City Council Regular Meeting - May 5, 2026

May 5, 2026 · City Council Regular Meeting

Subscribe via RSS: City of Orinda City Council Regular MeetingCity of Orinda Meetings

Agenda

1. April 21, 2026, Regular Meeting

RECOMMENDATION: Approve City Council Minutes of

Attachments (5)

Transcript

Warning: This transcript is automatically generated by machine and may contain errors, including misheard words, misattributed speakers, and omitted passages. Always listen to the audio or video recording before assuming the transcript correctly reflects what was said. Do not rely on the transcript alone for quotation, reporting, or any other purpose where accuracy matters.
Good evening. We're going to get started. Welcome to tonight's regularly scheduled May 5th city
council meeting. I would note that it is Cinco de Mayo and really appreciate all of you who would
rather be having queso and margaritas for being here to do budgets with us tonight. It's one of
my personal favorite holidays, international holidays. Sorry Sherry, do you have an after
printed copy of the agenda thank you let's see if i can find mine but it's a little bit hard without
thank you very much we are going to begin with the pledge of allegiance if you'll all please
stand what do we roll the call first oh sorry clearly i didn't have the agenda hang on can we
okay do the roll call really quick council member mauconny here council member riley
Vice Mayor G. here. Mayor Iverson here. And note for the record that Councilmember Hoxie is absent
this evening. And Councilmember Hoxie has an excused absence this evening. Actually I believe
in the last policy and procedure we got rid of excused absence. Is that correct? That is correct.
We misspoke. She is absent. Thank you for the correction. Okay. I pledge allegiance to the flag
of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under
God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. With that we'll adopt the agenda for the evening.
I'm not aware of any changes. Mayor, members of the City Council, I'd like to remove item H6
from the agenda. It will be back at a later date. Item H6 will be deferred to a later meeting date
and removed from tonight's agenda.
That was the Lazarus contract?
Yeah, that one was, just needed a little more time.
And with that.
To adopt the agenda with that change.
Thank you, do we have a second?
Yes. Go ahead.
Sure.
I'll second it.
Second.
Was there a question?
Okay, all in favor?
Aye. Aye.
With that, we will move to items for the good of the city.
One thing I will, well, I'll do it when we get to later in the item, I see we have Alex Drexel here to do our first item, D1, the Orinda Association annual report. Welcome.
Council members, Mayor, nice to see you.
Yep, the Orinda Association, we keep working on our programs with the SAT, the Fourth of July and the car show.
I would say you've got the report there, it just basically gives a basic explanation
of what we do, but to kind of give you some insights over kind of recently what's been
happening with the association.
Last year we ran a little bit of a deficit overall and that was due to mainly payroll
expenses.
All the other expenses were kept in order and so that's what I've been working on since
taking over in January is kind of getting hold on that.
We redefined all the jobs in the office,
set expectations in terms of kind of performance management.
We had some staffing changes, policies around hours worked
outside of scheduled shifts and things like that.
And so all that has kind of brought
those costs under control.
But I would say that's kind of a little bit
of a financial picture.
Donations were down a little bit last year
and our payroll expenses were up.
And so we've got a new drive in trying to raise more funds.
And then also just tightening up the ship a little bit
in the office is what's been going on.
Other than that, we're just continuing
forward with the programs.
I would say the level of service with SAT over the last year
has been fairly steady.
roughly 110 to 120 rides a month.
So that's just one way.
So we figure about 60 round trips
that are given to a rental residence a month.
And that's been fairly flat.
I think what we want to do, if our fundraising improves,
we want to expand that in terms of the hours that we service.
Right now, it's 9 to 2, Monday through Friday.
We like to expand those hours if the funding's there for it.
So that's just some insight.
I don't know if you guys have any questions
on any of the programs,
but those are the kind of the most recent
kind of things that we've been doing.
I'm sure there are questions.
Does anybody have anything?
Yeah, please.
Nice to see you, Alex, thank you.
And thank you for all the Arundo Association does.
Are you having any kind of special celebration this year?
Isn't it 80 this year, or?
Yeah, we're tentatively planning a pie eating contest.
in front of the the center here so it hasn't been finalized but we thought
that might be fun so yeah. I've been told that councilmember Riley was the
first one to hold her hand up on the pipe. I know who the culprit is in this. I keep
suggesting a water balloon contest. Instead we might participate then.
I had a question about the seniors around town.
I have been hearing from, is it Eloise?
Yes.
Okay.
That recruiting volunteers has been a little bit harder in the last few years, not all
of a sudden, but can you just tell us a little bit about how that's going?
Is it fairly steady?
Is it something that you have any ideas about how we can help support that?
Yeah.
The number of volunteer drivers has been, it's ticked up a bit recently because we've
We've made more of an effort to recruit them.
Like, you know, we'll kind of plug it in the message
from the OA board in the newspaper.
We've gotten a few new drivers that way.
But yeah, it's always a challenge,
especially during the summer months too,
when a lot of the drivers go off
and they're on vacation and whatnot,
but people still have their doctor's appointments.
So, no, any ideas that you have for us
to get more drivers, more volunteers,
you know, I'm totally open for it,
but we push for it any way we can.
Yeah.
And I guess my only other question is,
is there anything that you would like for the city to know?
How can we help you be a good partner?
I know you guys do so much between the paper, the parade,
any feedback that you've got for us as your partners.
Yeah, we're in the middle of our lease negotiation,
so being generous on that front might be nice.
and other than that, just support us any way you can.
Just for seniors around town,
is there any assessment about sort of data-wise
in terms of what the unmet need is?
I know that there were, there was ride requests.
There was data in the report on ride requests.
Is there, were there rides that couldn't, you know,
couldn't be made and...
Yeah, we do stay on top of that number.
Unfilled rides are rare, and so we do track that number.
I don't have it in front of me right now,
but that's an important number we track.
That's not a problem.
So yeah, that's the metric that you put around
anytime where you feel that the supply of rides
is not meeting the demand as you look at that number.
That hasn't been a problem, yeah.
And do you feel like you have enough volunteers?
I know that's something that's always been
a struggle for the various.
Yeah, I mean, we're always looking for drivers,
but we managed to fill the requests.
Oh, I met with the other program.
Oh, the other programs, no.
Yeah, 4th of July.
4th of July and 4th.
So far it's been OK, yeah.
Getting all the volunteers from 4th of July and the car show,
that hasn't been a problem.
Yeah.
That's terrific.
Are there any other questions?
Other than that, thank you for everything you do.
So thank you to the Arinda Association.
It's really existed, I think, a year longer than our city did
in terms of incorporation, right?
And really is a constant threat to all these great programs
in Arinda.
So thank you.
I had one question for the council, though.
I mean, is there any feedback for us, any way
that you think that we could potentially better serve
the community?
I mean, just even ideas around program expansion,
new programs, things like that.
anything worth mentioning at this point?
I think Council Member Hoxim talked to you guys
or somehow the message got to you guys
that it would be great to help seniors
who are participating in your program
with the latest information about fire safety
and how to harden their homes and all that stuff.
It's a ready-made group that comes together.
It would be nice to figure out how to tap that with FireWise
or with, I don't know if the Community Foundation could
help, some kind of.
That makes sense.
Yeah, it's a good channel for reaching out
to at-risk people in Arinda who might need the extra help
and knowing what to do if there's a fire
and to be prepared for it.
So I get it.
Yeah, that's a good suggestion.
I would agree with how I was just going to say doing co-sponsoring or initiating running
a community forum, right?
There's a lot of materials out there.
There's a lot of potential speakers from, you know, whether it's from the city or other
organizations around here, right?
Firewise, FISMO, the material is there.
The question is, you know, helping to get the material in front of individuals who aren't
engaged with it and may be unaware, right?
one of the more vulnerable populations that we've discussed here on the dais is making
sure that seniors are aware and have access. And that's a population that through seniors
around town, you're already plugged into. But also just general community forums. I
think OA has done that in the past with various subjects, public safety. And so this is public
safety, right? So...
Makes sense.
...emergency preparedness, evacuation, wildfire, resilience, all of that.
I also had one thing is you've got the volunteer matching board, which I sort of forget you
guys have, but the schools have volunteer matching.
To the extent we can help direct people to your board and help you promote that it would
be better to have one really good volunteer sort of clearinghouse versus multiple.
So that's something where I was reminded that that's a great resource.
We're probably not doing enough with so I agree.
I do think there's some potential for that program
to be updated.
I can't make any promises, but like, you know,
having it more self-service and online,
almost like a job board versus like a PDF
that's static you download that gets updated
every, you know, six months or something,
I think that, you know, that's gonna help
if we kind of modernize that program a bit
to help you that clearinghouse that you're talking about.
Yeah.
Q, any other questions or comments?
Right, well, thank you so much for coming and presenting
and please say thank you to all of the
grand association staff you guys do an incredible job thank you yeah thank you
thanks our next item D2 is the cancer support community presentation with
Brian Donahue if you'd like to please come up and speak good evening everyone
my name is Andy Dunn I'm the development manager at cancer support community San
Francisco Bay Area that's a mouthful I'll probably just say CSC going
forward. But we're just a non-profit here in Walnut Creek that can be a
valuable resource to any Orinda resident who is affected by cancer. So that could
be a cancer patient, survivor, caregiver, loved one, family member of someone who's
been diagnosed with cancer. So in a nutshell what Cancer Support Community
does is our programs are studies have shown we provide non-medical support
services that studies have shown improve not only quality of life but
health outcomes. Before I go on with with all our programs I just want to give a
couple of numbers for perspective. Last year in the United States alone over 2
million people were diagnosed with cancer. And to kind of help you kind of
visualize that, if you can picture a completely full commercial airline, say
a Southwest flight, that number of people are diagnosed with cancer every hour of
every day in the United States alone. So what we know is that the number of
cancer diagnoses is increasing and that there's a high incidence of mental
health issues in cancer patients and that there's a lack of supportive care.
So we address the supportive care. Fortunately here in the Bay Area all of
the medical centers are recognizing the need of this growing number of cancer
patients and so they're scaling up by expanding their medical centers and
building new cancer centers to try and treat all of the cancer patients that
that are in their department.
And where Cancer Support Community comes in
is that we understand that most of a cancer experience
takes place outside of the doctor's office.
You still need to get childcare for your daughter
to go get your chemo treatment.
You still need to take the trash out.
You still need to cook dinner.
Cancer affects you, it's not just a medical disease,
it affects you as a person.
So we come in and try and address all the ways
that cancer affects you outside of your medical care.
So we say that the first thing that you need to do
after being diagnosed with cancer
is get a medical team and a medical plan that you trust,
but that's not complete cancer care.
You also need to come to us for all of the ways
that we can improve your quality of life
and health outcomes outside
of your actual medical treatment.
And so what do those programs look like?
It's support groups.
Some are for specific cancer types.
Some are specific for caregivers.
Or they're just general support groups.
We also offer individual and family counseling
provided by doctoral level students
who are trained by our clinical staff
on the acute needs of people dealing with cancer.
We also have exercise classes like yoga, Tai Chi, Pilates.
And those programs are not only beneficial
to cancer patients, but those are actually
pretty common programs for caregivers to attend
because that one thing that we try to stress
is that to be a good caregiver,
you have to take care of yourself too.
And that includes taking care of yourself
physically and mentally.
We also provide a wide range of educational workshops
provided by experts in their field,
whether it's dealing with the side effects
of your medical treatment,
or we have nutritionists who specialize
in how to have sort of an oncology nutrition regimen.
We also offer emergency financial assistance
because cancer is a very expensive disease to treat,
and there are also outside expenses that we can support.
so you might be taking time off work
so you don't have income.
So we can provide financial support to pay your rent
or whatever that might be.
So it's just, it's very comprehensive
non-medical support services.
And we have a lot of programs.
I could spend the rest of my time
talking about all the different services that we provide
and it's important for you to know that.
But really the heart of what CSC is,
is the peer support that people get in their support groups
or in their yoga class from people
who are going through a similar experience
that they just can't get.
They can't get that connection with people
who don't really understand it.
Someone in our grief and loss group worded it
that it's called cancer support community,
not cancer support center,
and that the community is a big part of it.
I feel like the word community gets tossed around a lot,
but really what makes something a community
is something shared and the profound experience
that the entire family and the cancer patient
is dealing with after a cancer diagnosis.
And the support that they get from the people
who are attending their programs
is really kind of a magical thing.
And really what CSC is, it's a place to be
whatever you need to be at that moment.
I heard an anecdote from someone
who was in his caregiver support group
that it was very somber and quiet.
And that in the next room over,
his wife was in the patient support group.
And all they could hear was laughter.
And that's a lot of what CSC is.
People just kind of think bleak and dark and sad
after a cancer diagnosis.
And that's true, but that's why we
can be this respite from that in the sanctuary,
in this place to really kind of have a deep relationship
with people who are going through something like you.
So that camaraderie and that warm and fluffy is important,
but so are our credentials.
We've been around since 1990.
We have the highest rating from all the charity Watch Dogs.
We have very strong relationships
with all the medical centers.
They all understand that our services are part of complete
care for their patients.
So they support us in a number of ways.
They all, I mentioned that we have educational workshops
by experts.
It's the doctors and the nutritionists
and the social workers at all these medical centers
that host our workshops.
Obviously patient referrals is very important.
We have relationships with all of the medical staffs
to make sure that they are letting their patients know
that outside of their treatment,
they should come to us for what we provide.
And also they all fund us.
Everything that we offer is free of charge
to be accessible to anybody,
and we are all privately funded.
So medical centers, local companies, foundations,
and just a large number of individuals fund us every year.
Another great example of the medical community
understanding that our role is integral
and complete patient care
is when the new UCSF John Muir Cancer Center
opened a couple of years ago.
They gave us an office in their center
where we have a full-time patient navigator
who connects all of their patients
with all of our services,
as well as other resources that she's familiar with.
So that's Julianne there, that's our patient navigator,
talking to a John Muir patient, that's art.
So he's now, we call them participants,
but people who attend our programs are participants,
so he's a John Muir patient and CSU participant.
And I mentioned that medical centers are scaling up
to meet this growing need of cancer diagnoses.
And if we are being recognized as being part
of complete care, we need to scale up as well.
So we're right at this start of a great period of growth
where we're trying to double the number of people
that we serve, increase the variety of programs
that we offer, try and reach more people.
Because while we served 3,000 people last year,
a lot more than that in the Bay Area are diagnosed
cancer. And so we have kind of a two-way approach to that. We want to grow
physically and virtually. And so the nucleus of this is our new physical
site which is this is an aerial photo of our new our future home which is right
next to the Lafayette Reservoir. You might see a big construction site there
and that's that's us. That's where we're building our new home. So we were
donated six acres of land right here next to the Lafayette Reservoir to build
this healing campus because we know that nature is actually also really
important to healing. So we're gonna build a beautiful center that's gonna
have a demonstration kitchen and a yoga studio and I mentioned that you know an
entire family is affected by by cancer and we have a program for
children whose parents have cancer and right now they just play in our parking
lot but there's gonna be an actual you know kind of studio for them as well as
a playground for them to do their kind of play based exercises to kind of help
them process what they're going through but it's also just gonna be a beautiful
setting there's gonna be walking paths and gardens and it's it's just gonna be
a valuable valuable resource for all of La Marinda and beyond we want people to
enjoy the the setting that we are creating for everyone. So we want we want
just everyone to know that this new this new place is going and it's gonna be
available for everyone. So we made a lot of progress. This capital campaign was a
thirty million dollar project but we've raised at this point twenty nine and a
half million. So we're basically there we're in the home stretch. It's really
exciting to see this thing that's been a vision for a long time actually become
reality. I was walking around on the second floor of of the building that's
up now and I standing where my office is gonna be I was pretty cool. So just kind
of a timeline here we had a grand groundbreaking ceremony last year
construction began last summer and the construction will be completed by the
end of the year and we'll have a ribbon cutting ceremony early in 2027 and it
it would be wonderful to have the city of Aranda there
and participate in that.
Because even though technically the address is Lafayette,
I mean it's right here for all of Aranda residents to enjoy.
So I mentioned that our organization name
is Cancer Support Community San Francisco Bay Area
because that's a mouthful.
Because that's part of, we're part of a national network
of cancer support communities around the country.
We all operate independently.
It's, you know, basically a franchise model.
We have our own board, finance and governance.
But we're just part of a network
that can sort of collaborate, learn best practices.
And so cancer support,
there's 39 cancer support communities around the country.
And they're all looking at us,
that this is really the future
of what cancer support services looks like.
And we're really kind of paving the way
for addressing all of the non-medical needs
that anybody affected by cancer will experience.
So, we're really excited to be entering this new phase,
and I'm really excited to share this with all of you.
And I know other people are excited here too.
It was a two-part presentation.
I'm on staff at Cancer Support Community,
but my friend here, Brian, is just a local resident
and a volunteer and just supporter of what we're doing,
so he's gonna share more about why he's involved.
Well, hello, and thank you for having us.
By way of introduction, I am a 40-year Rotarian.
And I came to realize that during those 40 years,
I'm a retired trial lawyer.
And I had one of the biggest joys of my life
was having a lawsuit with Wilson-Sancini, the mayor's
old law firm.
And my figuring is that we were there at the same time.
So my personal story about my wife
had a pretty serious bout of cancer.
And I'm embarrassed to say that I didn't understand it.
I didn't want to.
I mean, it was just beyond me.
And so I was useless, feckless, and a typical idiot husband.
And so what we're trying to do is get the word out to everyone
that you know, everyone in Arendelle,
that these remarkable services are available for free,
for not just the patient, the caregiver, family members.
And it's just a really amazing, beautiful thing.
And so we, Andy and I, and Libby have made 15 presentations
to Rotary Clubs throughout the district.
There's been a fundraising aspect,
which the Orinda Rotary Club was most generous in supporting
this effort.
In fact, I was going to mention, if you're
looking for volunteers, hit the Rotary Club of Orinda,
for heaven's sakes.
So I'm going to quickly go through the slides
in the interest of time.
Basically, this is a different angle of the building.
I took a photograph of the construction site yesterday.
It really is, in my 40 years, this
is the most worthy project that I have ever heard of.
So what we've done in this campaign
a three-legged approach. Let's start with the leg in the middle. There's a matching funds program
which has been very successful. An anonymous donor is matching every donation made by May 30th.
There's a wonderful, wonderful, the first leg on the left is the walk for hope. My analogy is my
My favorite day of the year was the St. Patrick's Parade
in Fifth Avenue in New York City.
That's what this is like.
It's a celebration of health, all types of fairs and groups
coming out, sharing what's going on.
It really makes you feel good about this area
that we live in, in La Merinda.
And then, God willing, the third leg on the right
will be the Gatsby's Extravagantly Extravaganza,
which will take place at the Dollar House in Walnut Creek
to celebrate and to recognize all the people
who have helped us do this.
Quickly, this was our rotary team at the walk.
This is the extravaganza.
You know, I'm sure everybody, the city council,
would all look elegant in these nice gatsby-like dresses
and top hats.
And imagine you drive up, and what's the password?
And the guy says, whatever you say, hey, that's the password.
You can go.
So it's going to be totally crazy with fancy cars
and all that kind of stuff.
Coming around the home turn here is just not advancing.
Is it not advancing?
It's the green button, right?
green button. Oh, that's the last slide. Okay. So, I think that we'd like our purpose today
is to get the word out to Arinda, because in every talk that we have given, the last
question I ask is, hey, if you, a family member, a loved one, a neighbor, someone who's dear
to you, if you've had to deal with cancer, raise your hand.
Invariably, every hand goes up.
I probably asked this crowd right here in this room.
We probably get the same reaction.
So this is huge.
This is a huge benefit to Orinda,
if you're thinking Orinda.
So with that, I'll thank you again.
And he's got a little baby at home.
So we've got to get him.
Before you guys leave, I'll just say, are there any?
Oh, yeah, I'm sorry.
Sure, questions?
If our residents, either, or us folks here,
folks watching at home want to learn more,
either about your programming
or want to support these efforts, where do they go?
Our website is www.cancersupport.net.
Yeah, that's the best place to start.
Is there any other questions or comments?
I just had a, oh sorry, I had a quick comment.
Is that okay?
I just wanted to say thank you for everything you're doing.
I was extremely sort of impressed
by the scope of the programming,
but even more awed by sort of the heart and the soul
and the love that clearly is the foundation for all of this.
So I found your presentation very touching and thank you.
I just, Brian, your energy is so infectious.
We'd spoken a few times at Rotary events and at The Car Show.
And I think you're right.
I wish every single person in Orinda
understood how wonderful this building and this resource
is going to be.
So thank you for coming and helping us.
You know, if there's any other organization that would like us
to come out and do a show, we'd be happy to get the word
out any way, any time, any place.
Thank you very much.
I really appreciate it.
And thank you for coming to do this.
Good question.
Yeah, please.
Quick question.
Sure.
Was Community Support Center under a former name ever?
Yeah, it used to be called the Wellness Center.
Some people know it as that, yeah.
Thank you.
Okay, thanks again.
Well, thank you so much for coming.
Okay.
The last item, we don't have a speaker,
but May, there are a few heritage months in May.
It is also Jewish American Heritage Month,
but we're gonna do that one at our next meeting
because Council Member Hoxie would have like
to have been here for that.
But I just didn't want people to think
that we weren't going to do that.
It is Asian American Pacific Islander Month
and I just wanna say a few words
that Arenda's AAPI community is a vital part
of what makes our city thrive.
From our schools and local businesses
to civic leadership in the arts,
our AAPI residents contribute enormously
to the character and quality of life we all enjoy here.
AAPI families have long been deeply invested in our schools,
our PTAs and youth programs, helping make Orinda
one of the most sought after communities
in Contra Costa County.
We also have AAPI entrepreneurs and professionals
contributing to a vibrant, diverse and resilient Orinda.
And this month, we honor both the history and the future.
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
have faced real challenges and persevered
with remarkable strength.
And we reaffirm Orinda's commitment to being a welcoming
and inclusive community for all.
So thank you.
And with that, unless other words, questions or comments?
I just want to thank you for your words, Mayor.
Thank you.
With that, we will go to public forum on the agenda.
I have a speaker card from Nick Warnoff,
who I believe decided that he was not going to speak.
Just double-checking.
Jeff Blum.
Mayor, council members,
it's not very controversial
what I'm going to talk about this evening.
We just had recycling.
I mean, you've seen it all along the side.
Recycle smart.
Well, I often have a tear about that
because it doesn't seem to be working in my viewpoint.
The question is, how do you measure success
in a program like this?
I think it's great that it gets people
to get the stuff out of their house,
but the problem that I've seen is oftentimes
people know when their trash day is,
but no matter how many times you send that notice,
they forget that the reuse day is the day before.
So what happens is stuff is put out on trash day
and it goes straight to the landfill.
So I've mentioned this before in emails,
but I think we need to move the reuse day
to the same day as trash day
and just have that truck come around and pick up
because it's not recycling if it ends up in the landfill.
I mean, I saw some perfectly good office chairs
out on trash day, and those are going to landfill.
The other thing that's out there,
and there's not much we can do to change that,
is what I believe is recycle, which is repurposing things,
and what's acceptable in this program.
Basically, I like to look at it as,
other than no mattresses and things
like that, which should be obvious not to use.
It's something that you would normally sell,
but you don't have time to sell it, so put it out for reuse.
If there happens to be a stain on something or a rip
or something and it's a perfectly good item,
that's not reused.
They don't want that.
They want things that are basically in condition
that could be sold.
I don't think we can do anything to change that.
I just point that out because there's
a lot of things that could be reused
by people that are in need.
especially refugees or things like that clothing that might be torn might be a perfectly warm
jacket for somebody, but it wouldn't necessarily be accepted. So again, my recommendation is if we
can move it so the reuse day is the same day as trash pickup day and then landfill day is the next
day. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for taking the time to come and speak to us. And then next
Next I've got, for giving on the name, Shiraj Kathrani.
Hello, this is Shiraj Kathrani.
I'm here because I wanted to introduce myself
with the city council of Orinda and I'm glad
that I'm seeing a completely women's council.
I'm not sure where the fourth one is.
So fifth one is I'm running for the state assembly,
district 16 representing this area.
And I'm here to introduce myself.
One thing I wanted to highlight,
a lot of the residents don't realize that each vote,
the value impact of each vote is $19,000.
When you divide by number of people
representing the state budget,
you can easily get that number.
And I want people to realize and make sure
that everybody votes this time.
One important point I want to highlight
as well is 65% of races in Contra Costa County
are going unchallenged.
And I want any people from around here
who want to run for office in fall,
I would be happy to support all of them.
Thank you.
Thank you.
And I'd also like to thank you
for taking the time to come and talk to us.
And I would take any concerns
that as a city council want from the state representative.
I would really happy to take your feedback.
Thank you very much.
Unfortunately with public forum where we can't do comments,
but hopefully your contact information will be available
or easy to locate for people who wanna give feedback.
I'll leave some here.
That would be great, thank you.
That's all I've got for speaker cards for public forum.
Do we have anybody else from the audience?
Please come on up.
And if you don't mind just stating your name when you start
and three minutes is great.
Sorry, I think I neglected to do the speaker card.
Part of this, thank you everyone.
Good evening, my name's Kirsten Slossen.
I'm here tonight with my husband, Alex.
I've lived in Arrinda on and off since 1995,
and now currently with our two children
over on Hillcrest Drive,
and we are here tonight to ask
that the City Council revisit, excuse me,
Arrinda's mechanical equipment noise ordinance.
Arrinda's ordinance requires mechanical equipment
such as residential HVAC units to be screened
such that sound is 45 decibels or lower at the property line.
That standard is extraordinarily low.
To put it in context, 45 decibels
is roughly the sound of a kitchen fan.
When you look at neighboring communities,
Orinda is clearly an outlier.
Many nearby cities, Moraga, Lafayette, Walnut Creek,
Pleasant Hill, operate under a general reasonableness
standard rather than a fixed decibel cap
or allow materially higher noise levels,
particularly during daytime hours.
By comparison, Orinda's standard is unusually restrictive
and disconnected from the realities
of modern residential equipment.
The practical consequence of this is important.
Most modern HVAC units operate
in the 60 to 70 decibel range,
even when properly installed and permitted.
And in Aranda, as in most hillside
and residential communities, HVAC units are commonly located
alongside yards or near property lines.
The unavoidable result is that a large percentage
of Aranda homeowners are technically out of compliance
with this ordinance, even those with recently
or newly permitted systems.
Historically, this has not been a significant issue
because Arendans are good neighbors.
People work issues out informally.
Reasonableness, communication, and courtesy
have governed how we live together.
That has been our and my experience for decades.
In our case, however, a neighbor has chosen to pursue
strict enforcement of the ordinance as written.
We have not ignored the issue.
We have spent thousands of dollars
mitigation effort measures, including sound panels and blankets, substantially reducing noise levels.
When the city measured, there was no discernible impact from our units at the neighbor's patio,
roughly 40 feet away. Still, enforcement is being pursued because the ordinance sets an
absolute 45 decibel requirement. What this experience has made clear is that the ordinance
itself, not neighbor behavior, is the problem. It does not reflect how homes are built, how HVAC
system's function or how Arinda residents have historically co-existed. We respectfully
ask that the City Council refer this matter to staff to review the ordinance and to address
at a future City Council meeting. Let's bring Arinda into alignment with its peer communities
before selective enforcement turns a technical standard into a widespread and unnecessary
problem for homeowners across our great city. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Thank you very much and again we're not able to comment but appreciate you taking the time
to come and speak to us tonight.
Thank you.
Someone left a sparkling water up here also.
Not sure.
Free to good home.
Is there anybody else from the public who'd like to come and speak during public forum?
Seeing none we will close that and we will go to council member reports and city manager
reports.
Does anybody have any reports they would like to share?
is there an infrastructure subcommittee?
Do we do that one?
We, I mean, there were a couple different things
that we attended.
There was, one thing I did wanna just give
a little bit of background.
I know that the vice mayor and I were both
at the Cal City's East Bay division meeting last Thursday.
There was a very interesting presentation on e-bikes.
I took detailed notes,
which I'm going to circulate along with.
I'm waiting for Sam to send the PowerPoint.
We got a presentation from a professor from, I think,
Sonoma State, who talked about, showed us pictures and slides
of e-bikes, and really brought home
a few different takeaways for me from the presentation,
were, one, this is a really tough problem to solve.
It is very difficult to distinguish different capabilities
of e-bikes from the e-bikes themselves.
Attaching stickers with the different classes
is tricky because you can just go online and buy them.
Parents, children, policymakers all
need a lot more education about just the logistics
of this very new technology, basically.
And while there are something like 12 bills
in the state legislature, it's unclear that any of them,
other than one or two, are gonna make it through
or get signed, and even then, it's unclear
that they will solve the problem.
But there is a lot of efforts towards education.
Some surrounding communities have done things
like regional, educational videos and collaborated
with their schools, beyond.
Anyway, there's slides, there's information, I'll share it,
but I just wanted to say
it was a really informative presentation.
I don't know if the vice mayor wants to add anything.
No, I had also shared with the city manager
that not only was it a good presentation,
but it was incredibly informative,
like Council Member Mulconney said in a very concerning way
in the sense that if I already thought it was a big problem,
it's even more than I thought.
And so I think that the education factor
has got to be incredibly important,
because I just am convinced that many parents, even ones that
are being very good parents, can't possibly
understand all of the issues associated with these.
And from my own observations here in Orinda
lately in my own neighborhood, the amount of usage
just seems to be growing and growing.
And watching what a lot of kids are doing is very worrisome.
So I think it's going to remain a big issue.
And I think sharing the information
continuing to consider you know what we as the council and the city can do to
to help the community is going to be important thank you are there any other
and by the way I would just note that the city manager has been working on
this for more than a year with some of our partners like by Keith Bay and our
legislative reps and really appreciate the fact that it is not just a matter
of passing laws it's a it's a multifaceted problem and solution and
really appreciate you guys sharing what you've learned that's great were there
any other anything to share I just had a few quick announcements because we're
not doing items for the good of the city but may is also mental health
awareness month you've probably seen a lot of things about that but wanted to
note that it is also teacher appreciation week right now if you know a
teacher appreciate them and I believe we have five more shopping days to Mother's
day. With that, I will turn it over to the city manager.
Well, I was actually going to talk about, I'm just going to say Arindan Action Day.
I know the mayor and I were both there and I don't know if you want to give a little
report, but it was just greatly attended and I want to thank our Parks and Rec staff for
all, I know they're about, there you go. Directed from back there for all their participation
with that and then it was also very well attended. You can report on other things.
And I just wanted to comment many of our staff were there and council member
Makhani and I were at East Bay Med's annual Ward 3 presentation at the former
CalShake site. So it was very exciting and they gave us a tour and not only
talked to us about East Bay Med shared many of the items that they always share
every year in terms of update, that was important, and we were able to share with them how much
we want to continue coordinating with them, and our partners from Moraga were there as
well, but it was also very nice to get an update on the forthcoming new programming
at the site.
And two dates to keep in mind, there's going to be some sort of soft opening event on,
I think May 30th and I'm going for memory here and I believe their first show is on
June 5th. So go in. If you're interested, residents can go and look at the Siesta Valley
Bowl website and find out more.
That's very exciting. Thank you. And with that, city manager, please.
Thank you, Honorable Mayor, members of City Council. Just a reminder for the council and
the public that we are having our leash cutting ceremony on May 16th to celebrate the opening
of the recently completed dog park facility
at Arendelle Oaks open space.
Just letting everybody know that the scaffolding
will be coming down off the library if it hasn't already.
Do they notice scaffolding?
The tile project is now complete.
Very excited about that.
And we have installed new lights at Wilder Sports Field.
They are operational.
We have legislative letters heading out the door,
both locally and regionally.
Those are many of the items the bills
are moving into appropriations in the next week or so.
So we are prepared to provide more letters if necessary
to make sure our agenda and legislative platform
are being heard in Sacramento.
I attended the open house for MOFD this weekend
at station 45 and got an opportunity to walk around
and see all the great collaboration that's going on
between the nonprofit community, MOFD and the cities.
That was very lovely to be there.
and then we have tomorrow evening we have the two by two school committee meeting which is
council members Malcani and Riley attending thank you and lots of good news there with that we will
move on to the consent calendar I had two items I'd like to pull but let me just ask the other
council members were there any items that you would like to pull for further discussion yeah
please council member ryan um i forget what number it is but i'd like to pull the one on um
orchard uh h h seven that was on my list as well thank you so i wanted to pull h nine but i promise
it's really really brief me too and it was going to be brief anybody else i'd like to pull h 10
Is, uh, H10 is which one, right?
I'm sorry, what was the, uh, which one was that?
That was school year.
It's the, uh, it's the pavement, um, uh, perfect, the pavement project.
Great.
Anything else?
With that, uh, do we have a motion to approve the consent calendar, H1 through 6, H8, and
H, I believe we have an 11.
H6 was pulled.
Or was...
Oh, I'm sorry, you're right.
You're right.
Uh, H1 through 5, H8, and H11.
And do we have a motion to approve those in one action?
So moved.
Second.
Second.
All in favor.
Aye.
Aye.
And with that, City Manager, would you mind beginning with H7, and I would just note for
the record again that H6 on the Lager software was pulled to a future meeting, H7 is to decrease
the prima facie speed limit on Orchard Road.
I believe our city engineer will be able to provide answer any questions or perhaps make a small presentation if you so desire.
I'm assuming you might want a little bit of a small presentation.
We were hoping for a small presentation. How prescient of you.
I do have a small presentation.
Good evening Mayor and Council members.
So in anticipation of potential questions I put a few slides together just to give a little background and walk you through it.
So, tonight the request here in front of you is to reduce the
Thamafasya's speed limit of 25 miles per hour on Orchard Road to 15 miles per hour,
and that applies to the entire length of Orchard Road which
starts and ends of Moraga Way, so we can address it as the north end of Orchard and then the
southern end of the fire station on Muragawa. So a little background why we are here tonight
is primarily the Archer Road community came to TSAC, our Traffic Safety Advisory Committee,
and requested for traffic calming measures throughout the street. And their reasoning
for it was that there is a large number of cut through vehicles that come through there
and excess speed during commuter hours and at the same time students try to go through
to school and also there is an existing stop sign at the intersection of Orchard Road and
Brookside Road and we have gotten multiple complaints of people ignoring to follow the
law of stopping at the stop sign. So those are the primary safety concerns that originated
and then on top of as a request they asked for no left on sign of Moraga way on the north
end of Arshad. I don't want to note on the south side there is a existing no right turn
on Arshad at the morning peak hour which is 7 to 9 a.m. when you're coming northbound
from Moraga towards the Morinabad station.
So similar request was put in for this one.
And in addition, they had other requests for speed cushions,
tripping, signing additions, and all those kind of things.
So after the initial review, because of the no left-hand
sign request, we initiated a traffic study.
Once TSSAC had an opportunity to review the request.
And when the study did their counts and analyzed,
They really didn't recommend a no-left-hand sign.
Their data provided only a low percentage
of cut-through traffic.
So the sign idea was not recommended.
But alternatively, they also reviewed the speeds
that they observed.
And the southbound direction did have a higher percentage
of speeding, particularly during the morning peak hours.
their recommendation also included that the city consider changing the speed
limit person to the California Vehicle Code section 2 2 3 5 8. I'll go a little
more detail into what that section refers to in a minute. So because of that
recommendation we took it back to TSAC and the NAT and they both looked at it
and they both were actually in support of further studies. When we got to that
point it kind of shifted slightly. It became, you know, from a neighborhood traffic calming
request it became more of a regulatory sign change and speed limit change. So we had to
follow established protocol and how we approached that. So after we got support from TSAC and
the NIT to move forward and continuing to explore that, the city basically hired the
a traffic consultant to do what we call like an ENTS study
engineering and traffic survey, basically.
Or we also call it as a speed survey.
So yeah, I think I'm losing track of it.
Give me one second.
So the ENTS kind of relates to a few different sections
within the California Vehicle Code.
But the primary way the survey is used
is on arterials and collector streets.
So when we do the study, we basically
understand what the speeds on the roadways are.
And they collect all the speed data,
usually done during non-commute hours,
because the data they want to collect,
they don't want it to be influenced by congestion.
So that data is taken then, and they get the 85th percentile
of the speed on that observed speed.
And that defines what the posted limit on that roadway
ends up being.
So for example, we have Camino Pablo.
We have 40 miles per hour and 13 segments of Camino Pablo.
And then further south, when you go into Moragawa,
it becomes 35.
Those are all continuously assessed and updated
as needs change.
Now, that's only done for collectors and arterial.
Neighborhoods trees doesn't come under that
until we start looking at it from either this kind
of a request or a safety concern that we are aware of.
So in this case, because the safety was brought in
and the speeds observed were higher,
we proceeded with the same ENT as.
But we looked at it from a slightly different lens
in which there is the, as you can see here
in the slide in front of you, sorry about the lot of words
in that. But the third bullet point there, that's the section that this particular study
is leaning into, which basically allows the speed to be changed from 25 to 15 miles per
hour if there is reason to believe that although the observed speeds are higher, the existing
conditions of the roadway doesn't support higher speeds. Why this section was looked
that is because when they did the ENTI study,
the speeds observed were actually closer to 24 miles
per hour, which pretty much lines with the posted speed
limits there.
But when you add the safety constraints
that they were against, the recommendation
from the traffic engineer is to consider reducing the speed
limit.
Now, I do want to mention, Orchard Road actually
has a few different warning signs
for 15 miles per hour along the coast because of how tight
the curves are and also the roadway is in a position where there is no shoulders for
the most part and students do walk along the roadway to access the school bus that actually
comes through that roadway.
So that's one of the primary criteria that's influenced the study too.
The study itself was connected back in February and we looked at it as two separate segments.
The first segment is between the north intersection up
to Gloria Tabula word, and then the second segment
is Gloria Tabula word to the south intersection
at Moraga way.
Both observed similar speed limits.
I believe the 85th percentile for one was 24
and the other one was 25.
But both segments also met the criteria
as established in the vehicle code 22358.4.a.1.
As I mentioned before, these are the primary reasons
that were cited in the report.
The roadway is a local residential street
with one lane in each direction, narrow pavement width,
and predominantly residential frontage,
horizontal curvature, limited side distance,
and frequent residential driveway access.
pedestrian activity and lacks continuous pedestrian
facilities and portions of the corridor.
So due to these reasons,
they were able to recommend the 15 miles per hour sign.
As this is a regulatory speed change,
it requires city council approval
and we have to post a new signs
and replace any existing signs.
So hence the staff report in front of you.
Staff is recommending that the city council adopt
resolution 22-26 to decrease the prima facie speed limit
of 25 miles per hour to 15 miles per hour
on Archer Road between Moragawea and Gloritabola Ward,
and also between Gloritabola Ward and Moragawea
on the south side.
Thank you.
With that, I'm happy to answer any other questions.
Who has got questions for staff?
Can you repeat again why there was a no to the left hand turn?
I couldn't understand, or couldn't hear you.
Could you repeat?
Yeah, the primary reason is they did not observe.
Tell me exactly where that is again.
It's just the end of it, are you talking about?
Right, so it is the north end of Orchard Road, so just south of Overhill.
Okay, so you're on north and then you're, are you driving towards Moraga?
Yeah, you're going southbound on Moraga way, making a left on Orchard.
The primary concern was that during heavy traffic times, that is cut through traffic
that goes through there.
But the study data, which used two or three different data points didn't really result
significant traffic that they observed. That's primarily the reason. They didn't
have too many cars cutting through like it was mentioned. Okay, okay. But what
time was the study done? What time of day? This was the original study that was
seven to nine in the morning. Oh so we didn't see that study. We only saw two
studies. Right, thank you for the question. So there are two separate
studies like I said the initial study focused on the original traffic calming
request and they were looking at what are the criteria to have a no left hand
side. The second study is strictly related to the ENTS. Okay maybe I want to see
that study sometime but I don't know if I can. Yeah we can share that. Other
questions for Steph. I had one and that is if you'd mentioned that there are
already slow to 15 signs at the sharper curved parts of it, when I looked at it
on a map it looked like there was a really long straight part that we're
going to be also dropping to 15. I'm wondering how you what the analysis was
to not just limit the speed limit of 15 to the curvy parts of the road and to
leave the straight part at 25. Yeah, so the current signs are actually not a
regulatory sign. They are warning signs to ask drivers to consider slowing down
because of the curve coming in. This will be actually an enforceable posted
regulatory 15 mile per hour sign. That's the difference. The reason it wasn't
segmented too much is because the entirety of Glorita is close to one
and a quarter mile length and the first segment between the north side and
Glorita is about nine tenths of a mile and the other segment is about half a
mile. With that there is also sections in between where I mentioned the Brookside
Road also has a stop intersection. So changing the speed limits within that
The entire stretch over multiple times will confuse drivers
and focus, so they probably will not follow the changes.
So that's primarily the reason for doing it
as at the entire segment.
I mean, we did separate it as two separate segments
because Gloria gets a clear definitive separation,
but the recommendation came same for both sides.
That was exactly the question I was asking.
Thank you.
Any other questions?
Now I have questions that we're discussing.
Two questions actually.
One is, have we done this on other roads in Aranda?
Not recently, but we do have Lias Peral between Camino,
Sabrante, and the El Gavilan Road.
That entire segment is posted at 15 miles per hour.
It was done back when County was looking at this,
but it likely qualifies with the same reasoning behind that.
And the reason I'm asking is, I assume
we didn't send a postcard or something or notify residents
that we were planning this.
And so I'm wondering, do we think
that any Orchard Road residents would object to it?
I mean, I would assume that they would be happy
that there were slower speeds, but I'm not sure actually.
Yeah, so as this originated as a traffic calming request,
whenever we get one of those, we do establish a neighborhood action team,
and 80, um, which basically one person takes the lead in communicating city
staff, but they do have contacts of rest of the neighborhood folks and they
share information between them. So a fair number of residents are aware of
this. Um, I cannot speak for every resident in that neighborhood. Um, but
as far as the speed limit change itself, it's a more procedural thing that you
It's pretty good.
You know, if there was opposition or it sounds to me that the neighborhood action team was
mostly supportive and in fact driving this at TSAC.
Yeah, they fully supported the idea, TSAC fully supports the idea, and on top of it,
they've asked for some more striping and time changes that are also being looked at.
Okay, thank you.
That's helpful.
any other questions? Let me just quickly open it up to the public to see if anybody from
the public would like to speak on this. Yes, please come on up. It needs to be at the microphone
so we can get you on the recording. And because we're also on Zoom tonight, so thank you and
please just say your name. We'll ask you to limit comments to three minutes.
Oh, thank you. So, again, my name is Dr. Helena Herschel and I live on Orchard Road. And what
not been mentioned in this is that we can't get out of our driveways. And I have another
Orchard Road person here because they're blind and they're actually a trap. So that the traffic
comes through and they don't stop and we can't see them because they're coming over a little
bump, and they're kind of using Orchard Road as a racetrack, mostly the high school kids.
And it's become such that we can't get out of our home between, oh, I don't know,
3, 3.30 to about 4.30 or 5. And we had actually asked for them to put a sign to not turn down
that street because it's so terrible. I think the 50 mile an hour recommendation is a good start.
I don't think it's going to solve everything, but I think it's a really good start,
particularly if it's enforced. Because people are going down, and we took
many videos showing the speed, and they're going down 40, 50 miles an hour, just like, you know,
as kind of like, you know, kids do, right?
So thank you for taking my comments.
Thank you.
Would anybody else like to speak on this matter?
OK, seeing none, we will close that and bring it up
for discussion and deliberation.
Would anybody like to lead off?
I actually might just say one quick word, which
is just that I happened to sit in on a TSEC meeting when
this was early in its process.
And the anecdotes from other neighbors
were very similar about how many scary things
about kids and pets and you know,
I'm very reluctant to try to break
all of our residential streets
because of high schoolers taking shortcuts.
I kind of feel like we should fix
Moraga Way and not make every street
other than Moraga Way unlivable.
But this one I do recall was what the traffic report said.
It was, it's twisty, there's blind turns, it's narrow.
So I just wanted to support that I've heard many more stories
that are someone who would see what was presenting.
No, thank you for that.
That's helpful because I wanted to make sure
the residents on that street supported this.
It sounds like they really do.
And they were the impetus for this.
It makes sense as an initial measure, I think I supported.
And I would say we should also just keep an eye
the area right and see if this does improve things or you know. I'm actually
concerned that we haven't heard from the residents. I think it's a small action
team and it makes me nervous that we haven't talked to everybody. That voice
isn't here tonight. It's always been an issue. That street's always been an issue.
It's extremely dangerous during the school commute hours. I didn't feel like
this this survey was persuasive at all only thing that's persuasive about the
subjective comments I'm just not ready for this I need more information I'm
okay with supporting it but the problem is gonna be enforcement I you know it's
we could we could lower the speed limit everywhere in the community and because
quite honestly we do have a speeding problem all over the place but you know
maybe maybe some well-timed enforcement will help you know but I you know I I'm
very familiar with this street it's not far away from where I live and I you
know I understand the concerns so you know I I don't again I don't have an
issue with it it's just I think whether it's really going to be effective or not
kind of depends on how much enforcement we're able to to show. I was initially
very worried for the same reason that Councilmember Riley said of not you know
not hearing from everybody not sure if this was widely supported but one thing
I've come to feel very strongly about is that the four or five of us are not the
right people to be making engineering decisions and traffic decisions
especially when we have an entire traffic committee that goes through
multiple hearings where the neighbors are invited and they come and their
neighborhood team comes to talk so those forums are happening before we see
items but also we have got to rely on the engineering recommendations because
which neighbors are the loudest or the most persuasive or the most involved is
a terrible way to make traffic engineering decisions. The four or five of us, using our
opinions and experiences a terrible way to make decisions, I really feel like we've got
to be pretty disciplined about following the engineering recommendations unless there's
a compelling reason to go a different direction. I think like the no left turn on Ivy, we had
that compelling, that feeling that there was a genuine disagreement and a community value
But for the most part, in this case, I felt like there was both a really good TSAT process
and engineering data.
So even though it went against my sort of gut level what I would have wanted to do,
I am prepared to support it because I want to follow what the people who do this for
a living recommend as the correct solution and support it by data.
I don't know if we have consensus.
Does anybody want to make a motion?
Or keep talking?
I want another comment now let's keep. Yeah, I'm going to piggyback on council or vice mayor.
She's thought that enforcement is the underlying answer and it seems like we should be trying
to enforce the 25 mile an hour before we reduce the speed limit. And I get the point that
that you don't think I'm qualified
to make an engineering decision and I'm not trying to,
but I'm asking for more information
and I think I'm entitled to it.
I think that I just, on the enforcement issue,
I think that's true.
I think it's always a challenge with to get,
especially our younger, newer drivers
to abide by rules of all kinds.
But I do think that, you know, the reason we have these traffic calming measures in
the first place, the reason we even have speed limits is they do have an intern effect, right?
And so I think that a speed sign that is 15, you know, help stop people from driving 40,
right?
Maybe they'll still be driving 25, but it will help stop them from driving 40 and 50
the hills, like the comment reflected. I think it's worth doing and keeping an eye on. I was
concerned as to whether or not the residents of Orchard Road, I think that's a very valid concern.
I think we can both adhere to the recommendations or rely on the recommendations of the experts,
but also to the extent we do hear a lot from the community that's what we're here for and that's
our voice and I think those two things are compatible and I think that you know I hear
your concerns Councilmember Riley and I just between the Mayor's representations of what she
saw at the TSAT committee and the representations that we did have this this residence that led
this and I see that we have a couple residents here who did come to speak. We didn't get
a lot of opposition. Sometimes we do, especially when a neighborhood community is involved.
They tend to, if it's something they're monitoring, they tend to know that it's on the agenda.
And I would say if we do get a large number of residents opposing this, especially the
ones that live on Archer Road, I would want it to come back and reconsider it.
changing signs it's not you know a drum as dramatic a change as as you know
putting in speed bumps or stripes or things like that and I would want it it
could come back so for all those reasons I'm willing to support it and move
forward and I don't want to cut off any commentary but otherwise I would make
a motion great point about changing the signs you may recall I think we were all
on Commission when the no red flag day signs needed a correction and and so
that's a that's a good reminder what I would ask though is I had the same
initial thought that we should be enforcing the 25 but the data I thought
said that 85% were going 24 on average so the problem was that actually it was
unsafe at 25 so that that's where I felt like the engineers surprised me with
their conclusions.
Sivaj, can you help us think about that?
Yeah.
So one way to look at it is if this was a flatter, straighter road without the constraints
that we're talking about and maybe even as shoulders for somewhat safer pedestrian access,
the ENTs would have recommended keeping the 25-mile-per-hour speed limit because it's
a statutory requirement.
So if we study it and we get the data, we go by the data.
And another way to look at it is if actually
in that hypothetical roadway, if the speed limit observed 85
percentile came at 35 miles per hour,
then we are actually in a position
to consider increasing the speed limit of the roadway.
Because the understanding is the general perception
of that roadway sits safe enough to drive that speed.
So in this case, we are looking at the other side
of it where the observed speed is 24 or 25 miles per hour,
but due to the existing conditions,
the recommended safer speed, so to speak,
is 15 miles per hour.
So I guess the question is, do we want to support this
with the understanding that speed limit signs are relatively
easy to revisit if we get negative feedback,
or it sounds like there's also maybe a motion to take more
time and process. I think I hear one support. I think I hear one defer. What do we think?
Okay. Do we have a motion? I'll move to adopt the resolution as drafted. Okay. Do we have
a second? I'll second it. Okay. All in favor? Aye. All opposed? No. With that, the motion
passes three to one and really appreciate the discussion on this. It was a tough one
and thank you. And with that, we will go to the other item pulled from consent H-9.
I think there were just one or two comments, but not a presentation. Did we want a presentation?
I just literally wanted to say one or two sentences. My reason for pulling this was
to thank staff, to thank our Public Works staff, to thank our City Engineer, to thank
our city manager and everyone who worked on this for really listening to our residents
and listening to the council's feedback and moving so quickly. Just, it's really appreciated.
That was exactly why I wanted to pull it, so thank you for saying that. And with that,
would we like to make a motion and a second on H9?
I move that we uh is it a resolution before the resolution is drafted for H9 is it a or
is it a resolution to approve new CIP project 5042 for Coral Drive sidewalk do we have
a motion so moved sorry oh I'm sorry I'm sorry you're right do we have public comment thank
you vice mayor seeing none I will close it bring it up for discussion uh were there any
Any further comments? Do we have a motion? So moved. Do we have a second? A second. All
in favor? Aye. Councilmember Riele, you were an eye on that? Sorry, I didn't hear you.
Motion passes unanimously and we move to H-10, Vice Mayor, if you can just let us know what
you would like to do there. Yeah, I just wanted our public work staff to address some of the
public comments that we got. I know that there's always some confusion and it's
hard to understand sometimes how our maintenance programming works and I
just wanted to make sure that you had the opportunity to explain the answers
to some of the public comments we received. I did review the public
comments that we received, Mayor.
And we did formulate responses to some of the questions,
but some of the comments were more policy related,
so those were left out.
But yeah, some of the direct questions that were asked,
we did respond back to it.
You actually responded to...
Yeah, yeah.
I haven't sent the response yet.
Do you wanna, do you have them with you,
the ones that you had prepared for me
so you can answer those publicly to the Council?
If not, I can...
I do not have them in...
Okay, hold on one second.
One question, I guess, thematically
among some of the correspondents is roads with PCIs
that appear fairly high making the list for maintenance.
Could you just answer that generally?
And then it looks like City Manager is ready
with the specific question here.
Yeah, so the way we manage our payments
is we rely on a software program that helps us kind of analyze the streets and gives us
recommendations which street to put the dollars on.
So Street Saver is a program that our Metropolitan Transportation Commission created and they
manage it.
They allow access to the agencies to utilize it and we rely on it.
So the way it works is every time we make a change to the pavement, we feed the data
inside and the system takes it, processes it through various criteria, and then when
we request for like a list of projects, it takes the amount of dollars that we are willing
to spend and provides us a list of streets that are usually more preservation-focused
than repair-focused because the industry consensus is money is well spent in preserving the pavement
before it gets to repair than to try to fix a pavement that's
two-thirds in the end of its life.
Might as well let it go through and reconstruct it completely
kind of mindset.
So most of our dollars go towards preservation.
That's primarily why you're seeing
some of the higher PCIs.
And then there is a component portion of it
that goes to actually a more involved rehabilitation, which
is grind the pavement out, put new asphalt in,
and all more expensive, more higher dollar items.
I think the question's primarily related to why
we are fixing these higher PCI streets.
For us, we've been doing a pretty robust paving program
throughout the last 10, 12 years.
So that has put us most of our streets
in a pretty good condition.
So this is basically cycling through it.
One way to look at it is the rate of decline in the PCI
values gets higher as we wait longer.
So from 90 to 80 might take longer than 80 to 70 kind
of mindsets.
So we kind of rely on the initial list
that the software selects.
And then we field review the streets.
We see if it makes sense to focus on these streets
right now, or if there are other streets that we are aware of,
due to various other reasons, like a utility project that
just went through.
and we probably want to prioritize that.
So we kind of make those decisions off
after we get the original list,
and that's kind of what becomes our paving project list
for the year that's in front of us.
So the list that was included in this report,
which actually is not directly tied to this,
it's actually for a funding request
that we are required to submit a street list every year,
and there's also an opportunity for the council to look at.
So that list is inclusive of what came off of Street Saver
and some of the streets that we had sidelined
that we needed to include into this year's paving program.
It's all inclusive of all that.
Hope that answered the question.
Are there any questions from the council?
But I really appreciate the opportunity to hear that
because I was wondering when I read the letters
what the rationale was, so thank you.
Mayor, if I may.
Yes, please.
Just to answer one other question,
kind of got sorry there was a question about the cost that list that was
attached to the staffing staff report also so I do want to make clear that
it's not actually 800,000 this year we are doing a combined project of the 20
25 and 20 26 years paving and the engineers estimated cost for that is 3.5
million dollars so about half of that would apply to the 2026 paving project
And the reason we are combining them just for your background is if you all recall,
2024 paving got delayed because we received pretty high bids when it went out to bid.
So we pushed it back by pretty much an entire year for construction.
So that resulted in the 2025 getting added to the 2026 list and that's how we.
For clarity, sorry, the 3.5 million covers what time period because there was confusion
about that or questions about that?
Both 25 and 26 construction cost only.
Okay, I'm sorry, calendar years or those fiscal years?
Cause we've got that June.
Yeah, so the way we approach it is calendar year,
so to speak.
We just assign them as annual paving projects
that are presenting the calendar year,
but all the funding is tied to the fiscal year.
And that is a confusion that we unfortunately
kind of navigate every now and then.
Even in this request if you see the request we are putting in for the gas tax money is
for the coming fiscal year, so fiscal year 26-27.
But we are submitting our 26 paving lists because by the time we construct that, it
will be the summer of this year which falls under the next fiscal year.
Other questions for staff?
And obviously when we get to the budget item we might have more on the road topic, so might
not be done for the night. Is there anyone from the public who would like to speak on
this matter? H-10. Seeing none, we'll bring it up to see if there's any discussion or
a motion. I just want to thank the Vice Mayor for pulling
the item because I thought it was important to also respond to this public comment.
Yeah, agreed. Thank you, Seba. I think that's helpful for
people to understand because I know sometimes it's not completely intuitive exactly how
street saver comes up with things and it's good to hear that it's also reviewed by our
public works staff. We're not just, you know, taking it as is. So with that, I'm happy.
I thank you for the information and I'm happy to move that we approve the fiscal year 2627
SB1 Road Repair and Accountability Act project list.
Great. Do we have a second? Second.
All in favor? Aye.
with that we are through the consent calendar and we will move on to policy
matters. Next item is j one the fiscal year 26 27 mid cycle budget update and
I believe doug Alessio is going to be
MCing for the remainder of the items. Good evening honorable mayor members of
council. I'm doug Alessio, your assistant city manager.
The item that I'm here to talk about is the proposed mid cycle budget
adjustment we will actually have a separate item after this about the CIP
update for this 26-27 fiscal year so although the operating budget
incorporates the proposed CIP for 26-27 into the operating budget for the one
year so we can appropriate we actually break this into two items tonight. So
As you're all aware, the city adopts a biannual budget, the budget that's in place covering
our current operating period, which is the current fiscal year in 25-26, and next year
26-27 was adopted in June of 2025, and so this is our opportunity to take the additional
information we've gained over the past year and incorporate it into projections and spending
so this is a normal process that occurs every other year doing the mid-cycle
budget adjustment. I'd like to start by mentioning also on tonight's consent
agenda was the third quarter financial report and so just really briefly what
that showed was that the budget that the council adopted in June of 2025 actually
is serving us well. We're on target to make our revenue projections and to
running a little behind on our spending projections. So the current fiscal year
is on track to end in a positive place for the city. And there are only very few
changes that we recommended and they're really refinements. And so that's
That's actually the case for 26-27-2.
There's no major changes that we're going to be proposing, but rather some minor refinements.
Quicker, great.
So this is a citywide budget summary of all funds and it just shows two, both fiscal years
so that you can tell the progression from the year we're in to next year.
I think some of the highlights here are Year 1 is the originally adopted budget plus all
approved budget change forms that have been presented and approved since then.
Major variances in other funds revenue between year 1 and year 2 is the sum of multiple one-time
funding sources around gas tax, federal grants and some other special revenue funds.
So you'll see in year one, we were projecting $17 million of revenue and other funds in
the current year.
It drops to 14.5.
That's specifically the federal grant and a one-time gas tax item.
And then there's a couple other minor funding items that are lower.
So that's that big swing of close to $3 million in other funds.
variances also there's a shift from year one to year two for CIP projects so
you'll see that CIP budgeting year one is much smaller than year two so the
items that are not completed for a number of reasons have been pushed out
into year two so that's the other big change that you're seeing between the
two years and you might notice the general fund has a slight operating
deficit in year two and this is primarily due to the funding of a limited
duration position which was programmed in in order to help us actually push
through more CIP projects so this was a decision made a couple years ago to do a
limited duration funding in the engineering department so that we could
get more CIPs completed. All right. So, general fund changes for fiscal year
26-27 are mainly revolved around staffing allocation changes. I'll talk
about the specifics of that on the next slide. And the other large item is
transfers out of unassigned fund balance, which I will also explain a little bit
on the slide after the next. The only other change in the general fund is an
increase of about $82,000 which reflects contribution from the general fund to
the city's three lighting and landscaping districts and so those are
costs we've had and incurred in the past and will continue to but they were not
in the budget and so we just want to capture and reflect the accurate amount
staffing is extremely important as you all know we operate under several
constraints fiscal constraints people restraints and space constraints so
staffing is really important anytime that we have an opportunity via an
opening to evaluate the organization's operational needs. We usually will get
together and discuss what the best plan of action isn't always necessarily what
we've always had but it's something slightly different and so this year we
did have the opportunity to evaluate a couple vacancies and make recommendations
to fill those vacancies with different classifications. So the other point I
want to make is there is a the one-time limited duration position that's set to
expire outside of the budget cycle and that citywide the staffing changes were
making end up in a cost reduction of almost $30,000 that was not the goal we
didn't set out to actually save the $30,000. What we did was set out to
actually properly staff for operational needs and efficiency and we ended up
basically programming about 30,000 less in people costs. So this is a detailed
list of what's actually going to change. So you'll notice that there's a lot of
changes are occurring in Public Works. We had a reorganization several years ago
where facilities maintenance got folded into Public Works and we're still sort
of filtering through needs and how to best meet them. So you know the overall
takeaway here is the staffing is remaining constant. We're just hoping to
staff in areas where we need more help and and operate a little more
efficiently. Several of the items are new positions for us. A GIS technician is
something that we're currently accomplishing with a temporary employee
and what we're finding is that the the data and the usefulness of having good
maps is going to extend well beyond the time period where you should have a
temporary employee doing it and we really feel it's important heading into
the future using that technology and we'll find plenty of other uses for it
into the future. We're also looking at adding the classification of a code
enforcement. I'm saying tech here, it may be specialists. We're working on the job
description now currently code enforcement would have been handled by
planning technicians and what we found is that's not a very effective way to
have code enforcement happen and so we're recommending a halftime code
enforcement resource and then the other sort of new or add isn't a new position
at all we already have it in our catalog of positions that's the accountant we're
we're looking for a half time account.
Right now, we run basically a $34 million
corporation with three people.
And so having a little extra professional help,
there's only one professional, two technicians.
Doing that work is going to help enhance productivity
across the organization.
So we're pretty excited about that.
There's a process here.
We'll be working with the Teamsters
to review the proposed positions, descriptions,
and then we'll bring those back on June 9th
when we bring the budget back for adoption.
There'll also be a piece that we do around staffing
where we add those classifications to our catalog
and we update the salary schedule,
which always happens in June.
So those are sort of the next steps on the staffing piece.
As far as the proposed transfers,
if you were to have a copy of the city's
act for in front of you page 101 would indicate,
and I'm sure all of you are aware of this,
that the general fund balance grew
by a little bit more than two and a half million dollars
as a result of the end of operations at 24, 25.
So our fund balance grew by two and a half million dollars.
So we're making the recommendation to put that money
to work on one time items at this point.
And we're suggesting, recommending you move a million
dollars to fund 700 for future CIP needs,
then a million and a half to the building maintenance fund
for future CIP needs.
And I think that's maybe a misnomer right now.
It's called the building maintenance fund.
It's really the building maintenance and replacement fund
we have a lot of facilities that might need replacing and and it's maybe the
facilities maintenance replacement fund because some of those facilities are
fields synthetic fields cost a lot of money and we need to make sure we're
setting aside some capital for future replacements and we need to do that on a
more programmatic basis moving forward if you are amenable to those transfers
the general fund was of enough resources to maintain compliance with its 50 with
the 50% operating reserve policy so that means we have about 9.2 million dollars
in reserve in the general fund and on top of that there will still be about 1.4
million of unassigned fund balance in the event that some discretionary
spending you know is necessary and gives us a little bit of cushion still in the
general fund. All right the other changes that are happening in the budget
result are actually in measure R or fund 106. We're moving a hundred and fifty
thousand dollars worth of funding for the GIS mapping for this storm drains.
The project won't be complete by June 30th and we're anticipating that we'll
need about a hundred and fifty thousand dollars in next year to complete that
task. There's also an additional $450,000 for the Fire Safe Moraga
Orinda services contract that was approved at a previous council meeting.
Also anticipated in this renewal of the Lazarus evacuation modeling software. I
know it got pulled from tonight's agenda but we did program in money in order to
keep the subscription valid for next year. I know that we'll be looking at
whether that's the appropriate cost and having a future item on it but it's
still part of the budget changes that are in the document in front of you and
then an increase in outreach and education services about $48,000 so
those are the changes that are going to occur and measure R and then there's
only a handful of other changes than the ones I already mentioned two of them have
to do with revenue is an increase in our transportation development act fund.
We're expecting grant funding revenue increase of a little over a quarter
million dollars and then the flip side of the general fund contribution to LMDs
is increased revenue for the LMDs of 79,000 and then the other items is the
expense item is a bike trails and walkway master plan update that will cost
about $200,000 that will get split equally from the transportation impact
fee and the CCTA return to source funds. Alright the next steps are that any
changes in direction that you provide tonight will be incorporated into the
proposed mid cycle budget update. There will be a presentation made to the SSTOC
at their next meeting which is May 13th of 2026.
The budget will also be reviewed
by the Independent Library Parcel Tax Oversight Committee
and the Finance Advisory Committee in late May
and any recommendations or comments they have
will be passed along for the June 9th adoption.
And that is the end of my presentation
and if you have any questions
or want to give me any feedback,
you of course will be getting a presentation
for our Public Works Director Scott Christie about changes to the CIP for next year.
Thank you very much. I'll begin by asking what questions people have for staff.
If we were interested in adding something to the budget, is this the right time or at
another time?
It is the right time to discuss it and give me feedback and I'm more than happy to potentially
incorporate that in for the June 9th adoption, yes.
OK, so one thought I have is around beautification, which is one of our strategic priorities.
I've really enjoyed the banners we've had this past year that celebrate the 40th anniversary,
and I enjoy driving along Moraga Way to Moraga and seeing their various beautiful
Banners up on the street lights. And so I feel one of those just really sticks out
I always think of it as just this really really strong
Butterfly image and I know they have a monarch butterfly park there and everything so that makes sense. But anyway, it's memorable and
I
think a Brenda deserves the same kind of memorable street banner and
Apparently that you could have a street banner program or a lot of cities have these programs and I'd like to see us think about
Putting some money aside for that every year or this year however that works it somehow start off with a design and then installation
If I can just
While we're on that topic. I think the question of how there are flower baskets on the Brenda way
There's like empty flower basket holders that have not been maintained if we're gonna look at that and bring it back
I mean, obviously this is not a decision item, but I would love to look at both of those at the same time
Nice. I think those were removed because of the drought. So we had beautiful
Flowering baskets and they were watered and taken care of and then when they said we couldn't you know
Whatever politically or what or even financially we shouldn't be watering
So away went the pots
anyway, it's
They felt related in their unification
Sounds like what we're talking about is
Fairly modest given the overall budget and I would support beautification efforts as well and to the extent you're looking feedback
And it is something that could be easily incorporated into our budget. I think that sort of stuff
Goes a long way
And I would think that would be something that would come back and then be brought from the unallocated into allocated
Is that correct, Doug, in terms of the mechanics?
Yes.
OK.
So we'll meet with staff.
We'll figure out sort of a plan, and we'll
incorporate that into the budget that we bring back on June 9.
Other questions?
And we'll come back for a few minutes, too.
A couple.
And I know our vice mayor has an engineering background,
but I don't.
So bear with me on this question.
But it was nice to see a real thoughtful analysis
of our current staffing and what is working and what we need.
And so I appreciate all the effort that went into that
into the presentation.
Would the GIS tech part-time staff,
will that allow us to maintain sort
of the GIS drain mapping information that we're getting?
or is that completely unrelated and related to other work?
So yes, the drain mapping we're having done is all GIS-based,
and so there's a layer built into our map for that.
Maps are only as good as the data that they contain,
so if they're not regularly updated and maintained,
they get stale and less useful.
So yes, we're making a big investment
in mapping the storm frames,
And all of that will be in our GIS system and one of the many things that this person
will continue to keep up to date or add layers, map layers.
And I guess the budget priority thing that I'm asking about is we're getting all this
great data from this, you know, storm drain mapping and it's costly and we're finally
getting it down, I want to make sure we are able to budget to maintain it. And so that's
sort of maybe more on the lines of feedback than a question on that. And then I had another
one more question. And I think you highlighted this already, but I just want to be sure the
reason that the staffing changes are proposed staffing changes is because you're going to
give notice to the union, the teamsters. Correct. And you need they need to be approved
by council so when we change first of all if we add new classifications you
guys need to approve that we usually work to get the unions approval if its
positions that they would cover ahead of time and then you also get to set what
our staffing level is right now it's 40.5 full-time equivalent people and if
that changes or the mix of people change that's something that we usually
have to get your permission to do. Right. Yeah but I'm just clarifying that in
addition to that we are going through a process of notice and to the extent
there's for a request. Other questions? Anybody please? And the one question I
happen is not that I don't think I don't understand it it's just that it's
hard to get a picture of and that is obviously our budget only deals with
what's real right but we're constantly looking for other money right other
funds other grants other applications and that's a lot of different things I'm
I'm curious as to somehow do we have a picture
of what that is that we're in any given period
that we're trying for?
I mean, it sort of seems like we see bits and pieces of it,
like we see a grant application or I see a whole bunch
like that might be related to the transportation side,
but I'm just curious.
So I'll start and Doug can weigh in if you'd like.
We were on our call this morning
with California Consulting, our monthly phone call,
in which most of the department leads are on that call.
And we review all the available opportunities
that fit with the things that we're looking for in Arinda.
And so we're looking to pursue a few of them.
In fact, I'm gonna have California Consulting
come to the May 16th meeting
and give the council an update on what we're working on,
the history of what we worked on,
and the things that we continue to look for.
And so we do that once a month, and we internally,
and I don't know if, Doug, you want to add any context to that.
But we look for all those opportunities,
and we report them out as they happen.
We've got a couple of active ones right now,
but nothing substantial, I think,
in terms of the value of those.
And we don't typically program in a budget
something that's, you know, not going to happen.
So until we have a good idea that we've won a grant,
it doesn't appear in the budget.
That's usually why when we do get grants,
a lot of times they require council approval
or we bring back a spending plan to go with them.
So.
But in the CIP, which we'll get to on the next item,
there is a list of those that are grant funded,
which in terms of the money, so we're using.
But those are the ones that are already approved, right?
Correct.
And then the ones that we continue to look at and pursue and try to figure out how to
get the best application in to be competitive.
I just think it, well, yeah, the good news is you said you're bringing it back.
I mean, it's just nice if on some periodic basis, we have some idea maybe collectively
of everything we're looking at.
Sure.
Both what they're doing and what we may be applying for through other Bay Area agencies.
Yep, absolutely.
In the presentation by California Consulting, I think has happened every year since we brought
them on.
So I think except last year.
Oh, yeah.
All right.
Can I follow up to that?
So for example, the federal funding that we're seeking, and moving forward, I believe.
That was through Townsend.
Right.
And so that funding, I know that we get reports on it, but at what point?
Only if we get that money, it makes it into the budget.
If a grant is approved, I just wasn't clear on.
Yeah, I mean the appropriations process doesn't really, their fiscal year is end of September,
October 1. So we won't know until October 1 when there's a budget that's adopted whether or not
that funding makes it finally in there. The process for review is happening at this time.
I think we've gotten through, one of them has gotten through committee for community grant
funding and that's the North Arrenda Shaded Field Break. That's an agricultural committee and they've
reviewed it and passed it forward to the floor and now we're waiting on the other two to go through their committee reviews I
guess it I think the vice mayor for the comment because I think it's
Important when when we get maybe at the same meeting where California consulting is reported if we could just have a brief
You know also a report of overview of what else is sort of pending from other sources that might help us
Collectively get the the big picture because we look at the budget and then we look at all those other sources
we had chime in with a
Further request which is I would find it very helpful because we do we look at the individual CIP projects and some of them say
This is in the CIP, but won't be taken further unless we get a grant, right?
I think there was like the path to Claremont where I think we are getting the grant something like that
If you could just pull that list of projects that are
pending outside money onto just a list,
that would be helpful for me to sort of be reminded
because we know of the projects,
but I can never remember which ones are funded, funded,
versus funded when we get a match.
So I agree, that would be very helpful.
I know we're kind of down a rabbit hole here,
but anyway, were there further questions as may?
I had a few and then maybe people have a few more.
tiny one. The library shows up all sorts of places. It was like in the library parcel tax,
but a lot of that looked like operations. And then a decent number of library projects are
city projects. Is there any way we can easily understand what is library parcel tax versus
city versus maybe even county resources? I'm sorry, I couldn't quite make out everything you said.
the library because it's a county library it's a city building but we have
the parcel tax and a special you know oversight of the library parcel tax I
found it hard to understand you know there's HVAC there's the tile project
there's operating expenses can you just give me a quick understanding of what
funds what? Okay so as far as the partial tax was intended to pay for
additional hours and for maintenance and wasn't really intended for capital
improvements so that's something that I've learned after working with the
library partial tax oversight committee a year before last and they sort of
brought that to my attention which was interesting because the first two or
three budgets that put together. They hadn't sort of mentioned that and we
were programming capital before my arrival out of that fund. So right now
the only capital projects that are paid for with the parcel tax were painting
the building in the tiles and everything else has been deprogrammed out of there.
Although the county does run the programming of the building, we don't
include any county money in our budget. They operate the library. Obviously the
city owns the property under the library. The friends of the library own the
building that they leased to us for the cost of maintenance and the partial
tax pays for 85% of the ongoing maintenance and the general fund kicks
in 15% of the ongoing maintenance. So thank you. It was a tiny thing I just
kept seeing it everywhere. Measure are the slide had a small amount maybe 50,000 or so
for the communications efforts and I couldn't remember is that like contract with Trepebi
Smith is that part of a staff time person? What is the nature of that?
This is related to a contract we're going to be entering into we've entered into initially
for this fiscal year because it's within my signing authority and we were looking for
budget appropriation next year related to some support we're going to get from Paula
Ryanman on helping us do some more deep dive research and outreach as to why we what messages
resonate how do we get more people paying attention to wildfire hosting different sort
of focus groups and seminars and different events or some more of the education and outreach piece
internally without having a staff person assigned to it using a smaller contract and trying to be
be more effective.
Thank you.
And last question.
The Infrastructure Ad Hoc subcommittee
is continuing their work.
How should we think about any budget-related items that
result from that committee's work?
Obviously, it would be unallocated now.
But do you feel that the unallocated $1. something million
has enough room for whatever might come out
of the Infrastructure Subcommittee?
And maybe that's a question to my peers.
I guess I would say, yes, I think.
I don't think we know right now.
I think it would be a future item.
So I don't think it makes sense at this point
to try to be including it in budget.
It hasn't even reached a point where it's gelled enough
to figure out what it would cost.
That's exactly the question.
Yeah, and my comment would be that $1.4 million
an assigned general fund balance usually operating in nature once you move it to
fund 700 if if the things that came out of there were capital that would be
where we would charge those as fund 700 thank you and got it those were all my
questions does anyone else have questions before we open it for public
comment I don't see a lot of members of the public here does anybody want to
We will bring it back for direction to staff.
I guess this is I want to make sure we're using this opportunity to capture any and
all of the things similar to what council member rally said any wish list items that
you want to see in this budget because the next time we come back to you we want to not
be talking about items to be added.
I had only one direction and that is that I am concerned about that ladder side and
we pulled for tonight. I know you need to leave it in, in the way it was presented,
but I don't want to make that a de facto earmark if we're approving this at our next meeting
or maybe it's the June 9th meeting. And I know you guys know how to deal with that.
I just wanted to make a note of it on the record.
Yeah, I think what we would propose is I think what we're hoping to do is have Lazarus in
person on June 9th to talk about the contract. In the meantime, the appropriation for the
budget could be there and then separately you would take potential
action on a contract approval and there would be enough appropriation to cover
that but you would have an opportunity at the contract level to say yes or no
to the contract the appropriation if it doesn't if it sits there it sits there
it won't be necessarily used for any other purpose because it's measure our
program to funds and any amount that isn't used would be returned and
available for future program.
That was the question.
Is it programmed for that use if we wind up not deciding
to go that direction or changing what we're doing?
We typically don't spend Measure R funds on general topics,
general uses, other than those things that have already
been identified in the budget.
I still don't understand your answer.
Would it go back into Measure R unallocated
if we don't need all of that money?
It would stay in the appropriated amount for the budget.
It would be unspent and then at the end of the fiscal year,
it would go back to the unallocated amount.
Is there a way we could not have to allocate all of that
on an undecided item?
There are several ways to do it.
I could remove the allocation
and when you approve the budget,
you would do a, when you approve the contract,
we could do a budget change form.
That's one way to accomplish that.
So I could deprogram that out of the appropriation ask.
And when a contract comes to you,
then we would have to adopt a budget change at that time.
I guess, sorry.
No, I would actually, those are my questions.
I'd love to hear other people's opinions
before going any further.
On that point, I would, oh, sorry.
have my commentary. Can I ask a follow-up on that? Do you also have the option to make an amendment
on June 9th, changing the amount or deleting the amount then? Is it better to do a budget
change? Take it out now and do a budget change form or amend it later? As the city manager
commented, we're hoping what we bring to you would be what's adoptable. And yes, you certainly could
and I'm not sure I could. I
could give us direction to
change that at that meeting.
It just means that. The full
budget won't have been
presented. There will be an
item you've asked me to change.
So the document will be
different than what was in the
agenda. So. You guys are
always allowed to change the
appropriations. I I'm I'm sure
Um, I'm just curious, especially in today's environment and all the things that we touch
and talk about, I'm just, and have talked about in our strategic plans.
I'm just curious where you feel everything is in the world of technology and all the
things that we touch on, whether it's cameras, whether it's computer systems, whether it's
security upgrades, where are you feeling we are with all of that kind of stuff collectively?
I didn't see any big change or anything that's saying,
hey, we still need to do the next phase of things for the city.
So we made a lot of strides forward in the last year on technology.
I think we could, we've made,
we've deployed cloud permit for permitting software.
Doug is close to deploying new cloud-based financial software.
Sherry has deployed laser fish for the both for our needs,
but then ultimately for the public
to be able to find documents.
What am I missing?
Sure, we've invested in GIS.
There's a number of.
And HR.
And HR.
Onboarding software.
Onboarding and a bunch of other products.
There's several other things we plan on implementing.
fund 600 has resources to do that. You guys were generous enough to fund that
when we received the COVID America Recovery Act funds. That money is there.
I'm spending it judiciously as good opportunities arise. So we are
definitely, you know, implementing new technologies and processes and have
plans to continue doing that for the remainder of this budget cycle and
and probably beyond.
I think the only other ones related to public safety
is we have received a grant for about $79,000
for the East Citation Software System
that we can work with our residents on.
And I think we're getting closer for that deployment.
And then the only remaining item
in talking with the Police Chief
is we might need one or two more LPR cameras.
Okay, good.
It's good to hear that we're in much better shape
maybe than we were a few years ago.
Okay, on the Ladras item, when is the contract renewal up?
It's not till later in this year.
Is that right?
It's end of August.
Okay, so does that necessarily come back to the council anyhow or not?
If we want it, only if we want it to.
Yeah, we were, initially what the item on tonight was trying to time it with the fact
that we were having a budget discussion about an appropriation.
we can defer the conversation on the contract,
we could potentially defer the conversation
on an appropriation of Measure R funds
for something like that.
But our goal is that we would be back
before the fiscal year.
So we just understand what the contract might look like.
I guess what I'm asking,
it's more of a comment than it is another,
we do budget change items.
I mean, they come before us sometimes, right?
So an allocation is to me is simply
putting the money in a pot so that it's there
if we want to go through with it,
because we're expecting that we may want to do so.
But if the council decides not to renew it, right,
I want the money there in the pot.
I want to hear the presentation, of course,
but I want to make sure that it's reserved and it's there
because it's something that I'm hearing
that our residents really want.
and I think genuinely has a lot of value in that.
I don't want to get into all of that tonight
because we'll hear about that on June 9th,
but I want the money reserved.
And then if for some reason we decide
that either we want to go change the amount
or we want to not renew it or something like that,
in August we could do a budget change request
or something, right?
Or that would be what you would come before us.
Like procedurally, I know that's happened before
when things have changed.
I'm just trying to understand the process.
So if we leave the item in, it'll end up being appropriated
and appropriations legal authority to spend.
In the event that we don't spend $252,000 on it,
at the end of the fiscal year, that appropriation will lapse,
and the money will stay in fund 106
and will be programmable for future expenses.
Got it.
So, just because it's in there doesn't mean it gets spent
and it doesn't mean that you don't need to approve
the underlying agreement and those sorts of things.
It just means that there's the ability to do it
without asking for funding at the time.
Knowing that, I would like to see it,
see it, the allocation remain tonight.
Or, I would like to see the allocation come back to us,
but I would just make the argument
that I really don't like a publicly available number
that I think is wildly too high, and I love Ladras,
this is not anything about that vendor,
but I don't think there's any question
about the measure our money being spent
between now and August to not have sufficient resources,
and I would much rather the number be a blank slate
to be negotiated on whatever contract comes back
and I think we do budget allocations all the time
and I would like to budget the actual number
versus something that I truly hope is too high.
So that is my thought on preferring to do it
as a budget amendment to approve it
when there's an actual contract.
So that's the argument on the other side.
Can I just make one comment
because I don't want to set a false expectation.
When we come back on June 9th,
there probably won't be much modification
to what the proposal is,
but it's an opportunity to have a dialogue
with them about the proposal.
You don't have to approve it that night.
Obviously we have a lot of time,
but I want them to have the opportunity to present that
in a way that you guys can engage
and have the conversation either get comfortable
We're not comfortable with what's being proposed,
and again, I know we're getting a little further off topic,
but I just wanted to make sure
I wasn't setting a false expectation
of a renegotiated agreement coming back
at the next June 9th meeting.
This will be a conversation.
That's helpful.
Other questions and comments?
We can, I mean, that's a very small issue either way,
and I don't think there's a big deal, however we treat it.
But other questions, comments, feedback?
I had a few things, and forgive me for going a little bit
big picture, but I just want to talk
about financial leadership because I
had a conversation with Doug and Linda.
After reviewing this about it, it just
felt like our spending is going up generally.
And I just wanted to kind of talk about the forest
and not the trees for a minute about how it just feels
like we're loosening the purse strings every year.
And I was just so pleased with hearing them talk through
the way they look at the, you know, the five-year outlook
and the two-year outlook
and how we're allocating among budgets.
And we're, I'm actually really happy
that we're greenlighting projects and getting them done,
right, when I see the community center park
that they're finding money and allocating it
and still able to show that reserve balances
are gonna be there.
and the way they describe the staffing consistency
despite some changes.
We're staying conservative, but we're getting things done.
We're prioritizing things like the choral sidewalk.
The focus on action and prioritization is leadership.
And I'm so happy with the approach that you have taken,
how easy this is to understand.
the balance that you struck,
and I just wanted to really thank and compliment you all.
This process has been so really confidence building
for me as a council person,
and also the reserve for facilities,
I think is gonna be a real improvement.
Those are my only comments.
I mean, there's a lot of yes, my hand,
in terms of thank you, yes.
Thank you for the leadership.
I did, it did seem that we, you know, we, we have a lot of capital projects that are
really expensive and some of those we didn't do last year. So we're doing them this year.
And I think that's to me, you know, that was part of the adjustment. But
there are a lot of things I think that some of us would love to see pursue. It's kind of
exciting that the dog park is opening because I remember sitting here on a budget discussion,
years ago and talking about this and I'm going to be out of the country and I'm
jealous that I won't get to be there, but I'm so excited for that and I know our community
is really happy about it. To that end, I would love to see us do other things, but I would love
to see us pursue them through grant funding. I would love more community spaces, whether it's
sort of, across from the library or whether it's, you know, a place that can incorporate,
you know, gathering places. We have a lot of seniors here, or older adults, and we have,
you know, so multi-generational gathering places and community spaces and park facilities, and
there's always a dream of more pickleball or designated facilities. But all of that to me is
Grant and maybe something that comes in when we talk to California consulting and talk about future projects. So
but
Is there any I just want to mention too?
We are working on other beautification efforts which might find their way into this budget or as part of an amendment to the capital projects
which is the next item but
Cole is actually making really good headway with caltrans on some beautification efforts
So hopefully we'll be able to report back even better if it involves caltrans. Thank you
Are there any other comments? It seems like we're kind of coming to a trickle here.
With that, I think we'll wrap up J1. Final shot. Okay. We're going to wrap up J1. Thank
you very much. And we will go to J2, the exciting second side of the coin, which is our capital
improvements projects. Good evening, City Council. Scott Christie
and the public works director.
I do have a little presentation here which should appear in a
minute.
I think he is switching you over.
Okay.
In any case, the staff report just gives you an outline of the
process we go through.
As Mr. Alessio mentioned, the operating budget is on a two
year cycle and of course we are in tandem with that.
process is to reconcile what we show in the capital project software that kind of schedules
out the project, make sure that that matches up closely with what the finance department
has in their record. So even this draft probably has a few numbers that aren't exactly the
same. So that's part of the process before we finalize it, that I work with the senior
accountant to make sure we're on track with that. This is just a little overview then of some of the
recent year projects. This is that very new photo of the new LED lights up at the wilder fields that
so far they're working quite well. They're a better level of light, there's less spillover,
and then of course the energy cost is much more favorable. The CIP again would identify
the various funding sources we have and a lot of them are restricted and that
certain ones should only be used for transportation related things like gas
tax building maintenance funds of course are applied to those sorts of projects
so we look at all that and then what projects we desire to put in there based
on feedback again we we use public input we certainly use city council input such
as the Coral Drive sidewalk. We internally discussed these things and
put out sort of a call to projects to the different department heads and then
together we come up with proposed lists which we're proposing tonight and then
the update again would really just focus on the remaining five years and the the
CIP budget and that's why you'll see it's it's just a five-year period this
time. So we're we're finishing up 24-25 and then it it goes through fiscal year 30. Okay you got
a press right button. So significant completed project the library HVAC modernization that
actually occurred early in the fiscal year with respect to getting all the control system
updated and that works much better and we'll save energy on top of it. The exterior painting
projects that occurred here in the City Hall complex and the Library and Community Center,
the HVAC rooftop replacements that occurred this year, Wilder Fields LED Retrofit, you just saw
a photo of that, the dog park, and some things you don't really see on the surface, some of the
Storm grain repair projects were completed this year.
The annual pavement project for 2024
was of course really completed in this fiscal year
that we're ending now in terms of being paid out
and closed out.
And then here just this week probably
will substantially complete the Camino Pablo
median landscaping, which includes the cut-throughs.
Here's a few photos.
We had a lot of cranes going on this year
with on the left, the library, I'm sorry, the community center
HVAC, where they parked the crane down below
and then had lifts of, I think there were probably
10 or 12 units that had to be replaced up there.
And the LED retrofit also requires some big cranes,
man lifts to get up there and actually physically change
out the lights.
You'll kind of see in the photo on the right that the LED lamps,
The fixtures are much smaller than the metal halide ones
that are shown on the right in that photo,
a lot more efficient.
Dog Park on the left, it just shows,
this is kind of hard to see,
but it's a little video clip that I think Tod or Ross took
that shows some owners and their dogs having a good time
in the new park.
And then on the right is just the layout
that has the upper part of the fenced area is a big dog
and the lower part there is the small dog.
Projects underway for Rosen Drainage,
the smart signals project, that's exciting.
It's ready to bid.
Again, that's managed through CCTA and others,
but we're a big participant.
Pathway projects, we're finalizing the design now
for two of them, we're doing them together
for economies of scale.
Annual paving project, the one that Siva mentioned earlier
combines two years worth is out to bid right now. Bids in the bids are due in
early June. Library roof repair that construction should start here probably
next week. Community park play area the design is starting for that first phase
of the project and also for facilities and parks then we have the library
accent tile replacement that's actually completing as a city manager mentioned
the scaffolding schedule to come down this week. Crossroads Plaza that should
start here in the next week or so we're just finalizing the contract. Library
roof repair for some flat sections that is also starting probably next week. The
So play areas, again, the design is starting on that one.
Let me go back.
Make sure I didn't misstate something.
I think I said that one twice, so excuse me on that.
And going on then to propose changes.
So this is where we get into some of the details
that we're changing with this update.
We are reflecting in that first project for the pathway
that we were recommended for award for 140,000 in TDA funding.
So we've kind of crossed the first review process.
Normally, when we do that, we're almost assured
of getting the MTC buy-in that occurs in July-August timeframe.
And then it would be secured.
The other one is this big federal one that's pending.
So as the mayor mentioned, that's
one of those where we do highlight in the project
details sheet that we don't have the grant yet, we have a place holder in there, we do
show it just for planning purposes but we can't really start that until we secure that
grant funding. Community park, the accessibility and play areas, this reflects that we are
proposing to add the funding then for the actual construction. What we have currently
on the budget covers the design work for the accessibility improvements and the work that's
now underway with respect to the design that calendar and associates is doing. This would
actually fund the construction for both the accessibility improvements and the actual play
area upgrades. The green stormwater infrastructure, this one we're proposing an increase for the next
year of 50,000 to do some retrofit of some of the existing bio. Well, they're
actually landscaping islands within the Wilder parking lot for the sports fields
that we can convert to bioswales to help us meet the NPDES C3 requirements.
You you were you got a little taste of that with the item we brought to
council. I think it was the last meeting for this new joint powers authority.
then when they would have sort of a banking program.
And this is an example of something
where we can do it ourselves and get credit for it.
And then if we have excess, which I don't think we will,
we could actually put it up for banking, so to speak.
Proposed new projects then.
The Coral Drive sidewalk that was already presented.
And then there's three crosswalk RRFPs,
which is the rectangular rapid flashing beacons.
There's several of these in town.
They've been quite successful.
And here we're proposing three different locations.
The first is pretty much in response
to comments from the city council
to look at that north intersection, Morago Way and Ivy Drive
to consider putting crosswalk and RFPs at that location.
Next one is further down at Orchard Road
at that south intersection.
We've gotten some public requests for this.
I think a big part would be to evaluate that more closely
to make sure it is viable to do that sort of a design there.
And then the third one is Orrenda Woods Drive
just up the road on Village Gate Road.
There's a lot of requests
that we've received for that location.
There's no crosswalk there currently.
We would need to add then the RRFBs and advanced signage.
And of course we do an engineering study
to support that sort of design.
Last one would be, as I say in the staff report,
this is sort of a promotion where, you know,
considering to promote it from the so-called unfunded list
up to an actual funded project
to do the East Altarinda Drive gap closure
to connect the sidewalk that ends pretty much
at the edge of Orinwood's Drive
to carry that down to St. Stephen's Drive.
And then it would connect over to the trail.
So that one of course would,
we could possibly see grant funding there through TDA
subject to the TSACs recommendation of that.
And then on the facility side, a courtyard expansion.
We're looking there at doing not a big expansion
but something that would fit within the footprint
and expand the staging parking area
for additional equipment that we required through the years
and also provide space for potentially emergency use,
storage of materials or debris, things like that.
Replace the library HVAC chiller.
This is a pretty expensive item,
but the chiller itself is about 25 years old.
It's like a chiller boiler system,
so it's not like a conventional refrigerated air system,
but it works in a similar way.
But the other key components of boiler and a lot of replacement
work was done on that over the course of the last five years.
But then this component now is nearing the end of its service
life based on earlier evaluations we've had done.
And we are proposing to kind of get a head start on it
and plan for it now so that we can be proactive,
get that changed out, and then have a more reliable system
that's at the start of its service life
rather than at the end.
If that were to fail, you'd have a very uncomfortable
environment inside the library,
and the lead time on that equipment
can be pretty substantial.
Convert the Kindergium building to a meeting hall.
This is something for your consideration
that would provide a regular meeting room that both city council and other committees
and bodies could use. It would save on set up time. It would be a uniform place where
the public would know that there are these meetings. It would provide possibly maybe
a more approachable atmosphere for the public than the current auditorium, which would still
be certainly a critical meeting facility for meetings in which you expect a large crowd,
bigger turnout.
Community center restroom improvements and then the kitchen upgrades also at the community
center.
These are projects that we feel are useful because they would upgrade some aging equipment
and allow more serviceable modern equipment, better appearance.
I believe both the kitchen upgrades was actually on the unfunded list, so we're proposing that be promoted to the funded list. Also, same with the City Hall flooring replacement that was on the unfunded list, the existing cork flooring is now that's about 20 years old almost and it's it's never really
a great surface, hard to maintain, very difficult to clean, or if you damage it, it's not something
you can just replace like you can a carpet tile. So we're looking to program that in
for replacement. A more professional atmosphere would result easier to clean and maintain.
Before we move on to the next one, can I just make a couple of comments? Can you go back
And I just wanted to note on sort of the three in the middle, you know, when we look at making
investments in the community center, it's really about trying to improve the rentability
of that facility.
And so some of those things are investments we think are would be necessary to improve
the utilization of the Founders Room and some of the other community spaces that we rent.
and then obviously if we can convert, if it works, and again, we have a lot of feasibility
to do to determine if it could work, but if we could turn the kinder gym building into
a meeting hall, that would open up a lot more uses and rentability of some of the facilities
that we have currently that are being now programmed for meeting spaces for general
use and not where we can charge for renting it.
So that's sort of a little bit of the offset
that we're hoping to see ultimately
within investments in these types of projects.
Very good, thank you.
And then park related new projects.
Again, the first two are kind of an extension
then of the earlier discussion we had on the master plan.
So these then would fund the next phases,
phase two being the bandshell,
which would replace existing gazebo,
which is not too functional as a stage,
and then the adjacent picnic area upgrades.
So this would then fund the next phase,
some design work and construction,
and then the final phase being the common areas
that would address landscaping upgrades, lighting upgrades,
and then pathway restoration.
It's pretty much nearing the end of its serviceable life,
the paved pathways.
Library Terrace area pedestrian improvements.
This refers to the area adjacent to the parking garage that's
currently kind of a tiered area that has woodchips
as the covering.
There's some picnic benches there.
And this would upgrade that in some way.
We're not sure the exact detail, but something
to make it a little more pedestrian friendly, attractive,
put in some upgraded tables, possible corn husk things.
Cornhole.
Cornhole, excuse me.
Obviously, I'm not a player in that sport.
Can we do that soon?
I know.
I was going to say he needs to get ready for the tournament.
For the big competition, right?
That'll do it.
So then that of course would be consistent with the strategic plan to start making progress
with Connect or reconsider some of the Connect Orinda project ideas. Last one, park monument
signage. This would be a promotion from the unfunded list to get a more uniform signage
for the various parks to replace some of the aging wood ones and certain ones aren't really
very well marked. Before we move on on that I just note on the investment on
the bandshell in the picnic area upgrades having a group picnic area will
be a huge rental opportunity for us that we don't currently have and so we'll
look to have some offsetting revenue over the years to justify some of the
expense related to that improvement. One that's actually attractive. Okay and I
I think that wraps it up, so I'd be happy to answer any questions.
Pathway, can you, your last picture, your thank you, what's…
Oh, that is the pathway then along Camino Pablo, so this would be one of the recently
completed ones from Manzanee to Drive up to Claremont.
This is right where I walk my dogs every day.
That's from like a year ago, I think.
Right.
have one or two questions while everyone's warming up.
The corporate yard expansion, where is that located?
I couldn't.
So the corporation yard is the Wilder Sportsfield facility.
That's where our public works crew works out of.
So there's a building there, kind of a warehouse building
where we store equipment, have a few offices.
And then there's storage for the street sweeper, the trucks,
debris boxes, some emergency trailers, things like that.
So it's just on the other side of the sports fields,
about halfway up next to the parking lot
for the sports fields.
On the right side of the parking lot?
On the right side as you're going up the hill, yes.
Okay, thank you.
And then the 75,000 for pickleball in 26-27,
do you recall what that line item might be for?
Was it striping or something,
or was that just a leftover?
Right I think it was just partial it was not meant to be the full because there were still so many
unknowns on what the facility would be it was just kind of a holdover we didn't I didn't want
to just erase it so I just left it as is. But so it's exploring options it's not a particular
project at this point. Correct right. Wasn't that something that we put in like a couple years ago
Yeah, it was placeholder.
Think so.
To design over it.
Yeah, I was just curious.
And then last question, really more of a comment.
You mentioned the Founders Auditorium
in the community center.
We were just there doing the state of the city the other day,
and it's really not an attractive space.
$80,000 just for upgrading the kitchen
felt like not great price value.
but maybe if you can find some cost savings
or even allocate a little bit more budget,
something that made that room a little bit more upscale
feeling in terms of maybe some flooring or furnishing changes
is something I would be open to see and come back,
just because it's...
Change as well, because the gray color is probably not...
It's not a very nice space,
and it's kind of one of our main function spaces,
so that's something that I could see,
maybe like a nicer flooring or something would warm it up.
Just something for a future project to consider.
Okay. That's a good suggestion. Thumbs up. I didn't have any comments. Those are just
my only questions. I have additions. I don't know if those are called comments or questions.
Actually, real quickly, let me just see if anybody from the public would like to speak
or, okay, because it seems like our questions are segwaying right into feedback. So,
away we go, don't we? Okay. Speaking of signs, you listed a sign for parks and it makes me
think about the old wooden sign that says Arinda in front of Safeway and how that
desperately needs to be upgraded, removed and replaced, redesigned, rethought.
I know we touched it up recently and it did improve, but I think if we're going to do
a nice sign in front of a park, we need to do a nice sign right there at Safeway that
says, again, Arinda or welcome to Arinda, I think that's really important.
Okay, and I'm also thinking of the IB Drive discussion.
And I guess it may be it's too early or maybe we don't have enough data or something, but
there was an interest in seeing if the road was wide enough
at Moronga Way to turn left.
Help me out, what street that was?
Was that a coral?
To have a dedicated left turn.
It was a coral.
More of a dedicated left at coral was.
Yeah, and it looks wide enough to my eyes,
but I don't know if in fact you can do it,
but I think that would be really important to prioritize.
And then also in that discussion,
we heard that there were gaps in the sidewalk on Ivy,
And to me, that's a bigger safety concern
than the gap on Altarinda to St. Stephen's.
There are a lot more people walking Ivy
than going up and down that hill to St. Stephen's.
And I think the safety priority is just clear
compared to the gap to St. Stephen's on,
around, what's it called?
Or in the woods.
Does Ivy have consistent sidewalks?
No, that's why you call it a gap.
It's not really.
Yeah, I mean, I think it's much more than gaps.
It's sort of scattered.
Well, I don't know.
Whatever, I don't know what the problem is
or how it would be solved, but I think
that that would be a higher priority to at least look
at possibility of long range having better sidewalks
in that neighborhood where kids are, yeah, at risk.
If we can do it all, let's do it all, but I'd love us to think about that one too.
Scott, can you just comment on what the current gap is? Is it from
Moraga Way to Ardeth and then above Ardeth? Is there sidewalk along Ivy Drive? Do you know off-hand?
I don't know off-hand, I'm sorry, but there are gaps certainly.
It's been a long time, but I used to live over there and I never thought of it as an area with
sidewalks is all I'm saying so I mean there's some but I think what we the way I think of that is
as an expansion of the safe routes to school program like at some point we would want that
to connect also to OIS and I think maybe that's right but we've sort of been prioritizing the
elementary schools is that well I will say it is it because I beta tested it after that it was in
front of TSAC. And it is mostly sidewalked, but there is a gap from about IV to artist.
But then there's a really nice proper sidewalk, but somebody correctly pointed out that the
sidewalk is first on the right side and then on the left side. So there's a little bit of a street.
So that's why you think of it as being not consistently sidewalked is you have to cross
the street a little bit. So I think a study, but I think there's only a very small portion that is
is not side walked at all.
And so I actually think that's a fabulous suggestion,
at least to study and try to prioritize.
Comments, questions?
Ideas, projects?
Wishlist?
The, the, I,
just so we can spend another 10 hours
talking about the left turn on, no.
The IV drives, no, I would just want to get,
I would need to understand a lot better the situation
and what was any potential proposal around a,
I'm not convinced that the designated left turn lane,
I think I just need to understand it better, the proposal.
I know it came up in our discussion, but I.
I think that we heard that traffic stops there
when you want to make a left turn.
Right.
if you had a separate streamline,
you wouldn't be blocking all the flow.
That's all, I mean.
Right, I guess I'm not fully,
I'd want to learn more about it is all before,
was a priority, but yeah, it's worth exploring.
And I think that as we look at things and priorities,
another area would be that we've talked about a lot
is sort of facade improvements and economic development,
but I feel like a lot of this stuff
is stuff that hopefully we can look at
also, you know, creative ways where if the city puts in a little money and we
could try to get some other funding, you know, and have these as goals or
wishes. So that money would come out of operational budget and it's a
discussion item for the downtown revitalization committee on Monday.
They will be talking about the facade improvement program. Wonderful.
Vice Mayor G, you look quizzical. No, I would agree that, and maybe it's
part of our master plan for the sidewalks and everything, but I do agree with Councilmember
Riley and with all of our many discussions that, you know, just a planning review level
of the Ivy Drive sidewalk situation, because it's not really a good setup either in terms
of the safe routes to school aspect. So I think that's worth looking at, given all of
our other controversies around that neighborhood.
I would say that's an age group that's particularly well-suited to walking and biking themselves
to school.
You know, they don't have licenses yet.
So that's, I like that comment.
And when I'm taking notes, one other overall comment I just wanted to make is when we were
going through everything that we are, have achieved or are achieving all the projects
we've accomplished and all the projects that are underway,
and I'm looking at all our senior leadership team here
and our city manager, and I think they kind of deserve,
I mean, a round of applause, because I just,
it's really impressive.
I mean, how many years did we talk about library tiles
and other things, and like-
We have gone through a lot of city managers
on library tiles.
Crossroads Park, Crossroads Park.
six year chevron mini mart, which is not a city project,
but the library tiles and the community park master plan
that was going to sit there forever
waiting for a magical grant.
Right, so I'm, I mean, and also I think we've done
an incredible, I mean, we're accomplishing so much.
It's pretty remarkable that the budget is what it is.
So it's, I mean, because I think we're doing this
very efficiently and I credit our city manager and our public works department and our Parks
and Rec department and our facilities for everything so thank you all. Well we appreciate
that and of course the credit goes to the folks standing up at the podium and the people sitting
in the seats over here and Doug in the back who is always able to find the money to do the things
that we need to do. We definitely feel a sense of accomplishment this year. And even though we've
got a list we've presented to you, I don't think that's the totality of all of our ideas of things
that we'd like to get done. Things that you haven't seen obviously, if we can get things rolling with
Caltrans and looking at ways to beautify the underpasses and the pedestrian bridges,
We'll bring that back. We won't wait two years to do that. We want to turn the ship. We want
to make sure people look at Arinda and see that it's beautiful. And Cole is working right now on
ways that we can try to better secure that Arinda theater sign stays lit all the time. And so we're
We're coming up with ideas for how we might be able to achieve that and putting in some time and effort so we can come back to you and make a proposal to you.
I think that's also incredibly important.
I think all these proposed projects are really exciting and I like the emphasis on the community center and making that more.
You know rentable and pleasant I go there once a month for meetings and it's.
I missed the country club because it was way more beautiful.
So if we can come up with a color scheme,
or some softening and welcoming feeling there,
that'd be lovely.
I know you've thought of that before,
but all this ties into upgrading the bathrooms,
also ties into making it more rentable.
And so thank you for focusing on that,
that sounds like a lovely upgrade.
So I heard some desire to include at least a proposal
for a CIP to study and analyze the sidewalk for Ivy.
I think there was general consensus for that.
And then a little bit more research and information
on that dedicated left turn from Corolland and Moraga Way.
So I don't think we're gonna propose that at this point
as a mid-year, right, or mid-cycle.
And then I heard desire to under the heading of the park
signage, maybe look at additional signage
at the corner of Safeway and ways in which we could
potentially improve that.
Is there consensus for us to incorporate that?
I mean, we can certainly modify that CIP
that you're upgrading from unfunded into funded
and make it inclusive of not just park signage,
but that other signage as well.
Good.
And then we'll have to adjust the budget, potentially.
Once we get some cost estimates.
But we notice they appreciated the paint upgrade.
Just to make sure we know.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
But here's a new opportunity.
That's what I heard.
The other one would be the founder's auditorium
to look at ways.
Would that be an actual capital project?
Are we thinking?
I mean, you could probably spend enough money
to go over kind of our normal guideline is, say,
50,000 or more that's something we could capitalize rather than have it be an operating expense. Yeah, we could look at that
I mean we can couple that up with the other improvements to the community. Okay with the community kitchen then. Okay, sure. I
do
personally
Take Bart still and therefore walk
across the pedestrian bridge to Theatre Square from the BART station and also walk, you know,
over here. And that pedestrian bridge feels very uninviting. And I don't know the solution to that,
because, you know, objectively, there's lighting. But I've always thought maybe,
maybe we could get our art and public places committee involved or something and see if we
could create a more artistic community space that just feels brighter and feels more inviting,
right? Maybe softer lighting. I don't have the architectural background to exactly know. I just
know it doesn't feel inviting. So, you know, and that is sort of the key to connect to Brenda,
right? I think there's limitations because... Yeah, those assets...
we have a free one, but you know, there's assets don't belong to us. So we're at the mercy of
getting somebody at Caltrans who believes in the spirit of what we'd like to do. And that,
and I know they have programs that you'll see murals on Caltrans property. So we're
working through that process. And we think the pedestrian bridges are an important piece of it.
slightly off topic, but since we're talking about Connectorinda and Bart, one of the really low
hanging fruit parts of Connectorinda was that I guess there were two entrances to Bart. One had
been closed a long time ago so that when you're coming from the overflow, you know the lot on the
other side of the freeway and you cross over, you could enter closer to that side instead of going
all the way around. If you look at that plan again, it's Bart's property, but that was something that
when it was presented was relatively easy and cheap and was just a matter of focusing
and getting permission.
So I would invite staff with all their copious free time to maybe dust that off and see if
that's an easy thing to do.
Okay, we can take a look at it in the context of the other conversations we're having with
Caltrans.
It might be Bart too, so we have to double check who controls that.
definitely yeah it's definitely but it was just a subject for another time sure
anything else that that list felt complete anybody going once going twice
I believe that's item J2 great thank you thank you thank you all this was that
normally there's a lot of unhappiness and complaining this was lovely and I
believe that is the full agenda. Um actually mayor can I ask as no I I don't
have a matters initiated I have something I forgot that I should have
talked about when we did councilmember reports but it's important enough I
wanted to make sure everybody heard it especially there could be interest and
that is next week on Thursday and Friday May 14th and 15th the Contra Costa
Transportation Authority is having our spring workshop here in the Founders
Auditorium in Arinda and it is a public meeting it is open to anybody I do not
know whether any of it is being recorded or not but it is it is a work a two-day
workshop it starts from 8 30 to 4 both days obviously you can come and go but
it is an extraordinary opportunity to learn more about Contra Costa
Transportation Authority, what it's been all about over the many years of its
existence, what measure J, the current sales tax has actually done for the
county, how important it is to everybody, and then begin talking about the
framework of the hope that at some point here in the next, what, seven years we either have
to renew the sales tax or we're going to be minus a lot of critical money in this county.
So we're working on the formulation of how that process is going to work.
So it's a great opportunity.
I said it anybody can be in the room it's a and it will be an expanded
meeting meaning that we at the way ccta is organized not every the 19 cities in
the county do not at any one given time currently have a representative sitting
at the ccta board level and but we have invited representatives from every city
to come to this particular meeting it's so important and we will be talking
about the future of how CCTA is organized so it's a very important
workshop and there's going to be a lot of information I do hope some of it I
don't know if it's going to end up whether any we had the ability to record
any of it but there is going to be an enormous amount of improve incredible
presentation material that hopefully you will all begin to over time familiarize
yourself with even if you can't be there for much of the workshop. So but if you
can sneak in and certainly staff since it's so easy to get to here in Arenda
you get very few benefits being the chair but the one benefit you get is
meeting. You know, we have
We have moved from Oakley last
year to Arinda this year.
No, but I would just ask if you
could send the city manager
some way like a link to the
agenda so that if we do want to
drop in and out that we have
access to that. Just at least
I was looking right I was already looking at ccta's website to see if it was already
Posted that it's not so but yeah
Well, we'll make sure that everybody can can see the break out of it because the actual official agenda
And what's going to happen step by step are not quite the same thing so
In city manager if you can remember to tell councilmember Hoxie, I know she also enjoys that topic
So, thank you. And if there is a recording if you could circulate it, that would be amazing
Yeah, I don't know if we are gonna have the ability to do that in that room or not or maybe we are
I don't know our entire very expensive
Need to bring in all of their technology in order to make that was gonna say and they and they may be doing that
I don't know materials. They may be doing that our entire very expensive
Extensive consultant team will be there. So maybe we are recording it. So
And we just any matters initiated
All right. Happy Cinco de Mayo. Off we go
Everybody.