and workers
more safe and secure. The bill supports protections long
advocated for by CTA and supported by Metrolinx board adopted
legislative program. Next slide please. Federal matters, the big news is our
CEO Mr. Kettle, accompanied by government relations senior manager Anna Denneke
just returned from a very productive trip to Washington DC where we were able
to introduce Metrolinx to new members and key committee staffs of the 119th
Congress. Mr. Cuddle will have much to share on this in his report in a little
bit and that I know will be of interest to you. I will confine my remarks to the
appropriations process that is currently ongoing. As I know many of you are aware
the federal government is currently operating by continuing resolution at
FY 24 spending levels. That funding expires on March 17, St. Patrick's Day.
Unless the FY 25 bill appropriating new funding is passed by that date or more
More likely, another CR is passed, which keeps funding at status quo levels.
The important thing to note is, if the Congress cannot agree on an FY25 spending bill and
precedes the remainder of the year by CR, then the earmarks we have secured in the current
bill would not be enacted.
Hours and all earmarks would not pass.
So while there is considerable partisan divide in Congress on spending levels, there is also
strong impetus for members to pass a bill delivering immediate, tangible benefits to
their districts.
The accepted Metrolink earmarks into the bill for your information include a $500,000 request
for fiber network system from Simi Valley to Moorpark offered by Representative Julia
Brownlee, a $750,000 request for wireless crossing near-side station stop at Sylmar
San Fernando Station, offered by Tony Cardenas, and a $250,000 request for the same WCNSS
at the Burbank Airport, offered by then Representative and now Senator Adam Schiff.
Please note that none of this impacts the current Earbark process for the FY26 Appropriations
Bill, which has not yet been drafted.
This would be for the federal fiscal year, 2026, that begins on October 1st of this year.
We are in the process of identifying our priority projects internally and will submit to members
of our delegation through March and April as we receive submission forms and deadlines,
which vary by office in the coming weeks.
We will fully apprise the board of these submissions in the process as it moves forward following
resolution to the current fiscal year funding situation.
This concludes my remarks and I'm happy to take questions if there are any.
Board members, yes.
Director Spiegel.
I have a question on the locomotive rule. Can you kind of reiterate that or explain it?
Well, the locomotive rule was...
India's locomotive rule is very comprehensive.
Most, I would say most aggressive,
assertive rule to curb carbon emissions
in the country. It would have required, essentially, for
our railroad, converting all of our fleet
and not being able to purchase new rolling stock
unless it were zero emitting after 2030.
Now, as you know on this board,
there is no such technology feasible in the United States
that has been approved or even close to production
for moving our trains and trains
that are full locomotive sets as big as they are
across distances approved in this country.
That's not expected for years, probably, into the future.
So what we have been trying to do, our strategy,
assuming that the in-use locomotive
were to go into full operation,
we've been trying to convert
the remaining tier two locomotives
to tier four buyer before 2030.
We have 15 such locomotives.
By doing so, that buys us the full useful life
over the next two to three decades
for the technology to catch up
so that every train that we retire after 2030,
we could replace by a zero emission locomotive.
Hopefully that would be approved for service.
However, because the in use locomotive rule now,
because the federal waiver application
has been withdrawn, is in flux,
we don't know when or if it will be fully implemented.
The impetus to convert all of those 15 locomotives
is not as strong by 2030.
We're going to continue to do so
because you have directed us to become zero emission
or as clean as possible, as quickly as possible,
and we will continue to explore every grant
and other funding opportunity to do that.
But that's essentially where we are
with the end-use locomotive.
So do you find that CARB is a little overreaching then
for their position?
I mean, let me explain where I'm coming from.
Linda was at that meeting I was at yesterday,
and our partners in transit,
buses are having the same challenge with CARB.
And they now have a bus, one bus, in the entire United States,
and I don't know if it was beyond,
that meets the criteria.
They're charging two to three times the cost it should be.
So when you have one company, they're forcing us.
And we got a grant from the federal government.
And somehow, I don't know how, they
are blocking our grant, because we're not
getting exactly what they want.
Where does CARB?
I'm just trying to understand their authority level.
Well, a CARB has the authority to regulate passenger rail and bus within the State of
California.
The issue, of course, is that when you have a rail or service that crosses interstate
lines then it becomes more of a federal level executive authority.
I think from CARB's perspective, at least from the experience that was expended of bus
transit before rail which is ahead of us.
Kind of the approach was let's set a very ambitious target
and then as an incentive for the industry to move quicker
to get towards that and then if it can't make that target
then make adjustments in the rules to accommodate
the industry as it moves forward.
So I would assume that would have been,
would be the strategy for CARB within the rail sector
but that's completely speculative on that part.
I was just curious on that.
And then, so metronically, because they are in California
only, we don't, but we still have FRA roles that we follow.
So it's kind of both then.
Just trying to get it, did I cover that, Linda?
Very well, thank you.
Thank you, Director McKellen?
Thank you very much.
As you know, I sit on the AQMD board,
and I have asked CARB to provide clarity
on whether the in-use locomotive rule,
as it deals with passenger rail within California,
still applies because although they withdrew
the waiver request, the waiver request really
doesn't have anything to do with passenger rail in California.
They have yet to come back to AQMD with any clarity
on that issue and how they're going to proceed,
either with the in-house used locomotive rule
or the truck rule that they also pulled away around.
So yet to be seen, but it's unclear
whether they are going to enforce the other parts
of the in-house locomotive rule or not.
And if I could, Mr. Chair,
as we've wrestled with this in-house locomotive rule
from for the last several years,
it's always been clear that to have a success
of the industry having enough of incentive
to actually go and manufacture zero-emission locomotives,
you have to have a large enough market.
With the pulling back of the waiver,
the freight locomotive industry is not gonna go
in that direction.
So you have a very, very small subset
of passenger locomotives, and there is no manufacturer
that is going to go through the R&D and everything else
to get zero emission locomotive set up for passengers.
I think there, I would hope that there would be
some practical thinking in this.
And so that is why our team is gonna be in contact
with CARB making sure that we're all on the same page.
To a certain degree, because the intent was going
after freight locomotives in the first place,
knowing that we already do a lot to clean the air
and reduce greenhouse gas emissions
just by the very nature of our service.
You couldn't just go after freight railroads.
CARB could not just go after freight railroads.
It was the whole family of railroads, including ourselves.
And to a degree, we were maybe caught in friendly fire
or at least collateral damage,
if you'll forgive the metaphors there.
But that's what we're,
that's I think where we ultimately are going to be
and why we're gonna be watching it closely.
Thank you, am I seeing any other,
yeah, seeing that I do have one comment myself.
I know we're trying to correct the potential
for more damage along our coastal metro link
in the San Clemente area.
And we have a permit request pending
before the coastal commission.
We've asked for a emergency permit and they have denied it.
Instead, they wanted us to go through the regular, long regulatory process.
Apparently, the definition of emergency is as long as the train runs, it's not an emergency.
We've identified four spots that could, at any time, collapse along the tracks.
We think there's an emergency.
So there is a bill.
It was introduced by Assemblyperson Sharon Quitsilva.
And if I may put it politely to encourage the Coastal Commission to move more quickly.
So this was pending as long as we could experience another collapse because we know where the
hot spots are.
And so it's very frustrating that we can't get the permit we need.
We're ready to go.
So if you keep an eye on that, we appreciate it.
We definitely will.
There were 1,000 bills that were introduced in the last week before the deadline, so we'll
Make sure we find that one and closely track it for you
and keep you updated.
We're working on it.
Well, that's a fun one, so please track it.
And Madam Clerk, do you have any public commenters
on this item?
I believe Director Tremblay wanted to make a comment.
Oh, are you sure?
I do not have any request to speak on this item.
All right, this is a receiving file item, no objection.
It is deemed to be received and filed.
Our next item is our hopefully happy results
with our six months financial report by Christine Wilson,
our Assistant Director of Finance.
Hi. Good morning.
I am Chris Wilson, Assistant Director
of Finance presenting item 7C, financial results
for the six months ending December 31st.
Next slide, please.
This slide shows our ridership performance for each
of the six months this year.
The orange line tracks forecast while the columns are actuals.
The blue section, regular ridership, the orange section,
the student adventure pass.
As you can see, the month of December
is very close to forecast.
Next slide.
This is a Metrolink ridership forecast
versus actual by month with the forecast displayed
through the end of the fiscal year.
Through six months, ridership was forecast at 3.5 million
or a 59% recovery from pre-COVID.
Actual ridership for the same period
was 3.7 million, a favorable variance of 195,000,
and a recovery of 62%.
1.2 million of these riders were students
using the student adventure pass.
Next slide please.
Here we're looking at the farebox revenue.
Through the six months ended 12-31-24.
The budget for farebox revenue was 20 million,
or a 52% recovery.
The actuals were $20.6 million, a $600,000 positive variance, a 53% recovery.
The student adventure pass contributed $4.1 million to the actual amount.
Next slide.
Financial performance through the first half saw expenses under budget by $15.3 million.
Number agency support is a surplus of $16.7 million.
Total operating revenue was 32.8 million
or 1.4 million over budget.
At 145.9 million, expenses were under budget by 15.3 million.
The major categories contributing
to the underage are as shown on the slide.
Next slide, please.
Past two receivables and cash matters having been, oh, sorry.
She didn't cover them because she was unconcent.
This is the accounts receivable update.
And as you can see, pass-due receivables
by account and category.
At December 31st, we had $39.2 million
in pass-due receivables.
The great portion of that, $29 million related
to the working capital,
which we have now actually received a check for.
So that's really off the table.
Next slide, please.
As you can see, this is a breakdown of the amounts
that were due, giant amount was working capital funds,
which we've got.
Next slide.
This is the cash position of SCRRA at December 31st.
And as you can see, we were at $79.9 million
in available cash.
That is well over the $50 million threshold established
by the board.
Next slide, please.
This is the next one.
It looks like a bunch of stuff's missing.
Okay, three, six months, next slide.
Three, six months,
ridership for the Arrow were forecasted at 68,000
as an actual ridership of 74,000,
over forecast by 5.6,000 or 8%.
39% of this, 39,000 of this
is student adventure pass ridership.
Next slide.
We see here the Fairbox Revenue for Arrow.
Through the first six months, Fairbox Revenue was budgeted
at 95.7 thousand while the actual was 195.3 thousand.
100 thousand or 104 percent over budget.
101 thousand of the amount is from the Student Adventure Pass.
Next slide please.
Overall, for the six months ending December,
Operating revenue for ARO was 323,222,000 over budget.
A great portion of this is related to maintenance away revenue
that was not known at the time we did the budget.
Expenses are 7.7 million or 750,000 below budget,
while support required is 7.4 million
or one million below plan.
Next slide.
Next slide please.
This is a brief overview of the Student Adventure Pass status,
including Metro Lincoln Arrow total ridership generated
by Student Adventure Pass year to date in FY25 is 1.2 million.
These tickets were obtained through both the mobile app
and the TVM machines in the ration of 42% TVMs
and 52% mobile apps.
This concludes my report.
May I answer any questions?
directors any questions
that will happen
thank you very much
significant uh... they're significant projections are increases and uh... both
ridership
unfair box revenue for january
you have any idea
with the january figures are going to be showing
uh... i think they're they're they're not going to be as big as those are sure
we have actually had
KPMG do a new forecast, and we will be bringing that as an amendment to the budget in March,
along with a number of other things.
One of the other things we didn't do when we created the budget for 25 is that we did
not include student and venture pass revenue that was being provided to us by LC-TOP.
So when we're doing this amendment we're reducing the regular ridership and that'll come down
and we're including the amount that we're getting on the LC top revenue, which it offsets
to a great extent.
Thank you Chris.
Nice hat.
Thank you.
You must have several in your closet.
I do.
Thank you Director Bergson.
Thank you.
obviously the one thing that sticks out to me is the student adventure pass
ticket numbers and I think 37,000 is about a third of all the other lines
excluding arrow service. I just have to put out what are we doing that's doing
so well everywhere else that we're not doing in Riverside so hopefully we can
look at this in a microscopic way to figure out why we can't seem to get the number.
There should be a schedule change. Is there some issue that we're
encountering that is preventing students from using it or is there something
else? We need to kind of dig it out and it's not necessarily during this
particular item but because it's on that slide it's appropriate to at least have
conversation and get this started. So if I could Mr. Chair, Vice Chair
Burksen, so we are we're constantly analyzing this program. The Riverside
participation is a bit of an anomaly given the other where we have the other
with the other four counties. What we also though know and as we're
developing this budget and we'll be sharing more with the board we've
already shared this with the member agency executives as well as the
finance officers, is that the success of the program has been so great that we've
completely tapped out the grant. So we will be coming back in the next budget
cycle with a modification to the program because we simply can't afford to keep
doing it. Our member agencies, we're not in a position to continue to help
financially support it. So we're going to be tweaking the program as we look
towards the next budget cycle. Again, we have two lines that serve
Riverside. One of the challenges with the Riverside line is it's the line with our
least amount of service. It also wasn't very close to many schools. We have fewer numbers
there. And then on the 91 Paris Valley line and the IEOC line, a little bit more service,
but again, we have the challenge of, particularly universities and other schools that are proximate
to those lines, with maybe Fullerton, Cal State Fullerton being one of the few that
is near it, but we've marketed this thing with every university in Southern California
and how we've had takers, but it does happen to oftentimes just relate to the proximity
of a campus to a station. That said, as we look at Student Adventure Pass 2.0, we're
going to keep figuring out how do we better make sure that we're – this is a regional
We wanted to be successful region-wide.
More director comments?
Anne, do we have any public speakers on this?
I'll call Paul Dyson up to speak.
Please.
Mr. Chairman and board, once again, Paul Dyson with Railpaq.
I joined Railpaq in 1980 when I came to this country and I was impressed by this group
that concerns itself not just with trains, although we like trains, but we concern ourselves
with value for money for the customer, the taxpayer, and for trains being effective providers
of transportation. We don't support just any train anywhere.
And we are really concerned about the Arrow service. I did some back-of-the-envelope numbers
last night. It looks like, and perhaps you can correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks
It looks like a costing, operating cost to about $21 a passenger and on average it's
maybe three or four people per train.
It's a target.
I mean it really is a target for those naysayers of people that detract us from what we're
trying to accomplish here to run a service that's simply not doing the job.
So that's my comment.
It just, to me it won't do.
Just one other supplemental comment on this item.
There's mention made of forecasts by KPMG of ridership.
I would think that with given the years of experience that those forecasts probably could
just as well be generated in-house and be just as accurate.
And I questioned how much we're paying this outside service for this forecast.
Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Dyson.
Are there any more public commenters?
none. Any more director questions? Seeing none, this is a receiving file item without objection.
It is received and filed. And we move on to our next one, which is the rather lengthy
new code of federal regulations, and our deputy chief operating officer, Louis Kroskatero,
has been charged with that task. Would you please explain it to us?
I will do my best.
Good morning, Chair and members of the board.
Next slide please.
So starting off on May 21st of 2024,
FRA announced a new regulations requiring railroads
to develop certification programs
for dispatchers and signal employees.
These regulations require the railroad
to certify dispatcher and signal employees
starting September 17th, 2025.
I will clarify that when the regulations came out,
the original deadline was March 17th of 2025.
And since then, FRA has issued a six-month extension
for the submission date line,
hence the September 17th date.
The certification requires training
to be spelled out in the programs,
verification of requisite knowledge,
skills, and safety records,
the ability to safely and successfully perform assigned tasks,
and the completion of drug and alcohol and medical exams.
Each employee must be recertified
no later than every three years.
Next slide, please.
As a summary of who must be certified,
the individuals in the following crafts,
we have the traditional signal employees
and the dispatch employees,
but as well under the eyes of the FRA PTC
positive train control is a signal system.
So those agency employees under the IDTS group
and operations would fall under this new regulation,
as well as the mechanical employees
who are maintaining the PTC system
on our trains and our cap cars.
Individuals not certified by September 17th,
2025 will be prohibited from performing these duties.
Certified employees who are absent for more than 12 months
from performing the work will need to be recertified
before resuming work.
Next slide, please.
Here are some examples of new authority responsibilities
under these new regulations.
The authority must administer both certification programs.
The authority must request and review
state and federal driving records
for those employees who will be certified.
The authority must request and review safety
and training records from other railroads
employed those individuals prior to Metrolink certifying or recertifying those individuals.
The authority must track and store all certification records and backup documentation, and the
authority must issue certification certificates to those individuals.
Next slide, please.
This also comes to impacts to third-party signal projects, so those third-party contractors
will be prohibited from self-certifying given that the regulation says that only the railroad
may certify those individuals.
authority will be required to provide a certified mentor to all uncertified
third-party contractors. Meaning that that certified mentor must be in direct
and immediate proximity of those individuals who are uncertified when
they are performing the work and that certified mentor needs to sign off on
all the work that they perform for signal work. The certified mentor will be
responsible for all of those individuals under their supervision and we have been
closely working with our chief program delivery officer Justin Fonelli and his
staff determining the impact that this will have on all third party work in the
coming future once this regulation is in place. Next slide please. So here's a
roadmap to certification as I mentioned on May 21st, 2024, FRA announced the
regulations from May through July of 2024 staff assessed the impacts to the
agency. On July 30th of 2024 staff presented an assessment to the authority
XLT as far as how do we get to compliance of these regulations. On
On September 5th of 2024, staff launched a working group composed of all impacted departments,
including operations, dispatching, IDTS, safety program delivery, human resources, finance
and legal, and impacted contractors to develop the certification programs.
In January 2025, staff completed and submitted draft certification programs to FRA.
Liberal unions are legal and safety departments for the review and feedback.
I will say that this morning at 8 o'clock, we did have a meeting with FRA to go over
There are comments to our certification programs.
They mentioned that we have a very good program in place.
They provide a valuable feedback that we will use to update our plan and submit it by the
deadline.
Staff continues working with key stakeholders to identify and secure funding, staffing and
administrative needs for FY26 and beyond and staff intends to meet the submittal deadline
of September 17, 2025.
Next slide, please.
Budget impact.
identified key financial investments that would be required from the authority to meet
these regulations. Below are some examples of funding, staffing and administrative needs.
Additional authority FTEs to administer the certification program for over 300 individuals.
Those 300 are composed of around 30 for dispatch and 270 for signal employees. Compliance tracking
software to assist the authority on storing and ensuring compliance of certification program
across all individuals for the various training, testing, and evaluation elements, and that
would be not only for Metrolink employees, but also for Metrolink contractors, or certified
signal employees.
Required physical exams for authority staff subject to certification programs, medical
examiner expenses, required state and federal DMV record review, required additional training,
and the additional contracted labor for tracking signal and rolling stock maintenance contractors,
only for the operations maintenance aspect of it, but also for the capital and rehab
projects as well. Next slide, please. That concludes my presentation. I'd be happy
to answer any questions. Any questions from Director Spiegel?
If I could before Director Spiegel, just real quick follow-up, sorry.
Really? I know, I know, it's a big mistake. Sorry
about that. Just a couple of, just to, I want to add on,
as Mr. Dunn had indicated, I was in D.C. earlier this week, and one of the meetings I had was
with the new FRA chief counsel,
and this was a topic that came up in discussion.
I think we are going to get more,
there's going to be more information
as it relates to the time for implementation
and other elements.
I think FRA at the senior level is,
I don't think we're going to get completely out
of the obligations under this CFR,
but I think they're going to be a little bit more
Thought given and an opportunity for some some modifications, so I think we stay tuned at this point
We raise the issues related to third-party contractors in our ability to certify. Why would we be certifying third-party contractors?
They are they are taking a different approach than the prior administration
The chief counsel is the senior appointed FRA staffer at this point
Given that the FRA administrator has yet to be confirmed
So there is, I think there will be more news to come on this issue.
They were, they have heard, they have heard the concerns of railroads and particularly
commuter railroads like ours and short line railroads where what is being requested is
a very, very heavy lift.
You know, our team has done a great job being ready for when it happens, but we may have
a little bit more time in which to execute.
Director Spiegel.
So this basically sounds like another unfunded mandate.
That's correct.
And I know the safety of our passengers is number one.
So we can't say this is a bunch of bull.
So we have to recognize that there's a reason for it.
With that being said, do we, the positions that you gave us earlier, and they all are,
are most of our contractors and subs union?
Correct.
Yes?
So why would the unions not be responsible for this training because they are in other
areas.
So under the eyes of the FRA, the regulation falls on the railroad because every railroad
has a unique signal system and unique dispatching system.
So a signal employee that is certified by BNSF on BNSF will deal with different signal
equipment signal software hardware signal rules and under the eyes of the
FRA in the background the preamble of the regulation they believe that it is
best suited for the railroad who should know their own system to certify the
individuals as opposed to the contractors that may be dealing with a
multitude of variables between properties. I'll wait to see what they
say when we have our new FRA director. It is a very complex and I get it and as
long as we stay focused at the number one priority is our passengers and our
employees. That's the only reason I could not blow it all off but it is a very
you didn't give us a cost but I can tell you what's expected is going to be
costly. Thank you for the comment appreciate that any other director
comments any public comments? I've not received any written public comments or
request to speak on this item okay this again is a receiving final item if no
objection the matter is deemed received and filed we come on to our 2024 year end
system safety security and compliance report and again like to call up really
console our chief of safety security and compliance compliance part is important
Do we have your report, sir?
Good morning again, Chairman and members of the board.
Next slide.
Today I'm gonna go over the 2024 year end review
and look ahead for 2025.
This report is over and above our quarterly report
that is provided to the board, next slide.
So some of the highlights for 2024,
The arrival of the ZIMU triggered an amendment
to our system safety program plan,
which required us to conduct a hazard analysis
on the vehicle.
The preliminary hazard analysis is required by the FRA
before it goes into revenue service.
Our incident response plan was also revised
to include incident levels and to align the plan
with FEMA requirements.
Our passenger train emergency preparedness plan
was also revised to include ZEMO
and conditionally approved by the FRA in December of 2024.
And finally, our security team
successfully deployed six mobile CCTV units
along the right-of-way in its select facilities.
These mobile units are currently placed
on the Ventura and Orange County subs
as well as San Gabriel,
and at our consolidated maintenance facility,
and Keller Yard.
These units were purchased to combat trespassers
along the railroad right away in our facilities.
Our department collects and analyzes a large amount of data.
The data provides us with real-time information
which is used and helps us identify potential risks
and hazards for us to develop corrective actions.
Next slide.
Getting into the data, the slide might be a little bit busy,
but I'll break it down for you.
This is actually a, this slide indicates
a total number of trespasser reports
received from crew members by subdivision
over the last three years.
I'm happy to report that the total number
of reported trespassers has decreased
over the last three years.
From 2022 to 2023, there was a 14% reduction in trespassers.
From 2023 to 2024, we saw a 13% reduction in trespassers.
Next slide, please.
This slide indicates the number of homeless encampments
reported by train crews.
I just wanna premise this,
these are not the number of encampments
that we have along the railroad right-of-way.
These are the number of encampments
that are reported by train crews.
So some of the numbers you might,
train crew may report it more than once,
or you may have one train report it
and then another train report it,
which is for the large amount of numbers
that you'll see on the slide.
For 2025, or I'm sorry, for 2024,
you will see an increase as I stated
in the number of homeless encampments reported
primarily in Los Angeles County and Orange County.
This increase in reports is attributed to Amtrak's
implementation of electronic tablets for train crews.
So they all received iPads,
which actually allowed them for more real-time reporting
rather than using pen and paper.
So what we've seen is in promoting the use of the iPad
and the additional reports that were able
to be loaded into the iPad,
we started seeing more accurate data
of the homeless encampments along our rail lines.
We also began encouraging, as I said,
additional crafts which maintenance weigh in signal
to report homeless encampments.
So that's another reason why you see
additional numbers there.
It's also important to note that although we do see
these increase in reports, homeless encampments,
I'm sorry, there have been a reduction
in train strikes from 2023 to 2024,
Which a lot of the train strikes,
I'm sorry, a lot of the homeless encampments
cause trespasser issues which result to train strikes.
Next slide.
This slide's broken down by actual homeless encampments
by line, I'm sorry, by county.
Ventura County and Los Angeles and Orange counties
have seen increases in homeless encampments
from 2023 to 2024.
Again, this is due to the increase in reporting received
from all employees, not just our train crews.
Next slide.
Mr. Chair, I have a question on this last slide,
if I could ask it.
Sure.
I mean, you're talking about counties.
I noticed here San Gabriel Line,
which includes Los Angeles County and San Bernardino County.
If I wanted specifics as far as San Bernardino County,
where do I get that information?
We can get that information for you if you'd like.
Thank you.
The director comments, any public speakers?
I'm sorry.
So, again, this slide here shows the actual number
of homeless encampments by line along our right-of-way.
With the exception of the Paris Valley line,
every line has seen an increase in homeless encampments
along the railroad right-of-way.
This is just a different way to slice the data.
The last slide was by county.
This slide is by line.
The data shows us a few things.
Our train crews and other craft employees
have increased their reporting of homeless encampments
due to the iPads.
This also lets us know where these encampments are located
along the road right away so we could address them
and deal with the removal of them
quicker than we normally would.
Every week on a Monday, or on Monday,
our maintenance away team and county sheriffs
post a 72 hour eviction notice or removal notice
to vacate the right of way.
On Thursdays, our maintenance away team returns
and they remove the homeless encampment.
So this is an ongoing process that we do weekly,
and this is where we're seeing a lot of the reductions
in trespasser events.
Next slide, please.
The train strikes, moving on to train strikes,
I should say, over the system,
have decreased over the last three years.
In 2022, we've recorded 98 train strikes.
In 2023, we recorded 94,
and in 2024, we recorded 84 train strikes,
which is an 11% reduction from 23 to 24.
This again can be attributed to the increase in reporting,
which we're actually pushing a lot
and it's actually allowing us to collect more accurate data
to deal with what we need to do with mitigation steps.
Next slide, please.
So this chart's a little bit busy,
But if you look at the, from 23 to 24,
it explains or kind of shows you the reduction.
So between February and May of 2024,
we did notice a slight rise in train strikes.
And what we did was we redirected
our LA Department Sheriff's right-of-way team
and our maintenance of waste employees
to saturate the right of way during these times,
which we identified as the first and the last of the month,
which was, we looked at the days and the weeks,
so the first of the month and the last of the month
is where we've seen these spikes.
So what we've done is we deployed
our LA County Sheriff's Department
to do right-of-way sweeps to reduce those numbers,
address the trespasser issues,
and it's helped immensely.
And we're actually, we meet on that weekly,
we discuss those results,
and if there's changes that need to be made,
we'll implement those changes to continue to reduce
and bring those numbers down.
Next slide.
So moving on to rule violations.
This slide breaks down the rule violations over three years.
So rule violations have increased 68% from 2022 to 2023,
and 7% from 2023 to 2024.
What we're doing is,
compliance staff has increased the inspections
and audits that we're doing on our contractors
to ensure the compliance with operating rules
and federal regulations.
This hopefully will start to bring down
these rule violations from our contractors.
One thing we do have to remember is,
we have turnover within the industry
and the new employees that we're bringing in.
They don't have the railroad knowledge or history
or that you have your seasoned veterans,
or that the seasoned veterans have.
And their attention span isn't,
is what a seasoned veteran would be.
So we're looking at training,
we're looking at, you know, short training sessions
where they'll take in that information a little bit more
rather than a long training class,
because what we're seeing generationally
is the younger generation doesn't learn
like the older generation, like us, so.
So that's what kind of.
Right?
So that's what we're looking at.
I mean, there's, no stone is, you know, not until.
All right, all right, all right.
We're gonna dig.
All right.
So reporting employee injuries,
over the last three years,
I'm happy to report that injuries are down 22%.
You know, that's positive.
We're still continuing to reduce those.
Next slide.
And then moving ahead for 2025,
we're gonna take a deeper dive into the data
and we're looking at fare-evaders
and unruly passengers.
Next slide.
So looking at the data,
We determined that 50% of our assaults
come from either fare evasion or code of conduct violations.
Interestingly enough, a total of 83,
which computes to a total of 83 assaults.
Next slide.
What you'll see here, we changed our strategy
regarding fare evasion and code of conduct situations
and we began street carring.
So if you look at quarter four,
you'll see the numbers decline in the number of assaults.
Streetcar is what we do is we'll collect all the tickets,
make sure everybody that is boarding the train
has a ticket before they get onto the platform.
So we eliminate any faravators
before they get on the train,
which is actually,
you know, it helps with the actual assaults
because what we found is the people who are unruly
or they are violating a code of conduct are the Fairvators.
So next slide.
And then this slide pretty much illustrates the same thing,
the importance of utilizing the data,
which identifies our trends that we were speaking of.
We learned that by reducing the number of unruly passengers
by increasing streetcar operations,
we can reduce the number of assaults
and other incidents that would have occurred
while the train was in route.
Not only does this make it safer
for our employees and passengers,
but it also increases on-time performance
and improves the overall travel experience
for our customers.
Next slide.
And just real quick overview of our 2025 projects
for our department.
Our goals for 2025 are to reduce train strikes by 15%,
reduce rule violations by 10%,
and reduce reportable injuries by 10%.
Some of the project's safety staff is working on,
with MarCon on a public safety campaign
to reduce passenger injuries on our system.
We're also working with ops and program delivery
to certify the ZEMO for revenue service.
We're also updating our safety training
for agency employees and contractors
due to amending our passenger train
emergency preparedness plan and our system safety plan,
as well as working on extending the,
and amending our law enforcement contracts.
And that is the conclusion of my presentation.
If there's any questions, I'll take those now.
Well, it's good to have you on board.
Really digging in, and it's very much appreciated.
I think, go ahead.
Yes, Director Burksen.
Thank you.
A couple questions for you.
One, on the, just, you can answer,
you don't have to go back to the slide,
but on the system-wide strikes and Metrolink strikes,
was the total number of strikes a combined number of both
or was Metrolink's portion of the total system strikes?
Metrolink's portion is a portion
of the total system strikes on that slide.
So if it was 50 Metrolink and 83 total system,
then there was only 30 that was like Union Pacific
BNSF for Amtrak. I believe so. Yes, that's correct. I want to verify. That's my... See, we're usually, you have the same questions. That's why I said I wanted somebody else to go first, and that can cross my questions off. And then the only other thing that
concerned me was that slide that showed Alstom with Eleven. They are our new major player here, so we're watching to see what that means and why and if
If that's anything significant that we need to be paying attention. So I'm glad that that numbers there are to show us
But it's also concerning. Yeah, and just to respond real quick on that
We are doing actually a deep dive in an audit into
Alstom and we're meeting with them next week to discuss it
Director speaker this quick question. I don't think you wrote it down. I don't know
The certification
Program that we just went through well any of that help reduce the violations
Or is it strictly for the use of our equipment?
If they had a better understanding of the equipment,
would that possibly have an effect on violations?
So I'm going to let Louis up here with the expert
on the certification.
I will say yes for those employees affected
by the new certification.
So that was a chart that you were seeing.
Some of those were not signal employees or dispatchers,
some of them may be track or other contractors.
But for the signal employees and dispatchers,
I will say that yes, because that will be a requisite,
not only of them being trained and qualified
on the equipment, but then the requirements
of the certification to go through efficiency testing
every year and then be re-certified every year.
I will also add that the new regulation
also adds de-certification.
So if you get dinged on one of the things
so you're not supposed to do,
then you can be decertified for a period amount of time
and then more repetition,
then the longer the decertification period is.
The end result could improve our number of violations.
Yeah, that's correct.
Try to find good things.
Yeah, yeah, no, yes, yes, yes.
Director Tremblay.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Hilary, that was an excellent report and thorough
and I really appreciate the way that it was laid out.
I want to ask some follow-up questions with respect, first of all, with respect to trespassers
and the CC, the six CCTV units, how are those monitored?
Are they, they're not monitored 24, are they monitored 24-7 or periodically or how does
that work?
So, I'm going to let Cody respond to that, but from what I understand they are monitored
somewhat.
I mean it kind of gives us an idea of where our.
So based on your description of later of the movement I'm thinking maybe they get monitored
on the weekends and then on a Monday a team goes out, delivers the, I don't know how to
call it an eviction notice or a clearance notice and then on the following Thursday
goes out and actually does the encampment removal, am I thinking of it correctly?
So the CCTV units, the mobile units that we bought or that we have, those are actually
for trespassers they don't really identify homeless encampments. So they
identify trespassers along the railroad right-of-way or in our service yard.
And those are targeted at sites where we've had historic trespasser strike
issues and so that's why they're mobile and so we move them as necessary to
where we have lack of a better way of putting in hot spots. And they do they do
I do act as a deterrent as well,
because I got a blue flashing light,
so nobody can let trespassers know that there's,
and I think Mr. Kettle anticipated
a couple of my follow-up questions on the CCTV units.
I wanna make sure that I can reconcile,
though, on the homeless encampments,
we've got increases in the LA, Orange, and Ventura lines,
but decreases in train strikes,
and I guess the takeaway message
that I have from that is based on the assertive nature
of the encampment removal.
Yes, you are correct.
And with that, we're also identifying more encampments
because we're getting more reports on encampments,
but we've also increased the assertive nature
of the removal of encampments.
So if I, I think this is,
we're going in the right direction.
So it seems to me then that I,
conclusion that I draw is that some of this decrease is arising from two factors principally.
One is the use of the CCTV units relative to trespassers, and the second is the increased
reporting.
Is that a good, is that an accurate takeaway message?
Yeah, 100 percent.
On the 2025 projects and those goals, and I found them very interesting, are those,
those are all, first of all, they're great.
They're great goals. Are they reasonably attainable or are they what we would otherwise call kind of stretch goals?
Aspirational in nature. So I'm hoping it's the former not the latter. I think they are they are from my experience
They are obtainable
We're just now diving more into the data to really identify
What mitigation steps we could put into place to obtain those goals?
But I believe they are obtainable what I'm hoping and what I'm hoping mr.. Chair is that in the future either in March
Or if that's too soon
but soon
That we that we that staff come back to us with a report on precisely that issue
So I would respectfully ask for that mr. Chair and then finally a director mark has
Had a great question. I would like to see
Some information on those encampments on the line that I represent
There's a way I can get that information. I'd sure appreciate it at the same same question
Thanks, Hillary, thank you good good presentation. Thank you
Mr. Chair, I
Just just want to yes. Thank you. I just want to compliment your staff
We brought this up at the committee meeting about ferry Vader's
I'm pretty much everybody knows about the broken window syndrome.
I think this is a classic example.
When you deal with the fare evaders, you cut down on a lot of the nonsense and assaults
that happen on the—in the cars.
So I want to thank you for really—you and your staff for really taking advantage of
stopping the fare evasion.
Yeah, you're 100% correct and we're looking to expand that as well, so that operation
to continue that.
Thank you.
Director Marquez.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I appreciate that.
Just a couple questions.
First of all, encampments, obviously you guys are doing a great job, so thank you.
When you say that they're being reported, who reports them?
Just from my own personal knowledge.
So the train crews report them you know through their you know normal duties. They're going through the
Down the line. We also have maintenance the way employees that go out if they're working on the line
they'll report them and
Same thing with the signal employees. They'll report them as well now. Do we use technology at all like drones or?
Is that something we would consider not consider?
We we have to look at that. There's there's some laws
I mean you have to be a you know certified drone operator, but we could look at that
And the only reason I bring this up, the less encampments that we have,
chances are we're going to have less strikes.
So, that's why I'm bringing that up.
I agree.
Thank you.
And Mr. Chair, if I could, we are though under Hillary's latest sort of leadership
in this area is that we do have forward facing cameras in all of our locomotives
and so we are starting to use our camera data, our filming data,
as we're facing forward to identify homeless encampments.
And so it's not from aerial view,
but we still get a fairly good view
of the 100 foot or so right away.
And we better track if we don't get them reported
by our engineers in particular, the cameras pick it up.
So just, it's time intensive for us for sure,
but it is a approach for us to take.
Director, comments.
One last comment, Mr. Chair,
I appreciate the board's recognition of the work
on our street car efforts and fare evaders
This is something we have four of our LA County sheriff officers deputies here
in the room today and they're the ones that are the really the they are the
frontline on the platforms in the cars in dealing with those issues and so I
want to acknowledge and and let them know how much I appreciate the work you
guys and your team does to make sure we're we're operating a safe railroad it
Wouldn't happen if it weren't for you guys with badges and uniforms. So thank you
Right no public comments. Thank you
To receive and file item if not objection
Matter is received and filed now
8. Chief Executive Officer's Report
Mr. CEO your report. Thank you. Mr. Chair. We'll jump right into it. Next slide, please
So just this is just a bit of a heads up
The Metrolink Board adopted its strategic business plan right as we were entering the
pandemic.
And while many of the stated five primary principles still apply, the world changed
significantly around that same time.
And so taking another look at our strategic plan is going to be something we want to do
in the next year.
But we are going to be circulating over the course of the next month, working with the
member agencies a progress report on what we did in this last what we've done
with the last strategic plant business plan and it'll be presented to the board
at our March meeting but I wanted to give you a heads up that we are going to
be communicating with all our member agencies on the status of that progress
support so I just didn't want anybody you not being aware that we were going
to be communicating that progress with the member agency staff over the course
of the coming month month and a half. Next slide. As Mr. Dunn indicated we we
We were in Washington, D.C. earlier this week.
Ms. Anna Denneke, our government relations manager, and I had our track shoes on for
three days.
We took 18 meetings of our congressional delegation.
You can see five of the pictures that we took.
There were pictures taken in just about every office.
You will notice and recognize our delegation from work throughout Southern California,
including appropriators.
Having conversations with members on the Appropriations Committee are critical.
Those include Congressman Aguilar and Congressman Calvert.
And of course, the meeting with Senator Alex Padilla as well.
did meet we had it was Jeff mentioned earlier that we have a lot of new
members of our delegation many of whom are not are just learning are just now
getting to learn about Metrolink so it was a sort of an opportunity to share
what we are doing our change in our business model with the optimized
schedule but across the board when we were dealing with our members of
Congress our number one ask was the support for LA 28 and the Olympic Games
for our infrastructure needs and our operational surge needs in 2028. We had
across the board a lot of support, unfortunately nobody got a checkbook out
while we were there, but there was a lot of support of what we want to be able to
try to accomplish. There's a recognition about how high a bar we have but they
were successful meetings throughout. One meeting I had mentioned earlier when
Mr. Carascaro was discussing CFR 245 and 246 was a meeting with Chief
council of FRA. Again, I think we are, I think we need to stay tuned. We, I think
we will see more information on the implementation of that rule in the, in
the coming weeks, given that time frame that Luis mentioned of April when the
original date was identified and will be, I think we're gonna see some more
information on that so definitely stay tuned. Also though, the chief council was,
was aware that we were struggling with an issue related to our diesel multiple
units and the requirement for the overhaul of our braking system that is
currently requiring us to work on effectively six-month extensions for the
allowance of being able to use those multiple units partly because of supply
chain issues to getting overhauled brakes, the systems, the brake systems
overhauled. So there is a willingness to look at how we might adjust that longer
term, so that was a very productive conversation as well. I want to, across
the board, I think they were very positive meetings, a lot of support,
Metrolink enjoys a lot of support throughout Southern California. Long
standing members like Congressman Calvert were just effusive in the
praise of what we're doing and wants to make sure that Congressman Calvert in particular
pointed out that in the West, there may not necessarily be all the places for mass transportation
but Southern California is one of those few places and we need to continue to support
it.
So really appreciated Congressman Calvert's approach to this as well.
Ms. Denneke and I were extremely busy the whole time and I want to make sure I thank
the GR team, Jeff, Julie Netto, and Anna was just,
the event was, in my book, Flawless,
and I've sent the note to our staff about this.
Our lobbyists came to me, not in Anna's presence,
and said the level of effort and work that Anna put
into this was the best they've ever seen for Metrolink.
So it made me feel good that I was better prepared
because our whole team had us in a position
that we were better prepared.
So, again, Anna, great work.
So, thank you for that effort.
And again, we are going to be in D.C.
almost on a monthly to six-week basis
for the next few months driving home this point
of being ready for LA-28.
If, you know, and if we don't make this case now,
it will be too late.
So this is the time where we are putting
all our efforts into that.
Next slide, please.
This is a feel good story, some of you had a chance to participate in our holiday train experience.
This is just a quick opportunity to summarize that we had more partnerships across the board than we've ever had.
Our local partners, we had sponsorships, $275,000 in ticket sales, we did turn a profit.
And you can just see the one remark there about the experience that people had with our trains.
And, of course, Director Spiegel, I think the reason we turned to profit was only because
of Director Spiegel purchasing of the number of tickets we had on the Redlands, the Rancho
Cucamonga trip.
So, our thanks, our thanks for that.
It is a feel-good event, so thank you for that.
And Mr. Chair that concludes my report. I'm happy to take questions.
9. Board Members' Comments
At this point we have board member comments. Director McCallum.
Just a question of the CEO. Any feedback on how we're doing in getting LA 28 funding into the
state's 26 budget? In the, did you say the state's 26 budget? I was part of a trip
that was that mobility 21 did earlier this month that was an item that was on
the agenda I will say this I think that they're in Sacramento right now Jeff
reported on the budget and there are I think that right now word there's there's
a lot of work still to be done there's a lot of distractions the LA fires on
everybody's minds right now so you talk about LA 28 and and I think that they
hear us but it is so overwhelming with the palisades and fire that trying to get their
attention to that area, raising it to the level of significance is going to take more
doing in my estimation.
Dr. McCallum, I'm sorry, Marquez.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you for the update on L828. I really do appreciate that. I know
we've been working on this for about a year. We have three more years to go before they're
here is there going to be a plan B just in case we don't get the funding that
we're anticipating? We will we will have a plan I think you know I what we have
and I should mention this one of the things that we did and we've shared this
with our board leadership as well as the LA 28 ad hoc committee that we did send
a letter to Secretary Tokus Omoshakan earlier this year actually at the
behest of our Caltrans district director here, Gloria Roberts, saying here are
needs to have it to to shine in 2028. In round numbers it's about three hundred
and eighteen million dollars. It includes a couple hundred million dollars for
capital and about a hundred million dollars in operational surge so that we
could put every piece of equipment out there in the summer of 2028. When
President Trump was in Southern California for the Palisades fire, he
He made it a point to mention his support for L.A. 28 and making sure that the event
was a success.
Two days later, we took advantage of that opportunity and sent a very similar letter
to what we sent to Secretary almost shock and to U.S. DOT Secretary Duffy.
And we referenced the President's remarks while at the Palisade saying he has full-throated
support of L.A. 28.
So we sent that letter to Secretary Duffy.
That letter was shared with Congressman Calvert, who has a longstanding relationship with Secretary
Duffy, who, mentioning the fact that the president had made these remarks while in Southern California.
So our plan is to approach it that way, and continue to drive that.
And of course, where we have allies within our delegation that can pick up a phone and
make that call, we will take every advantage of that opportunity.
Anymore director comments? I just want to compliment staff. I was on the Moorpark
Metrolink platform on Valentine's Day, and the Metrolink staff members who
were with me did a wonderful job. There's nothing quite like approaching
someone for a 7 a.m., basically 7 a.m. train and offering them candy and have
them look at you rather incredulous and trying to figure out if you're a fairy
Vader or somebody from Metrolinx but in terms of our customer relations it's a
well-done program and I wanted to compliment staff on their efforts I do
actually and if I just take off the tie thank you mr. chair all right thank all
10. Chair's Comments
you for your comments it is appreciated and we move on to chair comments I think
there was another slide on there we go yeah my board workshop coming up in a
hotel that is next to Knott's Berry Farm. And I hope you all join us.
It's important that we all learn about what we're doing and how we can work
together. There's a camaraderie aspect here and I think it's really important
that we share our thoughts. And the organization is very much helped by
directors who care and join together and working with staff. So I hope you can
join us and I think our secretary will be anticipating your ARSP and if you
don't let me know please and I will be happy to make a phone call. Mr. Chair
unfortunately I'll be out of the country at those dates so I won't be able to
attend. I won't call you. All right and with that we are adjourned.